Modify a Paterson film reel to process 110 film

 by mcduffco
110 reel - 1.jpg
110 film is back and for the first time Black and White 110 film is readily available. It is really easy to process at home, if you have a reel that can fit it. There are some commercially available reels but I had a spare Paterson Auto-load Reel so I just decided to cut it down to size.

It was really easy to do, but I thought I would share how I did it. It is not perfect, it is ugly, but it works for me. Feel free to improve on it!

WHAT YOU NEED:
1) a spare patterson reel
2) some epoxy cement
3) a hacksaw or something to cut down the spools
4) a small screwdriver to pop out the ball bearings
5) some needlenose pliers (or something else to trim away some of the spiral on the spool)
6) some sandpaper to smooth down the trimmed down spirals
7) a strip of spare 35mm film to make a 110 test strip (so you do not wreck your negs when we are making this) and a 18mm spacer strip (that is wider than 110 film -- 16mm, so that real 110 film will have some wiggle room).

DISCLAIMER:
THIS IS A HACK JOB and is likely not as good as a purpose built spool for developing 110 film. If you want a 100% perfect solution you may want to get one of these purpose-made 110 spools. They exist. There are 16mm stainless steel spools available and also the Yankee Clipper II Tank (which gets mixed reviews). This is a hack job that worked for me and it may work for you. Read through it first and see if it makes sense for you, your mileage may vary, don't hurt yourself doing this, use a roll test roll of 110 film (that does not have any important images on it in case things do not work out), feel free to improve upon it, etc. If you are a perfectionist, you may want to do a better job than i did or buy a commercial product.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1:

First of all you need 2 pieces of film which I suggest you make out of some spare 35mm film you have kicking around. I used some negatives that did not work out, but you could use anything.

Cut one strip of the film to be 16mm wide. This is the width of 110 film. I will call this the "test strip" and will use this to make sure our setup is correct before we actually use the reel, and to practice loading the reel before we really use it. It would be nice if this piece was a foot  or so (~30cm), but just make sure it is long enough to simulate loading some film. I suggest this versus using real 110 negatives because if you use real 110 negatives they could get scratched. Plus, you may not have any 110 negatives at this point -- this is kind of the reason we are making this danged thing in the first place ;-)

Cut a second piece of film that is a bit wider, lets say about 18mm wide. We will use this piece to space the reel halves in such a way that when the 110 film is inserted there will be some wiggle room. Make this piece long enough that it can spiral around the reel at least once. A foot (~30cm) should be more than fine.

For both pieces, you should round or notch the corners of the edge of one end of the film to help it slide into the reel.
mrmath says: Jul 5, 2012. 2:09 PM
Film? I seem to remember something about this from when I was much younger, but it's all a blur now. Isn't that when you couldn't hold over 1000 pictures on your camera, and didn't see which ones were bad and needed to be deleted right away? I think that's it.
Nano_Burger in reply to mrmathJul 5, 2012. 11:35 PM
Film allows you to have a fresh sensor for every shot with none of the heartbreak of "sensor dust."

You can also change sensors to suit your subject: you have color sensors, black and white sensors, grainy ones, grainless ones, etc. I guess you can spend your time in photoshop approximating the look of film, but less time staring at a screen is better for your health.

Best of all, you have a max of 36 exposures not thousands. When you have this few, you make them count! Who wants to wade through 3,000 images of Timmy's first grade play?

Although it takes a little more skill and practice, even the most addicted digital photographer can graduate to film.
mrmath in reply to Nano_BurgerJul 6, 2012. 5:22 AM
Nano, I tell my kids about the good old days of film, and how you only had 24 or 36 shots. And, how each shot cost you money. Not just the ones they charged you for because they came out, but the ones that didn't still cost you money in terms of the film. And duplicates were extra, so if your friend wanted a copy of that....

That said, I will agree with you that for the purist, film is the way to go. But for me, when I'm shooting Timmy's first grade play, I'll take digital, and about 200 pictures.
Nano_Burger in reply to mrmathJul 9, 2012. 12:54 AM
MM, Just ran across this article from Pedapixel:

http://www.petapixel.com/2012/07/06/some-thoughts-on-digital-camera-lifespan/

Interesting discussion on the cost of digital photography. Film is obviously not a panacea for all, but it still retains many advantages.

The biggest joy for me is more intangible; the joy of working with mechanics, optics, electronics, chemistry, and fluid dynamics to bring about your artistic vision or just plain good snapshot. I also enjoy the risk of making mistakes that may or may not look cool as well. Risk may not be so good for financial institutions, but it does add interest to the photographic process.
mcduffco (author) in reply to mrmathJul 5, 2012. 8:25 PM
Haha, if film 'is all a blur now' you should use a faster shutter speed, or some gnarly, grainy 3200 ISO film ;-)
mrmath in reply to mcduffcoJul 6, 2012. 5:19 AM
mcduffco, I bow down to your superior humor!
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!