229Views10Replies

Author Options:

Will this circuit work? Answered

It works, but are there any problems with it that might fry the chip or something? Also, I didn't know if audio ground should be connected directly to the amp ground, and I saw one schematic that had a 10K resistor in between so I just did that.

Tags:dog

Discussions

0
user
gmoon

Best Answer 7 years ago


Yes, all the grounds connect together. That's why ground is referred to as "common."

It won't work without a coupling capacitor between the output pin and the speaker. Amplifiers have a DC bias offset voltage (unless it's removed internally), and the coupling cap blocks that, so that only the AC signal reaches the speaker. Replace the 50 ohm resistor with the cap.

That cap value also sets the cutoff frequency for the speaker (forms a low-pass filter), so use something larger than 200uF IF you want bass response.

You can drop the 100k ohm resistor across the speaker--it's less than 1/10000 of the load resistance, and will have no appreciable effect.

Remove the 10K resistor on the - input. Incoming ground should connect directly to LM386 ground.

The cap on the input may or may not be needed, and it's usually appropriate to add a resistor to ground for a reference (like 10K to 100K for the 386).

Look at the Datasheet, as frollard suggests...

On the datasheet all the examples show the 386 directly connected to ground. They do however show a cap in series with the speaker like you said. Oh, and the 100K resistor kept the others from getting hot... but if replace it with cap like you said I guess it wont matter.

There's a good chance it's the DC that's causing the overheating.

Are you sure it's 100K, and not 10K? I don't think the 100K would do much, but the 50 ohm series resistor would block a LOT of current. In fact, it would block a lot of the signal, too.

The Little Gem shows how to add an adjustable attenuator to a 386. First the coupling cap, then a 25 ohm rheostat (NOT a pot, these can take current) as a voltage divider.

You can replace the rheostat with fixed resistors, if you like. But they should be in the range of ohms, not Kilo-ohms. Unless you want to loose most of the signal.

Ok I changed it and it now looks like this. Also, if I replaced the rheostat with fixed resistors, they would be basically in parallel with the speaker right?

circuit.png

now instead of using a whopping 70 mA, it only uses 5 or 6 :D

Cool(er). Should sound better, too.

Wire two fixed resistors just like a rheostat or POT--the divided voltage is tapped between the resistors.

Like the pic below.

Just choose the resistor "ratio" to get the volume you want. Use the Little Gem schematic as a guide, and don't use more than 25 or 30 ohms total for both resistors. Like a 5 ohm and a 20 ohm... They need to be at least 1 watt resistors, too.

Resistive_divider.png

It might work, its not right.
Why have you got resistors feeding the speaker ?
There is no need for a FIXED resistor at the input, but it might want a pot, as a volume control.

It was too loud without them and the 386 got very hot, but a pot sounds good...

You have a fixed gain of 20. The easiest way to turn the input down is a pot.

What does the datasheet for the '386' say?