WHY LED RESISTORS

6,583

63

7

About: Last time in my life that I saw the moon that close to me... I was born in the capital city of a country that no longer exists.... I'm in my own timeline and an Electronic Engineer... Received my first degr...

So you need a resistor in series with an LED or two or five to avoid runaway current overload..

What often confuses beginners, is that resistor in series can be any place in the series group.. View the first two images.

Notice the battery is reversed in the last frame !

Step 1: UNDERSTAND LED Voltage and Current

Notice the small change in LED forward voltage causes large changes in LED forward current..

The colors indicate LED colors and blue curve also represents white LEDs..

When the the current is not limited by a resistor the LED will get hot and start to get damaged to the point of changing color and eventually loosing complete lighting especially white LED which depends on phosphors to mix with the blue LED light..

Step 2: Parallel LEDs Need Resistors Too !

Turning to the mistake of parallel LEDs is series with a single resistor..

See the different intensity of the LED CUBE which is made from 125 identical white LEDs..

I hope someone reading this, Understands LED Current is what accounts for the Brightness Intensity. As long as the current is at or below the Design LED Current.. Also if you run white LEDs at lower current (say 80% of Design) the Life Time of white LEDs get doubled..

There are still some LEDs with a tiny lower forward voltage and draw (pull) more current appearing brighter..

You can see the internal LED parallel wiring details in pictures #2 and #3..

Step 3: Superior Parallel LED Wiring

Both of these use a nine volt battery, five white 3.6 forward voltage LEDs and circuits that draw (pull) the same current about 100 milliamps..

There is a tendency to use the single 54 ohm 1 watt resistor but that is a very poor design because of variable light intensity like the cube explained in the previous step.. When actual LEDs are parallel wired together. The LED with the lowest forward voltage will rob the current from the other LEDs getting BRIGHTER and causing the other higher forward voltage LEDs to be Dimmer !

The Best Design is to use that single 270 ohm 1/4 watt resistor with each white LED, a Superior Design with the even light intensity in each of the five LEDs !!

Step 4: YOU NEVER SAW a RESISTOR & LED (V / I) Plot Like This

As a LED newbie feel free to skip the advanced concept presented in the following steps..

It just shows graphically how a simple resistor protects a single LED..

.

Looking at the first wide plot note the standard Red LED and Blue/White LED plots we have come too know. As you probably know a designed 20 ma LED will get burned out at over 3 volts which will push excessive 100 ma or more !

Then note the green straight line is the 270 ohm resistor plot.

Finally the pink plot represents the combined Red LED and the Resistor as a single item.

Note the single (Resistor+LED) pink line item. Only uses 24 ma at 9 volts..

.

Step 5: How to Calculate the Pink Plot

You can use a spread sheet or program any micro to generate the plot points.

Here is the text flow sequence to do this;

  • A) Read a Red LED forward voltage Vf and the associated current I..
  • B) Calculate the 270 ohm voltage Vr = 270 x I at that same LED current..
  • C) Now simply add the Vf + Vr => V pink plot point..
  • D) Repeat the A,B,C for more plot points..

Naturally there is no significant current flow as long as the LED is blocking from 0,0 to 1.4v,0.1ma..

Share

Recommendations

  • Plastics Contest

    Plastics Contest
  • Make it Glow Contest 2018

    Make it Glow Contest 2018
  • Optics Contest

    Optics Contest

7 Discussions

1
None
AdrianS181

Question 8 months ago on Step 3

Hi,! Why does leds have different light intensity with only one 54 Ohms resistor, instead of each led with a 270 Ohms resistor? Thanks a lot!

3 more answers
0
None
icengAdrianS181

Answer 8 months ago

When actual LEDs are parallel wired together. The LED with the lowest forward voltage will rob the current from the other LEDs getting BRIGHTER and causing the other higher forward voltage LEDs to be Dimmer !

0
None
icengAdrianS181

Answer 8 months ago

BTW if you read Step_2 there is an easier (non-math) answer why a parallel LED is brighter.

0
None
icengAdrianS181

Answer 8 months ago

First the 54 ohms for five LED

and 9 V_batt - 3.60 V_led = 5.4 V_resistor

which means resistor current = V/R =5.4_Vres / 54_res = 0.10 Amp = 100 ma

Next assume the white LED Forward voltage distribution is

LED1 is 3.60 volts at 20.01 ma

LED2 is 3.60 volts at 20.22 ma --- brightest

LED3 is 3.60 volts at 19.94 ma

LED4 is 3.60 volts at 19.78 ma --- darkest

LED5 is 3.60 volts at 20.05 ma

Now the LEDs are in parallel so they must be at 3.60 volts

If you add the currents they add up to 100 ma passing through the 54 ohm resistor..

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next, five LEDs in series with five 270 ohms each in parallel with 9 volts

with a blue slope of (3.75 - 3.4) = 0.35v per 15ma at the 20 ma point

So as resistance increases so does current regulation;

LED1 0.35v/15ma x .01ma => 3.60023v > 5.39977v/270 => 19.999ma

LED2 0.35v/15ma x .22ma => 3.60513v > 5.39487v/270 => 19.981ma

LED3 0.35v/15ma x .94ma => 3.52190v > 5.4240v/270 => 20.089ma

LED4 0.35v/15ma x .78ma => 3.51820v > 5.4269v/270 => 20.096ma

LED5 0.35v/15ma x .05ma => 3.60117v > 5.3999v/270 => 19.999ma

about 100.2 ma but LEDs are held closer to 20 ma then before and that gives more even brightness..

0
None
tomalla

8 months ago on Step 5

In your last calculation in step B) there must look like: U=R*I so :

Vr = 270 * I instead of Vr = 270 / I

2 replies
0
None
icengtomalla

Reply 8 months ago

Thanks very much for your detail reading and helping me correct that typo :-)))

I did rerun a spread sheet and can assert the pink Plot is unchanged !

0
None
tomallaiceng

Reply 8 months ago

You're welcome...tThe result was correct, I calculated the first value in the graph, it was only a typo. ;-)