Oodammo Pistol Contest Answered
This is the contest me and TD were/are organizing.
MeZak:4/5. Very, very quick.
OodAst3.6: 4/5. Not quite as quick as the MeZak, but it makes up for it in comfort.
TBOS: 1/5. Truly agonizing.
EAP: 3/5. Not bad. Tougher and more time consuming than the OodAst and MeZak, but much better than the TBOS.
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY / DURABILITY (Note, I'm rating according to how "Bendy" they feel.)
MeZak: 4/5. Really sturdy. Barely any bend.
OodAst: 4/5. Really sturdy, but again, just barely less sturdy than the MeZak. But not so much as to lower it a whole point.
TBOS: 2/5. Only 3 layers. Bendy, bendy, bendy.
EAP: 4/5. 5 layers, so it's obviously pretty good.
RANGE (The first range is with 2 #64's, the second is with the maximum amount. Measurement was averaged out of 5 shots. I used Google Earth, but I promise I didn't cheat.)
MeZak: 4/5. 39 feet. 63 feet. (Max. of 6 bands.)
OodAst. 3/5. 44 feet. 52 feet. (Max. of 4 bands.)
TBOS. 3/5. 41 feet. 41 feet. (Max. of 2 bands.)
EAP: 2.5/5. 37 feet. 37 feet. (Max. of 2 bands.)
FINAL SCORES MeZak: 12/15. #1
OodAst: 11/15. #2
TBOS: 6/15. #4 Ouch
EAP: 9.5/15. #3
So, congrats MeZak, you win.
(Though, I'd like to point out, this is based pretty much entirely on performance, not personal opinion.)