3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

Self Sufficient Arduino Board

Self Sufficient Arduino Board
«
  • circuitDiagram.jpg
  • arduino2.jpg
  • capacitor.jpg
  • battery1.jpg
  • diode_1N4001.jpg
  • connecter2.jpg
  • final_circuit2.jpg
This is a self sufficient Arduino board, which is powered by harnessing solar power and using a 9V rechargeable battery. It is perfect for anyone who is interested in doing Arduino projects that do not require a computer or any power supply. You can take this to the most remote places for any project.

What you will need:
9V Rechargeable battery
Solar cells (About 11V)
1N4001 diode
100uf 10V capacitor
Arduino board
9V battery connector
Power connector (to connect to the Arduino board)
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
 

Step 1Setting up the Arduino board

Setting up the Arduino board
This is probably the simplest step (please use the schematic as reference for wiring before doing anything else).

Change the jumper of the Arduino board to "EXT"
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
54 comments
1-40 of 54next »
Aug 19, 2011. 10:32 AMthesrikant says:
PLEASE TELL ME THE TOTAL COST FOR MAKING THIS PROJECT
May 26, 2011. 9:15 AMscottinnh says:
I am surprised no one added this, so I will: for a standalone Arduino, I would seriously consider a 3.3 volt board not the standard 5v edition.

Adafruit has a tutorial on converting an Arduino Uno from 5v to 3.3v. There are loads of 3.3v Arduino designs about (including the awesome JeeNode, which fits in a medicine bottle and can last months on a boosted AA battery).
Oct 24, 2007. 3:11 PMLasVegas says:
Your "Direction of flow of electricity" on your schematic is wrong. Electricity flows from negative to positive.
Jul 29, 2010. 4:15 PMbigjeff5 says:
How the electrons move is generally not important at all.

More important is the movement of energy potential.  In an electrical circuit the High energy state to Low energy state moves from the positive terminal to the negative terminal.  The electrons flow directly opposite of that to balance the energy between the positive and negative terminals.

When talking about flow, it's far more useful to use conventional notation because that is actually how the energy moves, even if it's not how the electrons move.

The electrons move in the opposite direction of the electrical energy, which means tracking electron flow is usually pointless.

That's why the conventional method is still taught in electrical engineering, and why the vast majority of books on the subject prefer the conventional method.
Jun 25, 2009. 3:09 PMReCreate says:
oh here we go again with the "Electricity flows from negative to positive." speech <_<
Oct 24, 2007. 3:20 PMprutschman says:
The author is using Conventional current convention
Oct 24, 2007. 4:03 PMLasVegas says:
With the advent of the transistor, this theory was proven wrong and has since been replaced. BTW: I have an old electronics textbook that teaches using this theory. Including the now outdated Fleming's Right-Hand Rule.
Jan 24, 2011. 10:01 AMpythoncoder says:
The realisation that conventional current was "wrong" long predated the invention of the transistor - dating to the discovery of the electron. However engineers had been using conventional current for so long that they decided to continue to use the existing convention. Note the direction of the arrow on the transistor symbol, and also that of the diode: all these symbols are designed around the concept of conventional current.

In semiconductor devices current isn't always carried by electrons - it can be carried by holes which have positive charge so the notion of a "correct" direction independent of the type of carrier is rather weak.

Engineers always use conventional current. I write as a retired electronics design engineer with a lifetime's experience.

Regards, Pete
Oct 24, 2007. 4:37 PMprutschman says:
Electrons flow from negative to positive, true.

The direction of the "flow of electricity," however, is an essentially arbitrary convention. Depending on the medium in question it may be most appropriate to understand what is going on in terms of electron flow (negative to positive) or "hole" flow (positive to negative) in, say, p-type semiconductors. In electrochemical circuits, the interesting portions of the circuit involve ion transport, not bare electron transport, in both directions at once, even for DC.

Conventional current, the flow of positive charge, is not an "incorrect" theory about which directions electrons flow. It is a very well established convention in electrical engineering. It is not wrong to use it.

See this page, for example, for more details.
Oct 24, 2007. 4:55 PMLasVegas says:
I'm sure you're arguing just for the sake of arguing. You can call up as many pages as you wish and it still won't change the fact that electricity moves from negative to positive.

As quoted from the first page you provided: Conventional Current assumes that current flows out of the positive terminal, through the circuit and into the negative terminal of the source. This was the convention chosen during the discovery of electricity. They were wrong!
Jan 25, 2011. 2:51 AMpythoncoder says:
Every electronics engineer is aware that current in wires is carried by electrons, and also that there are various situations in which it is carried by positively charged objects. The notion of "conventional current" is just that - a convention. This is surely elementary stuff taught, if not at school, certainly in the first year of a degree course.

It's a convention which is so universally employed that producing a circuit diagram with the arrows reversed would cause confusion rather than enlightenment.

Regards, Pete
Feb 1, 2008. 3:30 PMgrownupclothes says:
I agree that there is not a right or wrong flow. If I make a circuit that is built around either flow, either will work as long as you are consistent.
Oct 24, 2007. 4:59 PMprutschman says:
I believe that the hyperphysics web site I linked to second is a quite reputable source. You are, of course, free to disagree. You sound like you already have your mind made up that I am wrong, which is fine, but I want other readers to have the chance to make up their own minds. Just be clear that the flow of electricity is not the same thing as the flow of electrons, as my examples pointed out.
Apr 1, 2010. 7:49 AMkonto89 says:
 hi,

would a 12v  200mA solar panel be enough?

konto89
Oct 24, 2007. 1:05 PMkrowney says:
Very cool project. I've been wanting to use this myself for some time. What's the capacitor for? Is it to even out fluctuations in the voltage? I'm new to electronics and am just trying to understand stuff that doesn't make sense. I'm sure its correct, just trying to "get it".
May 23, 2011. 10:29 PMqwerty156 says:
Actually, the battery anyway absorbs the current spikes and lows so the capacitor isnot needed at all.
Feb 6, 2010. 12:02 PMLenny24 says:
Good Project. I Think you dont need the Cap. My Arduino (Duemilanove) Has Smoothing-Capacitors  "On Board".

Greets
Sep 5, 2011. 1:02 PMwakojako says:
I'm late but I think he means to smooth the flow of electricity if the batteries arn't charged and the sun keeps going behind clouds not smooth the flow of battery power. I think it just improves the overall performance a bit.
Sep 27, 2011. 8:02 AMwakojako says:
Thanks
Oct 24, 2007. 9:51 AMSpritegeezer says:
Great project. This was part of project I'm working on and now it's done. Many thanks.
Oct 18, 2009. 3:46 AMzerOne says:
Hi

Nice Project. 
But one question, how big should the Solar-Panel be to charge the battery ?
Can it also be to big and overcharge?

zerOne

 
Jan 9, 2008. 3:29 AMbooyaa says:
I can't access the PDF on your website, I keep getting the following error: HTTP Error 401.2 - Unauthorized: Access is denied due to server configuration. Internet Information Services (IIS)
Jul 29, 2009. 6:40 PMandresleon says:
Hello... i am also getting the same IIS error... it seems that permissions for that file, or folder, have been set to deny access to anonymous user. The whole site, for that matter, appears to have been set this way. Any chance you could repost this document again? Thanks again! Wonderful project!
Oct 24, 2007. 6:34 AMfishhead455 says:
Just a quick question(s): Are you sure the flow of electricity is in the direction you indicated? Is the diode oriented correctly? Electrons flow from negative to positive while holes flow from positive to negative...looks like you are using both theories, which makes it a bit confusing to a person who does not study electron/hole flow. Great project though...not knocking a thing, just looking for a bit of clarification. Keep up the great work and thanks.
Jul 3, 2009. 10:09 PMiwansuryo says:
Can you recommend which solar panel that can be used for this appliction? Maybe one from Solarbotics? I need it to make sure. Thanks
Oct 24, 2007. 5:55 AMKiteman says:
Oh, serendipity! This Instructable has arrived in perfect time to help with my latest project.

So, I have questions:

The only programmable chip I have any experience with is the picaxe system. Will this 'ible work for a picaxe board as well?

The one I own runs off 4.5V (3xAA batteries in a pack), so would I be correct to assume that I should replace the 9V cell in your circuit with 3 rechargeable AA cells?
Jul 3, 2009. 9:52 PMiwansuryo says:
Can you recommend to me, where can I buy the solar panel at online shop, which exactly match to your specification? Maybe you can choose one from SolarBotics store, http://www.solarbotics.com/solar_cells/

Thank you very much. It is very useful.
Feb 1, 2009. 9:52 AMacidhax says:
Where is a good place to pick up solar sells for cheap? :)
Feb 6, 2009. 2:03 PMamando96 says:
the neighbours solar garden lamps :) it's free!
Jun 25, 2009. 3:07 PMReCreate says:
Laugh out loud! ;)
1-40 of 54next »

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
7
Followers
1
Author:p2man(p2man)