Learning Objective
By designing, building and testing the weight capacity of bridges constructed from craft sticks, students will grasp a key engineering concept: the truss. Allowing students to bodily participate during the weight test will promote insight into the meaning of material efficiency. Pattern recognition and motor skills will also be developed as students construct their bridge.
Video of the project plan:
Remove these ads by
Signing UpStep 1Materials and tools
- Craft sticks (at least 100 per student)
- 4” cable ties (at least 15 per student)
- Mini hi-temp glue guns
- Hot glue sticks
- Alternative: use tacky or white glue
- Cardboard or newspaper to protect work surface
- Hanging scale
- Strong cord/rope/etc
- Carbine hook or similar device
- Truss bridge patterns (attached PDF or download image)
RetailMeNot.com offers reliable coupon codes for S&S Worldwide.
The retail giant Micheal’s sells miniature hi-temp glue guns for about $2.50 each. Sometimes my local Dollar Tree sells packs of 20 glue sticks for $1.00. The rope, cable ties and hook can be purchased at a hardware store, or Target.
The total cost of each bridge ranges from $0.50 to $1.50 with an average cost of about $0.75 when materials are purchased in bulk quantities, plus about $20 for the one-time purchase of the scale setup.
Truss brudge pattern.pdf225 KB| « Previous Step | Download PDFView All Steps | Next Step » |












































Something I'd appreciate (as a physicist) would be some of the mathematics to let students actually calculate the forces, and make a guess as to how much weight their bridge "should" hold (and then test that hypothesis with their butts on the line :-).
Since forces decompose linearly, in principle the students could do the math by hand, with only arithmetic (give them values of sin/cos 30, 60, 45 to use, to avoid the scariness of "trig").
I could imagine an introductory session where they measure
Then, once they have a truss built, take a uniform load and distribute it across the top (or worse, a point load at the center!). Draw force arrows to show how the load (a) pushes on the horizontal top members, and (b) runs down the diagonals to the bottom. The latter is where those sines and cosines come in, which you could "just give" to a younger class.
Don't forget the upward force arrows at the endpoints where the bridge is supported. On some members, you'll have arrows going in both directions, and the students get to learn about tension vs. compression, as well as bending.
Where the arrows meet at the bottom, you've got net forces on the glue joints, and possibly (depending on the design) unbalanced net bending forces on the horizontal members.
Can the joints hold up, based on the earlier measurements? As you add more weight, will the bridge fail at joints, or fail within members?
Then go and test the predictions. I suspect that it might even be possible to get within a factor of two or so between calculation and reality (allowing for measurement error, variations in glue joints, etc.), which is not bad.
With regards to kelseymh comment, I would rather have young engineers be exposed to and grasp the concepts of stress, strain, stiffness and strength in addition to the different loading conditions and their interaction/coupling. The development of a students ability to interpret and draw graphs (stress/strain) and diagrams (free body diagrams) to explain and understand property relations and loading conditions are of much greater value than simplified calculations that 'can' predict failure. Doing basic experiments to explain these properties and the governing mathematical relations would be of great value. Whilst the student gains knowledge of these concepts, their ability to intuitively build upon and improve previous designs will grow. Learning from failure, especially during experimentation, is crucial in the development of an engineer's problem solving abilities.
Finally, I have a great appreciation for the efforts taken in education of young people in the fields of mathematics, science and engineering, with commend your initiative and endeavour.
Good luck in the Teacher Contest.