Picture of Nice Easy Magnetic Generator Light
People look like they are having a good time charging up those other magnetic torches but it's definitely more fun to watch. This one may require 2 hands but at least you can go all night if you want to.

All you need is a stepper motor and some White LEDs, but a handle is optional.
If you think you have a stepper motor but aren't sure, turn it and see if you can feel the steps.

This motor came out of a big old floppy diskette drive but I think they are very common in other stuff
I took apart, like printers.

A resistor is probably a good idea because it's so easy to make power that you can burn out the LEDs.

It's easy to find the wires on a stepper motor that will light up an LED
but soon I'll show a good way to connect several.
Sorry about the blurry picture I'll update this and fix it soon.

Ok here it goes, this is one time that it's nice that the camera takes so long to take a picture.
I just fixed it up a bit and found something like a propeller to crank it with too.
And dont get mad... because that finger is not the one it probably looks like.
1-40 of 66Next »
elainek4 years ago
Reading the posts, and I see where a lot of "can't create energy" thinking enters in - true, we can't 'create' energy, but we can tap all kinds of 'free energy'. There's a wonderful batch of information in a free, downloadable book - PJK book - it can be viewed at http://www.yudu.com/item/details/203017/PJK-Book-July-2010 and other sites.

I liked the comparison of a sail boat crossing the ocean; the energy put in by humans was minimal compared to the 'free energy' of the wind. Energy is all round us in many forms - sound, wave, vibration, magnetic, electric, heat, water, decomposition - learning to recognize and tap into these isn't 'free' energy or 'creating' energy, but it's the principle of 'catching the wind' with a sail.

The PJK book is around 2000 pages of massive information! I'm not experienced enough to absorb a lot of it, but it's fascinating.
rpvanpatt5 years ago
 hey, I was wondering if you have had any progress on this project?  I wand to make something similar, like a dynamo charger or something.  You may have said already, but what are all the parts that you need to make you basic plan, and maybe if you know how to add in somethin like AAA battery charger to it.  Thanks
just an idea: Attach an electric motor to the generator instead of leds and replace the crank with the moving part of the motor then tap it for infinite energy.
uh... no. Wouldn't work. If you had a 100% efficient system you could make the motors spin infinitely, but friction will slow them down, and you cannot create energy. Well, you can, but it requires a nuclear reactor, a nuclear or thermonuclear bomb, or a star.
what if you had a few highoutput generators..., a few doubling circuts..., a motor..., a gew gears..., a chain..., and a few batterys..., and of course batterys... you can see where i am going with this right... would this work better???
No...I will explain as well as my brain-dead mind will allow. I just got home from a week of travel and I leave at 6:30 tomorrow morning. If you had a 100% efficient system, it could run indefinitely, but without an output. If you tap any energy, whether it be a sound, lights, motion, anything, it will slow the system down. Perpetual motion is physically impossible. I drive an electric truck, and you have no idea how many times I have heard the comment, "You know, if you hooked a generator to one of the wheels, you could recharge the batteries and extend the range." It DOESN"T WORK.
perpetual motion/energy is not physically impossible, we just have not accomplished it yet. with the right system it could work.
VIRON (author)  CameronSS8 years ago
Regenerative braking reclaims SOME of the energy in electric
vehicles when you stop or go down a hill, and that energy was
used first to get up to speed and up the hill. This is not perpetual
motion because lots of that energy was lost by friction, but it does
"extend the range" just not to infinity.

A nice illusion of PMM can be made only when you have an external
energy source and a load that doesn't need all of it. For example,
clocks can be powered by a barometer and watches can be
self-winding. Calculators can run on very small solar panels.
Even a weak solar / magnetic levitating motor is easy to build.
Solar magnetic levitating motor
CameronSS VIRON8 years ago
I never said that regenerative braking didn't work. We would hook it up on our truck if it was an AC motor, but its DC, which can't do regen without a huge cost. The concept I always hear, and all the other guys in the local EV club hear, is to attach a generator to one, two, or four wheels, depending on the genius, which would run constantly, thereby topping off the battery pack and giving us infinite range. If that worked, someone would have put it into use in the last hundredsomething years that EVs have been around. Regen works great! I know some people with Solectria Forces, which were nice AC drive cars made some time ago, factory converted Chevy Geos. They have drum brakes, but they are never used because the automatic regen works so well. It just doesn't reclaim that much energy, and not what Toyota wants you to think the Prius does.
i was just putting that out there... and i only ment would this work better as longer... but thanks for explaining it to me...
Lol, I can't wait till scientest discover a way of actually creating more matter, as for now, we are simply reusing matter. So for people that don't know what I'm talking about, there is no way to actually "make more matter" but rather it gets processed and turned into something else. Sorry for the crappy explanation, but it's hard as hell to explain that. Perhapes you have a better explanation?
VIRON (author)  Punkguyta8 years ago
You can create all the virtual matter you want. You also have two choices: almost totally free or ridiculously expensive.
Punkguyta VIRON8 years ago
Virtual matter, yes, but as far as actual matter, soil, elements, materials that make up this world all get reused and made into other materials, so in other words, we can't actually "destroy" or "create" more "matter" because this is all we have to work with. That's what the laws of physics say, I'm a bit rusty on that one, but I remember have a in depth discussing with my science teacher about it one day.
VIRON (author)  Punkguyta8 years ago
There is plenty of real matter in the universe. How much more do you want?
Punkguyta VIRON8 years ago
Not saying there isn't plenty, but just saying, there isn't a way to add matter, just use what is already there
I understand you. Everything in this entire existence is recycled on its own to make way for new things to come and go. planets and stars will blow apart and collect to make new planet and stars. Trees will die so other things can eat it and die and then give back to the trees which once helped it. I tried bringing this up in science class and no one understood me at all. I guess thats the problem with being 14. I don't see why we recycle though. If you look at it aren't we just making carbon fumes melting stuff were to impatient to just let sit there and decompose?
Well yes and no, because we could let these things decompose, but because a lot of the stuff in the landfills are mostly man made products, they tend to take several decades for things to start decomposing, I honestly don't think anyone has that kind of patience. You know why they're melting things down even more today than 20 years ago? Because everyone knows natural supplies are running out.
You know what I don't get. Why don't stores just sell us the bottles and then sell the contents separately like from a soap dispenser all you would have to do is get like one bottle for shampoo and just refill it. But then again I guess the petroleum bottle's are made and the chemicals that are made after reusing...Why don't we just get rid of plastics all together.
VIRON (author)  Slushba1328 years ago
How about: Ceramics, pottery, and glass. They've been around since beginning of history, and they're natural, and still around, in museums, along with old bones and rocks. But that's ok.
Yeah but ceramics decompose just as slow as plastics do. We still have pots from hundreds of years ago. I think iff we switched to pots we would have the same problem with not being to wait for it to decompose naturally.
VIRON (author)  Slushba1328 years ago
Well like you said we could just refill them forever. And if one breaks we just crush it back into sand and dust if we want to get rid of it.
Yeah but people would have to learn to get used to some sand and clay particles in our drinks. It does seem like a good idea though. The problem is converting the whole world away from what its use to. That and we still have to figure out an alternative way to make power.
Think of how impractical it would be...would you want to go food shopping and carry all of those heavy pots, having to worry about them breaking in your car on the ride home? "Damn, my Pepsi just busted all over my trunk...again!". Many safety issues. Furthermore, sure you could refill them...but what would you utilize to carry and transport said soap or shampoo from its source to your now empty bottle/pot? Probably another bottle or pot...and thinking of how lazy people can be, who would want to sit there and pour shampoo from one bottle into another when you have another full bottle (and you'd still have one empty bottle!). Good idea in theory though!
And actually come to think of it. Mass and matter can be converted. So I guess there could be more matter just at the expense of overall energy.
Yes you are right, trash can be converted even. But we don't really have any way of making it efficient enough, the different trash plants that do process garbage and melt things down aren't that big because that's just it, it's too in-efficient and too much pollution/heat loss. I figure it, unless we can find some new kind of matter out in space and then convert it to material usable here, we're totally fucking screwed eh?
I kind of think if maybe we cant fix the problems we have here on earth without going and trashing another planet maybe the species doesn't deserve to live. If we can't change as a species I kind of hope we die out before we drag the whole planet down with us. It doesn't seem that bad in the long run to trade one species for a whole worlds existence, even if that species is our own.
I'd have to agree 100% with you on this.
Punkguyta VIRON8 years ago
oh, not only that, but do we have a way to not only gather unknown materials from space, or even process it into anything we can use? Thought so, we can't, this civilization we call earth is such a fucking fluke.
VIRON (author)  CameronSS8 years ago
An electric car with solar panels would be really nice, but to Make something that just spins until the sky falls should be easy to do.
CameronSS VIRON8 years ago
I drive an electric car. Okay, so technically it's a pickup, but it was built in the early '80s and still works perfectly. The problem with solar panels is that they are so darned inefficient. It's nearly impossible to find a commercial panel more than 15% efficient, and NASA's space station panels are only around 25-30% efficient.
VIRON (author)  CameronSS8 years ago
The efficiency of an ambient power supply is less relevant when the ambient power is available for free whether you use it or not. Oversimplified, a free trip to church on sunday is a free trip, even if it's theoretically possible to get another one on saturday. If you just stay home, that much free power can run the radio and the fan for free, forever.
CameronSS VIRON8 years ago
but less efficiency means more is required to create the same output, which ultimately costs more.
VIRON (author)  CameronSS8 years ago
Initially costs more, unless you look for bargains and pay less. Also, if you drive a lot but not far from home, I recommend a wind turbine, because it blows away solar power (unless you never have any wind). I know a farmer who runs all his lamps on batteries charged by a windmill. Also consider the wind as a power source for a compressed air motor vehicle. It's real. Wow?
More importantly, low efficiency means you need more which has costs BEYOND money. It means more material and, in the case of solar power, more physical space.

For example, 100% solar powered cars will never exist. This is because there jsut isn't enough solar energy shining on the footprint of the average car to actually power the car. Your average car is 6 feet wide by 12 feet long, or 72 square feet. At roughly 100 watts per square foot (optomistic), you would need 7.5 square feet of solar panel for every 1 horsepower assuming *everything* was 100% efficient (which is thermodynamically impossible).

So a 72 sq.ft. vehicle can't possibly be more than about 9.6hp unless you use batteries to store energy when not driving or some other energy source.

After you factor in real world inefficiencies (15% solar panels, 80% driver electronics and battery storage, 80% motors) you're down to just 10 watts per square foot, or ONE horsepower for a full-sized vehicle. Good luck with that.
Also going along with Einstein's theory the more solar panels you need the heavier the car will get and require more solar panels which in turn way the car down more so nothing could be 100% efficient unless its power supply were weightless. And even going back to the beginning the "tapping" I assume would require chemical energy from your body. Not really certain though because I haven't actually read the instructable...whoops.
Why not just put it in a container with no air and give it an additional spin once in a while.
Air is not the only friction to consider, there's also gear friction, bearing friction, magnetic friction (or drag) and electrical friction (resistance).
imakethings6 years ago
you can also use a geared motor
FrenchCrawlersays: You do realize that there is still one week left before this month is over? Why not just leave it unpublished until it's finished or at least until you have some kind of schematic for it to post (even use paint to draw us a simplified picture of how it will work). How ever it works, it looks (as blurred as it may be) like we're all in for a treat. Don't let us down :P
1-40 of 66Next »