Here's a video of that. The debris is good for illustration of the water flow, but next I'll have to get a filter to get it out of there.
http://youtu.be/VQHR0XhijPo
This is my version of a solar hot tub heater. The other Instructables I've read circulate the water through the heater using a mechanical pump. However, my system is based on a thermosiphon, in which passive heat exchange occurs through natural convection: Cold water falls down from the bottom of the hot tub into the solar heater. Warm water rises out of the heater & back up to the hot tub. This design works great for my situation since I wanted to position my heater below the level of the hot tub. Usually these heaters are mounted on the roof above the tub. But a tree shades my roof since I don't want it to be hot in the summer. It's June 12 in Omaha, & I still don't have AC in the cottage I'm building. So that's the tricky thing: If you want a thermosiphon effect, your tub has to be higher than your solar heat collector.
This here is my second try on the design of the collector. Coiling a garden hose round & round didn't create a thermosiphon, and THANKS to your comments and info gained from the failure, I'm using 1-1/4-inch rigid PVC in place of the garden hose. Also, I don't have the box tilted at 30 degrees anymore. Now it is lying flat on a gentle sloped bit of lawn with a just brick under the highest edge, so it's close to flat, but not completely.
Please read the excellent comments below for explanation on how the thermosiphon pump works.
Materials:
- PVC tubes, elbows & Ts & glue
- Stuff to build the box. I used 2 pallets & some 2x lumber
- Sheet of rigid insulation
- Black garbage bag
- Silicone caulk
- Concrete blocks
- Black spray paint
Remove these ads by
Signing Up




































Visit Our Store »
Go Pro Today »




You would need to have a constant upward grading to obtain a natural flow, and that is not really possible with a looping system like that. But the idea is good!
I actually designed almost the exact same system. If you want to do it for a bit cheaper, try using irrigation tubing rather than a hose. The cost is a huge difference, although it is a bit less flexible and requires a bit more time and care to make.
That being said. You can buy some cheap little pumps that would work, and it is not hard to modify a submersion pump to act as an in-line pump.
So you've got maybe ten turns, each with a foot or two of head., that's ten-twenty feet of head, total.
So the head on the loops is higher than the head of the pipe to the hot tub. That will stop it drawing.
If you lay the collector flat it should start though.
The problem was that the heat collector tube was in a "N" shape when it should have been in an "Z" shape. Hot water pooled at the top of the "N" and stopped the flow. He turned the collector 90 degrees and it worked OKAY.
The glass front box is not needed. Just fake down the hose in a single layer flat coil between two "X"s of 1"x4" laying flat on the ground in a sunny spot and attach the hose ends to the bottom of the tub.
You will have plenty of thermosiphon action in minutes.
Cover the tub with a piece of foam core or bubble wrap plastic.
The greater the distances between them the better it will work. It's the ratio of water density to height, The colder the water the more it's density increases - there is more water in a given volume, and the hotter the water gets, the more it expands and the less water there is in a given volume.
The the higher the column of cold water and the colder the column of cold water, the greater it will push downwards. And inversely the same effect for hot water - relative to the cold water. The higher the column of hot water and the hotter the water gets, the less it will push downwards.
This is the ratio of pressure for thermosyphoning.
The Thermo syphoning is LOW powered pumping but the energy input from the sun is still the same, meaning the water will run slower than using a "big pump", but it will come out hotter. Same energy input though.
Faster pumping = less temperature rise per unit of water, slower pumping = higher temperature rise per unit of water.
A glass front IS needed because it retains much of the heat that would be lost to radiation and convection from the coil it's self.
Thermosyphoning - this is like having a water tank at the top of a rise, and a water tank at the bottom of the rise - with the hot tub being the top tank and the lower tank being the heater. The tanks are connected by two pipes - top to top and bottom to bottom.
The greater the difference in height, the greater the pumping effect will be with the water density and pumping effect - from the differences in water density.
As far as the heater goes, as long as you can get the waters cold input to be a little lower than the heaters hot output, that will start the water flow, it's after this that the pumping due to the water pressure and height differences between the hot tub and the heater kick in....
And am I understanding correctly that I want to raise the hot tub as far over the heater as possible?
Living in sunny Queensland I have come across several homemade water heaters and coolers from the one system! Black is not only a great absorber of heat. It is also the best "color" to radiate heat.
In the colder months the water is either thermo siphoned or pumped to the roof during the day, heating the water. This system is turned off mid afternoon. A solar blanket helps prevent heat loss over the cool nights. During summer, when swimming in the pool is like swimming in a warm bath, the warm water is pumped to the roof at night and the black pipe dissipates the heat in the cooler night temperatures.
Now I'm draining the tub & have an idea for a rebuild that probably will involve having the solar collector right next to & below the hot tub instead of 20 feet away, making a cover for the tub, possibly adding a recirculation pump, possibly solar, and of course changing the coil configuration.
What I'm picturing is maybe 2" pvc serpentining back & forth & all sloped at such an angle as to let the hot water rise. At one point I had a ladder arrangement in mind. I'm not sure how it would work. digitalia mentioned internal resistance. I'd love to have someone elaborate on what that means.
And do you all think a ladder, with 2 rigid tubes running vertically and "rungs" going across between them using T fittings would improve the thermosiphon or if the variations in volume would work against me.
My intuition says an opening on each side of the rung into a vertical tube for the hot water to rise up would decrease internal resistance, but I'm not sure.
Thanks for all your comments. I'll let you know how it's going.
I made a solar heater for my hot tub too, and I do not mean to take away from your hard work but you might find my experiences helpful to you.
I will skip the evolution of the design, but my final one had a 12 volt "live well pump" hooked up to a solar panel that would circulate the water through 120 feet of 1/2" PEX tubing (it was stuff that I had, your garden hose will probably work better if you continue to use it).
It provided an 8 degree temp rise at about 2 GPM. I used a 30 watt solar panel which worked fine and it was another thing laying around here so I didn't go out and buy it.
Anyway, it worked pretty good especially if you put the cover on the hot tub you could get it uncomfortably warm.
So if you have an extra solar panel laying around go buy a cheap pump, my first ones were just a wal mart 12V bilge pump for $12 ish that I dropped in the hot tub. Connect that to one end of the hose and the hot water will come out the other end regardless of your orientation.
Again, nice work and write up!
A
I was really glad to find your instructions. I searched the web for exactly this thing.
So, I thank you very much.
However then, a few minutes later, I found details on what I believe is called "Thermal conductivity" in English.
Copper has 399 W/(m · K) while Polyethylene (is that the material of your hose?) has 35 W/(m · K)
This means, assuming your hose material is as thick as a regular copper pipe (1 mm), less than a tenth of the lenght in copper could absorb the same amount of energy in the same time.
Over here, in Germany, the price ratio of copper pipe against a PE hose (food quality) is about 10:1
The same construction built with copper pipes might be cheaper or at least more efficient.
In addition: I do not know whether PE ages. Copper prices increase year by year. in 20 years, when you do not need this construction any moore, the scrap copper may be still valueable.
What do you think about this?
Friedhelm
http://www.wachtelbauer.de
http://www.builditsolarblog.com/2012/03/dougs-solar-projects.html
http://www.youtube.com/user/sundug69
However, a SLIGHT modification, and it SHOULD work.
Lay the collector flat on the ground. Start coiling from the outside, and for each coil inward, raise the coil a little. Making the Hotput the highest point in the collector, and the Coldput the lowest.
Redesigning for the back and forth IS going to be your most efficient design though, as it will maximize temperature differential between hot and cold, AND you can adjust the collector angle for maximum solar gain.
I'm not sure how well this will work for a hottub though.
It would do well, in a sunny area, for an outdoor shower, for sure.