Remove these ads by
Signing Up
Remove these ads by
Signing Up
Remove these ads by
Signing Up
PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format.
You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.
http://www.qualitysmith.com/request/articles/articles-heating/oil-furnace-cost/
1) What is preventing the flame from moving backwards up the fuel line to the reservoir? (Is it because there's no oxygen in the fuel line? Is there anything one could do to make this safer?)
2) Is there any advantage to this shot-glass "carburetor" method over the Brute's pseudo-fuel-injection method? I would think that the method you're using here wastes a lot of heat through the carburetor chamber itself, because the flame must move through the carburetor.
P.S. "The Brute" burner that I'm talking about is here: http://www.backyardmetalcasting.com/oilburners09.html
Thanks for your advice!
I'm pretty sure it is that
also the fact that for oil/petrol to burn, it must be a vapor already would have a big effect here. adding it straight into a fire this doesn't mean much, because the oil vaporizes from the heat of the fire, then burns. But in the pipe, the liquid oil would be moving fast enough to push the vapor out the end of the pipe before it has a chance to heat the rest up to vapor.
If you wanted to, you could add a one-way valve somewhere in that so that the oil can go into the chamber, but not flow back up. Or another design feature is to create a "Pop" valve in the oil reservoir. Basically means cutting a small square out of the top, then taping a single layer of cling wrap, or thin tape over the top. So it's still air tight, but if any force builds up in the chamber i.e. explosion, it will go through that hole, instead of actually going boom.
Just add a tee to the oil line (with additional shutoff) to feed waste paint thinner or perhaps kerosene to warm up the chamber. I have read where this works quite well and usually only takes a few minutes.