Shall we find out, boys and girls?
I was going to do this as a video, but since you can't actually see anything happening inside the centrifuge, I decided that would be boring.

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format.
You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.
Wise? ....I'm not so sure
Your wackifuge has (potentially) much greater energy stored in the the rotor - I think it could put a sample clean through a garbage can...
Think what a weed-wacker does to weeds - that's not because the wacker is sharp, just fast.
Scale that up with a bicycle wheel - adding circumerancial speed and momentum, then the wackifuge has the genuine potential to remove limbs in an extremely messy way.
But it did not occur to you that a series of pictures, unexplained pictures, would be boring also? Maybe it's just me but I'm the kind of guy who likes to read text about what you did, what equipment you used, where you found the equipment, what materials you tested, where you found them (if they were not found around the house), why you tested those objects and materials, and what the results were.
Okay, while I was writing this I noticed that each picture has a a very subtle caption written in nearly invisible ink and 4-point font. I still can't give you any points. I like paragraphs.
Obviously by reading the other comments this project has some appeal. I think if you were to write this up properly and dispense with the gimmicky slide show, you would have a much better Instructable.
Slideshows are not instructables, they are pictures of things that have been done (although, it's been so long since you wrote an 'ible, maybe you missed the introduction of the new formats?). They don't need lots of explanations, especially when they're written for those members with that certain sense of fun that seems to have escaped you today. This isn't a "how to", it's just the results of a few casual experiments, stemming from a forum thread. Maybe it's time you started taking part in the whole community, then you wouldn't waste your time typing scads of unnecessary criticism?
Sorry you don't like the caption text - complain to the management about that one, there are no options available - but I'm crediting the readership with either the education to know what centrifuge and 8,500g mean, or at least the intelligence to be able to ask.
... sorry, wrong forum...
Since DNA extraction isn't on my school's curriculum (the kids are too young), I decided to subject other things to extreme g-forces...
Could you test out a hypothesis or mine? I propose that orienting a (really, really tiny) muffin in a centrifuge would produce a black hole of awesomeness. Basically, if you make it so that the muffin tops (the best parts) inwards, then the centrifugal (or is it centripetal, in this case?) will throw the muffin tops to the bottom of the sample tube at tremendous speeds. The movement of a piece of matter with a Qa > infinity, or a charge of awesomeness greater than infinity, a such an accelerated pace causes a deficit of awesomeness in the area from which it moved, causing a rip in the awesome-time continuum. Test this around something boring and something awesome. If my theory is correct, putting H2G2 on the central axis of the centrifuge and Conrad's Heart of Darkness on the outside of the centrifuge should caused H2G2 to turn into something like HoD, and HoD to, most likely, trun into H2G2.