The Conetenna - a wi-fi antenna by Shadetree Engineer
Featured
Finished.jpg
Using parts from previous wi-fi antennas I have built, I attempt to create a monster antenna, yet only to wind up with an ordinary cantenna wave-guide with funnel attachement.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Harebrained idea

DSCN1981.JPG
I saw some info on how to make a Patch Style antenna for 802.11 networks.

I thought if one director was good, maybe more would be better. So I used the dimensions from the patch antenna to determine an aperture for a conical wave-guide, this so that I could use my fire-extinguisher based cantenna as a wave-guide feed. The patch directions recommend going to a store like a dollar store for a lid. I happened to find some cutting boards that were just big enough and bought one to test in the microwave. Passing that test, I purchased more and decided to use 3/4" pvc tubing as a frame.

W1GHZ
This is the page where you can find the latest version of the waveguide calculator, which I used to find the right length for this cone, based on the diameter of my existing cantenna waveguide, and on the 242mm diameter directors. This software indicated a possible gain of 13 Db. If it came close to that is still unknown as I still need to learn how to measure that. This is also where I can learn how to measure my results, if I would just spend more time there!

Seeing as I'm throwing in software links - Delta Cad is what I use to draw my designs. However, I took several years of drafting classes and what little of that I can still remember is not included in the help section that comes with Delta Cad, sorry.
_Scratch_ says: Mar 20, 2011. 11:55 AM
I had an idea for a wi-fi range extender, but im not sure if it would work... I would have a 2 liter bottle wrapped in aluminum tape magnetically suspended in a trough that is a bit wider than the bottle. I would have a compressed air tube put in the bottom of the trough, facing up, so that when you blow air through it, it spins the bottle at a few thousand rpm. when it's spinning, I would put a wi-fi transmitter next to it. I have been told this would act as an antenna, with the bottle throwing the signal farther or something. Can anyone confirm that this would work?
jimvandamme says: Oct 3, 2011. 5:56 AM
All this would do is splatter the radiation all over the place, and thus make it weaker. It doesn't amplify it or concentrate it in the direction you want, plus it would put lots of nasty modulation (PM and AM) on the signal which would probably make your receiver inoperative. I'd like to know where you got the idea.
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Mar 20, 2011. 1:28 PM
Wow! I'm curious who would tell you this, and what their reasoning might be.

By magnetic suspension, I'm assuming you will attach magnets to the bottle, or something.

But if you want to spin the bottle using a stream of directed air, why not just use the air itself as the suspension?

And just putting the WiFi transmitting unit next to the bottle may not be enough. If there's any effect at all, I would expect it to be affected by the precise distance between bottle and WiFi antenna, orientation of WiFi antenna, method of applying the aluminum tape - pattern of seams, capacitance effects from layers of aluminum & tape adhesive, if magnets are involved what about any possibility of eddy currents being generated inside of the aluminum - which goes back to the pattern of the tapes orientation, I would be tempted to try coating the inside of the bottle with a thin coating of paint and then aluminum powder such as Stop Leak for radiators, and if the bottle did anything, there will still be the amount of energy being transmitted by the WiFi antenna in directions away from the bottle so if you are thinking of generating a kind of magnetic containment field extending beyond the bottle then good luck! You will need some very serious measuring equipment to tell what's not working right. I think you should consider how to control the bottles rpm's very precisely. And try to figure out a method of detecting eddy currents. You might be doing nothing more than creating a very bad power generator at gigahertz frequencies. But it sounds like fascinating research. I would recommend using a very directional WiFi antenna. Maybe that trough should be the open end to a circular waveguide? Or a open-faced resonance chamber that faces towards the bottle's side, and the WiFi radiating element inside that?
_Scratch_ says: Mar 21, 2011. 3:08 PM
Alright, by the magnetic suspension, i would place the magnets in the bottle so the currents are irrelevant, and I would think it would be hard to get an even suspension with compressed air whereas with magnets, I can just glue a few rows inside and on the back of the trough, and I get an even levitation.
_Scratch_ says: Mar 21, 2011. 3:52 PM
Another alternative method to "spin the bottle" would possibly be to hook it up to a medium sized Tesla turbine, so I could still achieve about 20,000-30,000 RPM, while still being able to accurately adjust the speed with small air pressure adjustments and a simple meter to gauge the RPM.

Also, to the resonance chamber, a satellite dish would probable work well, with the Wi-fi source at some point behind the focal point, and the spinning bottle in the middle of the focal point, so it would spread out the signal that hits it, assuming it would actually work in that way.
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Mar 21, 2011. 5:15 PM
Oh, so it would be okay to mount the bottle to a shaft? I thought you were going through all that magnetic suspension to create an airgap. Well what about using a variable-speed dremel to spin the bottle? Dremels have all kinds of attachment methods to put anything on them. Might be cheaper than buying an industrial disk turbine, unless you were thinking of building one of those. But even an air-powered die-grinder could work and you can buy one for less than $20 However, I would be cautious about trying to spin a bottle at such high speeds. Getting it to stay perfectly centered and balanced wont be a casual thing either.

http://www.w1ghz.org/antbook/contents.htm - this is a good place to start refreshing your design approach.
_Scratch_ says: Mar 21, 2011. 5:25 PM
I would think the magnetic suspension would still be relevant considering that the bottle would likely be rather unbalanced just hanging from a shaft.
there are a few 'ibles on here that show how to make a Tesla disk turbine from some old hard drive platters, so it wouldn't be too out of reach, and I was thinking that the turbine would be better than a air powered die grinder since it would use a decent bit less air, since I wouldn't want to invest in a huge air compressor, that way, the air tank could be continually filled. I suppose a Dremel would work, but a corded one would be necessary for the higher power and endless power supply.
I would also assume the magnetic levitation would keep it balanced and rather centered, but I could be wrong
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Mar 21, 2011. 7:04 PM
I own an air-compressor and I have used it a lot, so I can say for a fact that if you can use a Dremel with good results, then that is preferable. Besides, if you get any useful results with this antenna design, you might want to run it for hours at a time.

A magnetic suspension is a very flexible sort of thing, so any kind of oscillation will build up very quickly into an unbalanced condition. I suspect that designers of high-speed maglev trains will have some interesting points to say about this. Try to imagine a maglev running a continuous loop at 230 miles per hour. Which is approximately the surface speed of the bottle at 20,000 rpm's. This only means that you need a very well thought-out arrangement for your magnets. Placing magnets on, or inside the bottle will probable stretch the diameter of the plastic at very high speeds due to the mass of the magnets acting under centrifugal force.

This kind of speed is one of the reasons why Tesla never got anywhere with his turbine design. Using the materials available back then, the disks kept shattering at any useful speed unless they were a very small diameter. But then the total horsepower was too low to be of any value for what he wanted to do. A scrapped hard drive disk is engineered to spin at a high speed. But they are rated for a speed that wont flutter at a microscopic level, you can actually run them much faster if all you want is to not shatter.

I would highly recommend that you skip all of the WiFi stuff and focus on simply spinning a bottle. And try to control the speed through as wide a range as possible. Maybe you shouldn't be running above 1000? You don't know yet what to expect from a spinning cylinder placed inside of a 2.4 gigahertz EM field.
_Scratch_ says: Mar 22, 2011. 5:28 PM
I suppose so, for all of it
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Mar 22, 2011. 9:14 PM
Well, if anything interesting happens, let me know. I tried to find any info on that kind of idea. But it looks like a total unknown. Doesn't mean that no-ones tried such an experiment. Just that it's one of those things that isn't easy to find.
tapplicat'on says: Aug 4, 2011. 3:49 AM
I have an ADSL/Router, will this antenna work for that too? And what about the weather conditions?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Aug 4, 2011. 10:24 AM
If you look-up 'cantenna's, you'll find that they use a patch cable to connect a WiFi card to the side of a tube. Just like this antenna. So yes, you should be able to use your router. Even better if you can change it's firmware to DD-WRT or other open-source firmware. The simplest way to put your router and this antenna together, is to skip the patch cable & connector. Take all the plastic off of your routers antenna, so it's just the inner cable. You'll see that the end of the cable is bare, this is the actual antenna portion. For something like my antenna, you would drill a small hole instead of cutting the square hole for the adapter that I used. Then that router antenna can be glued in place, inside that hole, with all of the bare section inside and only a sixteenth inch of the outer shielding going through the hole. Make sure it goes in straight. Then tape or glue the router right to the side of the can. Take a look around for 'power over ethernet' to send power to the router using just the ethernet cable. Then seal the whole thing so it's watertight. You can use a 100 foot cable. Rainy weather will reduce the signal. That frequency is blocked by trees & bushes too. The antenna could be put inside a plastic bucket with a snap-seal lid. So that might be a good way to make it weather-proof. Just run the ethernet cable through a hole in the bucket and silicone that tight.
ayvz says: Feb 4, 2011. 1:11 AM
ahmm
sorry for that..
its very hard for me to do the conetenna..
we have a group project..and we choose conetenna for our poject..
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Feb 4, 2011. 9:49 AM
No worries.

You could go to my profile and send a message directly to me about this group project.
ayvz says: Feb 4, 2011. 1:13 AM
can we use the pringles instead of cone?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Feb 4, 2011. 9:46 AM
If I understand what you're asking, then no: The Pringles tube does not make a signal match from the USB module to free-air.

What the Pringles tube does is the exact same thing as what the fire-extinguisher tube in this instructable is doing. Only the dimensions are different, and so the performance will be different.

You can use a Pringles tube along with a matching cone to improve the performance over just the Pringles tube alone.

The cone is an add-on. You should just get the tube to work first and try changing how it's made several times before going to the next part of designing a cone.
ayvz says: Feb 3, 2011. 5:40 PM
is it needed to have a wifi usb?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Feb 3, 2011. 11:53 PM
Is what needed? The entire instructable? The disks? Oh wait, this is a philosophical question, right? So no, a usb wifi is not needed. But it could be valued somehow...
george50k says: Jan 13, 2011. 12:56 PM
Nice, you can read more about antennas diy
I think the cone amplyfies the signal, the signal is a wave in the air, if you can do an aluminium cone, i think it could be better. Try to put the cone near your ear, i think that the wave (wifi signal) can be the same as the sound waves....

Nice, I will do somthing like that.

http://www.usbwifi.orconhosting.net.nz/
http://www.aircrack-ng.org/doku.php?id=es:cantenna_directional_antenna_with_gain
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jan 13, 2011. 2:00 PM
Go for it!

By the way, this used an aluminum cone. It's a composite style construction. The plastic cone is just a form to hold the aluminum in the right shape.

Yeah, putting a cone to your ear will help you hear more of a sound. But that still is not amplifying the sound, only reducing the amount lost. For the WiFi signal, most of that will not enter the antenna. A cone will help reduce that loss.
saysay says: Jan 30, 2010. 12:14 AM
sir, me and my friends are making a contenna..we are using a tin can..then connected to a steel cone..we have a problem in determing the antenna gain of it..i hope u can help us..
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jan 31, 2010. 11:54 AM
Well, I never bothered to learn how to measure antenna gain. So I wont be able to help as much as you would like, except that I think you might get a better answer if you post this question in the 'WiFi Antennas' group here on Instructables. Of course, the group may not look like anything is happening as the posts are getting old, but still give it a try as the group members should be e-mailed from anything getting posted there, and they may respond with better ideas than me.

Otherwise, you will have to use the google same as me.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_measurement

I might try a more practical measurement.  Just measure your connection speed by searching google for 'speed test' and using one of those results for a server that's close to where you are.

Do the same test using the bare adapter, and again with the waveguide

Take the result for the bare adapter and write that down on a sheet of paper. Double that number and write that down underneath the first number. Keep doing that until you get a number that is bigger than what you got using the waveguide. Count how many times you had to double the first number without going past the waveguide result, and multiply that by 3 (every 3 dB is a doubling of power). Assume that your adapter is 5 dB by itself and add that to the result (you could of course try to find the actual dB of your adapter).  This will be a number of decibels that you will not be able to use in comparison to anyone elses antennas.  This measurement will be only for your own use, to see how well you have done.  If you build another antenna you can use this approach to see what change there may be in connection performance.
Waren-Neutron says: Nov 23, 2010. 5:39 AM
are you a engineer ?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Dec 15, 2010. 9:15 AM
Nope, I only pretend to think like one. I searched google for a good description on how decibels work, then re-interpreted that to our discussion. I'm assuming data-rates are scalable in proportion to received signal-level. I'm also assuming that accuracy is not as important as consistent results. Always remember to measure for yourself some existing antenna to use as your reference, preferably a stick style or 'dipole' that receives in all directions if you want to get closer to being able to compare to other peoples designs. But they might not be as careful about such things, how will you know if their numbers are worth anything? - build their design and test for yourself!
Waren-Neutron says: Nov 23, 2010. 5:38 AM
TRIVIA;
you know that antenna is a 5 of the type of wireless antenna !
It is a DISH is a type of antenna that you use .
Additional it is commonly use in towers or communicating towers
and also for wifi
BodhidharmaCharma says: Oct 21, 2010. 11:01 AM
Has anyone built this and had good results? I want to make sure this works before I commit to building it (sticking out of my dorm room, folks might think I'm crazy!).
rayfalcon says: Jul 25, 2010. 11:34 PM
hey this gives me a very fantastic spying pc (laptop ) idea use this and one of the microphones from a tape recorder or an old pc that are builded into the system and place the microphone at the smallest end of the tube and use it to amplify sounds, voices ect ect and record them on the pc with sound recorder ....You could also use it as a security feature at home to detect unwanted visitors approaching i.e burgulars, or perhaps those pesky door to door salesmen. Have fun and Great instructable a 5 star rating for you.
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jul 26, 2010. 3:15 PM
Okay, but I would make a few changes - like don't block the end with that solid disk, use thicker walled tubing like a cardboard center tube from a carpet roll, and make the cone from several layers of poster-board to get a decent thickness. The added thickness will help keep sounds from getting through the sides and leave only the ones you want. Then mount this in front of a plywood parabolic dish and you will have a very interesting acoustic listening device. For a laptop that can spy, maybe you should try getting closer to the action. Just use a laptop with a built-in camera. Those usually have a built-in microphone as well. Then load this: http://preyproject.com/ I'm not suggesting that you borrow someone's laptop to do this.
saysay says: Jan 26, 2010. 11:30 PM
How to determine the gain of a particular cantenna?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jan 28, 2010. 1:45 AM
You need a good way to measure signal strength to do that. And just rotate your antenna a full circle in 10 degree steps, or whatever you like, while measuring one signal.  The change in signal strength at each position will tell you what the shape of pattern your antenna has, and how well it focuses in the forward direction.

As for determining the actual gain in decibels, I wouldn't worry too much about that.  I think the shape of the antenna's radiating pattern is more important than what it's numbers are.
saysay says: Dec 16, 2009. 3:58 AM
what is the polarization of the conetenna?
and the waveguide of it?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Dec 20, 2009. 2:14 PM
I'm not really able to answer that, due to a lack of serious testing.  What I can say, is that I have decided to use a default setup where the adapter is clocked at either the 3 or 9 o-clock position. That is, sticking out of the side of the Conetenna horizontally.  That seems to get the best signal most of the time.

I would highly recommend that you rotate your antenna and check your signal level yourself, as the conditions you will experience may be different from what I have.

I believe that the adapter has a linear radiation pattern from itself, so a circular type  of polarization is not going to happen here.  That means that the circular cross-sectional shape of this waveguide is likely not the best idea, but is just a construction shortcut. A rectangular cross-section with the right ratio between long and short sides would be better.
saysay says: Dec 9, 2009. 4:23 AM
why u combine the plastic and aluminum?
is plastic good for getting signal?
y u used plastic?instead aluminum alone
what kind of aluminum r u using?

Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Dec 10, 2009. 12:57 AM
Your suspicion is correct, the plastic is completely useless at getting any of the Wi-Fi signal.

On the other hand, the aluminum works very well at making the signal go where you want. In this case, what I used was some really thin Chinese made foil wrap. They didn't put a steel cutter on the carton, the foil is so easy to rip that just some cardboard teeth will cut it straight across.

One problem with using this foil wrap is that it wont keep it's shape if you even so much as touch the stuff, and the cone shape the foil is patterned after is supposed to be a precision device.

Now what the plastic does, is it makes for a very nice rigid shape that holds the foil in a fair approximation of the cone it needs to be.  As a plus, the plastic is transparent at that frequency and won't get in the way of the signal.  I tested this by putting some of the plastic by itself in my microwave and it did not get hot. (that means it did not absorb any of the energy, or 'block' it - also microwave ovens use almost the exact same frequency as Wi-Fi)
saysay says: Dec 6, 2009. 11:34 PM
what is the purpose of the cone in your conetenna?
what are the specs of it??
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Dec 7, 2009. 10:21 AM
The cone helps get more signal into the waveguide.  It acts as an impedance matching device to free air.  The dimensions are calculated with the help of some radio frequency tuning software, basically the bigger the opening, the longer the cone.  The ratio follows a complicated set of rules so it doesn't really just scale up by doubling the measurements.  Seeing as this waveguide is not really the best choice, I may as well have used a dog cone. i would recommend using one of the coffee can designs instead of a fire extinguisher.  It looks like I didn't put the finished length of the cone into this Instructable, but I did put the diameter of the cones exit - 242 mm. The antenna isn't nearby or I would just measure it and say what the length of the cone is, sorry.
dongskie01 says: Nov 13, 2009. 12:58 AM
sir, is your conetenna connected with a cantenna? or some kind of that thing sir? 

what connector you use from the conetenna to your pc sir? do it need some usb wifi adapter?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Nov 14, 2009. 12:57 AM
Well, it all started with the construction of a simple cantenna, which is actually just a waveguide antenna because I did not include the usual stack of washers inside of the tube like the origional cantenna.  The waveguide worked but I wanted better performance, so I tried aiming it at a small parabolic dish and thereby built a dish antenna with a waveguide feed. That worked better but was not very directional. I tried adding director rings to the feed but nothing worked. And then I read that a waveguide with a cone added to the end could be made very directional and also could get a decent amount of signal if built right. So I spent some time and came up with the ideal dimensions for my existing waveguide. I also tried making it even more directional by adding a crazy amount of directors, but that didn't work so I cut those off and just settled for a simple waveguide with cone attached. And that is what this instructable details the construction of.  I had thought that the more persistent hobbiest might see that I have posted instructables about my previous antennas and read up on those to get a more complete understanding of how this final antenna came about.  This is then, an evolutionary design, and not a very well engineered one at that.  I'm fairly certain that a larger diameter should be used for the waveguide, maybe five inches or more. That would change the required length of the waveguide tube, the distance from the back of the tube to where the hole is cut, and the overall length and outer diameter of the cone depending on how directional it should be.  The entire evolution of these antennas has been based on using the same USB WiFi adapter with a pair of five-foot USB cables.
0utbreak says: Sep 23, 2009. 8:43 AM
i can imagine the download but what about Upload speed ??
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Sep 23, 2009. 1:23 PM
Uploads are a bit slower. The hotter connection from this location would allow me to upload a jpg resized for craigslist default - 300 x 225 pixel - 9~13 kb, in less than two minutes.
0utbreak says: Sep 24, 2009. 2:13 AM
:D i wonder if the connection can be established with that low upload speed? cos i have also a coil antenna and i can get the connection ııIII lvl but cant connect cos low upload.. but if i come close to modem i can connect :S
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Sep 24, 2009. 9:10 AM
I had a connection, enough to access webpages. Do you mean you could get a signal but not connect? That is what happens when the modem-end has a hotter setup than the computer-end of your wireless network. What exactly is this coil antenna? - Like this? Or did you mean one like this? That last one would work a lot better than a range-extender type coil antenna. How far apart are you trying, with your adapter & access point?
0utbreak says: Sep 24, 2009. 1:26 PM
Yes i could get a signal but not connect. the antenna is bi-quad but couldent find it on this site.. u can check google search.. im trying it with my notebook. the modem should be a regular Airties-205 wifi modem.i can get the rance about 3/5 signal but cant connect cos of upload.. i tryed with usb wifi antenna also.. and worse result... i think u have the idea like u said modem has an end point ant also the pc has.. so if i get the signal and cant sent back this means computers signal-end is the ptoblem..
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Sep 25, 2009. 1:33 AM
Well, the computer end is where I would do anything first.
0utbreak says: Sep 25, 2009. 9:34 AM
:D tnx nayway ill contact u when i got more info
saysay says: Aug 12, 2009. 6:19 AM
what are the advantages of this system?aside of the distance... what is... its network topology? communication protocol? media? network operation system? network hardware? network software? network backup? network/system management?
saysay says: Aug 7, 2009. 3:23 AM
what is the conceptual framework of this system?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Aug 7, 2009. 11:15 AM
It's a waveguide antenna, with an impedance-matching cone to improve free-air performance
saysay says: Aug 7, 2009. 3:21 AM
what software you used in installing the system in your computer???what are the software you used in this system???
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Aug 7, 2009. 11:11 AM
System is XP Pro SP3 Software for adapter is the factory default that came with it
saysay says: Jul 28, 2009. 1:02 AM
can you explain more about the dremel with router attachment.. ho w you attach the router inside??? a compass?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jul 28, 2009. 11:09 PM
The drafting compass I used is very visible in the pic on step 2...
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jul 28, 2009. 11:07 PM
Good question, as it turns out that what I used is not a router attachment! That's just what I keep calling it when it's actually a 'Multi-purpose cutting kit'

The cutting kit attaches to my Dremel by unscrewing the accessory collar which is right behind the bit holding part of the Dremel, first chucking the spiral-cutting bit onto the Dremel, and then screwing on the accessory - which acts to control the cutting depth and also keeps the cutting bit aligned perpendicular to the plastic panel that I'm cutting here. The cutting bit will drill it's way through the plastic, and then cut sideways any which way you want it to by pushing on the accessory base.

By compass, I mean a drafting compass to first draw a circle. The circle will be the guide-line I follow with the Dremel to cut a circular hole. You could instead try using the can to trace a circle onto the plastic. (place one end of the can at the center of the plastic disk, trace around edge of can to leave a line on the plastic just slightly bigger than the can...) But I would recommend using a compass because you can find the exact center of the disk and then put the steel pointed end of the drafting compass on that point, this way the circle you draw will also be exactly centered on the disk. The hard part is following the line with the Dremel!

If I were to trace a cutting line without a compass, I would place the can where the hole should go, then use a ruler to adjust the position of the can from side to side, and then from up to down so the distance measured on the ruler is the same from the edge of the can to the edge of the disk in every direction.

I could do this without a ruler, if necessary, by using a strip of paper as an improvised ruler and make a mark at the edge of the disk in one direction, then see where that mark winds up at in the exact opposite direction - eg other side of the can.
saysay says: Jul 20, 2009. 12:47 AM
hi... please enumerate the materials that be needed in making conetenna.. EXACT info. please..tnx
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jul 20, 2009. 11:32 PM
Well, I was kind of hoping that by reading my instructable with due diligence, you might ascertain the precise nature of the correct enumeration of all materials involved. Even better, I would like to think that the style of construction might inspire something even more unique, which implies an altogether different composition of materials. You ought to note the key technology used, ie - 3/4" tubing & 7/8" holesaw to create a structure. This is something that should be used for other projects.
Eagle666 says: Jun 26, 2009. 6:00 AM
Did you make this antenna and then just stick a wifi usb adapter in it? A bit of a waste after so much great designing. Maybe an idea for better results: You could take an omnidirectional antenna (piece of metal rod with the right dimensions) and stick that in your antenna at the right place. Then a very short coax to your USB stick which you opened up and connect your coax instead of the internal antenna. Probably impedance matching is also required, however without it it would still be better then just sticking your USB stick in the antenna thinking that it's designed well enough internally (the internal antenna could even be directed in the wrong direction! not knowing how it's designed internally). But nice design!
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 26, 2009. 10:20 AM
Ouch! My head hurts! The cone and all of the framework was added to an antenna I had already built, so no I didn't just build a nice waveguide and then added an adapter to it. If you're curious, you might check out my first instructables to see the evolution of this. I was planning on doing exactly as you suggest, but with a better usb adapter that already uses coax, a Netgear WUSB54G. However, the Conetenna works well enough as is that I just haven't felt like pushing the art in a while. I never thought, nor did I ever suggest that the WG111T is designed well enough to be used as I have done. If you read the comments section, you will see a discussion where this very problem is pointed out. I just never got around to building that new waveguide....
Eagle666 says: Jun 26, 2009. 12:09 PM
Allright, I found your project more interesting then reading through the whole comment section ;). So sorry if I've skipped some parts. I was merely expressing my thoughts and hoping to give you some more ideas. I've now also looked into your Catenna project. I've seen that you've also dished it. Maybe the Conetenna could also be dished to give even better results. But... only if you feel like it...
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 27, 2009. 11:14 AM
That happens, no worries.

Dishing the Conetenna would require a very big dish. As I have become used to carrying my Conetenna around in my car, I would like to keep the size under control. I might just go the conventional route and get a proper wifi card with pigtail and make the radiating elements of a new antenna.

I like the looks of this: http://www.dxzone.com/cgi-bin/dir/jump2.cgi?ID=13491
Eagle666 says: Jun 28, 2009. 3:05 AM
That's a nice site. And yes, a Yagi would be nice, that's what I was planning to build. I planned to build this one: http://microblog.routed.net/2008/05/31/howto-make-a-simple-and-cheap-yagi-antenna-for-wifi-applications/

Which uses wood what makes it simpeler. But then it's not really for outdoor use, but that doesn't matter because I only want to use it as a directional antenna at the university. To bad that the link of the original designer is dead so I can't show you that (http://www.andrewhakman.dhs.org/yagi). Fortunately for me I have saved the pages in the days that it still worked.

The original designer took a commerial wifi yagi and took it apart and measured everything up. So much for diy... it's just a copy of a commerial one. The original one used a plexiglass rod as a base, that would also be nice. Weather resistant and still easier to work with than metal.
ketan7s says: May 6, 2009. 11:35 AM
Oh, this is the only guy I have seen who has answered almost all the comments and quarries of visitors. In others' tutorials, I saw only one or three light blue boxes. Good work and kindness. good wishes Shadetree Engineer.
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: May 9, 2009. 12:49 PM
Your' welcome, and thanks.
Spajky [-Spikey] says: Nov 4, 2008. 12:39 AM
@ Shadetree Engineer : you should use 2 dog food 1,2kg 10cm dia cans & a 3-WL (37cm) deep 30° horn with Usb Key mounted thru the bottom to get even better results ... Me & My GodZilla™ active Usb 24dBi eXtreme Wardriving Tool :-)) ...
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Nov 8, 2008. 11:47 PM
Okay, scaling up is cool, but I'm not so sure about mounting the key at the bottom like that. Have you tried your setup with a conventional key placement?
Spajky [-Spikey] says: Nov 12, 2008. 7:55 PM
I did & I have tried also a bunch of stuff in last 3y & became kind an expert in the matter :-) ...
check this my first instructable here ; there at the end are also 4 U two interesting links :-))
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Nov 13, 2008. 6:42 PM
Okay, I guess the same question applies to me. I'll build a new waveguide and try the same wi-fi adapter in a rear-mount. It just happens to be the model you recommend, a WG111T. I like the auto regulator hack using a lightbulb...
static says: Jun 9, 2008. 11:15 PM
I'm having a difficult time of wrapping my mind around this antenna construction. Is it possible to build a gain antenna out of plastic elements? In the event it is what I see that resemble directors appear to be of equal diameter and equally space. Directors vary in length or diameter and are equally spaced. Don't forget the transmitting antenna is going to have lobes and nulls in it's radiation pattern, that makes it difficult in evaluating the performance of a receiving antenna. The fact a receiving antenna works better in on place than another may very well be a function of the transmitting antenna. Not to mention the signals at this frequency are easily reflected.
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 11, 2008. 4:05 PM
Yes, you can use plastic. But you use the plastic to suspend metallic elements. In my case, each director had both a wire loop and a disk attached with scotch tape. The loops and disks could have been sized individually for tuning purposes, but the plastic disks need to be all the same diameter so that they can be slid along the pvc tubing - thus enabling some degree of adjustability for the spacing. The picture shows only a trial fitting, the spacing was not measured or adjusted to any specification - I just wanted to see how the disks would fit, and took a picture of how it all looked. My performance comparisons are based on using the exact same physical location, and aiming at the exact same network, at such a distance that I would have to change my position by a great amount before lobes become an issue. It may be that going from the rv to the roof was enough to spoil my comparison. All comparisons are based against my previous handful of designs, most of which are posted here on instructables.
boricua114 says: Jun 7, 2008. 11:15 AM
haha nice, just hope the wind don't blow the antenna down dragging the laptop down with it, I gotta make one for my cousin though because he has trouble with his wi-fi
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 8, 2008. 8:46 AM
The wind didn't get me, but the rain disabled my touch-pad. I had to move inside and run a heater under the upside down laptop. It's working again just fine now.
MasterJames says: Jun 6, 2008. 10:55 AM
Cool Idea!!! 8)
OK...here's an idea, but I have no idea if it would work.
At my local hardware store,they have plastic spools that when empty,they throw away. So I'm thinking, would they not work as well or better?

if you needed something as long as what you show above, maybe take 2-4 empty reels & fasten them together....you want a larger opening at the front? use a large one in front followed by a smaller one.

Keep in mind, I'm not an Einstein, & I have no idea if this would even work...
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 7, 2008. 1:19 AM
Sounds like a good way to way to scavenge materials. If any of that winds up in the signal path, you should try a test in a microwave. That's how I decided I could get away with using the dollar-store cutting boards. If the cylindrical part of the spool is small enough, maybe you can wrap that in foil to make the wave-guide section of this antenna, covering the back end of course.
MasterJames says: Jun 7, 2008. 11:10 AM
I'm a scavenger at heart, so I go EVERYWHERE to find parts; grocery stores, Walmart type store,hardware, you name it. I've even been known to stop and look at some of the things ppl throw out for garbage pick up. *G* the list of places to look is endless!
I think it's a cool idea that ppl like you can make some really amazing things out of what others take for granted or whatever "junk" is laying around. 8)
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 8, 2008. 8:43 AM
Some people have to take acid before they can see the world without other peoples definitions getting in the way. And some people are born with tools in their hand, they grow up tearing it all apart and they can see what the pieces are even before opening up the toolbox.
leebarret says: Jun 6, 2008. 7:23 PM
Could this ant be used for other type needs, say 1.2 or 2.4ghz wireless cameras?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 7, 2008. 1:26 AM
Yes. Specially for the 2.4 ghz camera. But I should also point out that I didn't necessarily design the most appropriate dimensions for a 2.4 ghz wi-fi. I was reading somewhere that the professional radio engineers wont bet any money on a design untill it's built and tested, because the formulas are just a way to get close to what the real world is doing. The only way I will know what I'm doing is to win the lottery and buy all kinds of strange tools.
Hammerholder says: Jun 6, 2008. 6:53 AM
You could sew up your cone with wire ties, --no?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 7, 2008. 1:10 AM
Er, yes. Or also zip-ties. But I was in some kind of strange sewing mood...
uguy says: Jun 5, 2008. 2:12 PM
Where did you get the 242mm figure? And what made you think the "plastic disks" would be "directors"?
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 7, 2008. 1:07 AM
Very good questions. I was inspired by a home-brew design for a patch type of antenna and I had the crazy idea of adding on to it, with more directors. It used a wire loop suspended around a small disk. The loop was 242mm in diameter. Each of those plastic disks I was using for directors, had a similar wire loop & disk, each identical. I tried spacing the extra directors all kinds of ways, but the signal always dropped in comparison to no directors. That's why I cut the whole thing in half. As a final experiment, I ripped all the metal off of the director disks and put them in front of the cone. There was no drop in signal, so I don't think the material was ruining the director idea. Just something I don't know enough about I guess. The bookmark for the patch antenna and the software I used is on my computer at home, or I'd include that here, sorry.
the_burrito_master says: Jun 5, 2008. 7:14 PM
just get a dog cone lol that might work.
the_burrito_master says: Jun 5, 2008. 7:15 PM
oh he already said it down there. :P
the_burrito_master says: Jun 5, 2008. 7:12 PM
awesome wi-fi from almost any where! sweet!
Big Bwana says: Jun 1, 2008. 9:51 PM
What sort of dbi gain are you looking at, or range are you getting ..
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 3, 2008. 11:18 PM
I don't know how to determine Db gain, but just going by signal strength and data rate, I would say this is a better antenna than all previous designs I have built. Distance is around 300 yards - for an 18 Mb connection with 4 out of 8 dots lit up on my meter. Though as I write this I only have 5.5 Mb and 4 lights lit.
Big Bwana says: Jun 4, 2008. 1:25 AM
Is that 300 yards with vegetation in the way ?? (( looks like you have some bush / trees where you are )) Or clear line of site, and is the other side using the same Contenna, or just a conventional omni directional antenna ??

Here is a great tool for playing with 802.11 networks, it's free.. http://www.netstumbler.com/downloads/ and you can see your before and after gains..
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 4, 2008. 4:30 PM
Oh, the 'other side' is a motel, they probably are using an omni-directional. I'm also getting around 20 or 30 other signals, six of which seem to belong to the same motel, two are from a couple other motels, one from a Jack-In-The-Box and a bunch of others that are probably 90% private. Some of the signals are too weak to connect to but are likely over a mile away. This is at what I call the 'shooting range', the top of a hill with nothing blocking the view, right in the middle of a good sized city.
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 4, 2008. 4:05 PM
That's 300 yards with almost no bushy stuff, maybe 20 feet of light bushes. Guess I should've spent more time on this instructable, I wrote it up quick as I was trying to get other stuff done. The main image showing the final construction was photographed behind my place, and the signal testing was done at my friends place where he has one of the best places for testing 802.11 directional antennas. I'm using a usb thumb wi-fi adapter that is not supported by netstumbler. I have another wi-fi adapter that is meant to be used at the end of a cable, looks like a router, maybe the next antenna will be using that - and hopefully Netstumbler will recognize that one.
Big Bwana says: Jun 4, 2008. 8:06 PM
Hey I think it's great, even if you did it in a hurry, I'm kind of in the same boat, no high speed to my home, well nothing other then sat internet so I play with antennas and dishes trying to get a signal.. (( might have to go with 900Mhz equipment though, kinda getting sick of dial up )) And 300 Yards with 20 feet of light bush in the way is pretty impressive, because when you think 2.4 G Hz a tree with leaves is like a wall made of water and this can attenuate a 2.4 G Hz signal like crazy ... especially when you look at the crap antennas in most USB thumb adapters .. Going to have to build one in the next week or two ..
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 7, 2008. 1:31 AM
Pictures of the shooting range have been added in four more steps. I think the rooftop was getting less signal somehow, maybe because normally I aim the antenna out the side of that RV and that could be acting as a back-plane. Now I'm thinking I should try changing the distance from the RV to see if that does anything.
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 5, 2008. 9:33 AM
I should take a picture of what the antenna was looking at, another casualty of working too fast! Untill I should add that, you can see the light of the motel sign through the bushes - it's that lightly bushed. Maybe I'll go up on the roof and try for more signal?
LinuxH4x0r says: May 31, 2008. 8:22 PM
Very nice! Featured
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 4, 2008. 4:13 PM
Yes! Thank you!
Grey_Wolfe says: Jun 2, 2008. 11:47 PM
For those of us who do not possess the appropriate programs to figure out the curves for the cone, and are either to lazy or simply do not know the formulae to do it by hand, a good option is an Elizabethan Collar. These are available at most pet retailers, (you know those cones you put around your dog's head to keep him from gnawing on the goods after getting fixed) and they are very affordable, $8-10 USD for the largest sizes. Also, they are fairly rigged, so should hold up quite well. And, they come in designer colours. :-P
Shadetree Engineer (author) says: Jun 4, 2008. 4:12 PM
I knew I should've put in some dimensions! The dog collar-cone thing will help add signal to a can, but I think it wont be as directional. However, that is a good approach for quick construction if you wrap some foil around it like I did. I'll add some specs on my cone if I can get into the edit mode...
thefonz101 says: Jun 1, 2008. 9:28 AM
is there any way you could attach this to a Psp?
showfire says: Jun 2, 2008. 9:02 AM
get a plug for an orinoco card and add it on there was a how to on a internet tv show a while back but i forgot what show
tyeo098 says: Jun 1, 2008. 10:09 AM
No PSP's have an internal wifi antenna, so unless you want to open up your psp to find the antenna wire... Then no.
dsandds2003 says: Jun 1, 2008. 11:48 AM
How do i hook this up to my computer??
Big Bwana says: Jun 1, 2008. 9:53 PM
802.11 b/g/n USB wireless adapter...
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!