This bicycle is really easy to do, cheap, and does not require any welding skills.

Front wheel drive recumbents not requiring welding are popular in instructables:


I did one myself :  http://www.instructables.com/id/simultaneously-pedalling/

These front wheel drive bicycles are easy to build, cheap and do not require welding. However, they have two main  problems: steering is affected by pedalling and traction is lost uphill because the weight is shifted to  the rear wheel. You may get used to compensate the steering influence of pedalling but it will always be impossible to use the bicycle on a hilly terrain. My rear wheel drive bicycle overcomes these problems while keeping the simplicity of construction of the front wheel drive ones.

Step 1: materials

For building this bicycle you need:

- Two bicycles. From one of them only the crank related parts are used.

- Two clamps (10 €) of the kind used to fix parabolic antennas.

- Two plastic tubes, inner diameter should allow passage of the chain. I bought chain tubes made specially for bicycles (5 €), but you may use any tube, for instance those black tubes used for irrigation.
Nice mod! It looks like you flipped the rear fork though. Did you remove the crank set and reinstall it on the other side? Is that pice of metal on the side a spacer because of it?
<p>Thank you.</p><p>The rear fork used as backrest comes from another bicycle. Is supported with a threadless stem, which I bought. It is explained in step 5.</p>
Yes, that I understood. But the close-up in the second picture in step 2, the rear drop outs are upside down. So I'm guessing that the piece of metal between the crank arm and case is to take up space if you flipped the parts around... Don't know if I'm saying what I mean very well.
<p>Sorry for the misunderstanding. You are right, the section of frame with the crank is upside down. The mysterious piece of metal you are referring to was used in the former bicycle to hold the chain guard. Now it is useless, I didn't dismount it because it is difficult to dismount the bearing without the proper tool.</p>
Ahh, okay. Now I've got it. Thanks :)
<p>very nice, your build changed the design of the one im doing</p>
<p>Thank you! Please tell me about your bicycle when finished.</p>
Nice job. Now I don't need to pay someone to do some welding for me- clamps!! One of those &quot;Why didn't I think of that?&quot; things. Thanks!
Thank you
Clever way to fabricate something without welding; good use of a sacrificial rear triangle in order to obtain and attach a bottom bracket/crank housing shell. <br>--Not sure I agree with the &quot;traction&quot; logic about weight over rear wheel. More weight over the drive wheel actually improves traction. The fore-and-aft weight distribution on many recumbents does affect steering though, as you said. It makes the front lighter than on a traditional bike. The steering wheel doesn't respond as well, the front wheel can 'wash out' more. The rearward weight distribution makes the front get even lighter on an incline, with less ability to move your body's ballast over the steering area due to the recumbent position. Perhaps you meant to refer to this dynamic, because 'popping a wheelie' inadvertently on a hill certainly affects traction; inasmuch as most of us on a recumbent would then fall over... But with low enough gears I daresay hill climbing isn't 'impossible,' just more difficult. <br>I still like your build, it fits my 'Swiss Family Robinson' ethic of being able to make what you need with what you have on hand!
Thank you for your comments. I check your &quot;Three Wheel Bike Car&quot;, great vehicle. <br> <br>About the traction: I did built the same bicycle with front wheel drive and I could not climb steep hills because traction was lost. With real wheel drive I can climb the same hill without problems. May theory may be wrong, but my experience is conclusive. <br> <br>May be I don't make my point clear with the traction theory, by loosing traction I meant that the wheel turns but the bicicle does not move because contact of the tire with the ground is lost. My English is quite bad, please excuse me. <br>
Mariano,<br>Don't worry about your English, you do pretty well. It was perhaps my mistake--I just did not know you were referring to a front wheel drive version, when you spoke about traction. In that case you are of course right, the front wheel loses traction on hills, just as you say.
The original description was a bit confusing. I amended the passage. Thank you for pointing out the problem.
What a sweet mod! I also would have never thought of using old bike tube as a chair back. Smart!
Thank you

About This Instructable


59 favorites


More by m a r i a n o: simple rowing bicycle "la remarianette" Easy wheel lacing solar bicycle light "la aladina"
Add instructable to: