About:I've been an experimental high-energy physicist for 20 years (since I started graduate school in 1988). I got my BS in physics from UCLA, my Ph.D. at Caltech, and did a post-doc at UBC before moving to SLAC.
Being an experimentalist means that I got to learn how to use machine tools, to fabricate little parts and jigs with a mill and lathe, and to deal with Real Engineers to design and construct experiments. This was a great learning experience, and I've been putting it to good use ever since.
Since I got together with my wife, I've been doing assistive technology projects for her. Now I'm starting to do the same to make taking care of our daughter easier. Designing stuff is great fun, but actually taking it from two to three dimensions, especially for someone else, is even better.
Location:SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (nee Stanford Linear Accelerator Center), IRC@kelseymh
It is the LIDAR facility in Washington. Which balances the two lasers in a vacuum with tune out notch at the crystal return mirror resonant frequency and use the corrective drive as the gravity signal information.
Speaking with my friend, the facility appears to have failed to confirm Einstein's gravity waves from nearby orbiting dual suns or sun with black hole.
I think that rather than "LIDAR" (which is used by the police to catch speeders) you are thinking of the LIGO facility in Hanford, Washington. It uses a Michelson-Morley interferometer set up, with Fabry-Perot cavities on each arm, to look for gravitational waves.
Together with a similar detector in Livingston, Louisiana, it is looking for gravitational waves from astrophysical sources such as merging neutron stars or merging black holes. At present, the sensitivity of LIGO is still not quite good enough (there's too much background noise) to actually observe such signals.
No problem! I've used McMaster-Carr as a resource for about fifteen years, now, and haven't had any problems. Their catalog runs to something like 3,000+ really dense pages, with everything from individual nuts up to forklifts.
I wanted to ask a fairly random question here in order not to derail the established thread as it's so far off-topic. In the vegetarian thread, you wrote "I am completely in support of your opinions about CAFOs. The conditions there are appalling -- if (when) human beings were treated that way, the perpetrators were tried and executed."
I'm curious as to where you stand on the death penalty - given what I know about your general political slant I would think it likely that you oppose it across the board. However, (though I realize it doesn't *necessarily* reflect anything about what you think), I wasn't as sure after reading your comment. I found the thought of what Nacho calls a "Lotus Eating Leftie" tacitly finding capital punishment acceptable on a thread about animal rights rather interesting. Thus my curiosity. :D
(If you're not comfortable with the question (I don't know that I would be!), apologies and I can remove the comment.)
In my comment, I was drawing an implicit historical parallel (i.e., to the Nazi concentration camps and subsequent Nuremberg trials). I do not favor the death penalty at all, for both moral and economic reasons.
[ Regarding OPERA's report of superluminal neutrinos: ]
I'm extremely confident that there's an unexpected, and subtle, systematic error in either the raw data or in OPERA's analysis. I've already done some back-of-the-envelope calculations for the obvious things (e.g., surface distance vs. line-of-sight) and they're the wrong order of magnitude.
When you read their paper, they go into great detail about their measurements, so I don't believe they've made any simple mistake.
I'm especially reassured by the three-dimensional GPS measurements of the L'Aquila (Gran Sasso) site (Fig. 7, page 10). The uncertainty in the measurements is quite clear from the scatter, and is just a few cm in each direction. The beautiful systematic trend of plate tectonics, with the theta-function from the earthquake in the middle, give me a lot of confidence that they have good data in hand.
PDF Downloads As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format.
You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.
Comment: This is really freaking amazing. Thank you for putting together an Instructable! I do…
Comment: The Wikipedia article is a good start. Note that much of the actual detector technolog…
Comment: What a very cute project! I like how one of your physicists appears to have been parti…
Comment: Interesting! Of course, if you're going to use LaTeX, you need to spell it correctly :…