Make Your Own: Black Hole Fabricator!!

 by 007dna
Featured

Step 7: Fire the Laser

Carefully fire the laser at the reaction bead. When done properly, it should explode, creating a temporary star. The computer should then fire the carbon launcher, taking all the hydrogen away from the star. This will supernova the star, and tear a sizable hole in the matter of space-time, creating your very own black hole.

 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
jbouffard says: Sep 28, 2011. 5:34 PM
IMMa FIRINg MAH LAZOR...
BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!
J2aper says: Jan 2, 2011. 2:21 PM
Why would one ever want to create a black hole ??
Halopwner85 says: Dec 18, 2009. 3:37 PM
a black hole is like one of those things you throw coins in to see which is faster. A object is floating around the atmosphere and when it gets close enough it gets sucked in in a spiral fashion. When it gets to the middle it pops out somewhere or sometime else
archistrage says: Oct 1, 2009. 11:53 AM
(sigh) Why does everyone always get this wrong. A Black hole doesn't tear a hole in the universe. It creates a point in which all mass that passes over the event horizon, is compacted into infinite density, until the mass is no longer able to sustain a physical state, and collapses back into the ground state, which is zero point energy. However the kinetic energy that sustained the physical state is emitted in the form of Hawking Radiation.
archion in reply to archistrageNov 27, 2009. 10:15 AM
Do you even know what "zero point" energy is?
Just to clear up the commonly overused TV term "zero point energy":
"zero point" is the state of matter when the mass reaches the coldest possible temperature 0-Kelvin, (absolute zero). "zero point energy" refers to the fact that ALL atoms still vibrate violently even though they have stopped spinning completely (absolute-zero). matter still exists, it is not changed in to some magical new energy. And it has absolutely nothing to do with black holes.
007dna (author) in reply to archistrageOct 26, 2009. 5:46 AM
 They originally start as a tear, though.
foxtrot4697 in reply to 007dnaJan 2, 2010. 9:36 PM
Glitch, poking stick.
JackOfSpades in reply to archistrageOct 18, 2009. 11:13 PM
 I'd rather use a black hole for time traveling.
seamaas in reply to JackOfSpadesAug 16, 2010. 10:27 PM
you couldn't the black hole would squish you into a human pancake
ALogan97 in reply to seamaasSep 25, 2010. 5:59 AM
and then squish the pancake into a tiny ball the size of an atomic particle or smaller
Foaly7 in reply to archistrageOct 8, 2009. 7:53 PM
What if one were to find a way to travel away certain exact spatial coordinates at light speed and come back to make a black hole there. Going at light speed you can travel centuries into the future. If someone made a black hole "after" this black hole was made at the exact same location and there was no black hole when they make one, but there is a black hole in the future there, what would happen? Would one possibly just overpower the other, or perhaps rip apart the Universe? My theory is that it would cause a two-way dimensional rift/ "portal" into the future.
CodeKid1001 in reply to Foaly7Jul 6, 2010. 1:31 PM
Scientists have proven that the faster you go, the slower clocks tick. eventually, it will start ticking backwards. won't you go centuries into the past?
ShadowDemon in reply to CodeKid1001Mar 31, 2012. 7:11 AM
The faster you travel, the slower your particles move, which means you can slow down time. The world, then, views time at a normal rate while you essentially "freeze" and time progresses. You don't actually travel to the future, as much as it may seem so.
Javin007 in reply to Foaly7Oct 29, 2009. 9:56 AM
If going light speed causes you to travel centuries into the future, why doesn't it take centuries for me to see the light when I turn on my flash light?  I can only assume the light is traveling at light speed, so thus, should go centuries into the future...
Basta in reply to Javin007Jan 19, 2011. 11:50 AM
Aaaaaahhhh...
The brain pain.
Foaly7 in reply to Javin007Mar 25, 2010. 8:03 PM
You can't go the speed of light in any human space technology. But a few advances, and you can go as close to it as possible. Going this fast will cause time to actually slow down for you, and the rest of the world will continue on, you aging slower than someone else. Even with twins, one would end up older on earth if one of them went this fast in space, then the space traveler would be younger, and the earthbound one would be like 80.
amoliski in reply to Javin007Mar 25, 2010. 7:55 PM
 If you were to put a saddle on the light, and ride it, thanks to relativity, you would be in the future. You would also be dead from, you know, going the speed of light.
Doubleblades85 in reply to amoliskiApr 26, 2010. 11:41 AM
Yeah... the G-force would be so intense you would be smashed flat in a heart beat....
smtgr14 in reply to archistrageOct 3, 2009. 8:41 PM
In theory if 2 black hole within close proximity of each other in hyperspace, the gravitational pull may cause a wormhole but the hyperlength (4th spatial dimension) must be less than a few miles.
moeman54545 in reply to smtgr14Oct 19, 2010. 7:17 AM
you do know that that comment has no grounding in any scientific field in the world and is completely wrong. i will explain your stupidity in parts.

1. black holes absorb each other when they are in close proximity. they do NOT create a wormhole. that is not true.

2. hyperspace is not real. period.yes, there is 4 dimensions, but they are as listed: 3 of space (spatial dimensions) and 1 of time. the fourth dimension is not a spatial dimension.


3. hyperspace is not real. period.

4. neither is hyperlength. you just took length and space and added a hyper to them.

and there you are. everything you said was wrong. you, my good sir, are stupid
ShadowDemon in reply to moeman54545Mar 31, 2012. 7:07 AM
Hilarious! And true. I don't see how sooo many people think the possibility of humans traveling at the speed of light in a physical vehicle makes any sense. If anything, I'd bet more money on turning our particles into light and becoming a beam, which sadly, involves death and puts me nowhere in the future. :)
Javin007 in reply to moeman54545Jan 19, 2011. 1:26 PM
Some people just need to the heck...
wbmcirvin3 in reply to smtgr14Feb 26, 2010. 11:01 PM

No offense, but I have a Question? Hyperspace exists in.... movies. In real life what is hyperspace?
gatorfrlf in reply to archistrageOct 1, 2009. 1:40 PM
yes, and the only part u can actually see is the mass spiraling around the "hole" into the "point of no return"( of the unbelievable pressure of gravity
lumocus says: Oct 28, 2009. 11:21 AM
in sssssssspppppppppppppppaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacccccccccccceeeeeeeee
DELETED_Haon says: Sep 27, 2009. 7:09 PM
(removed by author or community request)
007dna (author) in reply to DELETED_HaonSep 27, 2009. 8:29 PM
No, because I don't have a few million dollars! :)
Kryptonite in reply to DELETED_HaonSep 27, 2009. 8:00 PM
He said this is theoretical.
007dna (author) in reply to KryptoniteSep 27, 2009. 8:30 PM
Yeah. You are right!
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!