656Views13Replies

2 to the 2 to the 22 power Answered

I recently took the pamel (pennsylvania math league test thing) and for one of the questions it said: rearrange the numbers 2 in anyway with mathmatical symbols to get the highest number possible. I though the answer was 2 to the 222 power The answer was 2 to the 2 to the 22 power Is this correct? I thought that you would multiply the powers to get 2 to the 44 power, now have the power to the power and get 2 to the 4194304 power.

Tags:

The forums are retiring in 2021 and are now closed for new topics and comments.

(2 to the (222) !) would be higher than that.

Why not 2222? That would be 22256, which is bigger.

Mangled--two raised to two raised to two raised to two=two raised to two raised to 256

. Maybe it's a problem with notation/explanation, but 2**2**2**2 = 256. (IIRC, that's old FORTRAN notation for powers.)
. How's this: ((22)2)2 ?

This is how they positioned it

. Maybe I've forgotten my notation, but I read that as: two squared to the 22nd = two44

that's what I though, but the math league says 2 to the 2 to the 22 (my carrot thingy button isn't working) is the same as 2 to the 4194304 power because 2 to the 22 power is 4194304.

and by the math league I mean something that is state wide

. There must be some missing parenthesis. According to Calc98 (desktop calculator): 2 xy 2 xy 22 = 17592186044416. As does 2 xy 44.
. Are you sure it wasn't written as 2 to the (222)?

it could of been, I mean our teacher was just reading the answers aloud in an aututorium to about 600 people, so it could of been. But yeah with the parenthesis it's going to be a huuuuugggggeeeee number, a lot of calculators can't even handle it.

. Yeppers. I get "Overflow" when I try 2 to the 222 or 24194304)

. 2222 = 244 < 2222. I'm guessing you read the question wrong. Or maybe I'm not understanding what you're saying. :)

. Wow! my formula got mangled.
. 2 squared to the 22nd power = 2 to the 44th, which is less than 2 to the 222nd power.