Instructables
Picture of The Concept Of Sound Pressure (SPL)
Have you ever been told to turn the volume down on your music?  Have you ever wondered why when something is loud it is said to have more volume?  In this instructable I hope to clear up some major misconceptions about sound, and hopefully help you understand how sound works.

This instructable is more of a how it works as opposed to a how to. Once you understand how it works, it is much easier to learn the how to.

Please note that I am constructing this from a sound engineer's point of view. Most of the content is theory, so please keep that in mind when you read this.

If you haven't read my first instructable "How Sound Works" yet, I suggest you read it first.  You can find it here: http://www.instructables.com/id/How-Sound-Works/
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: What is sound pressure?

Picture of What is sound pressure?
Sound Pressure Level is normally abbreviated SPL.  SPL is calculated in decibels or db.  Please note that db is a relative term.  It can refer to almost anything, however, the most well known is SPL.  Most of the time when someone is talking about db, they are probably referring to SPL.

Step 2: The difference between Sound Pressure and Volume

Picture of The difference between Sound Pressure and Volume
The human ear hears pressure, not volume.  The difference between sound pressure and volume is that the closer that to the source of the sound, the more pressure you will hear.  The farther away you get from the source of the sound, the pressure will be less, but the volume will be the same.  A good analogy would be a faucet.  At the top of the faucet where the water comes out, there is more pressure than at the bottom, but the volume of water is the same.  (See picture)

One thing to remember with SPL is that as you turn the pressure up, you generally also increase the volume. Volume does affect sound, even though it does not directly affect how we perceive how loud something is. One of the main characteristics of a professional speaker is that it can produce more pressure with less volume than a consumer speaker can.
dog digger2 years ago
I estimated that my full pa system can output 134db!
thegeeke (author)  dog digger2 years ago
Just don't destroy anyone's hearing! ;) The thing I don't like about professional audio techs mixing rock concerts is that they seem like they have more pressure than they actually do (there are ways to do that with the EQ), so the amateur techs think that they just have to turn everything up and it will sound professional... little do they know they are destroying everyone's hearing! (That's my little rant and rave... forgive me!) :)
I do think most concerts are way too loud but it's worse when the gear can't handle it and it sounds terrible!
I think most music is too loud today. I'd rather ditch my Logitech 40 watt speaker system for a 3 watt a channel tube amp and decent speakers any day!
thegeeke (author)  dog digger2 years ago
I couldn't agree more! :)
tzion_xd2 years ago
kiteman, relax bro whats wrong with you its just a pic. Nobody looks at the pic anyway we look at the information and as far as I see it. Thegeeke did a great job thanx bro !! :)
thegeeke (author)  tzion_xd2 years ago
Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed it! :)

I do understand where he's coming from... As someone who does AV as a side job, I do fuss a lot with copyrights, and I doubt he would have made a big deal about it if I didn't put the copyright step in. Also, when I first started publishing ibles, I didn't think of specifically stating that I didn't claim copyright to the images, so it made it seem as if I did claim copyright to them. I am grateful to a few ibles members (I think kiteman was one of them) who originally pointed that out. :)

Thanks again! :)
Kiteman3 years ago
Such a big fuss about copyright, one assumes you have permission from the creators of all those images?

(And that's aside from the fact that copyright is covered by the type of license you choose to publish under.)

(Fun fact - if you stand next to a Shuttle-scale launch, the sound will kill you before the flames do.)
thegeeke (author)  Kiteman3 years ago
Those images are stock photos. They were found on public sights with public domain. (As far as I could tell.) (All the photos except the sink... which I took myself) And although copyright is covered under the license, until I published an instructable I never realized that there even was a usage license. Now because I made a point of it, there isn't any excuse.

Regarding the shuttle-scale... yes... I was aware of that, I believe that anything over 200 db SPL is fatal. (I remember being told that at one point... I have never actually tested it out...) ;)

I've only looked at the first one, but sound-mixer-02.jpg is Copyright 2009 © Pacific Disturbance - how did you miss that?

L
thegeeke (author)  lemonie3 years ago
First of all, I didn't get that image from that site. The site I got it from had no mention of copyright. Secondly, I saw copyright claimed for that site, but not for the image. More than likely they got it from the same place I did. That image is pretty common. Also, I got that image 5 years ago... which predates that copyright. Although I only used it in an instructable about a month ago when I published my first instructable on sound, I have used that image for years. (Granted, I haven't had all of those images that long, but it is true for the first image.)

I have no intention of stealing intellectual property, so if you can send me a link or screen shot of the place where you are seeing a valid copyright on any of those images, I will gladly take a picture myself to replace it. :)
"The site I got it from had no mention of copyright."

So how do you know you were allowed to use it? It is the nature of copyright law that all original works are automatically granted protection, whether it is explicitly mentioned or not. License to use a work must be granted. The lack of a visible note or © symbol does not mean that there are no copyright issues.
thegeeke (author)  Kiteman3 years ago
No, it does not exclude the possibility, but I got it off of a stock image site, so without any mention, it implies that you can use it.

Which stock-image site - point us please.
Please appreciate that without citing your image sources, in stamping step 6 on this you are effectively trying to claim the image as your intellectual property.

L
thegeeke (author)  lemonie3 years ago
The site is no longer in business... :( I have to say... it was the best deal around... $30 a year! The site was www.stockmedia.com.

Good point about claiming the images in step 6... I will specifically edit that and address it.

I actually remember stockmedia from the past, thanks!

L
thegeeke (author)  lemonie3 years ago
No problem... I was actually thinking... "this is going to sound pretty stupid..." so I'm glad someone remembered that site.

What do you think of the edit I made to step 6? Does it state it clearly enough? I really do appreciate you mentioning that... I should have put that in from the beginning. Thanks!

I never bother with things like step 6, as you've picked your license at the point of publishing.

L
thegeeke (author)  lemonie3 years ago
But unless you've published an instructable, you probably wouldn't know that there even is a license on instructables... I know I didn't. Do you agree with that, or do you think pretty much everyone does know about that?
If you're responsible enough to use the internet, you should be aware that all information, data and images you see online automatically belong to somebody else, and it is a breach of copyright to use them without first checking the status of the license.

I don't know about the US, but UK children are taught that at school.
thegeeke (author)  Kiteman2 years ago
The US school system is so messed up that the kids in public school these days are probably taught how to illeagly download music in their computer class! And then their parents wonder why their public schooled kids can't even get their foot in the door at college, but homeschoolers are accepted to whatever college they apply to!

(It's not a good idea to get me started on the US school system!) ;)

Well you should read things before clicking buttons, some people do, others don't.
I partially agree with you.

L
thegeeke (author)  lemonie3 years ago
I agree that you should read first, BUT, the icon for the license is so small, I never even noticed it before I published an ible.
... for a fee.
"Stock" is not the same as "copyright free", "free use", "open license" or "creative commons". Stock photo companies get their income from people who pay to use their images.

BobS3 years ago
Better remove step 6....

I once heard the dB value of a nuclear bomb going off 1 m away (the standard distance to measure?) is 268 dB...

One more advice to everyone: don't ever take a dB meter to a party! everyone wants to test it so it guarantees a police visit!!!
thegeeke (author)  BobS3 years ago
Do you still think I should remove it after the edit I made to it? I'm not aware of a "standard" distance to measure... at least not for pro-audio. You would generally take measurements in a lot of spots in the area you are mixing in. Although the inverse square rule is good to know if you're short on time, I never rely on it if I can avoid it. Sound is effected by EVERYTHING. (Such as how many people are in a room, the humidity, tempature, just to name a few!) Therefore, I am constantly training volenteers on how to take SPL readings... and having them taking readings on every night. Also, it will give indications on how to position your speakers. I have the ability to visulize how sound waves will interact with the enviorment, but it's always nice to double check it with a meter.

Regarding bringing a meter to a party, there is a simple way to deal with that: use it discreatly, and just say no if someone wants to play with it. It's a tool, not a toy. I like to bring it with me incase the cops do show up. That way I can prove that I'm inocent. (Much against common misconception, those of us who work for the government are not imune to the law!) ;)

I appoligize for any spelling errors, I don't have spell check on my droid, and I'm a terrible speller.