REAL cell phone remote relay \ remote firework starter

REAL cell phone remote relay \ remote firework starter
I am sure you have already seen the cellphone detonator by shootingeggs (who rule by the way), but unfortunately it is unsteady, requires semi or fully permanent installation, you can not swap the sim card and it is just plain too simple to my taste. It is why I made my own remote electronic relay. (you won't find this anywhere, I made it:) )

HOW THIS THING WORKS:
The module has 3 pairs of wires.
1- imput
2- output
3- phone plug

1-(2 long wires at the bottom) imput is you battery pack. You need a minimum of 5 volts.
2-(2 short wires next to the LED) the output is where you plug the fuse. It always leaks 1.45volts until the whole thing is activated - it is activated by part 3
3-(black plug imput) phone plug, this is where the cellphone is pluged (you will see how this is done in later steps). When the phone rings, it will open up a passage for ALL of the voltage to go from 1(imput) to 2(output) WITHOUT touching 3(cell phone); this means you will NOT fry the phone as no electricity goes in there.

Summary: when you call your phone connected to this, it will activate what is pluged on the output (be it a model rocket fuse, or a more powerful latching 2$ relay that controls a 120v device).
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
 

Step 1Here is the basic schematic and the parts you will need.

Here is the basic schematic and the parts you will need.
parts drawn on board (you can see an un-ubstorced board on the intro picture):

-555 IC timer (on which pin 1 is identified, I use a TA7555P chip)
-resistors : 33kohm, 467ohm, 1kohm
-Capacitors: 0.1uf and 0.01uf
-a plug that will fit the wire you will put in your phone, a cellphone and the cable that fits in the plug you used.

Optional: (it is a testing mechanism to see if your circuit works when the phone is rigning)
- 1 pushbutton or switch
- 1 LED; the positive (longer leg) is the top 5 on the schematic

The 555 timer IC chip used here WILL heat when the cellphone rings so do not touch it but it should not be damaged. If it is, swap it (its why I put mine in a IC socket, for 80 cents, id rather throw it out and swap it in case of problems rather then starting from scratch again.) This chip was not made for this, its why you will never find this circuit anywhere else (for now :p)
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
106 comments
1-40 of 106next »
Sep 1, 2010. 10:21 AMgreenhey says:
Dont use the schematic just go off the picture of the board layout.On the schematic the fuse output on pin 2 should be connected to pin3 and and the 470 resistor goes from pin3 to pin 2.I removed the vibrator motor and connected to wires in its place which gave me 1.2v then used this to switch a transistor to get 9v output using a old nokia.
Jan 8, 2011. 3:42 PMRetroPlayer says:
It is possible to do this without modifying your cell phone. I have a cell phone cradle on my desk that flashes when receiving an incoming call. Bought on Ebay a couple years ago. Also, there have been circuits all over the internet to do this:
http://www.redcircuits.com/Page47.htm

These work because your cell phone emits a signal just before it rings, and these simple circuits detect that signal and trigger. It needs to be placed very close to your phone, but does not require you to modify your phone at all.

My flashing cradle, unfortunately doesn't work with Verizon, which is my carrier, but it works with my brother's sprint/pcs phone.
Jul 12, 2010. 10:10 AMcool not lame says:
were can u get all these wires and stuff?
Aug 23, 2010. 12:32 AMpeanutthegreat says:
I think if you have to ask where to get wires, you shouldn't be building this.
Jul 13, 2010. 12:47 PMfreerunnin1 says:
you could always remove the motor that it uses when its in vibrate mode and connect those wires to a camera flash circuit and then from there put the output to a wire and connect that wire to the fuse... if you get what i mean.. :P
Jan 27, 2010. 8:03 PMSmartzkid says:
I've oft thought of building something much like this; instead of using the buzzer voltage, I want to 'listen' for certain frequency sine waves from the speaker. With a tone generator on the other end, one could use this system to control complex configurations of fireworks with far less wire than your average programmable system.

It actually wouldn't be too hard to build - using a microcontroller to A2D the 'output' cellphone's speaker and calculating the frequency, implementing a call auto-accepter (easy with a microcontroller), and building a bank of output transistors to sit between microcontroller and detonators. This would allow for the control of an arbitrary number of fireworks; the only limiting factor is call quality, which impacts how accurately frequencies can be matched.


Does anyone know of a super cheap prepaid phone service? I can't just go out and buy a junky SIM phone; Verizon doesn't use SIM cards :(
Jul 5, 2010. 6:50 PMtristantech says:
Actually, you can buy chips that they use in telephones that actually decode the DTFM tones from the keypad and output that number as binary or BCD.
Jan 27, 2010. 8:05 PMSmartzkid says:
This would also solve the 'wrong number' call problem; if the microcontroller did not detect the frequency 'protocol' it was expecting, it could hang up after a short period of time.
Feb 6, 2010. 4:53 AMgin_road says:
Could I also wire this to a old cordless phone. Hooking it up to speaker of phone and using Page button on phone base/rechargeer unit to ring phone?
Nov 8, 2009. 8:18 PMguitarman63mm says:
I see that only a select few see this for what it is...a piece of technology almost NEVER utilized for fireworks, and almost exclusively for ieds.  Now, I'm not going to go and say that we should try to control a simple schematic that any competent person in electronics could make, but if you can seriously convince me this will be used for fireworks, I challenge you.
Nov 21, 2009. 8:13 PMsubbatonikk says:
I built a circuit on a similar vein to this a while back and have just built another one with more advanced functions. I use it to remotely control a test rig so that I can troubleshoot phone lines without having to keep driving distances to put a short, a tone or a DSL signal on the line. I have very rudimentary electronic skills and knowledge gained just less than 30 yrs ago. I was able to design the circuit from memory and utilizing a couple of kits. If you google "sound activated switch relay' such kits are abundant. Terrorists are sophisticated intelligent people (albeit inhumane & viscious criminals). They are usually connected to networks of people some of whom probably have degrees in electronics/ electrical engineering.  BE REALISTIC and THINK before you insinuate!!  Julienrl is just being open and helpful about a modification to a well worn idea.  Why spoil his fun!!
Nov 21, 2009. 10:52 PMguitarman63mm says:
     As I said in my second comment, it's not about using a remote trigger for testing applications, it's about using it for 'fireworks'.  Also, for what it's worth, a blanket statement on 'terrorists' is unwise, as they will inherently vary in intellect.
    
Nov 20, 2009. 4:49 PMguitarman63mm says:
      That's a very true statement, and as I said, I'm not asking you to pull it, nor am I trying to control knowledge, as that is the opposite of this site's purpose.  
     Although you've stated an example of what you used it for, that's akin to saying you used a rifle's stock to dig a hole;  the main purpose of a rifle is to shoot, the main purpose of this device will be to detonate an explosive charge, which is precisely what you built it to do; the only issue is that the chances of someone utilizing this on the 4th of July for their fountains, as opposed to IEDs, are slim to none.

P.S. The title has a misspelled word in it...'fierwork'.  That in itself might lead one to believe this is an 'ible of suspect origins.
Nov 14, 2009. 3:40 PMRainh2o says:
I second this challenge  :(
Oct 6, 2008. 10:56 AMupritam says:
Your idea is great. I WANT TO LIGHT A FLUORESCENT TUBE IN MY BARE HANDS WITHOUT ANY VISIBLE MEAN. i AM SEEKING YOUR EXPERT ADVISE ' THANKS ALL ELECTRONIC GURUS.
Nov 16, 2009. 2:02 PMNaesen says:
You can make a wireless power transmission system using an ac electromagnet.
Nov 14, 2009. 3:53 PMRainh2o says:
If I was going to make a detonat...ummm.."fireworks starter" and didn't want to tear up the cell phone, i would just use a photo transistor connected to a simple switch circuit...then set the cell phone to light up when called..less intrusive to the cell phone.
Aug 26, 2008. 6:15 PMbeazll09 says:
what is the best and most easiest phone to modify to do this?
Nov 9, 2009. 8:26 AMBigNateMI says:
A bit late for that, I think.
Feb 8, 2009. 4:54 PMReCreate says:
just don't go with an iphone
Aug 27, 2008. 7:20 PMbeazll09 says:
i will. what model phone did u use? they are not some phones use cables and some just use flat surfaces pushed together but i have found that motorola phones are the best for what is needed for this project.
Nov 8, 2009. 10:56 PMSnarky says:
I get "wrong number" calls on my cell sometimes as often as three times a week. I realize you would want to use a "fresh" phone for this, but what would you do to prevent a "wrong number" call detonation?
Oct 24, 2009. 3:23 AMhiggzy77 says:
Sorry for my lack of knowledge but how does the 555 timer work?
Nov 8, 2009. 9:42 PMlordofthedonuts says:
The 555 is a widely used chip, it'd be complicated to explain how it works without taking like 5 pages because it can be configured in so many ways.
It really depends on how you wan't to use it.
For most people the 555 is their first IC cuz it's so versatile, easy to use and just plain awesome. You can find many comprehensive schematics online.
Nov 8, 2009. 6:41 PMSinAmos says:
Terrorism has made it's way to instructables.  Good job.
Nov 8, 2009. 1:31 PMsii2009 says:
 is there anyway you can stop the 1,45 voltage leakage, maybe by a resistor or instead adding a relay switch to the output onto another circuit :)
Nov 8, 2009. 8:43 AMJerryMopar says:
Nice, now ANYONE can make an IED!!
Nov 8, 2009. 8:28 AMroycetaft says:
Wouldn't it just be easier to use a small relay instead of an entire circut? idk..
Oh and I was confused about something, when you say "imput", do you mean "input" ?  Overall, great concept.  With a little black powder you could remotely scare the crap out of someone. lol
Nov 8, 2009. 6:55 AMjudgedead says:
 hey thanks i was wondering how to remotely detonate a bomb and now i know look out
Nov 6, 2009. 5:47 PMsubbatonikk says:
2 suggestions for improvements: 1) To isolate the output of your circuit from the firework starter you could add a 'normally off' relay to your output. When cellphone rings the relay is energised and completes a circuit to the battery. This would eliminate the problem of the always present voltage on the output. Would probably need a small transistor added also to provide the energizing current. 2) Many cellphones have jacks for a headset which deactivate the speaker. Wiring a lead with the right size plug to your circuit would allow you to attach/remove cellphone without having to modify it. I built a cellphone activated circuit which switched (sequentially) a series of 8 relays to control various test equipment remotely but I relied on 'sound' activation. The problem with this is ambient noise can trigger it. I will be looking at incorporating your idea. Thanks
1-40 of 106next »

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
10
Followers
5
Author:julienrl