Firepistons seem so high tech that it's hard to believe they were not developed at MIT or Carnegie Melon under a top secret DARPA contract with unlimited funding. Since the firepiston is also given credit for Rudolf Diesel's invention of his Diesel engine it is quite surprising that the firepiston was not invented by Diesel himself or by one of his contemporaries or the likes of Ben Franklin and other European and American pyro based device inventors of the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries.
What historians note is that the firepiston was most likely invented in conjunction with the invention of the blow gun by prehistoric South East Asians since firepistons are normally found in the possession of those who use blowguns. The need to dislodge the internal partitions at each connecting joint inside a length of bamboo by ramming a rod or piston through the membrane, and in the course of doing so, rapidly compressing the air thereby setting dust particles or the membrane alight, is the reasoning behind co-invention.
I was so amazed at the technology and the science behind it that after building my own firepiston to prove to myself that the science and technology was real I could not resist sharing the science, technology and construction of my first firepiston with you by creating this instructable.
Here then is a description of how to make your own working firepiston to see first hand for yourself that the science and technology do in fact work. I left lots of room for improvement in materials, workmanship and degree of completeness for possible use in the field, if going beyond a demonstration is what you want to do.
Remove these ads by
Signing UpStep 1: So how does a firepiston work, anyway?
The principle of increasing temperature by method of compressing air is explained by the Adiabatic process in which the internal energy of a gas must increase when a mass of air is rapidly compressed (or the volume of space containing a mass of air is rapidly decreased). The resulting increase in internal energy results in a rise in the temperature of air sufficient to light an ember, just like the pressure produced by an ice skater's blade is sufficient to increase the internal energy of the ice, which turns ice under the blade into water.
You can envision the effect in a 2D graph (below) with pressure as the ordinate (vertical) and volume as the abscissa (horizontal) and the adiabat or curve of constant entropy as the inverse relation curve. (Black lines are the curves of constant entropy.)
Rapid compression by a factor of 25 to 1 produces sufficient internal energy to send the air temperature to 800 degrees Fahrenheit. This temperature is sufficient to ignite a piece of char cloth for use in kindling a fire.
After several tries and some fine tuning (better sealing with more lubricant) I was able to produce embers with char twine using the apparatus I constructed.













































Visit Our Store »
Go Pro Today »




by all means continue to feed your mind better things then drugs and Challenge current technology make it bettermake new ! (lol my life in some old folks home may be much better by you doing it lol)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xp3gIpKnswQ
You just crank the engine over and then flick the decompression lever...causing the engine to rapidly compress air causing heat...
and it's never failed me. It did, however, take me a long time to learn how to turn that ember into a roaring blaze. I've never had problems lighting a fire, but I was accustomed to using flint and steel, or ferrocerium rods.
Any suggestions on natural tinder for fire pistons though? all I've ever used is char-cloth.
The first is to calculate the pressure change due to the compression ratio (or volume change)
p2 / p1 = (v1 / v2) (gamma)
Knowing that you can then use the second formula which relates pressure change to temperature change.
T2 / T1 = (p2 / p1) ( (gamma - 1) /gamma)
"Gamma" is just a number that depends on the gas. For air, at standard conditions, it is 1.4. (this is a simplification)
For the full workout go to http://wright.nasa.gov/airplane/compexp.html.
Now obviously this has some simplifications, but it should get you a good approximation. Plus their breakdown is for pistons in general which is good.
BTW Temperature is in Kelvin. Using the above equations and with the following:
Compression ratio of 25:1; initial temperature of 25c. The final temperature will be equal to 807c...pretty hot.
Just for one simplification that anyone with some algebra could understand involving why it gets so hot.
Use the formula PV=nRT
Where P = atmospheric pressure. V = volume of gas (air). n = atoms of gas in mols. R = gas costant .0821 and T = Temperature in kelvin.
Keeping in mind P, n, and R remain the same anyone can determine T with simple algebra.
You can use suggestion or not it's still a good guide.
I was just trying to ask how accurate 'my method' would be?
And you know. So, right, thanks.
Hydraulic ram