Introduction: Knex Ultimax U-100 MK5
Hey guys, i just got news on battlefield 4, and now i am making one of the guns featured in the game. If anyone is wondering why my name is CODawesome, i used to like COD in the past. But since I am building guns from battlefield 4 now, i switched sides, because i don't like COD anymore. I wish i could change the name, but it's too late. Ok, enough talk, lets go to the pros and cons on this beast.
Pros:
-accurate looks
-accurate shooting over 20 ft
-a 5.56x45 mag with INTERNAL PUSHAAAA
-CFBM (CODawesome's front bolt mech)
-super solid/UNBREAKABLE
-real flip up iron sights
-R.I.S. QUAD RAIL SYSTEM!!!!
- Knex EOtech SIGHT WITH AN ACTUAL RED DOT!!!!!
Cons:
-alotta cut pieces
-SOMETIMES JAMS
-IT TOOK UP ALL OF MY USEFUL KNEX PIECES
-MATURE COMMENTS ONLY!!!!
-This must have at least 2 favorites for step by step instructions!
-WHY: BECAUSE WHY WOULD I WASTE MY TIME MAKING INSTRUCTIONS FOR AN 'IBLE THAT NOBODY LIKES?
-IF U R A BEAST, FEEL FREE TO CLICK THE FOLLOW BUTTON, IF U WANT TO SEE MORE OF MY UPCOMING STUFF
Otherwise, good day to alla y'all!

Participated in the
Weekend Projects Contest
20 Comments
9 years ago on Introduction
As I tell you on most of your guns, you build it too thick. You see, if you would build it proportionally, you would have leftover pieces to make the gun as accurate as possible. You gun is too thick, in almost every way. It is a nice gun, but you would get better range and looks with making your guns smaller in size.
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
Leave no doubt that this is a nice replica, but all the same, it is too thick.
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
Red, remember the thickness I was talking about? This is what I mean. :3
The guy's got a point: they're all five layers. Now the gun may be too tall, or too wide, or too long, but really, all K'nex guns have the same thickness.
I am confuzzled. Please 'splain.
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
Whoops, I guess I did not make my self clear enough. When I said thick up on my first post, I was talking about how tall the gun was, not how many layers it had.
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
Oh, ok.
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
but if you compare the thickness of the real one in first person, you would see that it has to be 5 layers thick.
9 years ago on Introduction
Good job beasts. Instructions coming soon.
9 years ago on Introduction
Seems good, but the real gun has a bad stock.
9 years ago on Introduction
It looks okay, bit too blocky for me though.
Also, I agree with The Racker. The bold caps, overuse of exclamation marks etc. is annoying
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
wait. who is The Racker? oh wait, is he the guy that deleted his comments?
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
Si, I don't know if he deleted his comments, or that Ibles mods did that themselves though.
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
my response got deleted also, so it must be the admins
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
I didn't delete anything. It shows up that you deleted your comments though :/
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
Okay. Must be a glitch then, I didn't delete mine either, and it's still visible to me :/
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
I see your parent comment, but I can't see any of COD's replies(to my original comment). I can see why the mods would take them down though.
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
Ah. I can't see COD's first reply to me either, and your whole comment section, with COD and Flying Fish has dissapeared, even though you said nothing wrong IMO
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
I was kinda harsh. And fish went away as well, but my comments didn't. Weird.
9 years ago on Introduction
Good job!
Reply 9 years ago on Introduction
thanks
9 years ago on Introduction
Lol I thought you hated my gun for a second. Yeah, I didn't really like the looks of the stock, cuz it is disproportionate to the whole gun.