Step 9Measure performance
iImage Information

The whole project is now complete. You can now use the device for anything you please. You can measure the performance of the device by putting water into the heat-exchanger, mounting it in place, and measuring the temperature rise. How fast the temperature rises is an indication of the amount of energy being transferred per unit time. You can alternatively measure the amount of time it takes to boil a given amount of water or measure how much water boils per hour.
I finally abandoned this design and disassembled it mainly because I was not able to track the sun accurately enough for it to be practical. It sure was a lot of fun though.
If the absorber surface temperature stays low - like at or below the boiling point of water - it does not need to be a selective absorber as boiling hot objects do not radiate much infrared energy. On the other hand, selective absorbers do not absorb infrared energy as well as non-selective absorbers do. Since sunlight at the surface of the earth has about 40%-45% of the thermal energy in the infrared range, you typically want a normal absorber like carbon black.
If you are dealing with temperatures close to the boiling point of water you have many choices for paint, but if you need really high temperature paint, try Pyromark High Temperature Paint. It is available in 800, 1200 and 2000 degree F ratings.
One of the inefficiencies of heat transfer is the temperature drop across the thickness of the metal barrier; another is mixing the fluid enough to bring all of it in contact with the hot media. I feel that the best, most efficient way to solar heat water, especially with concentrator mirrors, is to place the absorber in the water. That is, pump the water in transparent tubes into the absorber surface at the focal point. One excellent media is an open-cell black ceramic sponge (looks like an aquarium aerator stone); another is to put a very concentrated (stable) black dye in the water. (maybe use both techniques?)
I would add to the absorber discussion that the emissivity values are for thermal radiation and emissivity varies with both frequency and temperature. For solar power from most reflective concentrators, the majority of radiation is visible, not thermal. So glass is a great transmitter of visible radiation but very poor for thermal radiation. A glass mirror that looks shiny bright in the visible range looks almost completely black when viewed (with a thermal imager) in the thermal range. For concentrators that use glass mirror reflectors, nearly 99% of the reflected power is in the visible frequency range because the mirrors absorb most of the thermal radiation. However, this design uses metal reflectors and these are efficient in both visible and thermal bands. Ideally, the translucent material should transmit both visible and thermal frequencies. In addition, the receiving face of the translucent material should be flat and normal to the incoming beam. One possible solution would be to use a multichannel polycarbonate panel used for greenhouse walls. The polycarbonate has excellent visible and thermal transmission. Its important to get the window-grade polycarbonate.