844Views14Replies

# can i use capacitors in paralel/serial like resistors?

i know about resistors that when u use them in serial, the ohm values should be added to eachother and then you have the total resistance, or when in paralel, count it up and divide by the number of resistors (right)

what i want to know is, does this aply for capacitors as well? like when i use a 1.0 uF capacitor and a 0.1uF capacitor in series, i get 1.1uF

please note that the ones im planning to use are ceramic.

and if they weren't should i connect them like leds in serial? like positive of one cap to negative of the other?

## Discussions

Best Answer 9 years ago

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_and_parallel_circuits

Answer 9 years ago

it looks to me that it is, but im not that sure, so, is it yes, or no?

Answer 9 years ago

. Look at the formula for series resistors. Now look at the formula for parallel capacitors.

. Look at the formula for parallel resistors. Now look at the formula for series capacitors.

. See a pattern?

. Capacitors can be lethal. Hold off building whatever it is you are building until you understand capacitors and their hazards better.

Answer 9 years ago

im building this

i thought i'd order a 1.1uF cap, but it seems like i didnt (cant find it anyway) and i do have a 1.0uF and a 0.1uF cap.

so, if i understand correctly, it works the same.

thnx.

Answer 9 years ago

. The preceding paragraph should be read: . Even if it was 1.1uF, it's just a filtering cap, so 1.0uF would most likely be close enough.

Answer 9 years ago

lol, didnt even see that really.

anyway, im going to use just a single 0.1 uF ceramic cap, and thatl be the end of it (i hope)

Answer 9 years ago

Have you looked at the schematic? It's clearly a

0.1uFand a10uFcap.The 0.1uF cap in that circuit is probably there to shunt away any high frequencies (to prevent oscillation and noise), and is usually referred to as a

decoupling cap. The 10uF cap is the smoothing (reservoir, or filtering) cap.Other than that +++++ for everything Nacho wrote. When even

goodproduction caps have a +/- 20% error, you'll never see something like 1.1uF specified on a schematic.Answer 9 years ago

. It's not the same for capacitors and resistors - it's "backwards."

.

Parallelresistor andseriescapacitor networks use the same basic formula..

Seriesresistor andparallelcapacitor networks use the same basic formula.9 years ago

Two things:

1.) It SAYS 1.1uF, it MEANS 1, 0.1 uF capacitor

2.) There is no need to be that specific with this capacitor. Its very very rare to need to select a capacitor with a very high precision.

Steve

Answer 9 years ago

why are all the caps being sold from 0.1uF up to 0.1 pF (thought that was smaller, might be wrong)

so if its not accurate at 0.1 uF then how can it be accurate when its alot less?

Answer 9 years ago

Units,

farads are HUGE, hence why the common units are

uF - microfarads, 1/1000 farad

pF picofarads, and 1/1,000,000 farad

nF nanofarads. 1/1,000,000,000 farad

its uncommon for a 1uF capacitor to be precise to the picofarads, because its an order of magnitude bigger. It doesn't make sense to have a picofarad cap accurate to the nanofarads...again, its too big for that kind of precision.

It DOES make sense to have a picofarad cap precise to the tenth of a picofarad though - because when you need a specific value, being off by double or triple can cause problems.

As for adding them up - they do the exact opposite as resistors, since they do the opposite of what resistors do - acting sort-of like batteries that don't conduct when they're fully charged. add them in series and you get inverse of sum of the inverses. Add them in parallel and you add their values.

Answer 9 years ago

steveastrouk said: Its very very rare to need to select a capacitor with a very high precision.

. I would amend that to: Its very very rare to need to select a

capacitor with a very high precision.filtering.

. When you get into timer, radio, AC, and other type circuits, "pretty close" may not be close enough.

Answer 9 years ago

Yes, I was going to correct that.... thanks !

Answer 9 years ago

il keep that in mind ;)