Make a simple AM transmitter

 by bmlbytes
Make a simple AM transmitter that will cost you less than $5.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Stuff you need

A crystal whos frequency is between .9000 and 1.2000 MHz.
Some wire
A male headphone jack
A breadboard or experimental circuit board (optional)
1-40 of 269Next »
eric m says: Apr 30, 2013. 4:07 PM
Hate the new layout for instructables. BRING BACK THUMBNAILS. So Stupid!
VirtualBoxer says: Feb 21, 2013. 6:53 PM
Can a receiver be made in a similar way?
jcox24 says: Nov 17, 2012. 8:50 PM
I made a transmitter using an oscillator and an audio transformer, run off EITHER a 9v cell or usb
Evo7 says: Oct 12, 2012. 10:24 PM
Greattt............stuff in here!!!!
fenwaydog says: Aug 2, 2012. 8:31 AM
I'm using an old crystal will this still work? The problem is it doesn't have a MHz Rating anyware on it.
TuxedoRonny says: Jun 27, 2012. 2:34 PM
Hm... I did everything exactly as you stated (without using a modulator) and this didn't work- at all. I have all the exact components, tried several different radios, etc. and still nothing. Are you sure this works on its own? Has anyone else tried this?
electronicz says: Apr 12, 2012. 9:15 PM
I have a 1.00 MHz crystal like bmlbytes, how high of a voltage can this crystal withstand?
account3r2 says: Dec 2, 2011. 9:46 PM
if i make my own transmitters and receivers using a 50 MHz crystal, since the crystal isnt in the FM or AM range, would the FCC rules apply to it?
gspeed0689 in reply to account3r2Apr 4, 2012. 10:43 AM
That is in the Amateur Radio range, and this circuit does not have enough power to really go far. Low power projects like this aren't enforced by the FCC, it's much like one of those mp3 audio devices that broadcast your mp3 player on a radio station in your car.

If you were to boost the power, you would then be subject to FCC rules.
nodoubtman says: Feb 15, 2012. 3:59 PM
do you need an audio transformer for this? i have a 600: 600 ohm 1 to 1

Thanks!
nodoubtman says: Nov 16, 2011. 10:22 AM
what kind of antenna do you use ?

thanks!
David97 in reply to nodoubtmanJan 31, 2012. 3:01 PM
Just some wire shold do it.
Dr.Bill says: Jan 31, 2012. 9:12 AM
I've never seen a transmitter this simple !
nodoubtman says: Nov 19, 2011. 12:48 PM
I have a crystal of 1.8432 Mhz , is it okay?

thanks!
nqzdepofltr in reply to nodoubtmanJan 4, 2012. 12:13 PM
Any crystal will work. All you have to do is get the crystal of the frequency you want ;)
nodoubtman in reply to nqzdepofltrJan 16, 2012. 5:24 PM
what does this circuit does in reality??

thank you! :)
marC:)
Bot1398 in reply to nodoubtmanJan 31, 2012. 3:04 AM
Your username says nodoubtman but look you have a doubt!!! :P
almamater in reply to Bot1398Jan 31, 2012. 4:42 AM
ahhhh very good!!
account3r2 says: Dec 2, 2011. 9:13 PM
between .9 and 1.2? :P all i have are 9 crystals that are 50MHz and a mysterious 2 legged one labeled 33.8688
atonix says: Oct 17, 2011. 9:10 AM
I think that we can increase its power by using an audio transformer .
jgabrielian says: Aug 27, 2011. 10:33 PM
how can i increase power?
Wesley666 says: Feb 8, 2009. 7:33 PM
Also what if I want FM not AM?
trashman1990 in reply to Wesley666Feb 11, 2009. 10:49 PM
like i said below, fm is modulated different compared to am, the transmission frequency of fm is based of off amplitude or as the amplitude of the audible sound wave increases the frequency of the transmission increases, but with am, as the amplitude of the audible sound wave increases so does the amplitude of the transmitter though the transmission and audible sound dont have matching waveforms... i think i explained that right (hope so)
fgul in reply to trashman1990Jul 12, 2011. 12:27 PM
Can we use an NE555 based oscillator instead of a crystal oscillator for this`AM transmitter circuit?
trashman1990 in reply to fgulJul 27, 2011. 1:39 PM
You would not be able to replace the crystal with a 555 timer for this specific circuit, but... you can make a much better transmitter if you base the oscillator off of a 555 circuit, although it would be a lot more complicated than this. I would try to get a basic understanding of amplifier circuits (not just opamps) and learn what signals look like before and after it had been modulated for am transmission, before I would dive into a 555 based transmitter. It would be a lot of fun and a good learning experience tho. ....Maybe I should maybe make a how to sometime....
Wesley666 in reply to trashman1990Feb 12, 2009. 7:10 AM
OK thanks
ReCreate in reply to Wesley666Feb 9, 2009. 10:13 AM
get a 100MHz oscillator ...and tune your radio to 100MHz FM
Wesley666 in reply to ReCreateFeb 9, 2009. 3:14 PM
so I would tune a radio to 33.3 FM if I had a 33.33 MHz oscillator. (The only oscillator I have is 33.33 MHz) Also how would you build a receiver for a specific Frequency? (Preferably 33.33 MHz!)
ReCreate in reply to Wesley666Feb 9, 2009. 5:43 PM
well first fm is from 87MHz to 108MHz what you have there is close to the range of remote controlled airplanes,49 i suppose you might be able to modify a radio to recive 33MHz (try by turning the little "screws" on the radio's circuit board?) also,since it is not in the am or FM range,you could broadcast it for MILES,ive hear of someone sending morse code from one side of the country to the other at 20something MHz
M0HIZ in reply to ReCreateJan 31, 2012. 1:48 PM
Firstly, FM and AM and not bands of frequencies, they are types of modulation. Secondly, do not try to modified a radio to receive on a different frequency as you will almost certainly change the tuned circuits to something totally different to what you want. Finally, it is very common for people to talk to poele or send Morse code to people on different continents or the other side of the world. This is one of the many aspects of ham radio.
Wesley666 in reply to ReCreateFeb 9, 2009. 7:09 PM
very cool. I found it in a computer motherboard or whatever and I tested it and it worked and I have never touched it since. I was hoping to build a receiver specifically for 33.33 MHz and I was wondering how I would go about that, and if it helps I have a crystal (two pins) with the same 33.33 MHz range if that helps. Thanks
ReCreate in reply to Wesley666Feb 10, 2009. 2:48 PM
if you find a crystal(2-legged) in a computer,it is used for timing,thats why replacing the crystal in a gameboy color speeds up the game. it speeds up the timing,making time trials unfair,crystals are used to keep track of time in computers,but oscillators...i have no clue why that would be inside a computer
trashman1990 in reply to ReCreateFeb 11, 2009. 10:32 PM
crystals are a very important part of an oscillator, normally they are used in a oscillator circuit to set the frequency, and yea, the crystals on mobo are for timings, the 33.33 mhz crystal on the motherboard is to control the timings on pci slots, may pci cards also have 33mhz crystals on them,
Wesley666 in reply to trashman1990Feb 20, 2009. 7:53 PM
this isn't a crystal its a oscillator, so it gives off a signal at that frequency, crystals don't give off signals, plus I have never seen a computer with another one in it ever and the computer it came out of had no 33.33 MHz crystals in it any how, they were all 14.6 MHz.
trashman1990 in reply to Wesley666Feb 21, 2009. 4:47 PM
i assumed it was a crystal because he said 2 pin, never heard of a 2 pin ocillator. most new motherboards have digital oscillators so you can set the pci bus clock in the bios, so you might not see many crystals (if any) on new boards, im not sure what 14.6 mhz would time
Wesley666 in reply to trashman1990Feb 21, 2009. 7:39 PM
well the computer it came out of was older then the dinosaurs but the frequency is 33.33 MHz and all the other crystals were 14.6 MHz so I have no idea what it was doing.
account3r2 in reply to Wesley666Dec 2, 2011. 9:17 PM
i still have my windows 3.1 computer up in my garage somewhere... it used to run DOS so im sure my computer has plenty of crystals
Wesley666 in reply to ReCreateFeb 10, 2009. 3:22 PM
I have seen many crystals (two legged) in a computer but I have only ever had this one with an oscillator in it. Very unusual.........
computergeek says: May 12, 2008. 7:24 AM
Really neat idea! But do you have to worry about the FCC Because you are transmitting radio signal?
bmlbytes (author) in reply to computergeekMay 25, 2008. 9:20 PM
Not if its not too powerful
1-40 of 269Next »
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!