Print PDF
Favorite
Email
I work in Assistive Technology, which is technology designed to help people with disabilities stay independent.
We encountered a man who had quadriplegia due to a motor vehicle accident. He had a little motion in one hand and wanted to use a computer, but he could not use a regular mouse. If he could use the computer, he could go online, surf the internet, research whatever struck his fancy, chat with other people, email, etc. - it would open a lot of doors for him and greatly increase his standard of living. We tried a commercially available joystick mouse, and he could use it successfully. The problem was cost: the commercial model was $550 (since then, it has dropped to $400 ) which neither he nor his family could afford.
I built a joystick mouse for him out of a USB gamepad and arcade machine components. This mouse had two features lacking in the commercial model: 1) It could launch programs or commands, greatly increasing the efficiency of computer use 2) it could talk, giving auditory feedback regarding which button was pressed, as he could not move his head to look at his hands.
We have since used descendants of the first joystick mouse with several people who had cerebral palsy or other conditions that made traditional computer use difficult. The cost to build one of these is about $45.
We encountered a man who had quadriplegia due to a motor vehicle accident. He had a little motion in one hand and wanted to use a computer, but he could not use a regular mouse. If he could use the computer, he could go online, surf the internet, research whatever struck his fancy, chat with other people, email, etc. - it would open a lot of doors for him and greatly increase his standard of living. We tried a commercially available joystick mouse, and he could use it successfully. The problem was cost: the commercial model was $550 (since then, it has dropped to $400 ) which neither he nor his family could afford.
I built a joystick mouse for him out of a USB gamepad and arcade machine components. This mouse had two features lacking in the commercial model: 1) It could launch programs or commands, greatly increasing the efficiency of computer use 2) it could talk, giving auditory feedback regarding which button was pressed, as he could not move his head to look at his hands.
We have since used descendants of the first joystick mouse with several people who had cerebral palsy or other conditions that made traditional computer use difficult. The cost to build one of these is about $45.
Remove these ads by
Signing UpStep 1Materials and Tools
Materials:
Wood, about 7" wide and 1/4" thick
Paint, Wood glue
(1) USB gamepad (I have had good success buying cheapies from eBay or other places - we will be destroying it in the process so don't buy the most expensive).
(1) competition joystick (happ.com is a good supplier too, but more expensive)
(6) competition pushbuttons (happ.com is more expensive here too)
(4) #10 1/2" wood screws (or metal screws)
(7) #8 or #6 1.5" Wood screws
(20) 0.187" Female Quick Disconnect Crimp Connectors
300" (25 feet) 24-28-gauge hookup wire (old CAT-5 cable works beautifully with the jacket removed)
12x12" square solid foam shelf liner
Tools:
Drill
Dremel with micro drill bit (e.g. 0.0260")
1.125" hole saw (for drill)
Table Saw / regular saw for woodworking
Needlenose Pliers
diagonal-cutting pliers (dykes)
Sandpaper
Soldering Iron and solder
Wire strippers
Helping hands
Wire crimp tool
Hot air gun
Hot glue gun
Software:
AutoHotkey (Windows only, similar automation software exists for Mac / Linux)
| « Previous Step | Download PDFView All Steps | Next Step » |
They can program both keyboard and mouse. JoyToKey is free, but Xpadder costs 5 dollars for each latest version.
This can also be used for MAME cabinets as well, except you use it for a MAME cabinet instead. Most MAME cabinet instructions are a bit vague when describing how to put the joystick together, so this actually kills two birds with one stone...
We have been puzzled by the economies of scale issue ourselves. However, this is true for most of Assistive Technology - much of the commercial equipment is insanely expensive (it is not hard to find things in the $5000+ price bracket). This is sad, because most people with disabilities don't have a lot of money (or the money they do have goes for therapies, medicines, etc.) It may have to do with being classed as a "medical device" or something - apparently there is 10x-20x jump in price if something is classed as medical or therapeutic.
Great work shadowwynd!
I've been a AAC (Augmentative & Alternative Communication) technologists for almost 10 years.
From what I've seen is that the companies that don't charge enough don't survive. To be effective their product must:
1.) Be strongly made.
2.) Good support must be offered.
3.) Solid research & development must be on going.
Take DynaVox as an example. They are still in business after all these years!
I was thinking you could probably use the board out of a USB numeric keypad for this instead of a game controller. That way you wouldn't need any 3rd party software; you could just turn on mousekeys in Windows.
Two notes, though:
1) For our original user, it would still need additional software to tell him what was pressed because he couldn't move his head to see his hand. For someone who didn't need this, the keypad would work great, especially if they didn't need variable speed.
2) There exists the possibility of blocking keys due to simultaneous presses. A keyboard is designed for very fast sequential presses, but doesn't work well if multiple keys are pressed at the same time. A keyboard uses a matrix to of rows and columns to detect key presses. If the right multiple keys are pressed, other input is ignored. For instance, open a text editor. Hold down the "A" and "S" keys simultaneously. Then try typing "W" or "X" while holding the "A" and "S" keys down - most keyboards won't do it because the same column is still selected. A numeric keypad would be the same.
A joystick normally has each button go to a separate pin on the microcontroller. This means that all the buttons can be used independent of the others (they can all be held down and one could be toggled successfully). For *this* project it shouldn't make a difference due to the limitations of the user. For some projects (for instance, if you were using a joystick board as an interface to a bank of switches) this property becomes important.
While making something "self-serviceable" is bad practice in mass production I consider it a must in "good quality"
But either way it is a good ible just the same.
I would prefer to see more mass-produced things be self-serviceable, myself.