Making Rheoscopic Fluid




Introduction: Making Rheoscopic Fluid

About: Hello, all! I am an avid tinkerer of all things. Follow me as I learn about all my interests!
Hello all,

I recently discovered rheoscopic fluid which is used to visualize the subtle currents in liquid. It works similar to dropping dye into the fluid to highlight currents, but rheoscopic fluid will never mix! Below is couple clips of my first batch.


Also, here is the video that started my pursuit:

How does this magical substance work? Well, to paraphrase Wikipedia, there are crystal flakes that align with the direction of shear when in motion. These aligned flakes reflect light toward the observer. Once the fluid stops moving, the flakes take on a random orientation and light is again diffused. Of course, Wikipedia gave no hint to the actual ingredient... I searched for a few good hours trying to figure out how this stuff works. Turns out it's something of a trade secret, it would seem...

...Next is some history I discovered during my quest for the secret, but you can skip to step 2 if you're dying for the details.

Step 1: History

Wikipedia was a dead end and also lacked any history on the fluid. However, I remembered the name of the video I saw was 'Kalliroscope' so I looked it up. The wiki article linked it to the works of an artist named Paul Matisse. After prolonged investigation, I was able to dig up only one photo of him and an amazing creation. He built a table with a large rotary disc of rheoscopic fluid. As you turn it, a blue hurricane like structure appears in the table. It also turned out that the kalliroscope in the video was produced by Matisse in a limited run and are quite valuable now.

Rheoscopic fluid was also used in the past by educators and engineers. These days computers are predominately used to run simulations of airfoils and fluid dynamics, but before that models had to be built and tested. One method was to take the object and submerse it in flowing rheoscopic fluid. I managed to find one video from the 1960's (@ 2:22 & 23:50 min mark) demonstrating flow instability:
A rare modern replica too:

But this form of art/science was largely lost after the 1960's. Only a few museums have displays and the limited places that sell rheoscopic fluid really don't say what it's made of.

Step 2: Secret Ingredients

After my long search, one video had 'mica powder' in the description. My wife was over my shoulder and said nonchalantly that it is used in makeup to give that sparkly appearance. It's also used in shampoo to give it that distinct shiny goo look. It's non-soluble with water which is why it doesn't mix. So I face-palmed myself for thinking it was some exotic substance and ordered white cosmetic mica powder from amazon:

You can also purchase different colors of mica. This opens up the possibility of, say, red mica against blue water. I chose white to begin with as it is very reflective and will appear to take on the color of the liquid.

It was only 1oz for $9, but it went WAY farther than I expected. You could use half an oz on a 10 gallon aquarium and have nearly the same results as Paul Matisse's table.

However, mica is not the only mundane source of rheoscopic fluid particulate. If you can acquire very fine aluminium powder, it will duplicate the mica's appearance pound for pound. You can even produce your own aluminum powder with a coffee bean grinder, foil and ear plugs. Inhalation and ingestion of the powder is dangerous though, and the grinder will only be good for aluminum. I won't rule it out though for future projects as it may be cheaper in the long run and a respirator/gloves will mitigate the danger. Video link:

Yet another way is to use silver calligraphy ink. If you happen to have some, it's a good alternative. You can use an eye-dropper to transfer the ink out of it's bottle. If not on hand or at a nearby store, I would just order some mica powder.

Ultimately, the cosmetic mica powder seems to be the best bang-for-your-buck and requires little effort.

*Update* Finely ground graphite seems to show similar properties. It might be the cheapest of the bunch, but it's naturally dark appearance may be an issue. It should not be handled directly; use gloves and a mask or respirator just like the aluminum method.

As for the working fluid the powder is suspended in, I use ordinary water! It works fine even if it isn't what Matisse used. After examining the label on an original kalliroscope in ebay, I discovered he used Tetrachloroethylene. It's on the EPA's hot list and is a chlorofluorocarbon + solvent. User Starphire tells me that it was selected due to it's low boiling point. This allowed convection to be seen when the solution was heated. It's also not flammable like other low boiling point liquids, but it's toxic. However, the visual difference in motion is minuscule and you won't notice unless you heat it (plus water is cheap)!

Step 3: Ratios and Additives

I took 1/4 tsp of mica and mixed it with 1 liter of tap water! It yielded a very nice flow visualization and suspension of particulate. After several minutes it will settle to the bottom, but when you maintain even the slightest movement it will remain. Also, I think it's quite possible to use less powder to yield still impressive results. 1/8 tsp per liter didn't have quite the definition of currents as Paul Matisse's table or kalliroscope, but it's still was pretty nice.

Simply adding a drop or two of food coloring per liter will give you great colors without diminishing the effect. You don't want to make it too dark a shade or it may block out light from reaching down into fluid. If you do make a darker fluid, you will need to add more mica to offset the occluded water. You can see in the photos that the plain white mica shines very bright, but is can be clouded substantially with (red) food coloring if used liberally. I am working on a ratio for darker mixtures and will update if I succeed.

Have some neglected high-lighters around? You can use them to add a vibrant florescent glow. I used some needle-nose pliers to remove the end-cap of the high-lighter. This revealed the ink well, which is just a squishy cotton like cylinder. Squeezing the ink well over your bottle of water will cause drops of high-lighter to fall in (as photos show). It looks very bright just in ambient light, but that wasn't enough. I exposed the mix to a UV flashlight and it created an interesting effect. Instead of the mica shining near the surface, the fluid seemed to glow from within and blocked by the mica. In other words, it was inverted in appearance like a negative picture film. The comparison picture shows it somewhat, but doesn't really do it justice. **special thanks to users Gravityisweak and Rpotts2 for the idea**

User Bpark1000 suggested adding some rubbing alcohol or dish soap to the fluid. This will prevent anything from growing in your container over time. I've been putting some dish soap in mine to test and it seems to be none-the-worse for it. 

It's really that simple! Maybe it's just because of all research I had to do, but I expected it to be harder to get something this interesting.

*Note/Update: I tried using baby oil for a more viscous rheoscopic fluid and it didn't work. Oil based liquids seem to repel the mica powder. This causes it to form a layer between the jar and liquid. If you want to make the fluid more thick/viscous, you can mix in clear corn syrup to the water until you achieve the desired consistency. However, this seems to make the fluid really resist moving and makes for less spectacular results. Still, it retains a nice pearly shampoo like appearance and might be useful for something.

**Note/Update: Turns out the corn syrup/water mix was actually useful! User Gravityisweak brought up the idea of adding magnetic particles to the fluid and seeing what happens. Well, as fate would have it, I had a magnetic viewer filled with corn syrup/water I made a while back (added pics). You see, the magnetic particles are just tiny pieces of steel wool I cut up with scissors. The thick fluid suspends them for a long time. The added mica traces little paths as the steel wool bits move about. In retrospect, I would use less mica and wool for better visibility. Here is a link to the mag viewer 'ible (remember, corn syrup and water is what I used in lieu of oil):

***Note: A lot of people have suggested using glycerin or Elmer's gel glue to thicken the fluid, but I haven't tested it yet. If you test it, please give us the results in the comments below!  

Step 4: Easy Viewer

For a simple and decent looking container, I used a 1 liter 'smart water' bottle. It's a near perfect cylinder which makes for easy viewing. besides being cheap, it's resilient and makes it good for kids to use. My daughter loves it. I recommend gluing the cap in place. I removed the label, which left a sticky residue. To remove it, my wife rubbed coconut oil and baking soda over it and left it for 5 minutes. After waiting, it wiped perfectly clean with soap and warm water.

Step 5: Final Thoughts

So what can you do with it?

*You can use it in a science fair project to show convection currents or aerodynamics with this lost technique.
*Make a toy for the kids or desk at the office.
*Incorporate it in a prop for a costume or movie.
*Make a killer coffee table like this guy below:

* Update: below is a simple table that most anyone can build in a day or two! Check it out:

I have some other ideas too that I am working on. If you enjoyed this instructable, stay in touch for more. I'd love to hear ideas, suggestions, and answer questions! Have fun!

8 People Made This Project!


  • Metalworking Contest

    Metalworking Contest
  • Fix It! Contest

    Fix It! Contest
  • Creative Misuse Contest

    Creative Misuse Contest

163 Discussions

Thanks for the nice background and details of your research. I wonder how this would look when pumped through clear tubing. Do you think metallic particles could be mixed in for fancy magnet play? What would happen if you mixed the mica with both cornstarch and water for a non newtonian fluid?

4 replies

Hey, get out of my head haha! I just put some mica in a old magnetic viewer I made.

Another member asked about using oil (which didn't work sadly) to make a thicker fluid. I opted to use corn syrup mixed with water which I used for my magnetic viewer in the past. Instead of making a new batch, I just sprinkled mica into my mag viewer.

To make the magnetic field viewer, take steel wool, cut as small of shavings as humanly possible with scissors, add to water, mix in corn syrup til desired consistency. Next time I won't use as much steel wool or mica for more transparency. I'll have to put this in my additives section...

As for the tubing, I had some 8mm clear vinyl tubing I ran it through. The flow became pretty laminar/boring and it was really transparent. Still, I think with bigger diameter tubing and more mica, it would look cool. Sorry no pics; battery died :(

The non-Newtonian fluid sounds interesting, but I haven't tested that yet. Thanks for the cool ideas :)

Mag viewer.png

No, actually, the two most common forms of iron oxides (rust) are both ferromagnetic, Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 (actually ferrimagnetic, a subclass of ferromagnetism. Fe3O4 occurs naturally as the mineral known as Magnetite (for its obvious properties). Both are used in magnetic recording media and magnetic inks (The black print on US bills is printed in magnetic ink -- you can just barely pull a bill with a strong magnet).

Not sure... I've had mine for months now and it seems to be functioning as good as the day I made it.

Great instructable! I'd used "PearlEx" (available at and it worked quite well - a little went a long way. Also added blue food coloring. Looks great with an LED lighting it from below. Thinking about making a small steel sphere inside of a very smooth sculpey losenge to put in the bottom, then setting it atop a small motor with a magnet to swirl it automatically, but haven't gotten to that one yet. Too many projects, too little time.


I know i am late to the game, but i thought i would share. I scoured my town for mica powder and found none. Nor was there any in the towns around me. I finally gave up and ordered it online. One of my local stores grinds down some kind of iron and thus has iron dust they just throw away. It might need to be sifted for consistent sizes, but this may be an interesting addition to your experiment!

That being said, my mica isn't acting the same as yours. I added it to the water and most of it floats. 1/4 tsp creates nothing but slightly sparkly water with floaty bits. I am sad to say the least! I was hoping for a beautiful swirling bottle, and instead, i have a jug of goop. Adding more intensifies the sparkly water, and adds to the floating mess, but does not create the swirling beauty that you have achieved. Inferior mica? Oddly mineralized water? I cannot discover the reason for this. Thoughts are welcome.

1 reply

Thanks for tracking down the ingredients of rheoscopic fluid, and for all the info about Matisse's Kalliroscope. This is my first discovery of your website. You're inspiring!

1 reply

To get to the point, you have the the formula wrong for the fluid. Paul Matisse used fish scales, a commercially-available form of pearlescent pigment, suspended in perchloroethylene (Perc), which is dry-cleaning fluid. He used fish scales because:

1. the densities are a fairly close match, so it won't settle out. (Perc is 1.5, scales are 2.1)

2. the complex refractive index is conducive to the visual effect. Fish scales have a high refractive index and reflective properties which give fish that "silvery" look. It helps the fish be invisible in the water, and is the secret sauce in Matisse's invention. (Now in the public domain.) Fish scales are still available commercially. Use 1% in Perc and go from there.


Matisse had a patent, long expired, in which he mentioned Perc as the suspending solvent. He also mentioned "guanine," which is a constituent of fish scales, probably to hide the exact formula for the fluid. Obviously, the patent should have claimed "fish scales," since they are made of guanine, but crystallized in such a way to give that "shimmer" and "sivery look" unique to fish. But Matisse no doubt had the paranoia common to inventors and concealed the secret sauce. lol.

Another issue is the toxic properties of Perc. It is still widely used for dry cleaning, but care should e taked to use gloves and work in a ventilated space. Once it is sealed up in the "kaliroscope," it will be safe, but issues remain about safe disposal of the items. This should not be an issue for hobbyist limited use.


Question 19 days ago

Hello, I am trying to create a body shimmer oil using Mica and oil. However, the Mica keeps separating from the oil. Is there anyway to keep the two infused?

Greetings Maker!

I appreciated your instructabtle (and striving) to duplicate the rheoscopic dispklay without paying a fortune for it as an "Aht" piece.

As a person who worked on the devices, I can tell you exactly how to build them, including the formula for the fluid that won't settle.

jo*n aht bugventures daht kom

Given the mica is repelled by oil, I'm wondering if it might be possible to make rheoscopic wave or other toys. They're usually made with coloured water and an oil on top, often baby oil, but adding mica to the water might be pretty cool.

Obviously you wouldn't want the mica to migrate into the oil, but if it's repelled by the oil it probably wouldn't anyway. (It probably will a bit, but it will tend to settle back out into the water.)

The Explora Science Museum in Albuquerque did (does?) have a giant sphere version of this (I'm thinking ~24 inches in diameter) that I was always mesmerized by. Thanks for getting me started on my own.


1 year ago

I am researching your activity now & collecting the necessary materials to make with my science class as a takehome momento at the end of 2017. Thank you for sharing this information. I will keep you posted, Miranda. (

Mineral oil has worse thermal conductivity than water and upgrading parts submerged in mineral oil would be a pain. Plus, that much mineral oil is nearly as expensive as conventional liquid cooling parts. It's cool looking, but it's not too practical in my opinion.

I once saw something similar at a trade show.

A color television chassis (on and working!) in a container of ultra pure water.

Seems pure water is a terrible electrical conductor. Can you guess what the vendor sold? ;)