3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

Weekly Project: Build Your Own X-Ray Vision Camera

Step 3Scalpel; Cut Your Filter

Scalpel; Cut Your Filter
Use a very sharp razor blade for cutting a 3mm-square piece of the Beryllium material and be careful only to touch the edges--it smudges easily.

« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
11 comments
Apr 17, 2007. 5:47 PMELF says:
Hah! That's a normal IR block filter, replace it with a piece of (over-)exposed color film, and you got a camera that can see through some things like thin fabrics, like bathing suits (Making you a creep if you tried it) but also through coke (the brown liquid stuff you know :P) some cheap sunglasses, skin to some extend (your bloodveins will "pop out" more viewed through the camera), and will also block the light from LCD monitors, because they don't emit any IR light, so it will look like it's turned off... Anyway, try that instead :)
Mar 17, 2011. 10:49 AMtechno guy says:
Where do you get an overexposed piece of color film.
Mar 17, 2011. 12:12 PMELF says:
Any smaller photo store where they develop film.
It's usually a wasteproduct from the start and end of a roll of film.
Jan 3, 2009. 4:11 PMelectricalman123 says:
Could I try just looking through the exposed/over-exposed film, instead of taking apart the camera and then replacing the filter?
Jan 5, 2009. 1:06 AMELF says:
Your eye can't see IR (or at least not very much) so the effect would be minimal at best
Jan 6, 2009. 1:26 PMelectricalman123 says:
So that means I do have to take apart the camera and replace the filter?
Jan 8, 2009. 7:15 AMELF says:
Yes, unless you do it with a cam with "night vision" (which is the exact same function, with a small IR LED on the front of the camera). That is also the reason why I only did it to a cheap webcam :)
Dec 17, 2007. 3:50 PMcowscankill says:
over exposed... like what? a diposable camera's film left in the sun?
Aug 4, 2008. 7:12 AMtubbychick3n says:
just go find some old film negatives, usually before the roll of pictures, there's about four sections of all black.
May 15, 2009. 2:13 PMusb key says:
do the negatives need to be on a camera lens? and can i just take pictures, develop negatives, and use those?
May 15, 2009. 2:41 PMtubbychick3n says:
Yep. The next time you go to develop pictures, just take the darkest part of the film (negative) and find the sections where no pictures were( it should be extremely dark in that area) and use that. That's what i did for my eyetoy.
May 15, 2009. 2:05 PMusb key says:
if i used a camera and i got the negatives i can use those? could i just look through them or would it have to be a camera
May 15, 2009. 2:39 PMtubbychick3n says:
It has to be in a camera. If only it were that easy. I wouldn't ruin a good camera if i were you. I put it into an old eyetoy (ps2 webcam-type thing) that i use as a webcam for my computer and it worked great. It's actually quite fun to mess around.
May 23, 2009. 3:05 PMusb key says:
but that would still be a web cam. can i get a disposable camera and use that or does it have to be night vision (i saw some youtube videos)?
May 26, 2009. 5:50 PMtubbychick3n says:
I guess there might be some digital disposable cameras that you could use, but i don't think the disposable film ones will work like you're thinking.
Aug 5, 2008. 7:40 AMcowscankill says:
ORLY?! someone finally tells me what i wannt to know! xD Thank you
Aug 6, 2008. 5:46 PMtubbychick3n says:
no problem. i have already done this with one of my eyetoy cameras and it works great.
Apr 8, 2008. 7:13 PMRetroPlayer says:
Actually, I believe it is supposed to be UNEXPOSED, but DEVELOPED color SLIDE film. And two pieces are recommended.
Aug 3, 2008. 5:59 PMLebanite says:
much rather use that... speaking that berillium can be harmful to your health
See Link
Apr 9, 2008. 12:16 AMELF says:
No, I'm pretty sure that it's suppose to be exposed, and normal negative film... Maybe they yield the same results :)
Dec 18, 2007. 1:57 AMELF says:
Yea, for like, a second or something :P Till it's "black", won't more than a second or two :)
Dec 18, 2007. 1:11 PMcowscankill says:
oh...okay thanks
Dec 18, 2007. 2:50 PMELF says:
You're welcome :) Remember, these films are very photosensitive. On a sunny day you might only expose it for like 1/125 to 1/500 of a second.. ;)
Aug 4, 2008. 4:52 PMAnarchistAsian says:
ummm... is this dangerous? or is it just x-rays already present in the enviornment that you are viewing with?
Nov 10, 2007. 7:04 PMNozeDive says:
It's true. I used the exposed film method on a digital camera that I removed the IR blocking glass from. It works pretty well. P.S., it may be a CCD (Charge Coupled Device) sensor. They're used frequently, as well as CMOS (Complimentary Metal Oxide Semiconductor) P.P.S. About those capacitors... I made a pretty painful Taser style stun gun out of a disposable camera back in 2002. They hurt, but other than that, capacitors are okay to deal with. They taste great.
Jul 7, 2008. 10:45 AMDerin says:
a ccd is $130
Jul 9, 2008. 10:00 AMNozeDive says:
You can get new, in the box, web-cam style cameras that use CCDs from eBay for about five dollars a piece. I bought three, so I could use two normally, and modify the third one. I also got a used digital camera (also CCD) with an LCD screen for about $30. That way, once I modify that one, I can have night vision on the go. »Tøny
Jul 9, 2008. 10:17 AMDerin says:
I was saying the CCD unit for a sony handycam costs $130(atleast thats what the repair guy told me)
Jul 10, 2008. 4:13 AMNozeDive says:
That's expensive. I didn't know that those components cost so much separately. But, then again, Sony has some pretty impressive night vision cameras. Thanks for the info! :-)
Jan 4, 2009. 2:24 PMCoffee bean says:
the night feature on sony camera really is just something that they use to jack up the price.
Jul 10, 2008. 4:25 AMDerin says:
I think so,it is more than half the price of the camera itself!Yea,Sony makes a couple good camcorders but mine has TWO FAILS.both the cassette head AND the CCD unit is damaged
Dec 6, 2007. 1:37 PMmaker12 says:
the photoflash is not good to "tatse" and the other ones doint "taste"good SO BE QUIET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Apr 22, 2007. 12:44 PMdanielsb7676 says:
some other guy said beryllium was extrteamly dangerous does this replace all dangerous materials (besides the capacitor) and what do you mean by over exposed color film
Apr 22, 2007. 3:37 PMELF says:
Well it doesn't do the same as this project is *suppose* to do (I hope you know that this is a prank) but it can change the spectrum the camera can "see". And yes, there are no dangerous materials in any camera I've taken apart, so it would be safe (at least for you, not for the camera ;) )
Overexposed film, well... Go down to your local camera shop and ask for the waste from the developement. You should be able to get a "frame" (you know, normal camera film is a long strip with a "window" or "frame" for each shot) that is entirely black, or almost entirely black, and it's important that it's from color film, because I've read that B&W film blocks the IR light.
You then have to insert a small piece of this film into your camera, replacing the IR blocking filter, which is often located just above the CCD.
Oct 25, 2007. 8:21 PMSnuffyDaPenguin says:
How would I go about "over" exposing film? Or can I just use film that has been used that I tore out of an old one-time use camera?
Oct 27, 2007. 11:38 AMELF says:
It's just exposed film with no picture on it :) So completely black So yes, you can use that from the one itme camera
Apr 23, 2007. 3:11 PMdanielsb7676 says:
wait yours is a prank or is it actually "x-ray"
Apr 30, 2010. 4:13 PMrobotman3 says:
can you use a radioactive source insted of beryllium?
Nov 10, 2007. 8:52 AMnikb says:
Beryllium metal is used in science because it's transparent to x-rays, not because it fluoresces. The normal use is to have a film of beryllium that's thick enough to be optically opaque, but thin enough to let the x-rays through.

To make an x-ray window, you want the lowest atomic mass possible in the materials you use. x-rays are scattered by electrons orbiting close to the nucleus, while visible light is reflected by the conduction electrons that spread throughout the metal.

So you want a material with as few tightly bound electrons as possible. Beryllium is the lightest metal that is practical to work (though the dust is carcinogenic), it's only got 4 electrons per atom.

The periodic table reads Hydrogen (gas), Helium (gas), Lithium (metal, reacts with moist air), Beryllium (metal, stable)

To get something to fluoresce under x-rays, think scintillators

Scintillators
Apr 5, 2007. 3:15 PMHachetman200 says:
i got shocked badly doing this but i managed to finnish it

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
69
Followers
8
Author:PopSci