I needed the bridge to more directly connect the meadow below my house with my picnic grounds - which were on the other side of the sometimes-arm-of -the-pond, sometimes-nearly-impassable-ravine.
This is the best resource I found online for building this bridge:
http://www.trailstobuild.com/Articles/PochuckBridgeEngineeringArticle/Pochuck%20Quagmire%20Bridge.htm
The bridge cost about $4000 to build and took several hundred hours of labor and thought.
Not that the thought wasn't labor, too!
I want to thank all of you that voted for me in the Woodworking Contest. I ended up 6th in the voting! Now for the judging!
Jake
Update - runner up in the Woodworking contest. I got a t-shirt - I'm happy! :)
Remove these ads by
Signing UpStep 1: The Math!
An then there is the math in a suspension bridge. This is actually a fairly easy part once you use a spreadsheet and this formula:
y=(lbm/ft)/2T * x^2
which gives the sag ("y") in the catenary cable (which is not a catenary but rather a parabola) at any point along the deck ("x") as a function of the suspended weight and the tension ("t") at mid span. For my purposes, t is an input, along with the weight per linear foot of bridge (actually, half the linear weight as there are 2 cables) and the sag is what I aim for. Given the limitations of the equipment and dimensional lumber -I could not readily have raised anything longer than the 16 ft laminated posts (4 2x8x16 glued and bolted) with which I constructed the 2 towers- and minimal bury (approximately 2 ft) that meant I had at most 13.5 ft of max sag to work with. I aimed 12.75 ft of sag to allow for about 6 in of arch in the deck plus a really short suspender at mid span.
Taking all that into account, the suspended weight of the bridge is about 4000 lbs, almost all of which is the weight of the dimensional lumber used in constructing the deck. I used 2 in board for everything - 2x4x16 and 2x8x16.
With that weight, span and sag, I calculated a tension with 2000 lbs of load and treated lumber at 40 lbs/cu ft (which may be heavy, as it is more than the average weight of the pieces I weighed) at 2500 lbs. I used 2200 lbs in my calculations. From that all other loads, such as anchors, eye bolts, turnbuckles, were set. All the main load carrying material (wire rope, etc) were rated 3500 lbs or greater working load. I used 1/2 " galvanized wire rope (about 5500 lbs working load) for the catenary cable and 3/16 in galvanized aircraft cable (850 lb working load) for the suspenders. There are 37 2x8 joists on 2 ft spacing with 37 suspenders from each cable.









































Visit Our Store »
Go Pro Today »




Now gnats, that's a different story!
More or less. :)
I'm an architect and I can say that this bridge really brought something special to the property.
Bravo!
Inspiring.
Intimidating.
Have you any photos of the critically important anchors and more info on how the cables attach to them?
Also, can you describe more about the spikes.
Thank you for an outstanding Instructable.
What kind of glue did you use to laminate the anchor?
Wow.
It is very difficult to line up plates on both sides of the posts. I had to do it on the towers, but it was no simple task to bore holes in the posts that aligned with the plates on both sides so that the holes pre-bored in the plates would work out.. Next time, I drill one side, bore the holes, mark the plate for the other side and then drill those holes!
Very nice!
That is a lot of work, but the feeling of getting the job (well) done is priceless.
Greetings,
Were I starting engineering school now, however, I might choose to study bridges, too!
Congratulations on a super build.
After-the-fact picture taking is not possible, but you might add a picture with a couple of arrows or lines drawn indicating how the forces and cables will go.
Your finished bridge looks awesome!
Just to be clear, though: there is no tension-adjusting mechanism on the vertical stays? You calculated the length of each stay assembly at each joist, built them to that length, and installed them that way without any further fine-tuning possible, is that right?
It obviously worked great, but what would happen if one of the assemblies was slightly off-length? And how do you deal with creep (stretch) in the suspension cables and vertical stays?
I have been thinking about all the projects on this site, and all the things people do to make things, and I think that, large or small, it is the making, the creating, that is important.
I had an opportunity, and need even, the requisite skills and enough help and money to make it happen. There are many projects here for which I entirely lack the skills to make happen, and to attempt those projects would be beyond me.
It also helps, in a long project like this, that I am at my best with a deadline and when I obsess, both of which were true.
there are so many cool projects on this site & this is one is one of those that keeps yah seeing & doing more...
I have a blog http://casperdub.blogspot.com (scrapbook) of my work which you might find interesting (the folding, sideways sliding kids-scale chairs video begins automatically part way down the blog)
perhaps I should enter something here...
this is my first time ever commenting on this site...
thanks for sharing the process.
But don't let me stop you. Keep those superlatives coming! :)
forgive me my English I'm from Belgium.
If I had pulled in the catenary cables without any other structure attached, it would not have been an issue and I could have used a continuous cable. The problem is that installing the deck from the in-air cable would have been all but impossible.
I could have used the same process of floating the bridge to the site and then taking the catenary cables over a saddle to each anchor and then raising the substructure, but then the towers would have had to have a greater "bury" and that would have reduced the max sag, which would have increased tensions and loading everywhere else in the bridge, or would have required longer tower legs, and they were as long as I could comfortably handle as it was!
grts
In any case I am not exactly worried. The wood is not treated to the highest level, and sealing it will do a lot to preserve not only the environment but also the wood itself. We use very few pesticides or herbicides on the property, or even chemical fertilizer, and the total environmental load of bad stuff is very, very low.
But it is a lot of fun to be the only one here. :)
I particularly like instructables like this--large but do-able projects that encourage the rest of us to just go for it. Very nice addition to the site.
Rewards come in many forms, and this, to my mind, is one of the best.
People in general are much more capable than they think. For anyone who's taken on a challenge and over come it, they realize that patience and determination are the biggest factors. It reminds me of that quote about perspiration and inspiration.
(Who said that anyway?)
I like how you addressed the Tacoma Narrows bridge, too. Way to think about some of the outcomes.
Really, when you you consider potential load, soil erosion, and external loads there's always room for more counterweight. However, it's nothing you can't fix with a nice concrete bridge-entryway later on.
Really, the bridge looks great. I wish my neighbour had one these instead when I was growing up instead of the planks-on-rocks method. Though it's better than we had (nothing!).
But I have contingency plans if either the tower footings or the anchors, or both, prove inadequate. At least, I have plans if the inadequacy is not demonstrated by catastrophic failure. :)
But when it was done...
Next time id suggest you use a chain block to hoist up the lines, you can normally hire them cheaply. using turnbuckles works but you don't want to overheat the steal because you may be effecting the rating on them.
Again well done.
A rented chain block would have been far easier than the come-alongs. If I do it again, I will likely consider using them.
Thank you for the documentation comment. There is no way to document everything that goes into a bridge like this without writing a book. Maybe a small book, but a book nonetheless.
It all worked out way better than I imagined. :)
One question though. I'm guessing it is a river or something, what about boats and other aquatic vessels