Oodassault Pistol Review
This is a review of TD's newest pistol on Ibles, the Oodassault Pistol.
Review requested by TD.
Range: 7/10
25-30 feet with 2 64's. Could be better, but not very bad for a pistol.
Looks: 9/10
Bleh. I don't look for how a gun looks, just reliability and power.
But I'd say it looks pretty good.
Strength(in terms of holding together) and Comfort: 7/10
The back of the pistol exploded once for me. I wouldn't recommend putting too many rubberbands, the back may explode if you do.
Also, the thicker part or the handle (middle layer) was pretty flimsy for me, and broke pretty often.
After replacing the blue clip with a tan clip, it stayed in place and never broke off. No biggie.
Other than that, very sturdy.
Handle's very comfy, no rods sticking out anywhere.
Reliability: 10/10
Not once has this pistol jammed, or the trigger system failed.
Power: 8/10
Not too bad. Dents my super-special awesome cardboard (with extra reinforcement) a bit from a good 5-10 feet away.
Accuracy: 9/10
This uses oodammo, of course it's very accurate.
I can hit a 3-inch target from about 15-20 feet away (and I suck at aiming lol).
Extra Features/Sights: 7/10
Sights are kinda unnecessary, but fun use if shooting at stationary targets from a REALLY short distance.
Safety is also fun to play with, and pretty innovative. Nice work, TD.
Piece Efficiency: 10/10
Uses very little parts, and gets the job done.
Overall: 8.4/10
Very good pistol for playing around and war (for a sidearm).
Reliable and powerful (for a pistol), this is a must build for anyone with the pieces.
Ible: https://www.instructables.com/id/Oodassault-Pistol/
EDIT: I have a bad sense of measuring. My friend with better depth perception came over today. He estimated about 20 feet flat with 2 #64s. Whoops :S
And TD's right, I do rate too high.
:S
Discussions
10 years ago
Mind reviewing my new oodassault pistol if I happen to post instructions? I updated it even further from the current version on youtube.
Reply 10 years ago
I will! as long as i get enough info. And instructions.
Reply 10 years ago
Alright. I might post it this weekend and I'll send you the unpublished version. I wanna make sure the gun isn't only good in my hands and eyes and suckish in everyone else's.
Reply 10 years ago
Via what? E-mail? cordak88@yahoo.com
Reply 10 years ago
Naw.
10 years ago
2 staples #64's got me 60 feet. 45'd of course.
Reply 10 years ago
Yeah, go shoot it flat.
Reply 10 years ago
40.
10 years ago
I got 25-30 feet with just one band. This is easily one of my favourite guns.
Reply 10 years ago
Well then, you must have magical rubber bands.
Reply 10 years ago
So that's where they went... :P
Reply 10 years ago
Or your rubberbands are cursed :S
Reply 10 years ago
...... Damn you, Walmart. Damn you.
Reply 10 years ago
Walmart= US communism.
Reply 10 years ago
Salvation army= CAN Communism
Reply 10 years ago
Not really, the people at the top must make bucketloads.
Actually, that does = communism. But not the theory, the reality.
Reply 10 years ago
Lol
Reply 10 years ago
I shoot all my knex guns with one band.
Reply 10 years ago
... That's great....
Reply 10 years ago
they arent #64 either.
Reply 10 years ago
...Woohoo.... Why're you telling me this?
Reply 10 years ago
becuz i canzerz! :-P
Reply 10 years ago
Just regular 64# really.
Reply 10 years ago
Oh. Nevermind then I have tons of those.
10 years ago
Wow... The final rating is almost equal to mine!
10 years ago
I think guns' range and power should be judged with however many bands they can hold, rather than a set amount. That way, structural strength can be tested too.
10 years ago
Muchos gracias senor! Me le gusta! ...I think I said that right. Works for me although hopefully people don't think those ratings are too high. For example how did you test accuracy? I think for something to be 10/10 it must be able to hit a target at its max range. Otherwise yeah I agree with most of it. Thanks again.
Reply 10 years ago
I think for something to be 10/10 it must be able to hit a target at its max range.
Good point. Bullets tend to have a parabolic travel (As Mepain said), so it's theoretically impossible for any gun to hit a target at a max range (unless you're aiming for the ground lol).
I overrate things alot XD
Muchos gracias senor! Me le gusta!
Correction: Mucho gracias, senor! Me gusta mucho!
:P
Reply 10 years ago
(Canadian) EH! THANKS DUDE!
Reply 10 years ago
(canadian reply) Oh Ya, you betcha!
Reply 10 years ago
Oi, Im the Canadian, I make the Canadian comments, eh dude?
Reply 10 years ago
No fair. You get Canadian and half the other knexers get British so what do I get? Texan? WELL HOWDY Y'ALL! Not my thing...I'm in Minnesota. We're practically half Candian right there, eh?
Reply 10 years ago
Darth Gecko Man and I get Washington... "COWS!!!"
Reply 10 years ago
LoL I s'pose... Good ol stereotypes...
Reply 10 years ago
Want to come round for a good old game of croquet and have afternoon tea and scones? Stereotypes are funny
Reply 10 years ago
And tea cakes, to be sure old chap!
Reply 10 years ago
Crumpets as well old bean.
Reply 10 years ago
Sounds positively spiffing.
Reply 10 years ago
Well toodle pipski, I can't hang around.
Reply 10 years ago
Cheerio.
Reply 10 years ago
Maybe I should make a forum topic for the sole purpose of stereotyping. What d'you think? :P
Reply 10 years ago
Up you you old boy!
Reply 10 years ago
HOW'D YOU KNOW I WAS TEXAN?
Reply 10 years ago
I GET RHODE ISLAND!!!
Reply 10 years ago
And then there are the Brutish knexers. ;)
Reply 10 years ago
lol yeah!
Reply 10 years ago
oops yeah didn't mean to put that s on muchos but otherwise I didn't say "I like a lot" I said "I like it" And yeah well I guess that's true too so I guess it would have to be it's "flat range" although you can still see how horizontally accurate a gun is even when the bullet falls seeing how humans are generally tall targerts I don't care for verticle accuracy. I've found that the laws of physics will actually create a small amount of recoil on some powerful repeaters which makes the gun move upwards ever so slightly.
Reply 10 years ago
"Many thanks sir! I he likes!" A little off.
Reply 10 years ago
Are you sure you didn't mix up le "it" for el "he" ? And if you really want to get technical I said "It is pleasing to me"
Reply 10 years ago
"El" is not "he", it's "the". For it to be "he" it needs an accent mark above the "e", as in "él".