iSteadii 2.0 - Image Stabilizing Unit by Lftndbt
Featured
Attached.JPG
I would like to introduce to you, the iSteadii .
Its task is to act as an adequate stabilisation unit, for a Compact point and shoot or a DSLR camera.
The principal is based on a floating buoy. The mass of the camera is equalised by the
counter-weight,  which is self locating. Therefore deadening fluctuations of movement.

Camera lenses today, come with options such as image stabilisation. Not only are these lens expensive, compared to their counters, they are not always the best bang for your buck.
This little unit should only set you back a few dollars, that's if you don't have the parts already laying around your house.

There is an iSteadii 1.0, yet this is a vaste improvement on that design. It deserves its own I'ble, which it may get at a later date.

By no means will this perform as well as a normal stabilising lens, but then again it does not cost as much.



On that note I give you iSteadii 2.0
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: What You Will Need

Equipment.JPG
Before you start you will need the following-


~ Utility Knife

~ Tennis ball

~ Sharpie

~ Pliers

~ Spanner to suit nuts

~ Tape

~ Threaded bolt  1 - 1 1/2 inches long or 25mm - 37.5mm with 1/4-20 thread type (Head type  irrelevant)

~ Nut to suit x 2

~ Washers x 2 (approx 3/4 - 1 inch)

~ Lead sinker (sphere type, atleast 8oz)
1-40 of 67Next »
helpme66 says: May 31, 2011. 3:39 PM
Here's the best way to hold the thread.

Take a spare nut and cut through one of the corners (between two of the flats where the spanner goes) with a hacksaw. The nut should now look like a circle with a gap in it.

Screw the nut onto the thread and squeeze the nut against the bolt with a pair of visegrips.

This will grip well but won't damage the thread.
SasquatchKid says: Jun 7, 2010. 4:02 AM
Ill try it tonight because I'm 11 and i get paid by my school to take photos i get 50 bucks a week but saving up for a new laptop for editing an it's like 2000 dollars (i have 1000)
junits15 says: Jul 9, 2010. 12:12 PM
wow thats a great pay for an 11 year old! I'm 15 and get paid $15 per hour to landscape common land, the max I've ever got in one week is $45! What kind of laptop are you looking at?
SasquatchKid says: Jul 10, 2010. 3:51 AM
Im looking at one of those fancy scmancy gaming computers (forgot lol)
junits15 says: Jul 10, 2010. 9:25 AM
Alienware? those are awesome! I've had my eye on the m15X but i have no $ :) lol
sockless says: Oct 22, 2009. 8:32 PM
Under 18?
Why is it that people always underestimate the abilities of children?
I'm only 14 but I am perfectly capable of being able to use large power tools (e.g. lathes, mills, drill presses, diggers, mitre saws etc.) without injuring myself.
bertzie says: Apr 13, 2010. 3:24 AM
Mainly because children tend to overestimate their abilities.
sockless says: Apr 13, 2010. 5:19 PM
I guess so. It's also due to the legal system in the US of A. In New Zealand, we don't have to worry about people being sued, so in my 'ibles, I don't need to put a disclaimer, since you can't sue me :)
The Lightning Stalker says: Oct 23, 2009. 12:29 AM
Nobody's insulting your intelligence. It's just another way of saying that if you screw it up, it's your bad. When we were that age, we had trouble assessing exactly what our abilities are, even though it didn't seem like it at the time. The same is still true, but certainly not to the same degree.
Lftndbt (author) says: Oct 22, 2009. 9:25 PM
This particular case is not about, underestimating abilities more liability. 

I write a few I'bles, many with some dangerous aspects. As an Author you have to understand, that if a minor follows your instructions, hurts themselves but DID NOT REALISE they might hurt themselves (as silly as that sounds), you the author are indeed liable.

There are several documented cases where not only minors but adults have had charges laid for mis-guiding instructionals.


I am just being pre-cautious. I do not expect an 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13 or even 12 year old would hurt/have problems with any of these steps.
johnwwyatt says: Dec 11, 2009. 11:53 AM
Thank you for this great idea.  Instead of the lead sinker, I used zinc plated BBs (0.177 caliber [4.5mm) steel airgun shot).  I filled the tennis ball about half full.  They roll around inside very well.  This saves the step of shaping the lead sinker.  You will need a funnel to pour them in but the hole can be slightly smaller.
Lftndbt (author) says: Dec 24, 2009. 5:50 AM
Did you notice any improvement? Glad to hear you gave it a go. 
johnwwyatt says: Dec 24, 2009. 11:41 AM
I did see an improvement on low light shots, the BBs roll around in the tennis ball very easily and redistribute the weight nicely.  I made a couple as Christmas presents this year.
Soupraok says: Jan 1, 2010. 2:48 PM
So filling it with bbs works the same as putting a ball bearing, or a lead sinker, because i cant find a round lead sinker or ball bearing for the life of me.
johnwwyatt says: Jan 1, 2010. 3:26 PM
Yes, the BBs are great and no extra work.
wynddan says: Mar 23, 2010. 8:32 PM
 i'm thinking of possibly doing this with the BBs but I have to ask, do you hear them rolling around as you move the camera? I ask b/c I use my dslr for video, and it might be pretty distracting to hear those sounds.
johnwwyatt says: Mar 24, 2010. 8:33 AM
 No, if you move the camera slowly you do not hear the BBs rolling around, the tennis ball baffles most of the sound unless you shake it, I would think it should also work well when you are recording video, I did fill the ball to a little less than half full
Soupraok says: Jan 1, 2010. 3:53 PM
I know what Im doing tonight!!! Thanky!!
systemlayers says: Feb 21, 2010. 9:46 PM
Thanks for this instructable.
I made mine and i have to say... It works!
It's not mind blowing or anything but seems to help a stop or two.
And in general i like the feel of the weight under my camera.
Helps with video as well.
I covered my tennis ball with electrical tape so it didn't look so ghastly though :p
Mike73 says: Oct 16, 2009. 12:52 PM
Awesome idea. I really like this.
Lftndbt (author) says: Oct 16, 2009. 3:55 PM
Thanks!! :) 
Mike73 says: Oct 17, 2009. 1:57 AM
You're welcome.
I've been planning to make a bean bag for a couple of weeks now. With all the different lenses and a battery grip (awesome, it has a built in battery, so the original one can be used as a spare), a standard bean bag won't do. So I'm thinking about some sort of adjustable bean bag with a couple of segments and velcro. I'll post it as soon as I get to actually realise my plan.
Lftndbt (author) says: Oct 18, 2009. 4:20 AM
Sounds tops!! Can't wait to see it! :) 
01new says: Jan 3, 2010. 9:07 PM
Hi there!
Does this works for any type of camera?   i have a small camera so i wanted to ask first..    Thanks
mianne says: Jan 16, 2010. 8:40 AM
This should work with any camera with a standard tripod mount, from a $20 point and shoot or a $2500 dSLR. (Though the latter will probably already have image stabilization built into the body.)
ohgood says: Dec 12, 2009. 5:57 AM
 very cool. going to try this today. :) thank you !
Lftndbt (author) says: Dec 24, 2009. 5:51 AM
Did you have any luck? 
bhunter736 says: Nov 1, 2009. 7:08 PM
Great idea!  Thanks for sharing.
Lftndbt (author) says: Dec 24, 2009. 5:49 AM
No problems anytime. :) 
lemminggenocide says: Oct 31, 2009. 5:07 AM
why not use a gimble?
Lftndbt (author) says: Dec 24, 2009. 5:49 AM
yeah sure, a gimble would work..?.. How random. :) 
dbbd says: Oct 25, 2009. 10:40 AM
 I don't get it. So making your camera heavier makes it more steady?
My camera is heavy enough, how making it even heavier improves stability?

stefan says: Oct 16, 2009. 3:17 PM
A dumb question for sure: I take it the lead weight rolls around inside the tennis ball, and that's what you mean by 'self locating'? How is that better than having it in a fixed position? Does having the weight more 'down' help?
craftsman says: Oct 22, 2009. 3:59 PM
when you bring the center of gravity of an object down it is more stable, but you're right a fixed position would almost undoubtedly be better
Lftndbt (author) says: Oct 22, 2009. 9:36 PM
Why would you assume fixed to be better?
Remember you need to tilt the camera up,down,left,right and all diagonals...  A fixed position will always want to drag the camera back to level, putting strain on your wrists, actually making you shake more... 

craftsman says: Oct 23, 2009. 2:20 PM
oh you mean like on a table or something like that?
I was referring to the use of a tripod as fixed position
Lftndbt (author) says: Oct 23, 2009. 3:21 PM
LoL, did you read the I'ble? : )
He is referring the the counter weight rolling inside the tennis ball...

A tripod trumps everything always for a "fixed position".
If i'm doing landscapes, HDR or astrophotography, my camera is fixed to a tripod. 
skidoo says: Oct 24, 2009. 9:53 AM
Don't you mean a good tripod with a 9-pound weight hanging from its center axis trumps everything? ;-) 
craftsman says: Oct 23, 2009. 9:19 PM
yea nope i didn't I just surmised from the pictures.. :)
Lftndbt (author) says: Oct 23, 2009. 10:18 PM
 ;)
1-40 of 67Next »
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!