Instructables

Walking Clacks Tower (Portable Semaphore Tower) Mark 1

Featured
Among other things, I teach a topic on networks at Flinders University.  As much of my other work is focussed around providing communications in difficult places, I decided to make the topic as hands-on as possible, so that anyone, anywhere might be able to make use of it, and even teach it to others without even needing a computer.

What is the relevance of all this you ask?  Well, if I wasn't going to use a computer to teach networks, then I needed some kind of cheap network device that I could use as a teaching tool.  Something that would have analogues (pun duly observed) to the real-world vagueries of wireless communications, with line-of-sight constraints, appreciation of dissipating power over distance, directional receivers for excluding interference and improving gain, and the plain old unreliable nature of physical layers generally.

I've been reading too much Pratchett lately, so immediately decided that the best solution would be a simple clacks or semaphore line system.

Pratchett's clacks system uses shutter semaphore, but that is really too tricky to build for $20 a tower (even old Pony needed more in AM$), let alone drive in duplex with a single operator sitting in a $7 chair.  

So I have opted for a cable operated single arm semaphore with a range of about 170 degrees, since the single actuator can be easily operated by foot, allowing the operator's hands to be free to write down what they see on the next semaphore tower.

You can see the arm of the semaphore tower in the image, with actuator cable attached.


So let's get started.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
Kiteman3 years ago
Yay, Pratchett reference!

(Did you know that the Reverend Lord George Murray invented a shutter-based telegraph that could send messages from London to Portsmouth [about 75miles] via a network of towers in just one minute? It was used during the Napoleonic Wars - IMO it was the inspiration for the system Pratchett described in Going Postal.)
omnibot Kiteman3 years ago
That was my first thought to! I must confess I was hoping for a recreation of a clackstower but this is good to.
<sub>
(Did you know the electrical telegraph was capable of sending pictures as well as text? There were many systems including purely analog ciphering methods but my heart is always with this proto-fax)
</sub>
gardners (author)  omnibot3 years ago
It really is amazing what they did. There is an excellent book that talks about some of this called The Victorian Internet that I would like to read (donations welcome, ship to LPO BOX 350, Parkholme 5043 AUSTRALIA :)

Paul.
Kiteman omnibot3 years ago
As I type, I have the beginnings of a "proper" version in my head, but it will have to wait until we get better weather or I get access to a bigger workshop.
gardners (author)  Kiteman3 years ago
I would be interested in anything you come up with.
One nice thing I discovered with the PVC pipe is that it is very bendy, and so allows a taller tower to bend in the wind, just like the Dearheart's plans for the MK2 towers in Going Postal.

In fact, I will probably experiment with mounting WiFi antenna on a length of unguyed or lightly guyed PVC pipe as a cheaper easier option to guyed steel rod. Also, PVC doesn't attract lightning quite so much (thorry Igor).

Paul.
Kiteman Kiteman3 years ago

<sub>Oh, I've found more details.  The shutter-telegraph was eventually replaced with an arm-telegraph very similar to your design, but larger.
gardners (author)  Kiteman3 years ago
Hello,
First, thanks for your enthusiasm for my little project :)

Yes, the shutter-telegraphs were replaced with arm-telegraphs after Claude Chappe did experiments with visibility in France, and found that angled rods were resolvable at greater distance than were coloured panels.

From my perspective, I wanted the best bit-rate-per-dollar I could manage at bottom dollar, so a semaphore arm that can (under optimal conditions) encode an analog signal equivalent to many bits was the answer.

In fact, the difficulty of actually encoding more than 2 or 3 bits with the semaphore arm just adds to the educational value from my perspective, as (hopefully) the students will realise that 1 bit is easy, 2 bits is doable, and 3 bits probably slows the thing down so much and/or introduces such a high error rate that it is faster to use fewer bits-per-baud, and thus a valuable lesson will have been learned, that is directly relevant to the variable bit-rates of WiFi, and DSL latency versus throughput optimisations.

Paul.
Kiteman3 years ago
Oh, and I've just noticed that you classified this under "wireless"...

:-D
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!