Your own terrestrial planet without atmosphere by AlphaRomeo
Featured
planet_pop7.jpg
This a simple classroom or science at home project that has a good edutainment value even at primary school level.

The Science Part
Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars are called terrestrial planets as these have 'land' to stand-on.  We may also add moon to the list. Lunar and Mervury surfaces are highly cratered. These craters were formed about 4 billion years ago when the solar system was just born (about 0.3 byr ago) and taking it's present shape.  At that time there were large number of small bodies flying in the solar system and naturally colliding with the other planets. 

The gaseous planets like Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune simply swallowed these debris. But on terrestrial planets these missiles left their mark in the form of a craters. 

On planets like the Earth, Venus and Mars most of these makes were eroded by changing weather on these planets.  Whereas Mercury and Moon, which have little atmosphere, have retained their poke marks. 

Thus - if one goes exploring planets of other suns and come across a planet which has highly cratered surface then it is quite likely that the planet has little or no atmosphere.

Study of these features on the planets has helped astronomer to get insight into how the surfaces of these planets have evolved over a period of time.

The Fun Part
---->>>> begins from the next step

 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: DIY surface of a planet without an atmosphere

planet_pop1.jpg

For this project we required

A) Quick setting Plaster of Paris ( POP )  available in the hardware shops. Cost of 5 k.g. POP (about 1 USD).
( POP  is a white powder that, when mixed with water to form a paste, will turn hard in a few minutes. POP is made by heating gypsum, a mineral composed of calcium sulfate and water. )

B) A cardboard box tray  of 20 x 20 x 5 cm. Normally 8 inch pizza comes in a box of this size.  We need only one side of the box 

C) 250ml cup - a Styrofoam cup will do. 

D) A white sheet of paper (standard wall calendar will do).

E) A vessel to mix POP.

F) A pair of rubber gloves (for every player)

Also a few sheet of newspapers, scotch or paper tape to stick the sides of the pizza box if needed.
 

arpruss says: Sep 8, 2011. 8:21 AM
You know, when I saw the photo for this instructable, I thought it was an astrophoto instructable. It looks uncannily like some of my webcam moon photos (attached)!  The color and texture are good.  Great work!

One difference is that your craters have less of a flat bottom than a lot of the larger moon craters.  Any idea why?
Video4-un_pp.jpgmoon.jpg
Orngrimm says: Oct 18, 2012. 5:19 AM
Physics does not scale very well in this particular field...
See, if a meteor crashes into our moon, a lot of debris is thrown not only outwards, but also upwards (as you can see it if you dump a heavy stone into water). As gravity pulls it down, it gets spread a little bit... And there is the key: The height compared to the gravitational force is different if you do it bigscale on the moon and smallscale on the earth.

Also on the moon the craters filled up by the millenias of small but constant solar winds... From time to time particles get pulled off the surface and travel a few feet before they fall into a depression and get trapped for another millenia. The bigger the depression the more trapping-effect it has. And a sizeable crater is quite a depression. :)
ceramiceye says: Sep 8, 2011. 12:35 PM
The Key difference would be material, I'd assume. While this is a fantastic simulation of the formation of a planet (btw, I am definitely going to use this for my 8th grade astronomy class this year), it is just a simulation. There are different forces at work for a large object like the moon being hit at tremendous speeds by an asteroid. The energy released from an impact of an asteroid will usually partially heat up and melt the surface that is hit, especially during the moon's early stages when it was forming and the thin crust was still cooling off. Also debri is usually thrown up and brought back down by gravity. Plaster on the other hand, hardens as it dries out instead of cooling off.
tbh-1138 says: Apr 3, 2012. 11:07 AM
The difference is part material and part scale. Your photo resembles very small craters seen on the moon, while also looking like larger craters found on the moons of Saturn which are made of ice instead of rock. I'm sure that if your instructions are followed on a much larger scale then the craters will look more lunar. I've also gotten Marslike craters by adding a bit too much water.
vnzboy says: Sep 26, 2011. 5:36 AM
nice project.. but just for the record recent studies have shown that the moon was created more than 5+ billions years ago.. moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.
AlphaRomeo (author) says: Oct 21, 2011. 6:55 PM
Sorry for the delayed reply.
Well to the best of my knowledge the age of the earth itself is about 4.6 billion years or so (which is also the age of the solar system) and the moon formed due to an impact of a mars size body with the earth about 50 million years later. I think the 5 byr is stretching the age too far back in time.
crudworks says: Sep 13, 2011. 5:32 AM
I suppose you could put Bicarbonate of soda in the mix for it to create random craters.
It would be interesting to see what it looks like.
AlphaRomeo (author) says: Sep 13, 2011. 7:04 AM
Fantastic suggestion - thanks very much. I will try later this week - I am traveling -
crudworks says: Sep 21, 2011. 4:24 PM
You're very welcome.
As a film maker it's quite tempting to see how realistic one can re-create the Apollo 11 landing.
Obviously the conspirisists will go crazy if I'm successful.
Dream Dragon says: Sep 21, 2011. 5:54 AM
Ohhh you rotter!

You have me thinking of all kinds of things to do with plaster in pizza boxes now, and I REALLY should be doing something much more productive!

Wonder if you could model tectonic movement by casting a thin slab, breaking it, moving it a little and then casting more over the top...

What about sprinkling the surface with dry dust and larger particles...

How about layering different materials like WAX...
(Yes I KNOW wax is immiscible in water, but you don't WANT it to MIX exactly, just make a layer of different texture and flexibility.)

Dammit! On with the rest of my day, but than you for sharing.
carmatic says: Sep 8, 2011. 7:26 AM
How much work is it to make something like the Face Of Mars ?
mslaynie says: Sep 8, 2011. 9:24 PM
Unfortunately, the Face of Mars is less a face, more of just a trick of the light.
carmatic says: Sep 10, 2011. 2:01 AM
Yes, I want to recreate feature on Mars so that when I shine light at it from a certain angle, it will also look like a face
User1 says: Sep 8, 2011. 12:42 PM
You convinced me! We never made it to the moon. :(
St Jimmy says: Sep 9, 2011. 6:47 PM
Mythbusters
zeeproduction says: Sep 8, 2011. 2:25 PM
After the latest disclosures it seems Mars is not at all redish ;). Personally I don't know how it is.
ilpug says: Sep 4, 2011. 2:44 PM
This could be a useful method to make terrain blocks for tabletop gaming. I must tell my teacher about this for the Astronomy class he teaches.
AlphaRomeo (author) says: Sep 8, 2011. 8:34 AM
Would you let me know your teacher's reaction?
ilpug says: Sep 8, 2011. 10:06 AM
If we do it, definetely.
-chase- says: Sep 8, 2011. 8:09 AM

many were talking about filming dust particles due to a new Tutorial on the VCP blog -

Though many make terrains in a 3D app it is nice to know an alternative.

I was thinking too with something you mentioned about it cracking.

It would be kinda cool to allow to crack while filming it drying via stop motion photography. (Taking a shot every 10 seconds etc etc)

or even waiting till it's almost dry - still moist and purposly cracking it.

And another thought maybe you can help with - is there a product that you could make this same effect with that you know of that would be softer.

Another words - it would crumble once dried as opposed to being so hard it "breaks" when it cracks...?

I take it this material used in your instrucable is more like white chalk or plaster of paris... so i'm wondering if there is a softer material one could use that you can think of? That would more crumble... hmmm kinda like a coarser dry mud is what i'm thinking...

any thoughts on that?

and thanx for posting this.
Happy for you it made the Instructables news letter.

-chase-

Aegian2424 says: Sep 4, 2011. 12:34 AM
do you make props for movies?
AlphaRomeo (author) says: Sep 4, 2011. 1:30 AM
No - but I appreciate your asking me this
I am a science educator - astronomy in particular - I use this sort of things get my audience interested.
seandogue says: Sep 3, 2011. 10:51 AM
(removed by author or community request)
AlphaRomeo (author) says: Sep 4, 2011. 1:28 AM
Thanks very much -
lemonie says: Sep 1, 2011. 1:28 PM

That is a good effect.
Might make good bathroom tiles....

L
AlphaRomeo (author) says: Sep 3, 2011. 9:08 AM
my be I should try one on a cement - I suppose it also be anti-skid
rimar2000 says: Sep 1, 2011. 7:58 PM
Very interesting and fun!

Please read my comment at http://www.instructables.com/id/Discovery-of-an-Amazing-Object-in-the-Sky/


Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!