3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

Surround Sound from Stereo

Surround Sound from Stereo
This instructable describes how I converted stereo into surround sound using my decoder and two satellite speakers. The goal is to extend "home theater" surround sound experience to any place with quality and simplicity. Works great with all stereo equipment including TVs.

You will need the following items to convert stereo into surround sound:
1 Surround Sound Decoder Kit
2 Satellite speakers (4 - 8 Ohm, about 3 Watt nominal power). Almost any type of speaker works: Computer speakers, satellite speakers, small speakers, big speakers, etc.
Cables to connect satellite speakers
Pliers, cutters, and heat gun to strip and terminate cables

 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
 

Step 1Choose place for satellite speakers and prepare cables

Choose place for satellite speakers and prepare cables
The satellite speakers should create a trapezoid, rectangle or square shape with the front speakers. Two short cables are needed to connect amplifier output with the decoder and two long cables are needed to connect satellite speakers to decoder.
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
26 comments
Jun 24, 2010. 11:34 PMrb118 says:
This is cool! What about center channel?
May 28, 2010. 8:48 PMcomputer_freak_8 says:
What do you mean? Digital systems are inherently more linear than analog; besides that, the sound you hear is analog, whether or not the processing equipment is digital.
Jun 1, 2010. 10:40 AMcomputer_freak_8 says:
What is a "Passive ABC decoder", other than a term you invented?
Jun 2, 2010. 3:33 PMcomputer_freak_8 says:
Yes, I know what "passive" means, and I know what "decoder" means; but I cannot find anywhere that there is a type of decoder that's passive and known as an "ABC" variant.

Others following this discussion: run a Google search for "abc passive decoder", "passive abc decoder", or "abc decoder circuit". The quotes are needed for it to search for the phrase (rather than just containing all three on the same page).

I still can't find any, which leads me further to believe that this is simply a Hafler circuit (or some variant thereof) in a box, and thus incapable of "decoding" anything apart from the difference of the left and right channels.

To RRC: So, how do I make a sound play on the one of the rear speakers, but not any of the other three, via this Instructable?
May 31, 2010. 1:55 PMGooru says:
"Spurious free dynamic range..."??? Do you make this up as you go along?
Jun 1, 2010. 10:33 AMcomputer_freak_8 says:
No, RRC is using real terminology. It's just not anywhere close to being used properly.
Jun 1, 2010. 9:01 PMGooru says:

My apologies... I didn't make myself clear.  "Spurious free dynamic range" is a valid term when dealing with the fidelity of an analog to digital conversion (not DAC as RRC suggests).  It has absolutely nothing to do with this particular circuit.  There is nothing "digital" about it, and using the term here is a smoke screen. 

Jun 18, 2010. 9:06 PMGooru says:
More smoke....
Jun 1, 2010. 10:43 AMcomputer_freak_8 says:
I stand corrected: "Passive ABC decoder" is not a real term. At least, if it is, then Google is running behind...
Mar 27, 2010. 8:26 PMGooru says:
Sorry, but this is "pseudo" surround sound.  If you want to see how the really works, look for the article titled "Simulated Surround Sound".
May 28, 2010. 8:33 PMcomputer_freak_8 says:
Two questions:
1. What do you mean by the appropriate "recording"?
2. What encoding does this device "decode"?
May 25, 2010. 2:34 PMGooru says:
No sir, it is not "true 360 degree" sound.  That requires at least one and preferably two discrete signals for the rear channels.  With your setup, some component of the left and/or right signal will always exist in the other channels.  At best, this device will widen the stereo field, but it can never derive a discrete sound source from the existing two channels of audio.
Jun 1, 2010. 10:31 AMcomputer_freak_8 says:
This makes no sense whatsoever. If it is encoded, it will require decoding. Like you said, "set of formulas". Very ambiguous; not useful for me to know how I need to "encode" my audio to have it "decoded" by this Instructable. Probably because it doesn't really "decode" anything, (at least not in the sense that I normally hear that word used) other than what's already there: the stereo signal. It's not like it carries any "extra" data, is it? Is this device compatible with four discrete channels? If so, please correct me.

Since your device is passive, my guess is that it's simply a Hafler circuit, no?
For others following this discussion, look here and here. If I understand correctly, RRC's box is simply a pre-wired Hafler circuit (or a variant thereof). Essentially, it would me the "rear" channels are just the difference of the left and right stereo ("front") channels.
Aug 10, 2009. 8:15 PMHarleyDK says:
I once saw a schematic of a 5.1 surround processor, and there the rear fill was the difference in output on front-speakers, so you could just use an amplifier with common negative, and hook the rear fill up in parallel to the positive output from your amp. I have used the system myself, and got a pretty good sound impression when I first saw T2
Jul 26, 2009. 11:30 PMsrhadaham says:
so does it have the proper delays that surround sound uses to create depth?

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
1
Followers
2
Author:RRC
Electronics expert