385Views22Replies

Author Options:

Nuclear Reactors and Batteries Answered

Hydrogen fusion is a promising source of energy. They have made fusion reactors already. Though they aren't going to supply our energy needs because they consume more energy than the make. Fission reactors have been already made and are good at making energy. Unfortunately they have dangerous radioactive byproducts and wastes. Please post anything you want as long as it has something to do with nuclear reactors.

22 Replies

user
salazam (author)2011-12-15

I thought fusion created more energy, it just requires insane amounts of heat. Like in the sun. If only there was a way to harness THAT energy...

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Masterdude (author)salazam2011-12-15

I've read that some people think thermonuclear reactions could be carried out at lower temperatures (ahem "cold fusion") but it seems that their claims have not been definitely proved or disprove and are generally considered in the category as "anti-gravity" devices. If only cold fusion worke it would be awesome. In essence, it's a jar with water and metal electrode (well, it may be slightly more complicated then that...).

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Lithium Rain (author)2008-12-17

I live fairly close to a renowned research facility. I suppose I'm dead meat if it ever goes kablooey.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
kelseymh (author)Lithium Rain2008-12-17

The big national labs don't generally go kablooey. The ones with weapons programs just contaminate the ground water (Brookhaven's tritium, Hanford's various nasties, Pantex's beryllium). The "pure science" ones (Fermilab, SLAC, NHMFL) are usually more concerned about the local community. Not that I'm biased or anything...

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Lithium Rain (author)kelseymh2008-12-17

This one dump ed/s mercury into the local river. :-\ Hopefully they've cleaned up their act.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
kelseymh (author)Lithium Rain2008-12-17

Notice that I didn't even ask which lab :-)

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Lithium Rain (author)kelseymh2008-12-17

I did! спасибо. :-)

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
kelseymh (author)Lithium Rain2008-12-17

можете (thanks, Google!)

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Lithium Rain (author)kelseymh2008-12-17

>Forehead wrinkles in confusion< Ummm...Рыба!

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
kelseymh (author)Lithium Rain2008-12-17

I asked Google to translate "you're welcome", then cut and pasted. Did I end up with the "you're" part by mistake? Oh, well.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Lithium Rain (author)kelseymh2008-12-17

No, I think it means "can", as in "can do". Unless I'm wrong. Which, you know, I could be.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
kelseymh (author)2008-12-17

New Scientist is reporting on a version of a "radioactive solar cell", which collects beta-decay electrons directly for current.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
kelseymh (author)2008-11-29

Do natural reactors count? The Oklo site in Gabon (West Africa) is a rock formation containing the decay products of a "standard" U-235 water-moderated reactor.

The "reactor" was formed about 1.5 billion years ago when natural uranium-containing minerals were concentrated, presumably by migrating through ground water. At that time, the fraction of U-235 in natural uranium was higher (since not as much had decayed), high enough to be usable as fissionable material.

The ground water itself acted as the neutron moderator, permitting a self-sustaining chain reaction to run intermittently for a few hundred thousand years.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Masterdude (author)kelseymh2008-11-30

Yeah. I think I read about this on the Discover Magazine web site.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Masterdude (author)kelseymh2008-11-29
user

I was just about to post about those =]

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user

I had just read the article myself before seeing bumpus's comment. Where did you read about them?

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user

I have no idea =] I just remembered an article about the bath-tub size reactors that would just require monthly service, and that after like five years, it would produce a softball sized amount of waste.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
bumpus (author)2008-11-20

Heh, there are two pretty close to me. :P

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
KentsOkay (author)2008-11-20

... Right there with yah?

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer