3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

Make Your Own: Black Hole Fabricator!!

Step 6Hook Up the (Super)Computer

Hook Up the (Super)Computer
When the laser hits the bead, it will create a temporary star.
Take a very fast computation computer (You could grab one from a server room...or from IMB or someone else like that) and program it so it will fire the carbon launcher just as the star starts to die. The connections between the launcher and the computer should be nice and tidy, so there should be no "frayed or fragmented" pieces. Make sure to double check your programming, or else this will create a large pile of useless hydrogen-carbon bonds, instead of a black hole.
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
9 comments
Oct 1, 2009. 11:48 AMarchistrage says:
Clever, but you do realize this won't make a blackhole that is actually dangerous. Even if a star the size of the sun collapsed and became a blackhole, it would only be about half a mile wide. But this would make a blackhole with a maximum size of a DNA molecule. Oh, and btw, that "simple computer" would need to be a supercomputer that could calculate the individual reactions between the dampening effects of the carbon, and the resulting fusion reaction in the Hydrogen molecules.
Jan 11, 2010. 7:55 PModdmidge says:
Our sun won't create a black hole, it won't even supernova, its 3 times to small for either.
Aug 28, 2010. 6:25 AMking kolton9 says:
well then sun will grow and grow and grow and grow and grow until it reaches saturn and shrink and shrink and shrink and shrink and shrink and poof its gone
Dec 12, 2009. 1:34 AMshams says:
you are right but at the same time you are wrong.because all black holes are same in size nd it is actually a very very small dot....small means about 10^-33....It is called singularity....But what varies is the size of it's gravitational limit....higher the number bigger they look (actually we cant see them)..nd B.H would very bright if they didnt suck any photons....And now you dont really need a super computer for this kind of calculation.....because in the year 2001 IBM made one of the fastest mainframe super computer and it's computing power was 4.5 Tera flops/sec....but now you can get a 4.2 tera flops of computing with a 250$ intel core i7...nd if you use skull trail then bro you will get 8.4 tera flops...hahahaha...wicked right ??.....even a 199$ xbox 360(jasper) got about 3.1 tera flops...............
Dec 15, 2009. 7:07 PMsadben says:
yeah but a cheaper AMD phenom II @ 3.2 ghz works better than the intel one.
Dec 17, 2009. 12:54 AMshams says:
 nope it aint.........amd doesnt got that computing power....no hyper threading nd power boost....core i7 870 is 2.9 ghz chip...bt when boost is on then it jumps to 3.6 with out any overclocking or additional cooling...nd its bus speed is much more higher.....
Dec 12, 2009. 2:05 AMarchistrage says:
True, but I have a theory that larger black holes are actually made up on multiple singularities.  I was stating it based off that.

I always enjoy these conversations, because at the end of the day, no matter who agrees with what, no on actually knows.  We're studying an object, like you said, that we can't even see, who's very nature is to prevent any particles from escaping it's field.  I'm always willing to debate these things, but I never put that much faith in them.  

And also, the big problem with the computers, isn't necessarily how fast something can be processed, but how many things can be processed at the same time.  You can't do it in a linear fashion, because your individual reaction calculations will be flawed.  They must all be done at the same time.
Dec 17, 2009. 1:01 AMshams says:
 dont you think that those singularity would attract each other with tremendous force ??.....I didnt tell about speed...it was computing power....nd super computer are only used for high number of input nd out put.....to achive that in your pc you gotta use various input hubs............and super computer are also used as a analog to digital converter.......nd yes with the blessing of hyper threading of new intel's chip ur pc will be a super pc....bt mainframe super computers are the boss........I always thought that how it would be to put several 5870 in those monster sc !!!!
Oct 18, 2010. 7:08 AMcountable says:
Do you work for Intel? You seem to be singing songs of praise about the i7 when cheaper and more powerful processors already exist...
Dec 16, 2010. 12:22 AMshams says:
cheaper more powerfull ??...can you name one ??
Dec 17, 2010. 4:43 AMcountable says:

This is cheaper and faster than everything on this page, except for the Gulftown which is 4 times more expensive and only 300MHz faster.

Dec 20, 2010. 11:03 PMshams says:
http://www.overclock.net/amd-cpus/720800-amd-x6-vs-intel-core-i7s.html
Dec 20, 2010. 10:51 PMshams says:
just put a nvidia tesla and get cluster level computing !!
Dec 11, 2009. 11:10 PMmatthewja says:
I reckon you could make that simple computer out of an old Atari.
Oct 3, 2009. 8:36 PMsmtgr14 says:
This guy know exactly what he is talking about. And due to the irregular bending of space and time after the creation of the black hole cause anything near to be gravatationally pulled in and thus adding to the mass of the hole and in effect increasing the gravatational field? and what about destroying the singularity of the hole anyway?
Jan 2, 2011. 9:55 AMkarlpinturr says:
Destroying a black hole's singularity would be so difficult as to give the most die-hard ("There's no such word as 'impossible!'") optimist the blues...

A singularity is an (almost) infinite mass of (almost) infinite density. There is nothing in this universe - nor, probably, in any other - that does not require more energy to destroy than to maintain, so you'd need practically infinite energy, properly focussed, to destroy it.

But to achieve the required levels, you'd have to harness all the energy in the universe, as well as convert all the universe's mass into energy - which you can't do, partly because the loss of life would be far higher than the Black Hole would ever account for, but you'd also have to convert all the singularities in the universe into energy...

So, the destruction of the singularity you're aiming at (ignoring the fact that you've already converted the mass of your 'gun', along with its guidance systems, and yourself into energy) would require its own mass to be converted to energy, as well as that of everything else - which would then be pointless, as the singularity itself would no longer exist...

And, no, you can't stop at converting the singularity to energy, because that would require almost as much energy as 'simply' destroying it.
Jan 3, 2011. 6:32 PMbguiles says:
just a shot in the proverbial black hole... but wouldn't hawking radiation rather quickly "evaporate" a "small" black hole, provided it's kept from nomming other bits of matter in the mean time?
Jan 4, 2011. 12:17 AMkarlpinturr says:
Well, it might, but that wouldn't really destroy the singularity itself, 'merely' render it inactive - and that possibly only temporarily, given the constant  energy generation state in/of space.
Oct 1, 2009. 4:39 PMtiny hay says:
I think he was just trying to say not to touch it.
Oct 1, 2009. 2:27 PMRollerT says:
And what use is a black hole that just evaporates into x ray's and hawking radiation anyways?
Nov 24, 2009. 1:59 PMjrdur7277 says:
 I got to step 6, and I can't find the jacks to plug the computer up to. well, that was a wasted billion dollars!!!

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
17
Followers
6
Author:007dna(Robotdna)
Enjoy engineering, astrophysics, violin, and skiing. Also: visit my website!