3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

Save electricty with your computer

Save electricty with your computer
An average person who uses a computer would usually just walk away from it when your done, or if your gone for an extended time (and they know about it in advance) they'll probably put it in sleep . I (myself) use to keep my computer on about 8 hours a day, just saying I'll comeback to it later. Well there are many ways to save electricity.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
 

Step 1CRT versus LCD

CRT versus LCD
«
  • electriccostmap.gif
  • LCD.gif
  • Fat CRT.jpg
Many people and businesses use CRT monitors because they might have it from an old computer and say "Hey, why buy a new monitor works just fine, I'll save money."

Facts about an average 17" monitors (using the average kwh price of 9.86 cents, you can look at the map):

CRT
1) Electricity used: 80 watts
2) Money spent keeping the monitor on for 8 hours cost about 6.4 cents per day, which adds up to 23.36 dollars a year.
3) Cheapest new I could find off of Newegg was 125 dollars.
4) They're fat and ugly and take up half of your desk (well that was an opinion)

LCD
1) Electricity used: 35 watts
2) Money spent keeping the monitor on for 8 hours cost about 2.8 cents per day, which adds up to 10.08 dollars a year.
3) cheapest new I could find off of Newegg was 150 dollars


So if you have a CRT and switch to a LCD an average would save 13.28 dollars. If you had a choice of buying the CRT and a LCD you would only lose 11.72 dollars. A cheap price to help the Earth and have more room on your desk.
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
73 comments
1-40 of 73next »
Sep 12, 2011. 1:46 AMdscodellaro says:
This is really misleading information.

Firstoff, a Mac Desktop is made of laptop components, so apart from a huge screen, has equal or near equal power consumption to a laptop.

Operating system does have an impact on power consumption in the loosest sense. That sense being that increased workload from any application (OS, Office, browsers, games) will result in more power drained. We know this is true because when playing a high-end game, the graphics card heats up, and the heat energy comes from electricity. Same idea on a phone (i.e. Iphone), games will make it heat up, and also drain the battery faster.

Therefore, because there are so many varieties of Linux, technically Linux will be the most power efficient because many Linux versions are built specifically to use low power. Also, Macs and Windows PCs are generally loaded with a greater amount of bloat ware which typical users do not remove, which causes increased power drain.

Finally, my computer uses a 1 kW power supply. Desktops may typically use between 60-250, but there are a significant number up to 500W and many high-end up to 1kW or more. Past comments are correct, comptuer power demand is almost entirely dependent
Nov 13, 2010. 2:02 PMTheBestio says:
I hate math, but maybe you wanted to say 10 PCs, 300W*10= 3 Kw, not 100 PCs (30Kw) it's a huge company :P
Feb 7, 2010. 12:12 PMwillrandship says:
For all the people who say OS doesn't matter:
Windows is slow after the first 6 months. It takes longer to do the same functions, therefore more power draw. Also, CPU load is increased, which uses more power.
Feb 4, 2010. 1:11 PMlaci37 says:
Almost anything with a x86 compatible processor is considered a PC, laptops are all PCs and how comes the idea that a PC could only run windows, a linux machine some other thing? linux machines are all PCs as well (of course because linux is open source it has been ported to several other platforms).
And OS-es doesn't have to do much with power saving, except if they are able to control the CPU voltage or something, which is not really used out.
Nov 2, 2009. 7:02 PMminimustangs says:
If you are running three or four computers in one house, consider getting a KVM switch...then, no matter what the type -  CRT or LCD -  you're only using 1 monitor.

I've personally cut back from 3 CRTs to 1 LCD. I have more space on my desk ( I HAVE desk space) and the electric meter has stopped whizzing around...
Aug 16, 2007. 2:04 PMthisislee says:
Hibernate is pretty much as you described it. All RAM is dumped to disk. Then restarting is the time it takes for the motherboard to get ready plus the time to copy the RAM back from disk. It's much faster than a full boot up, but slower than recovering from standby. There's also a deeper sleep state that can reduce the power used at standby. I believe it's called S3 standby. Most of the parts actually turn off, but just enough power is used to keep the RAM alive and I'd imagine a few other important tasks. Support isn't necessarily great for this. I've been able to get it working on 1 of 2 computers I've tried.
Oct 10, 2009. 8:07 AMBFeely says:
That's the 1-6 watt standby the author mentions.  In S3, the power supply actually goes into off mode and the motherboard stays alive using the +5Vsb supply.
Oct 3, 2009. 4:24 PMBlackice504 says:
alot of people forget that software now days does change the running of hardware for example a GPU will run at higher clocks then on the desktop thus more watts are used why do you think Nvidia ATI say to make sure your PSU is this many watts ect. but also yes Running different software will use more or less power depending on how complex it is and i am very surprised at alot of people that think other wise and then sit there and argue the point with out doing any study on it after been told i RUN CRT 24inch screens A: LCD does not offer what my CRT offers especialy for when my computer is needed for REAL TIME aplications one would be SCOPES i dont care what any Co. tells you about LCD but there is a DELAY still today especialy when you are competeing with monitors like the Hitachi ACCUVUE 240Hz Refesh Rates that uses even more power TO DEV45 he has a idea what he is talking about and MR C64 on some things and for MR64 MAC is not classed as a Computer its Classed as a E.T Device for people who have little or no idea what to use a Computer for. MAC OS yes is very close to Linux and even has some core programing from it but its NOT EVEN Close to Linux in terms of Functions. as for Windows and DOS they would use more power then anything else DOS been more so because it does not have ACPI ( power Management it just runs hardware at full speeds hence some people video cards Fan Runs at full speed in boot and dos mode as for Hybernation mode for computers i hate to tell you if you really understand how that works you would not sit here and say it saves power because it does not 1 it creats a page file ON YOUR HARD DRIVE OF YOUR RAM thus meaning when your computer in in hybernation it needs the CPU in sleep mode or what ever you want to call it the ram is still ACTIVE the HARD DRIVE IS still active but the Spindle is PARKED meaning all these devices are just waiting for you to move the mouse oh yes your mouse and all your usb devices are drawing a max of 500ma per port thus meaning your south bridge is active and waiting for your commands. Standby mode your computer is mostly off e.g monitor , hard drive is in spindown ( parked ) CPU is in sleep mode, some computer fans will be off ( not the PSU FAN.) ram is still running as all your programs are there so i would have to say for Computers it does not save power. what this function was made for so people who did have laptops and run out of power would not loose there work so that when the laptop has power the it will boot and load this page file into mem so all your stuff is there so that is different again to the normal H-Mode because you have Run out of BATT power thus you would use nothing but on a Computer you dont run out over power hence everything is still on yes far less then when your using it but not less the standby. so before been a child and commenting that people know nothing because of english grammer ect. i think you should take a step back and look at a Logical view. Find out how it works for your self. thank you for the instructable not what i was expecting but some of the things you said where right but not all but that is why we have such a site to gain input from other people that may or may not know more so to all the people reading this please remember why this site is here remember why we can write comments to help each other gain more NEED FOR INPUT. thank you.
Apr 3, 2009. 1:50 AMamanjain59 says:
Thats the most needed article in today's world .
http://crossaffairs.blogspot.com
Mar 18, 2009. 2:41 PMIFLATLINEI says:
Hibernation isn't really an option in my opinion simply because when enabled it can soak up quite a bit of ram and degrade processor performance. Which could make your computer slow. This would cause you to be on longer and then in effect use up more energy. Standby is fine and when your going to be gone for long periods of time then simply shut it down.
Feb 5, 2008. 4:46 PMcwid says:
This is incorrect. The operating system on the computer has absolutely nothing to do with its power consumption. It all depends on what hardware you have loaded in the computer. Both Linux and windows can both be run on an extremely wide variety of hardware. Hell you can even run Windows/Linux ON a mac. For example if you have windows on some Bigass gaming rig with 4 graphics cards, double quad core processors, a 12000 rpm 1000 GB hard drive, and a liquid cooling system, it's going to use a hell of a lot more power than a little $400.00 Dell word processing machine. I mean, both would have XP on them, and both could have Linux on them just as easily, but that wouldn't make them use any less or any more power.
Apr 2, 2008. 7:37 AMCOMMODORE64 says:
This information is correct. All depends on what specifications you loads inside.
Jul 5, 2008. 1:56 PMcwid says:
english isn't your first language is it?
Jul 5, 2008. 2:19 PMCOMMODORE64 says:
ASL / ESL actually. ( American Sign Language / English Sign Language ) Should have said " It depends on what requirements the hardwares actually need." Thanks for pointing it out.
Jul 5, 2008. 2:24 PMcwid says:
and the plural of hardware isn't "hardwares"
Nov 30, 2008. 4:53 PMchriskarr says:
No, the plural of 'hardware' may not be 'hardwares', but multiple types of hardware, such as ram chips and hard drives would be hardwares, just like multiple types of cactus would be cactuses. Most people don't realize this, which is why it is red when you type in cactuses (also, instructables doesn't want us to be vague and use multiple types of hardware as a description in our instructables).
Jan 12, 2009. 8:30 PMgeterkikzkid says:
Yeah, such as: "I cut many types of CHEESES." I don't think you can say "Geeses" however. Hmm, 'Geese'? why isn't the plural of mice Meece? oh well.
Jan 12, 2009. 9:12 PMCOMMODORE64 says:
Since when you have some of guts to be sarcastic?
Jul 5, 2008. 3:10 PMCOMMODORE64 says:
fine, "hardware". Happy now? :P
Nov 30, 2008. 4:53 PMchriskarr says:
If you were saying different types of hardware, you were correct. Be happy. Somebody supports you!
Mar 2, 2008. 6:40 PMbeff50 says:
no necessarily, if you use a lower os, then your computer uses less power. and there you go, more energy efficient.
Mar 3, 2008. 2:43 PMcwid says:
Man, what are you talking about? Have YOU ever heard of a "300 watt" OS?
Mar 3, 2008. 5:10 PMbeff50 says:
that isn't what i meant. you don't know what you are talking about. if your computer is working to hard running a massive os like vista, your computer will drag in more electricity to power everything. this is because your fans move faster to cool the cpu, the cpu is doing a lot of calculations. and there are even more factors, like if it fills up your ram, you hard drive has to work harder because the ram is filled, so your computer will even sometimes have to run off part of the hd causing it to run faster drawing in more power. so remember, smaller os=happy pc :D
Mar 4, 2008. 4:20 PMcwid says:
Yeah but running a little fan a few more minutes than normal and and doing a few more calculations with your CPU isn't going to have a substantial effect on how much power your computer is using overall. You can run Vista on a laptop, right? Aren't laptops supposed to use 15 to 45 watts? All I'm saying is that the power comsumption of a computer is NOT determined by what OS it's using, but by what hardware is loaded in it.
Apr 6, 2008. 10:21 PMCOMMODORE64 says:
Laptop, depends, if it is mainstream and low cost, then yes. High end laptop such as alienware or XPS, no. they uses 85 - 95 or maybe more. And beside, i have been running Intel 80486 DX2 ever since, it uses only merely 45W, and the psu is 115w. seriously, the psu has nothing to do about it, it is all depends on hardware's power requirement.
Apr 7, 2008. 1:52 PMcwid says:
OK, it's REALLY misleading to give a ranked list of which op systems are more power effiecient, and in my opinion it's just microsoft hate behind the rankings. The HARDWARE is what's using the power in your computer, not the software
Apr 9, 2008. 5:15 AMCOMMODORE64 says:
Try to use Vista as a example. This os did nothing, but forcing you to upgrade to steeper requirement. XP or older uses older, slower requirement, which it is a good way to leave your old computer on, when you are not using it. The major difference is LCD and CRT. LCD saves lots of energy than CRT, so remember to turn off all monitors or at least put it on standby power.
Mar 5, 2008. 7:41 AMbeff50 says:
ya dandy, and what im saying is that the harder your system works with a massive os there is a tiny little spick in power. you know what. how about i just post an instructable on how to really save power on a computer? will that help?
Feb 5, 2008. 4:49 PMcwid says:
And as a side note, Linux systems are also considered PC's, But can be run on almost anything with a processor.. So technically, Linux can fit into the category of a mac, a PC, and a laptop. And actually, so can PC.
Nov 30, 2008. 4:57 PMchriskarr says:
Just as a side note to a side note, Mac is based off of Linux, that's why they don't just sell the OS for mac, but the whole computers with a backup disk.
Jan 12, 2009. 8:26 PMgeterkikzkid says:
Well, I'm not a Gaia worshiper. But I that DOESN'T mean I will intentionally waste energy. It's good to take care of the environment. Plus saving energy will save money. So reap those benefits and cash. Another methods you can you are to change you lightbulbs and stuff. I think I'll make a tut for those methods I know. If so I'll give credit for sure. BTW, operating systems don't really apply to power usage. Unless you use some stupid power saver settings.
Jul 5, 2008. 2:21 PMCOMMODORE64 says:
I also forgot to mention about mini-itx boards, they uses much less than 60 watt, and probably less watts than the laptop.
May 22, 2008. 12:03 PMlittlechef37 says:
The os your computer uses has little or no affect on your power consumption... however windows is slow. Linux is faster so you can accomplish more in a certain time period thus saving you pennies.... Hibernate is more efficient the stand by because the computer goes completely off where as in standby it uses the least possible amount of electricity your computer can use. such as turning off the hhds, slowing down the fans, turning off the video card..... I use my Lcd Tv for my monitor....
Mar 21, 2008. 3:03 AMGrimdopple says:
cwid, beffs hella right, the power consumptions has alot to do with the os, the harder your computer works just to sustain it self the more energy it uses.
Apr 7, 2008. 2:01 PMcwid says:
buddy, what i'm SAYING is that, sure, the operating system you use does have SOME impact on the power consumption, but it really all comes down to HARDWARE, and this instructable saying that linux uses less power than windows is INCORRECT and it should be CHANGED in order to NOT MISLEAD PEOPLE.
Mar 6, 2008. 5:24 PMshammallamaman says:
Or you could use a program called local cooling that reduces your computer's energy usage!
Feb 26, 2008. 7:58 AMGloria2324 says:
I dont know about a computer saving you money on electricity. But i do know that this thingy i bought like 8 months ago seems to be working for me. its called a Smart Energy SaverSmart Energy Saver you can just plug into any outlet in your house and BAM you will see the meter slow down before your eyes. We have a 3000 sfqt home and we use 3. 2 down stairs and 1 up. Save us about $85-$125 per month depending on the weather and our AC usage. but the product definitely rocks. check it out people. oh and they are only 60 bucks each. http://thesmartenergysaver.com
Jan 11, 2008. 8:52 AMsteve248 says:
Here are some huge power saving that seems not discussed yet. Ever heard of "kill-a-watt"? It is a meter to how much wattage a device use. Try it on your PC when the PC is turned off and you will see the PC is still using power. A PC has a "soft" on-off switch. That means, it has a stand-by power even when it is turned off. Same for LCD monitor and many other device. Hence, I use a master switch to completely turn off electricity to those device. You can use a heavy duty extension cord with a switch. A TV with remote control has stand-by power too. Unplug it if it is not in use for a long time (such as the one in your vacation home, etc..). Standby power is invisible power-sucker, especially on devices that you use only once in a while.
Jan 11, 2008. 5:54 PMvotecoffee says:
Very good point. Another note, if you hibernate your PC versus shutting it down, for you XP and above users, you can power off and save yourself from ungodly boot time. Mac users don't have to worry about this (darn those inefficient Windows OS programmers). : )
Jan 11, 2008. 6:00 PMvotecoffee says:
Creating a system that duel boots to a stripped down OS like 98 with no unneccessary software installed for fast boot when access to just internet access, word processing, can be really handy. Partition a drive with main partition fat32 big enough for win98, second partition winnt, and a third partition, small, of fat32 (for file swaps since 98 doesn't see nt partitions). The first partition should be fat32 because a lot of boot selection software uses fat32 and not nt partitions. Use a boot loader and you can load up xp and all the extras or just that old 98 you had leftover that'll load in a minute. ***do not attempt unless you know what you're ding, changing partitions can erase all of your data in most cases unless using specialized software, and misuse of that can result in the same. if it's your first time, have a local nerd present***
1-40 of 73next »

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
91
Followers
17
Author:guyfrom7up