000.jpg
03.jpg

Remember how your parents used to say "don't put metal in the microwave"? Prepare to throw that cardinal nugget of advice straight out the window because we're going to do just that. We're going to use a domestic, unmodified microwave to melt metal! 

I happened upon an article in an old Popular Science magazine (c.2003) about microwave smelting and thought it was so awesome I had to try it for myself. So, just what happens when you try to smelt metal in the microwave? Turns out, it works!

Also, if you do it wrong you end up with a fiery microwave disaster:
Want to see how it's not done? Let's go!
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Tools + materials

tools+materials.jpg

tools:
  • oven mitts
  • safety goggles + face shield
  • metal tongs / grips
  • old microwave
.
materials:
  • stainless steel measuring cup (crucible)
  • silicon-carbide block (details in step 2)
  • ceramic casserole dish / fire bricks
  • tin / lead / silver solder (details in step 2)
  • mold for metal ingots (pancake mold)


DividersMaker says: Jan 18, 2013. 10:35 PM
Hilarious. You got my vote.
dlivings says: Dec 19, 2011. 1:07 AM
Funny to read all the scaredy cat comments. People are so misled. Actually water is not very conductive nor dangerous as folks think around water. When you add soap / or salt to it , it becomes conductive. I saw mythbuster stooges tell everyone that a toaster in a bathtub is lethal. I will jump into a bathtub with a toaster and smile all the while and jump out unphased, (because I know not to touch any metal with my hands) It takes 2 poles to be shocked.. When people die, is when they have their fingers wrapped around a metal conductor. The electricity contracts your muscles and makes it impossible to let go. If electricity has caused your house to catch fire, you'd better get some water on it! If you're scared, then put on a dress. Also, you can never put FOIL into a microwave. nor the plates with gold painted fancywork. As a rule of thumb, you should not put silverware in the micro unless there is 1& 2/3 more mass of water. And never with the silverware against the side of it, because it can create a pocket that traps microwaves and will spark which burns holes in the paint.
finton in reply to dlivingsDec 9, 2012. 5:31 AM
Tee hee. "I will jump into a bathtub with a toaster ... and jump out unphased". You mean "unfazed", but "unphased" is an apt misspelling when talking about electricity!     :]
soundmotor says: Oct 17, 2012. 7:37 AM
mikeasaurus: although they did not cause any problems for you, you might want to try firebrick next time. Firebrick is not porous like red brick so it does not retain moisture. If your red brick is stored outside they may. Mosture in red brick + heat could = steam with a resulting.....KABOOM!
KneXtreme says: Aug 17, 2012. 11:30 AM
Do you reckon I could melt silver coins?
porcupinemamma says: Dec 18, 2011. 7:53 AM
I soooooooooooo wish I had the guts to try this!!!!
jobergy in reply to porcupinemammaDec 18, 2011. 8:56 AM
if you go to Salvation Army or Goodwill, I have seen several old microwaves for like 10 - 20 bucks! so much better than risking your own! :\
Capn_Clawhammer in reply to jobergyDec 19, 2011. 3:03 PM
Dec 19, 2011. 10:53 AMSIRJAMES09 says:

silicon is another cancer causing agent..


I think the cause of confusion on this issue for most might actually be a spelling mistake. *Silicone* (notice the 'e') is in fact a proven carcinogenic compound of several polymeric and plasticine components. *Silicon*, in compound with additives such as carbidinium, may in fact be carcinogenic (I personally don't know for certain), but by itself, its practically an elemental substance and is at least 98% inert. It doesn't break down into other components. If you melt it down (extremely unlikely in ones backyard microwave) it stays the same substance, just in a liqiuid state. It is, in fact, a major component of such naturally-occurring things as basaltic magma and lava, (and of course basalt itself), and is also present in almost every crustral formation on earth. The last I heard, basalt doesn't cause cancer. I may, however, be proven wrong on this. Only time will tell.
.
aristide202 in reply to Capn_ClawhammerJul 28, 2012. 1:11 AM
Anyway the most common source of pure silica is quartz and quartz means sand and sand means shores . Now what about the ahzard in taking a walk along the shore in a september morrning ?
The hazard comes from the diameter of quarttz particles, the smaller the inner you'll get them into your lungswhen breathing and more or less you'll never get rid of them. The quartz particles ,like asbestos fibers , are almost totally inert and the problem comes from your immune system effort in getting rid of them. So best thing to do is is keeping away from any kind of mineral dust, hard wood saw dust, carbon fiberst, concrete dust and whatever . Avoid dry hammering of rocks . Wear an appropriate mask.
An intersting source of ultrafine dusts are steel wheels of trams smashing anything happens to lay on rails in dry weather period and the concentration of those dusts in an important crossing in a heavy traffic hour? You can easily see what happens and on check on sight powders concentration pointing a green laser in the suspected area , the greener the worst . See also the mazing difference brtwuen a dry and a rainy day , I shall say I am amazed from this kind of quick air checkings.
jobergy in reply to Capn_ClawhammerDec 22, 2011. 4:15 AM
Cool story bro.... But seriously, may I ask why I was spewed all of this information as a reply to: [quote]

"if you go to Salvation Army or Goodwill, I have seen several old microwaves for like 10 - 20 bucks! so much better than risking your own! :\"

I read this in my email and am confused beyond belief, but i learned something non-theless :P
porcupinemamma in reply to jobergyDec 18, 2011. 10:33 AM
Tell you what, why don't you come over? "My mom makes a he## of a brisket" Bazinga ;0)
jobergy in reply to porcupinemammaDec 19, 2011. 10:11 AM
HAHA! I LOVE THAT SHOW!!! Sheldon seriously is what makes it great.
freeza36 says: Feb 10, 2012. 7:55 PM
my science teacher (who by the way is awesome) put a cd in his microwave. he advised me NOT to do it
State50 says: Jan 17, 2012. 12:58 AM
I don't know who had cancer, because I read this after the thing had been censored and cut-up all over. Silica dust can result in lung irritation called silicosis. Constant irritation, due to external influences or toxic chemicals externally or internally made from the environment or stress can trigger cancerous growth abberations in cells. Having said that, I pray for the person with the cancer, that God would act on their behalf for their salvation and healing - in Jesus' name.
hopsman says: Dec 28, 2011. 9:16 AM
I wonder if some combination of centrifuge/smelter would be useful in spacce applications?
67spyder says: Dec 25, 2011. 6:48 AM
I applaud Mikeasaurus for including the failure as well as the success. Sometimes we learn more from failures. Plus it will stop someone else from from trying it.
flie727 says: Dec 18, 2011. 7:24 AM
BIG TIME SAFETY WARNING!!!!
NEVER pour toward yourself  & Please wear safety faceshield & glove!
Somehow make a handle or tongs to allow you to pour to the side!
There is a VERY REAL POSSIBILITY of SPLATTER when the molten metal strikes the mold.
*Extremely Important*: If there is a HINT of MOISTURE on the mold this is not simply a possibility, it will be a reality.
PLEASE, be super careful about this, molten metal burns are not funny!
BTW, I'm an assayer for a refinery - I've had pours splatter & I've seen others have this happen to them!
Earthscum in reply to flie727Dec 23, 2011. 5:19 PM
I definitely agree with djimdy's assessment.

One thing (out of all that could be added about safety) that I would like to add, if I may, is ALWAYS HAVE SOMEPLACE NEARBY TO SET YOUR CRUCIBLE.

Worst than having an accident is dropping your crucible and creating bigger splashes. Bear the pain for a split second and put the crucible down. This is why it is important to have someplace in the immediate area.

I prefer a couple bricks (fire), and having a bucket of sand can also be helpful to allow any unused or remaining molten material to flow to a clump in the edge by sitting your crucible at an angle to cool.

I love this idea... it's freaking crazy, but considering using a propane forge, I guess this isn't so bad. At least it won't blow up, and you can just throw a switch to stop the process at any time. I'd like to see someone "in the know" with this process do a Pewter casting before I attempt one, though.
djimdy in reply to flie727Dec 19, 2011. 9:22 PM
Great comment and one that should be added to a basic fact sheet or at least pinned to the top of the comment thread.
What makes this so important is that it's one of those 'at the last minute' things you don't realize until you're already there and it's effectively too late.
Christopher B. says: Dec 22, 2011. 1:18 PM
I was fine with the crazy metal-melting antics, up until you poured water into the microwave. Please, please get a fire extinguisher and don't kill yourself!
porcupinemamma says: Dec 22, 2011. 5:57 AM
The GoodWill and Salvation army usually have Thrift Stores where you could pick up a microwave for very little cost. Was that what you were wondering?
lasersage says: Dec 22, 2011. 1:19 AM
All these people worrying about lead poisoning and yet nothing about the fumes from the building foam :)
I'd be more concerned about breathing that.

Have any of you ever read
http://www.gizmology.net/stovetop.htm

there is a fantastic article about smelting Zamak. Its Zinc, because of its low melting point, with Aluminium (and a touch of copper) dissolved in it.
Makes for a very useful alloy for casting, but can be made at relatively low temperatures.
The next candidate for microwave smelting?
bonpierce says: Dec 18, 2011. 2:05 PM
You do realize this contains LEAD right? Lead is a carcinogen whether it is being melted or held in your hand a a charm or around your neck as a necklace.

You don't want long exposure of any kind to this stuff. Seriously.
weesuzi in reply to bonpierceDec 21, 2011. 3:02 PM
hiya folks Safety is a myth, risk is the reality. Paracelsius said " The poison is the dose" in the 15th century. As abinger says below, risk/dose increases with, time exposed and the ability of the product to get into your body due to its form (gas, fume, mist, powder, pearls, bricks...its pretty hard to inhale a brick). Spoken by someone with 16 nuggets of mercury amalgum in his gob(mouth) I feel Ok about it. Loook at it this way Acetic acid /vinegar pretty much the same chemical different concentration use one in the lab and a lower concentration use it on your chips(french fries) Whisky....like drinking it ...but don't want it in my eye. Same chemical same strength different risk. Phosphoric acid used as a disenfectant sanitiser in breweries, used as a main ingredient of Coke...okay bad example. As a safety professional( and ex lab tech with 30 years behind the bench) I genuinely appreciate people's need to communicate safety ideas and protect their web community friends. High five hazard spotters! But educate yourselves to the risks not just the hazards. Google EH40 and you will find the UK occupational exposure standards for all controlled chemicals and peruse the Health and safety executives website at www.hse.gov.uk all info free and usually pretty practical. I would love to write a safety bible for this site but where would you start and end..ohh yes Asbestos to Zoonoses (an A to Z of not so common sense) Bout ye.
terpodion in reply to bonpierceDec 18, 2011. 3:05 PM
Lead isn't a carcinogen. It's a toxic, heavy metal - a poison. That's different. It isn't going to hurt you unless you ingest it, either by eating it, chronically getting lead paint (which isn't sold anymore) on your skin or by inhaling the fumes after it reaches it's vaporization point which is a whole lot higher than it's relatively low melting point. If one were to smelt lead every day, there would be danger. One time isn't dangerous if you are the least bit careful.
aristide202 in reply to terpodionJul 28, 2012. 1:20 AM
Do you remember good old time of tetraethil lead in gasoline ? I guess some of that stuff is stil spread all around
samurai1200 in reply to terpodionDec 18, 2011. 4:12 PM
So why is there this huge push away from it for consumer (and most other) electronics?
SIRJAMES09 in reply to samurai1200Dec 19, 2011. 10:42 AM
AMEEN!
terpodion in reply to samurai1200Dec 18, 2011. 5:21 PM
Because it if it ends up in landfills it contaminates the water table. Of course, every public waste disposal site that I know of keeps electronic junk out of the landfill and recycles it properly but because it once did end up there; politicians created the legislation to eliminate lead in all forms. Makes for good campaign bragging rights. "Senator Jones drafted legislation to eliminate lead and protect our children."
paqrat in reply to terpodionDec 23, 2011. 12:20 AM
I think too there is a certain paranoia about lead. This paranoia is, in part, spread by certain legislators who, in an effort to look as though they are actually earning their salaries, play up the supposed dangers of "demon Lead" and pass legislation against it. If the web site I looked at earlier is correct, easy flow silver solder contains cadmium which is definitely something you don't want to breathe the fumes. I have read cases of jewelers killed by melting cadmium and breathing the fumes. I have yet to see anything about anyone dying from melting lead. If melting lead was that dangerous plumbers should have been dropping like flies before legislation banned it in plumbers solder. I believe the effects lead has on the brain and nervous systems of immature humans is the main thing we must be careful of when dealing with lead and that is more likely to incur through ingestion.
gladiator327 in reply to terpodionDec 18, 2011. 7:11 PM
Then why do we still use Lead Acid Batts for vehicles?
static in reply to gladiator327Dec 26, 2011. 6:43 PM
Lead Acid batteries are still being use for vehicles because an all around substitute hasn't been created. The hazards of using them have been mitigated to a large degree on both the manufacture, and consumer end. The salvage price for lead has always been constantly high enough that persons in the know, never sent them to the land fill. The high deposits we see now on new batteries is to keep the ignorant, and lazy from sending them to the landfill.
skrubol in reply to gladiator327Dec 19, 2011. 9:43 AM
Also, due to the large deposits encouraging battery exchanges, something like 98% of car batteries are recycled.
terpodion in reply to gladiator327Dec 18, 2011. 10:42 PM
Because there is no acceptable substitute. It's pretty much as simple as that. No other type of battery can stand up to the thousands of cycles of charge / discharge, put out as much current and withstand the environmental conditions that vehicles are subject to. At least not in that price range. How would you like to have to pay $350 to $700 for a car battery (installation not included)?
skaar in reply to terpodionMar 21, 2012. 9:20 AM
i've read that iron acid batteries are better for lifespan and resiliency, but they're low capacity. now ni-mh could be used, they have low size, high current and capacity. at least acid iron could be built at home.
samurai1200 in reply to bonpierceDec 18, 2011. 2:58 PM
This is a good point. It's easy enough to find "Lead Free" solder these days (Sn-Ag-Cu), people should just use that if they plan on handling their ingots (as a paperweight, etc) created here.
yogadavid in reply to samurai1200Dec 19, 2011. 11:45 AM
Lead free solder was used in a lot of volkswagons, xbox, and pretty much everything else where the environmentalist went on a rampage to get rid of lead. that is why you get the red ring of death in an xbox and your airconditioner in your volks wagon. Especially in deisel. Environmentalist did not think ahead about all the crap going into a landfill because it can't stand up to any heat and or vibration.
static in reply to yogadavidDec 26, 2011. 7:35 PM
Would appear that not all lead free sold alloys are created equal. Who knows exactly why they weren't properly researched by manufacturers, or those specifying manufacturing specifications prior to their use? This is not the first time a change(for any reason) in manufacturing methods created problems, and it will not the last. Of course it's all the fault of the environmentalists.
canucksgirl in reply to samurai1200Dec 18, 2011. 3:10 PM
You realize however that lead-free solder is actually worse for you.
wocket in reply to canucksgirlDec 19, 2011. 12:00 AM
Certainly is. Always read the material Data Staftey Sheets about any of these things.
samurai1200 in reply to canucksgirlDec 18, 2011. 4:10 PM
*citation needed.
canucksgirl in reply to samurai1200Dec 18, 2011. 4:35 PM
I had originally heard about a Danish study through a television program, so I had to do some quick research to get you facts you can read yourself.

Heres a pdf from a company called OK International, who is a global supplier of soldering products. In it they reference the study and explain the results. Obviously being a supplier, they have no reason to manipulate the results either way...
icyfyer in reply to canucksgirlDec 20, 2011. 5:39 AM
While I find the linked PDF interesting, I can't give it much credibility because of their inability to correctly quote the name of the largest occupational safety organization in the US. It seems like a miniscule detail, but they're making a lot of claims, and citing a lot of other works, not to have done their research, or at least proofread the work before publishing.
canucksgirl in reply to icyfyerDec 20, 2011. 12:55 PM
Yes, I see too that they referenced OSHA incorrectly as OHSA.
I only chose this source because (someone here wanted me to back up my statement and) Ok Int. references the Danish Study that I had heard about from a TV program.

If anyone wants to read the full Danish Study for themselves they can read it here.
chamunks in reply to canucksgirlDec 19, 2011. 12:57 AM
Wow thats really quite the paper I said to myself I'm just going to skim it than I got to the end and was like wow that was informative. I reccomend that to anyone who wants the real scientific answer to whether or not LeadFree Solder is More harmful to you. Which apparently it is.

Que instructable about making an effective deskmounted airfilter for your soldering station.
canucksgirl in reply to chamunksDec 19, 2011. 1:12 AM
I'm glad you found it informative. Too often people just assume that lead-free means safe and they use it without proper ventilation, doing god only knows what to their lungs...

In fact, an Instructable member has already made an inexpensive air filtration system that was intended for use with soldering.

You can see it here.
chamunks in reply to canucksgirlDec 19, 2011. 11:42 AM
Well thats handy, I dont exactly work in a production environment where I'm soldering ALL day. But this is good to know I also was under the same assumption.

I've been using this stuff the "Special Blend" at Sparkfun, http://www.sparkfun.com/products/10243 enjoying it quite a bit I will definitely look at that Ible though I do really appreciate my lungs. :)

The area I work in is a pretty open area but its probably still insufficient.
canucksgirl in reply to chamunksDec 19, 2011. 2:19 PM
If you read the MSDS, it has basically the same ingredients and warnings as other non-lead solders. What I would be concerned about is two statements;
  1. Prolonged inhalation of fume may result in lung complications.
  2. This product may contain lead. (So much for being lead-free...)
It's important to read it if you haven't already. :)
static in reply to canucksgirlDec 26, 2011. 9:08 PM
Actually the MSDS is not a datasheet for the Sparkofun product. The data sheet is for Indium solder products that Sparkofun lazily points customers to. Early on the data sheet states the warnings concerning lead apply to those Indium products containing lead. The datasheet is usable, but you need to know what it is you are looking at, and how to apply it to the Sparkofun solder product. A thousand lashes of Ann Landers wet noodle for Sparkofun, for confusing people about their products.
wikkit says: Dec 21, 2011. 10:57 AM
Someone may have said this, but there are too many comments to be sure:

You're not smelting, you're melting and casting. Smelting is the removal of metal from ore.

Otherwise, carry on. Consider better safety gear.
AKA the A says: Dec 21, 2011. 1:57 AM
Not only does the grass soften as you heat it, but when it reaches the "barely visible red hot" temperature, it becomes conductive and starts to absorb microwaves (and thus heats up even more)...
AthleticTrainer says: Dec 18, 2011. 9:54 AM
I worked in a kitchen that had a microwave which was specifically designed to have metal put in it and be safe. The way it was explained to me was that instead of using "microwaves" they used "radiowaves" to heat things and it didn't harm anything. I remember seeing the cooks put small baking sheets and metal measuring cups into it to melt butter or quickly thaw frozen food. The head cook went so far as to demonstrate its awesomeness by putting his pocketknife in and hit "popcorn" lol...anyone ever heard of these?
strehlow in reply to AthleticTrainerDec 18, 2011. 4:06 PM
Microwaves are radio waves at about 2.4GHz. Yes, the same frequency band many WiFi networks and cordless phones run on. Just at a much higher power level.

I have a convection microwave which can have metal pans in it, and the carousel is made of metal. Indeed, the inside of the oven is made of metal, so the issue is not just having it in there. It depends on the shapes and sizes of the metal items, and how they might be connected together.

Put a ring of frozen peas on a plate so they are touching and see what happens. You are likely to get arcing on them too. They are not metal but are conductive, and making a ring forms an antenna loop.
AthleticTrainer in reply to strehlowDec 20, 2011. 12:47 PM
Awesome... I will have to try the peas
WPee in reply to strehlowDec 19, 2011. 7:11 AM
Putting a ring of frozen peas forms an ANTENNA LOOP.

I will have to try this to get better cell phone reception while out in the back woods snowmobiling...beats writting your name in the snow. :-) :-)
Andy314159 in reply to AthleticTrainerDec 18, 2011. 2:29 PM
It's an induction oven.
AthleticTrainer in reply to Andy314159Dec 18, 2011. 3:18 PM
no it was a microwave complete with turntable
wholcombe in reply to AthleticTrainerDec 18, 2011. 4:28 PM
We have a microwave that came with our house (just built) and it has a metal rack in it, so you can have two levels. It says you can use metal in there, but I think it has some conditions, I've never tried on purpose, but did accidentally leave a spoon in a dish once, no problems.

79spitfire says: Dec 18, 2011. 7:47 PM
And once again we have the perfect examples of why no one wants to try or create anything new or different!

Great job for having the cahonies to try something 'out of the box' (or microwave as it may be)

As to the insulation I would suggest trying to score some refractory bricks, they can be had at ceramics suppliers, and cut easily. You may have some luck chatting them up, and getting some fractured or broken ones to cut up.

I'm not a fan of using solder, as much of it can contain fluxes, and it can be pricey. Old (lead) tire weights can be used. Silver might be another possibility, but also can be pricey.

Before we have ANOTHER tirade about how bad lead is, please keep in mind that lead has been used for casting for thousands of years, and while it is very toxic when ingested, or inhaled, simple safety precautions will protect a casual hobbyist.

Remember it is YOU who is responsible for you safety, not someone who is trying (at his own risk) to create something new!
bryan3141 in reply to 79spitfireDec 18, 2011. 8:16 PM
the solders used for making stained glass windows are guaranteed flux free. There's also a "silver" lead free solder available at any stained glass shop (I use it if I'm making something for an expectant mother or a baby's room). It melts a little higher and solidifies fast enough that it's hard to pull a proper bead with it, but it's not completely outrageous in price....usually sold by the pound.

If you're soldering or melting lead-containing alloys, please remember to get your blood tested at least once or twice a year.
Aeryk1 in reply to bryan3141Dec 19, 2011. 10:06 AM
I remember reading about using microwaves to melt metal back in 1966, yes, back in prehistoric times, before the laser much less the microwave oven. By changing the frequency of the microwave, you control what is heated by the microwave. Our microwave ovens are adjusted to the wavelength of the water molecule, distance between the oxygen and hydrogen atoms in the molecule.
While it may be beyond the oven's internals, if one could adjust the frequency, you might be able to reach higher temps.
jimvandamme in reply to Aeryk1Dec 20, 2011. 5:26 AM
Water is polar, meaning that the molecule isn't symmetrical. So in an oscillating electrical field at the right frequency, they all flip back and forth furiously and generate friction among themselves.

The other way of loading a microwave cavity is by bulk resistivity. When you put a conductor in the field, it runs current from one end to the other and short circuits the field. When you put a semi-conductor in the field, it conducts a lot but has some resistance across it. If you know your Ohm's Law, you know that there's a point where you maximize the power transfer to a load from a generator. If the resistance is too low (good conductor), your power is shorted out and your load doesn't get hot. If it's too high (an insulator), it doesn't get hot because no current flows.

The silicon carbide has about the right amount of resistance to heat up. Unlike the polar resonance effect in water, this effect occurs at any frequency, including DC. So you can measure the resistance of the material with an ohmmeter. The resistivity changes with impurities, but it's in the 100 ohm-cm range, and is used for high-power resistors.
throbscottle says: Dec 20, 2011. 3:26 AM
I tried to post this comment before, but it seems to have gone awol. Apologies if this appears as a repost.

This 'ible immediately put me in mind of something I saw on TV this year - I think it was Bang Goes The Science - in which Richard Hammond (again, I'm not sure) melted a glass bottle in a completely un-modified microwave. He softend a bit of it first with a blowlamp to give the microwaves some liquid molecules to bang together, and that was able to heat up enough to melt the solid glass it was attached to, and pretty soon there was a heap of mostly molten glass where the bottle had been.

I'm wondering if metal could be started off in the same way, thereby eliminating the silicon carbide - so long as you could prevent arcing of course. Be good to be able to smelt scrap aluminium this way to make pulleys and stuff.

Also put me in mind of this 'ible: http://www.instructables.com/id/Fun-with-Bismuth/ for something to melt other than solder.
SIRJAMES09 says: Dec 19, 2011. 9:28 PM
Respect for others is a huge thing with me, always has been & always will be.

Having said that, I have removed all my posts because after rereading them, they sounded(to me anyway) anything but respectful.

I apologize to anyone whom I have offended or made to feel less than the person they are. That is not me, That is not how I do things, that is not my way.

I do not agree with this instructable, and that is all I will ever say on this matter.

My apologies to all.
culinaryoverlord says: Dec 19, 2011. 9:09 PM
I have worked with all the metals mentioned here, hell, I can alloy you a low melt babbit that will melt in a cup of hot coffee. There are a few good points among the bar-de-bar-bar in this thread too. The metals are toxic, and precautions should be taken, but staying upwind should suffice.Get some bismuth and antimony in there and you could have much better results, and much more possible toxicity The alloy would be more able to take the detail. The alarmist folks really outnumber the risk takers here, nothing wrong with ringing the bell, do it too much and people stop listening.
SIRJAMES09 says: Dec 19, 2011. 11:01 AM
there are too many things that can go wrong in this instructable....lead is deadly, silicon is equally as bad....I can not & will not support this instructable.

The risk to life and/or limb is too great.

They need to pull this instructable.
adam 101 in reply to SIRJAMES09Dec 19, 2011. 1:29 PM
"all it takes to kill a show forever, is to get one episode pulled. If we convince the network to pull this episode for the sake of Muslims, then the Catholics can demand a show they don't like get pulled and then people with disabilities can demand another show get pulled and so on and so on, until Family Guy is no more - it's exactly what happened to Laverne & Shirley. " -- Cartman

Take this quote and reapply it to Instructables. I think you will see why a site cannot pull this instuctable. As soon as it is pulled then nothing can stop people from pulling any instructable that may be deemed to dangerous of has the potential of being used for illegal ends. Next thing you know the site is empty and user-less and the DIY community is devastated.
SIRJAMES09 in reply to adam 101Dec 19, 2011. 5:00 PM
I suppose you're right....

My apologies.
adam 101 in reply to SIRJAMES09Dec 19, 2011. 7:14 PM
Don't be too sad, we all make mistakes. I was just in a trolling mood.
adam 101 in reply to adam 101Dec 19, 2011. 8:39 PM
and I get a little upset about internet censorship.
ContraptionMaker in reply to SIRJAMES09Dec 19, 2011. 12:38 PM
SirJames, no one is saying you HAVE to do this. The risk is your choice. If you think it is too dangerous for you then don't do it, but don't stifle others for trying something new. One thing about silicon, if it is so dangerous why do they make cooking utensils and cooking pans from it.
hcaa in reply to ContraptionMakerDec 19, 2011. 1:38 PM
You're mistaking silicone for silicon.
SIRJAMES09 in reply to hcaaDec 19, 2011. 4:58 PM
you're right. nobody is putting a gun to my head & forcing me to do this...

I apologize for being so uptight. I will just sit in the shadows & be quiet.
momn8r says: Dec 19, 2011. 8:15 PM
SIRJAMES09-Silicon and Silica are two different chemical compositions and it doesn't take much of a chemical change to make a completely different compound so next time you want to find facts to back up a claim of toxicity, remember that Wikipedia is NOT a valid resource. That's why college students are not allowed to use it for research papers. There are no legitimate facts and anyone can go to any page and change the data in them. I personally know people who do it just for fun.

This instructable looks fun and interesting and anyone should use caution when trying to cook or melt anything. I thought we were all grown ups and knew that already. There's no logic behind removing legitimate and useful knowledge.

So I give Two Thumbs Up for this instructible.
ToyMaker says: Dec 16, 2011. 7:34 AM
Pretty good i'ble. Would be much better with correct terminology. "Smelting" is a refining process, typically extracting metal from ore using heat and chemistry (see this wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smelting). "Melting" is converting solid to liquid through application of heat.

keep on i'bling
joewez in reply to ToyMakerDec 19, 2011. 6:42 PM
Thank you! I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed. Bugs the crap out of me.
pdidit says: Dec 19, 2011. 5:04 PM
A couple of things you might try. Flux will help the dross and oxide problem and the bubles or "pits" are probably from gases building up in the melt. Zink cloride might be the flux for that type of solder but I wouldn't use that in a melt. Nasty fumes.
Check out www.backyardmetalcaster.com and www.metalcastingzone.com for lots of stuff on casting.
Opcom says: Dec 19, 2011. 4:32 PM
Industrial processes are inherently dangerous but they are what make the world go.

There is nothing wrong with this instructable at all, and no reasonable person expects a safety manual to be presented with every instructable. I find amusement in the way the 'room' fills up with safety experts, decrying the project and wishing the information to be supressed, every time someone does an industrial experiment.

Instead of either complaining about the article or having several users post a nearly identical warning, those overly concerned with others' safety ought to collaborate on a document containing the warnings about all kinds of processes and materials and make it available on this site. A hobbyists's safety manual.

It is easy to complain or condemn but it is worthwhile to contribute. Information supression is much more dangerous than home made industrial process experiments . Be safe! - Don't Supress Information!
Aerospaced says: Dec 19, 2011. 3:06 PM
Good grief, too many comments to read. In case that someone hasn't already said it, try Woods Metal.
SIRJAMES09 says: Dec 19, 2011. 10:53 AM
(removed by author or community request)
dnl_grrr in reply to SIRJAMES09Dec 19, 2011. 1:40 PM
it seems there is a "be nice" policy on comments, which didn't filter your comment out. I did google your comment and it was very interesting reading. sirjames09, you should try it. its way better to be close to right then to just "feel" rightous. Good luck on your ongoing education.
ContraptionMaker in reply to SIRJAMES09Dec 19, 2011. 12:49 PM
No it is not... From Wikipedia... Over 90% of the Earth's crust is composed of silicate minerals, making silicon the second most abundant element in the earth's crust (about 28% by mass) after oxygen.

(So we should all have cancer!)

Silicon is currently under consideration for elevation to the status of a "plant beneficial substance by the Association of American Plant Food Control Officials (AAPFCO)." Silicon has been shown in university and field studies to improve plant cell wall strength and structural integrity, improve drought and frost resistance, decrease lodging potential and boost the plant's natural pest and disease fighting systems. Silicon has also been shown to improve plant vigor and physiology by improving root mass and density, and increasing above ground plant biomass and crop yields.
SIRJAMES09 in reply to ContraptionMakerDec 19, 2011. 4:55 PM
(removed by author or community request)
djimdy in reply to SIRJAMES09Dec 19, 2011. 9:17 PM
It's pretty terrible that you have cancer, but those 8 doctors are telling you your cancer came from silicon, that's outrageously misinformed and irresponsible.

To wit:
Silicon as an element will rapidly passivate and form glass (SiO2) on the outside, Quartz if it is crystalline. Silicone is a polymer chain based off of silicon and oxygen, as well, but in -mer chain form and comes in an infinite number of combinations, as you well know, from medical grade to food grade to construction grade. Do you use powdered drinks? Invariably, one of the final ingredients will be "silica", which is nothing more than ground up glass (or highly refined and pure sand, however you want to put it).
I used to handle pure silicon wafers in a chip fab. The only reason to wear gloves is to protect the silicon from you, not the other way around.

To sum up, silicon is all around us. If silicon by itself caused cancer, no one would be left alive to tell the tale. That said, silicate fibers in the form of asbestos can cause mesothelioma, but implicating silicon is no more favorable than implicating oxygen.

I'm very sorry for your condition and wish you the best in your recovery, but also hope that you can help the public good by spreading and clearing up facts and not the alternative.
jolshefsky says: Dec 19, 2011. 1:06 PM
I'll have to look more into silicon carbide as a heating element. I already know a guy with refractory bricks who also likes to melt metal ... I've been contemplating melting zinc to dissolve aluminum (e.g. aluminum alloy with a low melting temperature).

I appreciated that the magnetron does not directly generate heat. That was one of my problems with melting metal in the past: finding a hot enough heat source that was controllable and wouldn't sacrifice itself in the process. Assuming all the microwave energy gets absorbed by the silicon carbide, it shouldn't be hard to calculate its temperature rise given the mass of the block and the amount of energy delivered by the microwave. Plus, like solar intensifiers, the temperature seems to be nearly limitless (unlike a torch whose flame temperature is the upper limit, the sun has a very high temperature limit, and microwave excitation probably has one, but it's way out there.)

Very cool indeed!
wilgubeast says: Dec 19, 2011. 12:38 PM
This seems really dangerous. You have jeopardized everyone's access to delicious microwaveable popcorn simply to perform an experiment? How DARE you?!

There are children around the world without access to Orville Redenbacher's finest buttery microwave snack, and you go and waste a perfectly good popcorn-creating device. Not to mention baked potatoes and pizza.

You must be the 1%.
doflagie says: Dec 16, 2011. 6:40 PM
Microwave radiation is a safety problem that should be addressed here. You really don't want to cook yourself. An AM radio tuned between broadcast frequencies will generate a lot of static if it finds microwave energy . In fact you can use an AM (hold the antenna close to the gasket) radio to sniff around the gasket of any microwave to see if it's time to replace it.

Play safe, I hate scraping up friends
bpfh in reply to doflagieDec 17, 2011. 3:22 AM
I never thought of doing that :) Thanks for the head's up!
wilgubeast in reply to bpfhDec 19, 2011. 12:35 PM
You can also put a cell phone inside and call it to check that no EM radiation is escaping and cooking you along with your food. Although the danger during smelting appears to be minimal, as the microwave does not last long enough to cause significant radiation damage.
ContraptionMaker says: Dec 19, 2011. 9:43 AM
I feel I need to add my two cents worth here. I address this to all the those robots out there saying "Danger Will Robinson, Danger!" I am 54 years old and as kids we played with lead soldiers, lead cars and played with mercury. We held in our hands, rolled it around on the floors and used it in experiments in science class. We rode our bikes and skate boards without helmets or knee pads! According to you I should be dead or at least seriously crippled! I am neither! Now I am not saying these things are not dangerous, but, that the actual danger is, like a lot of things in our society, blown out of proportion. We, as a society, tend to over protect ourselves. Yes, precautions need to be taken, but lets not stop expanding just because there is some danger. What if someone said to Ben Franklin, "Ben, you can't fly that kite now because that lightning could kill you!"? Or told the Chinese, "Don't mix those ingredients together, they will blow up." or "Henry don't put that motor in that carriage, people will crash and die!"? Crossing the street is dangerous. Should we just walk around the block instead? As a society we tend to over protect the individual. You must wear a seat belt when you drive, don't play dodge ball in school, I read somewhere that some schools are even banning wiffle ball (seriously?)! Do we really need legislation to protect us from ourselves? I say no! If we want to put our self in danger then that should be our decision, not some legislator in Washington. We have many more advancements to make in science, and yes, they could, and will be dangerous. How many people have died trying to get to space? Does that mean we should not try? Shall we become a stagnant society because it could mean someone might get hurt? I hope not!
Now I am sure this post will receive a lot of flack and that is OK, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Mine is "Take a chance, it can only be your last!"
PS118 in reply to ContraptionMakerDec 19, 2011. 11:52 AM
What would you do without freedom? Will you smelt lead? Aye, smelt and you may die, run away and you’ll live... at least a while. And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all of this, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but they’ll never take... OUR FREEDOM!!!

er... i mean... OUR SCIENCE!!!
SIRJAMES09 in reply to ContraptionMakerDec 19, 2011. 10:48 AM
I understand what you're saying, but after having cancer 1 time(nasal pharyngeal carcinoma -IE: head/neck cancer), If I'm going to make ANY kind of mistakes, I'll make them on the side of safety.
Chu Guk says: Dec 19, 2011. 11:16 AM
Hey, awesome! I found it pretty cool, though I'd be thrown out of home if I tried it :D Just one thing... is it not possible to melt solder wire just in a pot on a fire? Do you really have to use all the microwave stuff? Or you could just put the pieces in the shape you're using and hold the soldering iron in it? Donno, never really tried it myself :D Nice instructable though (even if it is dangerous, hehe)
stephenfitton says: Dec 19, 2011. 10:55 AM
Still got the original article P.S.unable to get silicon carbide at time, so instead I made up a crazy alloy that eats microwaves and dosen't increase its temperature until it becomes satuated at 1000 watts per 60 seconds for 1/4 inch cube. Silicon molding is great for projects like this,nothing is impossible
s52e36 says: Dec 19, 2011. 9:13 AM

I dunno, I think it would be much more effective to use magnesium instead of the bricks, and some thermite to get everything up to the appropriate temperature...


And while I think that would be a very interesting experiment it's also very likely to create a fire that will probably kill you. 'specially if you throw water on it.

Anyway, I think this is a great project, and if there was some way to do this repeatably and safely with a cheap-o microwave I would totally sacrifice my old microwave to science.

If you want to stick with solder casting, I recommend just picking up a cheap-o solder pot for around 40 bucks. Does the same thing, without the flames. Of course it's not nearly as cool.

I would like to see you do bronze next. Either making it as an alloy of copper and tin, or just finding a chunk of bronze and making it into something cooler. There is no better way to learn science than by doing it, and I applaud you
SIRJAMES09 in reply to s52e36Dec 19, 2011. 10:51 AM
the best way to smelt metal, is by using a combination of Natural Gas & oxygen...HOWEVER, the plumbing for that is very expensive because of the type of pipes & insulation that one has to use....which makes it cost prohibitive to the average Joe or Jane.
lechiengrand says: Dec 19, 2011. 9:08 AM
Fun instructable!
So which metal worked better? It looks like you're holding two in your hand at the end - one that made a crisp, defined ingot, and one that's a little more... "organic" in shape?
Thanks for documenting and sharing.
mikeasaurus (author) in reply to lechiengrandDec 19, 2011. 10:36 AM
I used tin/lead solder which melts at 180-190 °C (360-370 °F) and silver solder which melts 450 °C (840 °F). The circular ingot was the tin/lead, the fire caught when I was attempted silver. The 'organic' shape (you are too kind) was caused from the silver experiment being aborted, though I can tell from the shape that I had achieved melting (so..success?).

Wildrat says: Dec 18, 2011. 7:35 PM
good instructable.
If all the cave men sat around a pile of wood discussing what the discovery of fire could cause, for example forest fires, house fires or cave fires we would never have been able to have weenie cook outs because of weenie heads worrying about every thing that could happen. Fire would not have been discovered or used and all the cave men would be sitting around a wood pile eating raw pork, beef, and mechanically separated chicken and turkey! Yummy!
barrem01 in reply to WildratDec 19, 2011. 8:35 AM
Your analogy is flawed. Your hypothetical cave men have not yet discovered fire, while our modern civilization has not only discovered lead smelting, we have a lead smelting industry with decades (centuries?) of research on safety, quality, and efficacy.

This is a dangerous entertainment, like sky diving. There is a very tiny chance it could kill you. If you want to get your kicks that way, fine, but don't confuse it with science.
ContraptionMaker in reply to barrem01Dec 19, 2011. 9:49 AM
Barrem, if this is not science what is it? Popular Science thought it was worthy. Mikeasaurus experimented with foam insulation. Yes it was not a good idea but he learned something from it. That IS science!
79spitfire in reply to WildratDec 18, 2011. 9:47 PM
Actually they would be sick from the pathogens carried by their raw meals, and of course man kind would have never developed the ultimate cooking method, the Barbecue!

As Miss Frizzle used to say, "Take chances, make mistakes, get messy!" How on earth are you ever going to learn anything if you don't!!

"The only perfect sight is hind sight" and the only way to get that is to do!
fixxit says: Dec 19, 2011. 9:47 AM
One note that should be obvious, but may not be: solidified hot metal is indistinguishable from cold metal. I would keep an IR thermometer handy to make sure you don't grab what you think is a cooled item that turns out to give you 2nd degree burns.

My cousin used to smelt old car pistons with a pottery kiln and made this mistake. Once.
Seags says: Dec 19, 2011. 6:13 AM
Hahah, talk about brain-washing. There are obviously some dangers involved here but mostly a whole heap of fun! I've been smelting lead for so many years now that, according to the doom freaks, I really aught to be dead, lol. There's NO danger in using lead responsibly...just as there's probably no asbestos in your gran's outhouse roof (most of that stuff is concrete sheeting) and even if there were, you'd have to drive a dumper truck in an asbostos quarry to gleen any harmful effects.

I'm just thankful that all the great inventions came about before Health and Safety stuck their ill-informed and generally miserable nose in...otherwise we'd have none of the beautiful machinery and artifacts with which we are now surrounded.

Great Instructable!
wocket says: Dec 19, 2011. 12:02 AM
Instructables admin people, these sorts of instructables really should have a safety ratings system attached so that the author and viewers could rate the danger involved. I’d scale this one on the Quick fracking Dangerous side of the scale.
EmcySquare in reply to wocketDec 19, 2011. 2:56 AM
Totally agreed !!

Mostly to the "Add a danger scale" than the rest, but it's definietly a GOOD IDEA
throbscottle says: Dec 19, 2011. 2:12 AM
Earlier this year there was an item on TV (it might have been "Bang Goes The Science", but I'm not sure) where (it might have been Richard Hammond, but I'm not sure) melted a glass bottle in an un-modified microwave. He needed to soften just a bit on the edge of the bottle with a blowlamp to get it started, then the microwave did the rest, in a few secconds.

The point being, the microwaves will heat anything as long as it is liquid (ie, has molecules that can be jigged around), and heated up the softened glass enough to melt it, then the bit it was joined on to, and so on.

It would be really good if this method can be used with other metals, like bismuth (see this 'ible: http://www.instructables.com/id/Fun-with-Bismuth/ ) or to make something really useful, like aluminium pulleys and things. (Unfortunately I don't think I'd be allowed to...)
butterknife says: Dec 18, 2011. 10:07 PM
Using glass would not generally be a great idea. While glass doesn't liquify until around 1000ºF, it does weaken significantly at temperatures as low as 300ºF, and it can lose surface tension around 800ºF depending on the glass. Borosilicate and tempered soda-lime glasses stand up to heat much better, but I really wouldn't advise it. The potential for harm is just too great. Sudden temperature changes from hot to cold can cause microscopic stress fractures in glass as well, which will eventually lead to breakage or shattering.

Stick to stainless steel or ceramic crucibles for anything more intense than Bunsen burners or conventional ovens.
Wildrat says: Dec 18, 2011. 7:49 PM
Hey Man,
Add a colon to your link in your "start" link for melting points of metals.
Again I like this. It has me thinking about another project I have been thinking about for a couple of years. I'll give you a clue though. Your water bucket would be turned into an oil bucket, although water will work fine also.
gladiator327 says: Dec 18, 2011. 7:32 PM
So 161 YOU want to expose users Familes to the contaminents in the home that this experiment is bing tested at.
gladiator327 says: Dec 18, 2011. 7:26 PM
I wold of preheated the mold to leave the pimples behind!
moon161 says: Dec 18, 2011. 5:46 PM
Yes, I'm irked about the molten metal and chemical hazards here. It seems safer to do it on a gas range in the kitchen, or over a propane burner outside.

I'm sure there's a disclaimer that absolves the site of responsibility for accidents somewhere, but I'd get someone on staff with a background in industrial safety. Having an instructables staffer cook this up doesn't help the site image.
grimdaddy says: Dec 18, 2011. 5:08 PM
This should win an award for the best Instructable comment feed ever. My goal is to do copper. Melting point, 1357.77 K, 1084.62 °C, 1984.32 °F. That should be a real challenge. Then when pennies become extinct from the Fed. I can have shot at it. 1982 and back are the best ones for high copper content. 95% copper in 1982 and back.
hogey74 says: Dec 18, 2011. 4:37 PM
Maybe its just me but the more warning comments on an instructable, the more I want to do it! Especially if there is the risk of fire and/or explosions lol. I am taking all these clearly well meant warnings seriously BTW.
heydella says: Dec 18, 2011. 9:38 AM
I'm confused.
What are the white bricks in the picture? Are these the slabs of insulation that you are telling us NOT to use? There seems to be a disconnect between the written and the visual instructions that is a bit alarming! I sure wouldn't want to make a mistake with an instructable like this. Could you clarify?
keithisit in reply to heydellaDec 18, 2011. 4:28 PM
The photographs were obviously taken during the (ultimately) failed attempt before the ible was written.
The instructions are clear and I quote "DO NOT DO THIS!"
canucksgirl says: Dec 18, 2011. 3:12 PM
I love the cutting styrofoam image... hilarious.

Very cool idea. Nice to see it done considering I don't think I have the nerve to try it myself. :D
olmon says: Dec 18, 2011. 1:50 PM
While being 'Interesting' from a scientific standpoint. I wouldn't recommend this for anyone to do beyond a satisfying the curiosity thing. Much faster, simpler, safer & cheaper for the low melting temp materials such as solder to just use a propane torch or a blow torch. A torch would have accomplished the whole deal in a couple minutes without all the rigamarole.

Using a micro wave to slump or fuse glass, however, is a project that is quicker & easier then using a torch, but I would recommend obtaining the commercially made kiln for that purpose because they aren't that expensive.
Andy314159 says: Dec 18, 2011. 1:18 PM
The reason for the voidage (bubbles) people are seeing in the casting is the liquid is solidifying as you pour it and crystals are keeping the liquid from flowing into the hole before the whole thing turns solid.

In casting, you always need some superheat - the melt temperature above the melting point or in the case of an alloy the liquidus temperature. Plumbing solder is NOT a eutetctic solder like electronic solder is purposely so crystals will form in the liquid and the liquid will still be well above melting temperature. This allows it to form joints in wider gaps than would be possible otherwise - if it was all liquid it would run out.

Preheating the mold simply makes the initial bits of liquid that go in cool slower so you don't get solid blebs from that preventing new liquid from flowing in and filling the voids.

So solutions are to heat the mold, heat the melt hotter, or use a melt composition closer to the eutectic.
MCUman says: Dec 18, 2011. 11:56 AM
WOW! Is this whole stunt going to be in the new Jackass Movie?
Void Schism says: Dec 16, 2011. 8:44 AM
Worth mentioning to anyone daft enough to try this without a decent knowledge of fire safety:
DO NOT USE WATER ON ELECTRICAL OR METAL FIRES!!!

Clearly the power was disconnected and the metal had been removed, right? (nod convincingly)

wetting electrical fires can result in electrocution and pouring water onto molten metal can cause steam burns, expolsive thermal stresses and molten metal spray.

Get a CO2 extinguisher and keep it to hand. A bucket of sand is also a good idea for those "why is it still burning... oh #@%& itsathermitreaction!!!" moments

Have fun, be safe and if it blows up post photos ;)
mikeasaurus (author) in reply to Void SchismDec 16, 2011. 9:37 AM
I'd like to say that goes without saying (water on electrical), but since we're putting metal in a microwave all bets are off.

To be clear, this wasn't an 'electrical fire'. It was an organic fire in an electrical appliance. The process of unplugging the microwave was edited out of the video for brevity. Also not shown was the comedy of panic than overcame me when I realized that our fire extinguisher was not operating and we had to jump to our backup plan of water.

For the kids in the back row not paying attention, I've added another disclaimer to address your comment in step 3. Thanks for the prompt!
BillDaCatt in reply to mikeasaurusDec 18, 2011. 7:35 AM
Just like adding water to acid, adding water to molten metal is generally a bad idea. It could splash the molten metal and/or the water could turn into super-heated steam.



Always put the metal in the water. Never pour the water on the metal.



If there is a fire, use a CO2 fire extinguisher. The CO2 will displace the oxygen as well as provide rapid cooling.



It's also advisable to avoid wearing clothing made from synthetic materials, especially your shoes, when preforming this kind of task. Nearly all synthetics will melt and stick to your skin causing severe burns. Cotton and leather clothing offer your best protection when working with molten metal. Heavy welding gloves, instead of oven mitts, are also highly recommended.
snateraar in reply to BillDaCattDec 18, 2011. 10:55 AM
Not sure if a microwave is watertight, but the electronics inside certainly aren't.
The transformer inside, combined with a HV capacitor and diode can reach up to 4,000 volts of AC electricity. And you don't want water near that ;)
vrr says: Dec 18, 2011. 10:15 AM
I know you said don't use construction insulation.

But if you do use proper insulation, shouldn't the insulation go around the brick instead of inside the brick?
depotdevoid says: Dec 16, 2011. 7:56 AM
Sweet, science and fire!

So, let me get this straight: the silicone carbide absorbs the microwave energy, and gets hot. That's what prevents arcing to the crucible or solder?

I noticed the pitting in the ingot you made, it reminded me of the troubles I had with my custom lego stamps. I also used plumbing solder (though I used a torch to melt it!), and I ended up with pitting and irregularities. Do you have any idea what causes that?

Anyway, great instructable! I've actually got an old microwave in the shop right now and my first thought was "Oooooooooh . . . melting stuff!", but I think this time I'm going to restrain myself.
mikeasaurus (author) in reply to depotdevoidDec 16, 2011. 9:31 AM
Yes, the silicon carbide is a susceptor, heating up the crucible and melting the metal. What prevents arcing is the bricks blocking direct line of transmission between the magnetron and the crucible.

I cast a few ingots and had pitted results each time, I think it's caused from the temperature difference between the molten metal and the cold mold. We tried to warm it up prior to casting, but with limited success. Maybe if we had more/better equipment we would preheat the mold. A preheated mold and some gentle vibration I think would allow any gasses to escape and create a smooth ingot.

You should definitely try it, Ian! It's just the right amount of danger and impracticability to make it worth a weekend project. You know I want to see your results!
marcintosh in reply to mikeasaurusDec 18, 2011. 9:17 AM
The easy secret is to use Cuttlebone for a mold. As an art student I used them for casting. They work great. Here's a couple of links-

http://www.metalwebnews.com/howto/cuttlebone/cuttlebone.html
and
http://www.pennabilli.org/tecniche/CUTTLEBONE.htm

If you were casting pistons for engines I'd say it wouldn't work but since your casting was relatively flat and not all that large then by all means give it a try-

Bonus! they aren't expensive and if you're careful can be reused!
mikeasaurus (author) in reply to marcintoshDec 18, 2011. 10:14 AM
I just learned something new: cuttlebone!
scraptopower in reply to mikeasaurusDec 17, 2011. 2:00 PM
I think the bubbles are caused by something else, not the temperature difference. I seem to remember when I dabbled in metal casting, other people were placing some chemicals into the molten metal to remove the bubbles prior to casting. Sorry I can't remember the exact details, but I think the pitting can easily be fixed.
mr.mountaineer in reply to mikeasaurusDec 16, 2011. 11:54 AM
yes the pitting is caused by the temperature difference i melt lead all the time (usually for splatter art ) and have found that heating the mold with a torch before pouring in the metal eliminates the pitting. although an electric hotplate would work as well (yet another use for an unused kitchen appliance) or maybe even a bar-b-q grill .
strehlow in reply to mr.mountaineerDec 18, 2011. 4:13 PM
The mold has to be above the melting point of the material you are pouring into it to guarantee that it will not crystallize when it hits.
depotdevoid in reply to mr.mountaineerDec 16, 2011. 12:09 PM
Interesting. I did try heating my mold with the torch before pouring the solder, but no luck. I wonder if I'd tried putting it on a hot plate instead of hitting it with a torch, perhaps the mold would be more evenly heated?

I've still got the negative from that experiment so I may try again some day. Perhaps I'll attach a small pager motor to the edge, to vibrate out any gas bubbles?
mr.mountaineer in reply to depotdevoidDec 16, 2011. 7:34 PM
i am in no way an expert on the subject but i have done this quite a few times and i have also learned that if you heat the lead longer than needed to melt it and get it really hot less bubbles will form. i hope this helps
Fiction says: Dec 18, 2011. 9:29 AM
You've got your sights set too low!

I did a similar experiment a few years ago, and with a few changes you can be melting IRON in your microwave.

First - use firebrick or rock wool for your insulation, which can easily withstand the several thousand degrees that may be generated. It's also cheap.

Second - get a proper ceramic crucible (or maybe just a ceramic mug...?) also to withstand the heat.

Third - get your hands on a healthy amount of black iron oxide (also known as Fe3O4 or hematite... magnetite sand might also work). I bought a 10lb bag for dirt cheap from a pottery supplier... you can get a 5lb bag from amazon for $20 right here:

http://www.amazon.com/Black-Iron-Oxide-Natural-Pounds/dp/B004KICAVU

The structure of Fe3O4 makes it readily absorb microwaves. The only catch is that it has to be up to a certain temperature (somewhere around 600-800° F I recall) before it starts to heat up aggressively, so using another material as a "starter" will speed things up (with enough time in the microwave, it will melt on its own, but it will happen in less than a minute if you get it up to temperature)

The Silicon Carbide used in this instructable would probably work as a starter... I experimented with using graphite with moderate success.

Once up to temperature, the iron melts rapidly, and somewhat violently. I'm sure there are ways to control this, as well as draw out the some of the oxygen from the mixture to give a purer end result. I wasn't able to test these, as by the time I had figured out how to reliably melt it at all, I burnt out my microwave.
John McKenna says: Dec 18, 2011. 9:20 AM
Oh! the Humanity!
Very Nice.
I wonder if the surface finnish of the ingot could be improved if solder flux was smeared on the bottom of the mold like you would put grease on a cookie tray?
hhnewman says: Dec 18, 2011. 8:11 AM
About depotdevoid's distortion and porosity issues… one of several factors is, that as metals go from liquid to solid, metal shrinks. The more slowly the cast cools, the more uniformly it shrinks. The more quickly it cools, the more it distorts. Also, the center is hot liquid, and the edges solidifiy and shrink first. Since cast metals are crystalline, this imbalance causes the metal in the middle, as it continues to solidify, to pull apart at the crystal margins, creating a spongy porosity that increases as the solidification proceeds toward the center of the cast. Here's a Wikipedia explanation.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casting_%28metalworking%29

Fun discussion!  Howard
askjerry says: Dec 18, 2011. 6:38 AM
Best Instructable Ever.
dr2chase says: Dec 18, 2011. 6:26 AM
Was that aluminum coated with anything? Is that an anodized surface, or something anti-stick? Teflon is supposed to start degrading at 500F, and decompose at 662F (Wikipedia is a little vague on this -- "pyrolosis ... is detectable at 392F").
friger says: Dec 18, 2011. 4:57 AM
Oh great, now I have to do this :(. Thanks Mike, thanks a lot.
blinkyblinky says: Dec 17, 2011. 6:03 PM
Your wife (if you have one) must have come into the kitchen and said "What on earth have you done to the microwave?"

You could also use bismuth to make custom molds...why get that messy?
poza says: Dec 17, 2011. 9:19 AM
in your video you throw water onto an electrical fire. please say you unplugged the appliance before introducing the water!
zombiefire says: Dec 17, 2011. 2:10 AM
looks like a microwave smoke bomb
Richard_Hell says: Dec 16, 2011. 3:24 AM
Great instructable, i've got a sometimes malfunctioning microwave which is just right for this job.
In the worst case scenario i'll end up with stuff to make an arc welder :-) (which i wanted to use it for in the first place) :-D
DavAnt in reply to Richard_HellDec 16, 2011. 5:30 PM
Like!
thoraxe says: Dec 16, 2011. 4:17 PM
For tin/lead, a simple blowtorch would work fine.....
sunshiine says: Dec 16, 2011. 3:37 PM
This is totally awesome! I could never try this but I commend you for your experiment! Thanks for sharing.
Sunshiine
pfred2 says: Dec 16, 2011. 1:28 PM
One high temperature insulation brand is called Kaowool. It is used in things like furnaces. Different kinds can take different heats. I think the lowest is about 2,500 F

I melt metal the old fashioned way over flames.
fjordcarver says: Dec 16, 2011. 4:54 AM
Question, if my wife gets a new microwave for Christmas, will that mean I can have the old one?
Good Job! I will try this one day! Very cool, thanks for sharing.
mikeasaurus (author) in reply to fjordcarverDec 16, 2011. 9:49 AM
Better to beg forgiveness than ask permission. besides, how can she miss the old microwave with a shiny new one to replace it? (grab it now, and start melting metal!)
rimar2000 says: Dec 16, 2011. 4:45 AM
This is awesome, never I thought that is possible. Congratulations for daring to do it.

I hope that the MWO has been saved from destruction. Here in the third world can not all afford to have even an old MWO.
mikeasaurus (author) in reply to rimar2000Dec 16, 2011. 9:48 AM
The microwave died in the name of science.

I didn't know her well, but will always remember the time we smelted metal together and how she held back the licks of fire for a few solid minutes while I got my camera ready.
BobS says: Dec 16, 2011. 7:55 AM
What would be the upper temperature limit? Would it increase if a second magnetron (with the circuitry still in the separate oven) was added. (or would the magnetrons fry each other? (Cool experiment: Maybe I should build this one !!!)
caitlinsdad says: Dec 16, 2011. 6:26 AM
Buckets of water are great for electrical fires, not. I bet you do taser experiments too.

Wouldn't you want a shallower metal crucible since it shields the microwaves or is the idea to heat the crucible which melts the metal inside?
LexanPanda in reply to caitlinsdadDec 16, 2011. 7:37 AM
The idea is to heat the silicon carbide, to warm up the crucible and its contents.
jessyratfink says: Dec 16, 2011. 5:44 AM
This is fantastic. I had no idea. :O
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!