4560Views80Replies

Author Options:

The Future of Invisibility Answered

It is reported that a team of researches at the University of California, Berkeley claim to be on the doorstep of invisibility. Using a special type of metamaterial they are bending electromagnetic waves and negatively refracting visible light. Their ultimate goal is to render entire objects invisible to the naked eye.

After reading this, I conducted some invisibility experiments of my own. Based on my initial experiments with invisibility cloaking, I must concede that we are not quite there yet, but are getting close (see image).

For more information, read the full news report

50 Replies

user
skhan55 (author)2013-01-02

I think Its possible.. to be invisible..
What if I put a camera behind my back and it gives the live Video stream to the LCD that I hold in my Arms..?
If its possible to made an LCD suit that one can wear and 1000s of cameras working with LCDs to display the other sides of someone as if nobodys there(Person wearing LCD suit)

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Orngrimm (author)2012-12-20

I made the same, but my method was 100% successfull. However, the problem was that i turned my camera invisible, so i wasnt able to find it anymore... So no pictures of a invisible camera in my hands, seen in the mirror (would look like i am holding nothing and this nothing makes pictures).
But take my word on that.

:)

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
smartphelix (author)2008-12-19

honestly, I really want to believe this but, um, do you have any proof or at least the method for becoming translucent? please

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
kelseymh (author)smartphelix2008-12-19

Heh. Read the news report Randofo cited above, or even better, some of the original papers.

Randofo's picture is (obviously) a nice photoshop (or whatever :-) overlay.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
zelback1 (author)kelseymh2012-09-11

I think it is not a photoshopped picture. I tried what was said above, using a picture of the room and a projector, and I sat in front of it and took another picture... well, actually I sat down about 49 times and took like fifty pictures and in between I had to get up and fix some miniscule problem so I couldn't see the difference between the edge of the projection and the wall in the picture. You have to do it just right, and the lord only knows how many times I had to get up and adjust the projector position, trapezoid, span, width, contrast, and brightness, but it works the way they said it would... However, I must note that I was blind for about half an hour after I did all of this this because of all that time spent looking directly into the projector. I do not reccomend trying this without sunglasses. Kudo's on figuring this out though. This just proves that sometimes simple but abstract ideas are much bettter solutions to a problem than complex technology and years of development. ^_^

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Fashim (author)2009-07-31
user
Fashim (author)Fashim2010-01-11

Please Please make an Instructable on this What Fun i could do with this

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Fashim (author)2010-01-11

I have to admit if This is portable Invisibilty so you can move around this has would be Awesome for War.. Except Thermal Sights

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
flittermouse (author)2008-12-28

YEP! It's called photoshop CS3. If you believe this guy I have a Moggwai you can buy for 300 dollars; no water of food after midnight.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Fashim (author)flittermouse2010-01-11

If nobody has Bought it i will!.. But i Believe this Post

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
randofo (author)bumpus2008-12-28

I think he is implying that I photoshopped this...

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
bumpus (author)2008-08-12

A a little electrical tweaking to my Phaser... Like I said.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Sharku (author)bumpus2008-08-13

get a tripod, take a picture with the flashlight and without the flash light, photoshop the flashlight out of the pic and set to 10 opacity NOTE: you cannot see the item shadow on the desk EVEN if you were invisible youd still see a shadow

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Serpentine (author)Sharku2009-07-28

The flashlight is making a reflection on the table. There would be no reflection if he did what you imply he did. Also, There would not be a shadow.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
DrCoolSanta (author)Sharku2008-08-25

Correction, you don't need to photoshop the flash light out, it would work anyway.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
inkwash (author)2008-12-30

hey,

I have did the invisibility program in a stage take the breath out of all the viewers...

what i did was that i took the picture of the background..
setup an LCD projector in front of the stage to project it...adjusted the brightness to be justified by the ambient light and voila!!!! who ever standing before it is translucent!!!!!!!!!

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
kelseymh (author)inkwash2009-01-02

That's a very nice method. Since you've been on I'bles a few months, why not put together a proper I'ble presenting the method, or at a minimum a Slideshow or Video demonstrating it.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
lordofthedonuts (author)2008-08-13

Do anyone here understand the principle behind this? because I don't It's funny to see how people talk on technology they don't understand hehe.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
kelseymh (author)lordofthedonuts2008-12-29
<bump>
Read the original articles. The idea is to fabricate an artificial material (often stacks of split-ring conductors) with both a negative index of refraction (not found in natural materials) and with a spatially varying index.

If done correctly, a plane wave (e.g. from a distant illuminant) incident on the "cloak" will be guided around it in such a way that, instead of a shadow or diffraction pattern, the outgoing light will also be a plane wave. Consequently, it will appear as though nothing was in the way of the illuminant.

There are many issues with this technology.
  • It mostly works only in two dimensions. There have been reports of 3D cloak designs, but the symmetry makes the problem much more complex.
  • It mostly works only at specific wavelengths. The split-ring method preferentially affects wavelengths close to the diameter of the rings, so cloaks tend to be very narrowband.
  • Most cloaks have only been demonstrated in the microwave regime for the same reason. Fabricating repeating material structures at the few hundred nanometer scale (with the materials needed for cloaks) is not easy.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
GorillazMiko (author)2008-08-11
user
GorillazMiko (author)randofo2008-08-11

Shhhh. Don't talk. Just pull your hair.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
The Jamalam (author)GorillazMiko2008-08-12

*Kicks down pit of death*

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Derin (author)GorillazMiko2008-09-08

*kicks down into pit of arms*

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
whatsisface (author)The Jamalam2008-08-12

Fail of the week goes to.....

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Labot2001 (author)whatsisface2008-08-12

if I said his name, would I FAIL too?

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
CameronSS (author)2008-08-11

Your experiments are probably close enough. Most people don't pay enough attention to see someone at 10% opacity.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
lupinesoul (author)CameronSS2008-08-12

But most people would notice the motion of the near invisible subject.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Rishnai (author)lupinesoul2008-08-12

But then probably not be able to pinpoint it... kind of like watching the Pedator move in the original movies: you could only see it if you had an idea of precisely where to look.

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
DrCoolSanta (author)lupinesoul2008-08-25

No they would just be too scared to pin point you. Besides they won't be able to recognise you anyway. "Mommy, that transluscent girl just took away my ice cream" "WTH?"

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Rockerx (author)2008-08-14
It is so much easier in the movie world. Minus the stupid sounds:)

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Plasmana (author)2008-08-11
user
Psychic Master (author)Plasmana2008-08-14

can any body tell me how you would actually be able to make this like design schematics of just tell me where to go

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
Keith-Kid (author)2008-08-11

If it's invisible, how can they be sure it works? How can they be sure the object is even there?

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer

user
randofo (author)Keith-Kid2008-08-11

How can they be sure it's really there even if it is visible?

Select as Best AnswerUndo Best Answer