3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

I'm tired of "It's my first, be nice"

Am I the only one who's tired of the people who use this little disclaimer as an excuse for a poorly written, poorly documented, non-unique, or otherwise substandard instructable? As far I'm concerned a first-time attempt is no reason for poor quality. If anything, it should mean they have taken extra care to ensure that everything is done well, in hopes of creating a good first impression and building some respect and appreciation from fellow contributors. Looking through the top rated instructables, a rather large number of them are their contributors first (and often times only) instructable, so obviously it is possible to create an excellent instructable your first time around. A person can keep a work in progress in their "unpublished" area indefinitely, so if extra documentation, proofreading, or the like are necessary, a person has all the time they need. So often it seems like the people using this excuse are rushing to get their project published, treating instructables more as a message board or even instant messaging. This is not how its meant to be. If a person has a unique idea, or frankly anything worth posting, unique or not, nobody is going to beat them to it. People need to slow down and make the best instructable they can, rather than falling back on the "it's my first, be nice" excuse. Above all, people need to take a little pride in their work.

82 comments
sort by: active | newest | oldest
Oct 27, 2008. 1:56 PMpappyld04 says:
I realize this discussion is rather old so I thought I'd share this litle tidbit with everyone!


Aoccdrnig to recheearch at a Elingsh Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprometnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by istlef but the wrod as a wlohe.
Oct 27, 2008. 5:03 PMbumpus says:
Okay, that was pointless, and everyone knows about the research done. There is no reason to bump a thread as old as this. Thank you for the pointless bump.
Oct 28, 2008. 3:36 PMLithium Rain says:
Is anyone else as tired of this "recheearch" as I am?
Oct 28, 2008. 4:16 PMbumpus says:
Yes.
Oct 28, 2008. 5:19 AMpappyld04 says:
Almost as pointless as your comment and bump? Noone forced you to read it! Not everyone has seen this research or this post so it may be a good idea to speak for yourself rather than grouping everyone into your theory!
Oct 28, 2008. 5:56 AMxACIDITYx says:
No, but your post has nothing to do with the topic, thus it's a useless bump
Oct 27, 2008. 3:53 PMLithium Rain says:
I disagree on one point. I've had several people beat me to worthwhile instructables.
Oct 27, 2008. 5:05 PMbumpus says:
Cough* Light Bulb Lamp *cough
;-)
Oct 27, 2008. 6:41 PMLithium Rain says:
Thanks. I needed to be reminded of that. Actually, that is one of the ones I had in mind.
Oct 28, 2008. 2:47 PMbumpus says:
:D
Oct 28, 2008. 2:49 PMKentsOkay says:
chat
Feb 29, 2008. 4:39 PMKeith-Kid says:
Thing is, most newcomers are really nervous about what people will say. Nowadays Internet (MAINLY FORUMS) Flame the hell out of newbies for saying something they might consider stupid.

People think all sites will be like that. They're just nervous. WHen I started here......(pfft like three months ago) I justified everything I did and said:

oops sorry I miswrote that because......its my first comment!!

-no its not

-yes it is

-bu

-YES IT IS FIrst COMMENT!!!!

Oct 27, 2008. 3:54 PMLithium Rain says:
So true. Many sites are extremely prickly to newbies.
Feb 4, 2008. 2:56 AMPatrik says:
Eh, it's no skin off my back. To be honest, I like knowing that this is their first. They just shouldn't expect the "be nice" part to have much effect, beyond the general "be nice" policy on Instructables.

Look at it this way: every person that says that is one more new Instructables poster - isn't that something to celebrate?
Feb 3, 2008. 5:26 AMGoodhart says:
Well, my first attempt may leave things out, may have a bit missing here and there, but I won't apologize for that ahead of time. I DO want to know what I did wrong, so I can fix it (if possible) or at very least "not do it next time".
Feb 2, 2008. 7:14 PMFunkNattidelic says:
I dont like it when people do stupid stuff with dangerous things, tell you how to make explosives and then say " Now kids, Dont go and try any of this at home..." **cough** tetrenitrates flash powder instructable**cough**
Feb 2, 2008. 7:17 PMDoctor What says:
I think he made that comment as a joke. But just in case anyone catches something on fire, he isn't liable.
Aug 25, 2007. 3:05 PMMr. Rig It says:
Hello all, I am new to Instructables and even as a college grad, my spelling still is not what I would like it to be. Now with that out of the way, I have come to love Instructables and I know it is a place that I will be spending allot of time. When i have a project to create or an item to repair I search all over the internet to see if someone else has done it. One day I found Instructables. I had never heard of it before and I could not figure out why. I have to say I like the majority of the Instructables but some seem a waste. But wait, take a closer look at who is writing them. Most of the time it is preteens or teens. There are so many reasons that I would rather see these youngsters post poor looking Instructables than out committing crimes like vandalism to my car or stealing my car stereo (again) than I can think of. When reading Instructables you need to consider the "Totality of the circumstances" such as age, education, geographic location, and life experiences to name a few. I worked my but off to get an education it has helped me in all walks of life. It doesn't make me perfect though and it doesn't mean my spelling and grammar are any better. Instructables, from what I see, are about learning and teaching others, positive criticisms/ enforcement are the best educators inform others politely that they can make their Instructables even better by gong back through them and checking for errors. However when someone gets out of line it is the administrators job to take care of that. I myself like the "We have a "be nice" comment policy. Please be positive and constructive with your comments or risk being banned from our site". It's pretty straight forward. I posted my first instructable last night. I have received great feedback everyone likes it and it appears I have even inspired a 6th grader to use it as his science fair project. This kid will take and build this project and build on to his knowledge for the rest of his/her life off of one little easy Instructable. Now to the hard part sorry to single you out Andrew546 but from your comments on my first Instructable you were not very nice. I was insulted with your post. You were wrong all the way around and it came down to one little word that you did not know the meaning of and it is the word "Round" you thought it meant "Bullet". So whose ignorance is to blame not mine, the Author, but yours the reader. So if I am spelling my words correctly, my grammar is acceptable, and you are the one not understanding then don't blame me for it, blame yourself. I'll tell you what else if this page gets to the point where people are getting "high and mighty" (I really hate to say this) I will find a new type of insttructable page or I won't post at all.
Aug 25, 2007. 9:23 PMMr. Rig It says:
Well if you chose to see your self as a liar that's on you. I said you were wrong not that you were a liar. You spent quite some time looking around and you came up with one reference link?? Oh and by the way I am not wrong. Tell you what why don't you write and Instructable on the difference between bullets and rounds. If you can show me difiniative proof that you are correct. I will not have a problem what so ever with you showing me the light. Oh and since you started this thread don't forget to use proper grammar and spelling because we will all be watching. I would sincerely like to see it.
Aug 25, 2007. 9:41 PMMr. Rig It says:
Find it as funny as you want. You are wasting my time and my Instructable is not a forum for your voice your personal insecurities. We are done.
Aug 25, 2007. 10:16 PMMr. Rig It says:
You see you may have asked me to correct something that you thought was wrong, however just because you feel it is wrong doesn't make it wrong. Could it be that you are the one who is incorrect? I have already given you the option of agreeing to disagree or write an instructable about it and show me that I am incorect. I haven't heard any reply back from you about either. And actually yes your forum is the place to discuss it let me quote you "Am I the only one who's tired of the people who use this little disclaimer as an excuse for a poorly written, poorly documented, non-unique, or otherwise substandard Instructable"? This is exactly what your forum is for. The "crying" is not about concern for safety. It's about how you voice your views. You have been corrected in this very forum on your own spelling and grammar but you complain about others when others make mistakes. Do you think proper spelling and grammar only matter in an Instructable but not in another forum such as this? You have given me the impression that you think you are right all of the time. It is OK for you to make mistakes but not others this is the "crying' I am referring to. I hate to have it so blunt and rude myself (my analogies) but i don't know how else to say it. I accept the apology for blunt and rudeness. Yes it did seem to get out of hand. Lets make nice with each other (extending a virtual handshake) do you accept?
Aug 25, 2007. 10:58 PMMr. Rig It says:
I'll tell you what, it seems you feel strongly and it concerns you, I will do something about it, I will remove it the statement all together. Perhaps I should have done that in the first place just to avoid confusion. The most important point is eye protection and I know we both agree on it. Ok the other point, I understand what you are saying poor instructables junk up the site. Some people do poor work and others take practice remember what I said about the "Totality of the circumstances?" issues such as age, education, geographic location, as well as language barriers and some cannot afford programs like Photoshop and literally have to use MS paint. I'll tell you what though i have see some awesome work in MSPaint and it was all done with a mouse and not a drawing pad. Some people need help, especially young ones and others who are not computer literate, they are the ones who need positive reinforcement. Some unfortunately only start and never finish. I understand completely what you are saying, I feel your pain.
Feb 24, 2007. 2:02 PMfrank26080115 says:
there should be a editor group that has enough permissions to change only misspelled words in all instructables
Aug 3, 2007. 12:56 PMwhatsisface says:
That's a great idea.
Aug 3, 2007. 1:05 PMKiteman says:
Access that will allow editing of any sort will also allow total changes that the original author did not intend or want. Instead, Instructablers with more experience (or just better English skills) should privately offer advice or help to newbies or posters with poorer English. I have done this once or twice, and it sometimes works. (General note - I am willing to help others as well)
Aug 3, 2007. 2:06 PMfrank26080115 says:
actually, imagine a page, all the unreconized words are red underlines, and the editors can only click on them and select a replacement from a menu, and that word is still underlines with the original spelling remembered and still able to be changed by somebody else
Aug 3, 2007. 5:11 PMKiteman says:
If that's possible for admin, then it's possible for the original author, isn't it? I now use Firefox, with the dictionary installed, so I have an extra eye on my spelling, but it can't watch my descriptive skills - clarity of expression is a strictly human ability, it requires a human to recognise its absence, and a human to correct it.
Feb 24, 2007. 2:32 PMAeshir says:
Very good idea.
Feb 23, 2007. 6:01 PMAeshir says:
I agree, but some people are total nubs and don't know how to make one, and they learn within their second or third. If they don't, they will get comments that say "this sucks". What I really hate is instructables that aren't proofread or spellchecked or anything. People who type "thisis the bedt instrucable evr! u will be amazzed!"
Aug 2, 2007. 2:22 PMfstedie says:
I am relatively new to the site but that doesn't mean that I will publish crap. I only have two Instructables published, but I put a lot of time and effort into them, simply because I take pride in what I do. I don't expect everyone to like them but I do think that most everyone can appreciate a well written Instructable when they see one. By the way, there is a built-in spell check in the comment box, why don't people use it? Maybe they don't know that a red-underlined word means it is likely misspelled!
Aug 2, 2007. 5:42 PMAeshir says:
Hmmmmm....doesn't work in Opera (my browser) I guess. This site was designed for Firefox, so maybe it doesn't work in IE (what most people use).
Feb 23, 2007. 6:04 PMAeshir says:
Remember though, you don't want to give people a bad first impression of Instructables.
Aug 2, 2007. 2:04 PMmafiacarstarter says:
I hate to disrupt the wonderful conversation, but with the subject matter at hand, I couldn't let it go. "when they create there first. " Mayhap their would be better than there, there.
Feb 24, 2007. 2:34 PMAeshir says:
I like Frank's idea.
Feb 23, 2007. 8:00 PMPunkguyta says:
Well, theres a happy medium to it, like, try to do the best you can first time around, but don't expect people to ooo and awe at it because you're new.
Feb 25, 2007. 12:42 AMninepound says:
I think that as long as people are willing to contribute, who cares if they missed an apostrophe, or mispelled 'mechanism'? Heck, I just retyped an entire 8-page instructable for someone! People were burying the guy in 'learn to type, nub' comments because of his poor grammar. He had a great idea, but nobody seemed to realize it. I agree that 'first time instructable-ist' is no reason for bad ideas or sloppy work, but give them a break. It IS their first time. They'll learn the ropes eventually.
Aug 2, 2007. 2:33 PMmafiacarstarter says:
As someone who has been reading a rather large amount of the dross on the Internet over the past twenty years, I must say that, the grammatical grasp of the average internet user has decreased dramatically in this time. Moreover, the decrease appears to be accelerating. This is not an issue that will just solve itself. Also, if no one is given feedback about incorrectness, inappropriateness, or the disrespect that becomes apparent when proofreading is wholly omitted, then they will never "learn the ropes." Grammatical rules come from study. These things must be learned. Since schools no longer teach them, we must all take it upon ourselves to make not knowing the rules more uncomfortable than learning them. Any written phrase that includes the word "the" misspelled should be taken as an insult, because it is. The author of that statement cares neither about what they wrote nor about who will read it. This is a good sign that they shouldn't have bothered. If someone is incapable of typing something out properly, and they still feel that the world would be a much better place if they posted something, I'm sure that they could find some wonderful person kind enough to do the typing for them. Furthermore, please contact me if you ever need surgery. I'd love the practice, and I'm sure you'll understand if I mess up, because it's only my first time. (I apologize if that came across as angry. My hyperbole skills are a little rusty. I was trying to prove a point.) I mean this in the most strict and literal sense: Whether it is the first time or the ten millionth time does not matter one jot or tittle .
Feb 28, 2007. 2:31 PMlemonie says:
39 comments and we've hardly touched "this is my first instructable". It seems we're all more concerned with poor-quality postings? There's no need to advertise that this is one's first time, but people like to say "Hello, I'm new here". "My first instructable" is by way of an introduction, and it's inevitable. Perhaps etiquette would be to post a comment to the effect of "welcome to instructables, please follow this link (quote from ewilhelm on what a finished instructable is) and best wishes for future projects"? L
Mar 1, 2007. 5:50 AMKiteman says:
Perhaps we should encourage newbies (I've not been here long, so maybe that's me as well) to put the "it's my first" comment just there, in the comments? Constructive stuff about the Instructable (ways to improve it) could follow that thread, and the Instructablist (Instructableer?) could edit their posts as required. When the Instructable is "ready", the "my first time" thread could be deleted.
Mar 1, 2007. 11:10 AMfungus amungus says:
But you can't delete comments on your own and constructive advice should remain for others to see anyway.
Mar 1, 2007. 11:09 AMKiteman says:
Fair enough (but I was thinking about spelling and grammar, rather than technical stuff).
Mar 2, 2007. 12:44 PMfungus amungus says:
Wow, you replied before I even posted! So tell me, do you use your powers only for good or have they corrupted you even just a smidgen?
Mar 2, 2007. 1:59 PMKiteman says:
Gosh. W'appen? I must have been watching Heroes as I posted (it's just started in the UK). I'll be beaming into New York next...

(Strikes heroic pose, hands on hips, legs akimbo, jaw jutting.)
Mar 1, 2007. 1:44 AMlemonie says:
I agree with your issue, but I'm unsure whether this is commonly used as an excuse (for laziness). There are a large number of users who have joined simply to comment (no picture uploaded, no instructables). A user will feel their status elevated by posting an instructable, and when that's what motivates, you can get an excuse of an instructable. Now I'm coming around to your perspective. They put up something just so they have an instructable, then they feel the need to mitigate this action. Yes, you're right. Regards L
Feb 24, 2007. 3:08 AMPrometheus says:
Spelling and grammar are far less important to instructragbles than the meaning of the entire project. The purpoose of the site is to share ideas and generate a common goal of increasing the technological scape of humanity in one way or another, not to spell-check. If someone has a good idea that may progress humanity to an upper level, this just might be the place that it may be found at; spelling/grammar has little to do with it. I'll take an exceptional idea from an illiterate far more than a mediocre idea from a genious any day.....
Feb 24, 2007. 1:20 PMtrebuchet03 says:
Spelling and Grammar establishes credibility and shows how much effort you put into said idea. Plenty of good ideas never make it anywhere because of this... Likewise, plenty of mediocre-bad ideas go global -- just look at The Sharper Image nowadays. Lots of so-so thingamabobs (expensive ones at that) and they sell due to the credit established behind the name. More so than sharing ideas - We're selling ideas to niche/target audiences. Most of the foodie stuff I post is targeted to those in the collegiate lifestyle. If someone else sees the idea and says "Hey, that's something I can/want to do" -- that's mission accomplished and makes me happy. I'll bet if I included muddy directions and poor to no pictures, I wouldn't get the response I've gotten thus far :) Meaning is lost when the audience is too busy struggling to understand an introduction :/
Feb 28, 2007. 4:12 AMPrometheus says:
I agree with ya somewhat, as when someone spells "accelerator" as "excelirater", that ruins credibility, but the occasional typo should not be a discussion upon itself. It is quite important for people to make their projects clear, and I can't take the above person very seriously, but I do not dwell on a typo as a deciding factor on one's credibility. As I understand it, this is not an ad-site, it is a place for people to share ideas and inspire each other in their own creative endeavors. As far as some of the below comments go, People liek Bill Gates and Steve Jobbs have hired-hands to do their advertising, and it is THEY who do the spell-checking/etc. You would never know if Gates was a poor speller because his marketing department would correct it for him.
Feb 28, 2007. 1:10 PMtrebuchet03 says:
I agree with you ;) The occasional typo is perfectly fine - no one is perfect. I think I posted that somewhere in here :P Hell, it matches my blood type... type O :P

The problem comes when it's obvious that no effort was invested.


As I understand it, this is not an ad-site

Apparently, that's not necessarily 100% true. The admins mentioned that the reason the advertisements in the forums are not deleted because there's nothing in the rules/TOS that say otherwise. Apparently they're building a section just for advertising - to help makers find what they need (maybe) :)
Feb 28, 2007. 9:03 AMLasVegas says:
Believe it or not, before they were big, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs did not have anybody writing their scripts. They were the marketing brains that made their companies what they are today.
Feb 24, 2007. 2:28 PMAeshir says:
The problem is that some people never spell check or anything. Some times it makes the projects impossible to do. Either way, it's extremely annoying.
Feb 24, 2007. 12:35 PMLasVegas says:
Language and grammar are necessary to convey an idea. Shoot... That's the very reason we humans developed them! A good idea must to be described in such a way that it can be repeated. If it could be described using "1337," it's likely lame. A genius isn't going to waste his time describing a mediocre idea.
Feb 24, 2007. 1:18 PMtrebuchet03 says:
I disagree with one point :P A genius will take a mediocre idea and sell it as the latest, greatest must have idea ;) It doesn't even take a genius (IQ wise) -- but the act itself is a good sign :)
Feb 24, 2007. 3:26 PMLasVegas says:
I would say a great marketer (read Bill Gates, Steve Jobs) can take a mediocre idea and make it the latest, greatest, must have idea. This doesn't take a genius, but it most definitely takes a great command of language and grammar!
Feb 27, 2007. 3:02 PMKiteman says:
>Grrr!< Now you've mentioned it, I see it everywhere!
Feb 24, 2007. 3:15 PMraccoon says:
I am relatively new to Instructables and rarely check on the Forums. But it is windy and raining outside, and the two hockey games on TV are both Eastern Conference games and of little interest to me. So I decided to kill some time here. This subject line immediately caught my eye (perhaps because of the missing apostrophe) and I have to say I agree with Andrew546. The Instructable on Instructables stresses the use of proper spelling and grammar, and gives plenty of guidance on how to do one properly. Yet some people who are providing instructions on working or playing with electricity, fire, explosives and other combustibles can not find the shift key, insert all three letters in the word "you" or correctly spell many of the nouns they recommend using, much less the verbs describing what to do with them. I agree that spelling and grammar establish creditability, and am reluctant to try anything (particularly if it might explode) recommended by someone too careless or sloppy to turn out a decent text. Besides, I am a blonde and therefore currently considered by society intellectually challenged (I do not know what knex is) and subject to countless internet cartoons like the Blonde girl's Geometry Test (which is really pretty funny). Still, I figured out how to run a text through spell check before posting it to an Instructable, and the system gives one ample time to check, recheck and edit before publishing. Ignoring those features seems to me to be an insult to the system and the people who developed it. I do not know what can be done about it, but I am glad to know that other people also see it for the irritating and tiresome situation it is. Thanks Andrew546.
Feb 25, 2007. 12:09 AMewilhelm says:
perhaps because of the missing apostrophe

You kill me! Ha!
Feb 25, 2007. 1:58 PMraccoon says:
Sorry, but if you were killed by a KNEX gun (or KNEX spear, bow and arrow, knife, sling shot, Altoids tin launcher, etc.) it could not have been me. There would be, however, an abundance of other suspects at this site.
Feb 25, 2007. 11:25 AMtim_n says:
My first project was http://www.instructables.com/id/EIMFOHPWRZEXCFHWVP/ - I made sure that I read up on loads of other instructables first, had a camera handy and the idea nicely laid out. I've probably made dozens of spelling mistakes - but I enjoyed making it and won a competition with it! = )

It was the competition that spurred me into making an instructable and I've always fancied being a bit inventorish. Now's my chance to unleash it upon the world!

Next instructable will be a straw bale shelter for my allotment constructed from waste materials = )
Feb 25, 2007. 6:51 AMKiteman says:
Correct use of language is extremely important to many of the instructables here. A misunderstanding could cause anything from wasted time making something that doesn't work, to serious injury or police involvement.

A case in point - I recently posted an Instructable for building a simple jet engine fuelled by a form of alcohol rendered undrinkable. The correct name of the fuel is "methylated spirits" or "denatured alcohol". However, here in the UK, it is usually known as "meths".

I referred to "meths" all the way through the Instructable, blithely unaware that, to American readers, "meth" is an illicit psychostimulant.

However:
There is context to consider. In my opinion, "sloppy" language is acceptable if the Instructable is intended to be humorous, and abreviated phrases like "IMO" and "AFAIK" are perfectly acceptable in the forum or comments.
Feb 25, 2007. 12:40 AMewilhelm says:
I deeply appreciate that everyone cares so much about the quality of the site. It's too bad this is a printed and not a verbal, in-person medium -- I'd like you to see my eyes so I could easily convey the sincerity in this statement. Yes, poorly written Instructables are annoying, yes I do remove Instructables that cross a line. Perhaps that line is too low, but I tend to err on the side inclusiveness rather than exclusiveness. Having said that, three points: 1) Don't let the idea of a presenting an idea distract you on this issue. I agree that great ideas speak for themselves and, maybe, can transcend grammar and spelling. However, an Instructable is for sharing what you did and how you did it. Without the how, it's not an Instructable, and poor spelling and grammar seriously get in the way of showing the how. What you did, without the how is better suited for the forums. (Not to say poor grammar should be in the forums, though!) 2) If spelling and grammar are a serious impediment to sharing a great project (for non-native English speakers, who choose not to post in their native tongues, for example), the balance should be made up with great pictures. I'm guessing that this conversation wouldn't be happening if every poorly spelled Instructable had stunning pictures. 3) My personal approach to this problem is to lead by example. I try to set the bar high by posting well-written Instructables with great pictures (I hope). In terms of how we deal with this as a community, here at Instructables, we're desperately trying to finish a bunch of of new stuff, including more ways to bring to good stuff to the top and to get the junk off as soon as possible. You guys are telling us you don't want to be distracted by junk, and we'll soon have tools to make that happen. In the meantime, thanks for bearing with us while we get the new stuff out there. Also, in case it wasn't clear, I consider this a conversation and will always try to listen respond as I can. So, keep letting us know your thoughts.
Feb 24, 2007. 8:20 PMtrebuchet03 says:
I'd like to add something to what Andrew posted.... Everyone makes mistakes. And sometimes, proofreading yourself won't catch all of them. So, if someone says... "Hey, you misspelled XXXXXX" - don't take it personally. They're watching your back ;) This, of course, assumes that it's evident that you put effort into your work.... I say this, because I just realized that I misspelled "Pseudo" in the title of one of my instructables posted awhile ago when I went to use it in a link. And yes, I went back and changed it.
Feb 24, 2007. 9:40 PMWeissensteinburg says:
I agree. I, and I hope everyone else wont pee their pants if a word is misspelled, an apostrophe is missing, or they used "me" instead of "I" I believe most of us are just against things such as using one letter for a three letter word (r-are u-you) and saying cuz instead of because. Its the laziness that bothers me. And of course this includes the people who just have crazy spellings for things because the letters are easier to reach than the correct spelling.
Feb 24, 2007. 3:03 PMgrumpygrady says:
and who's spelling and grammer is going to be the standard? american english german translated to french translated to american english a great idea is a great idea even with misspelled words and bad grammer and if i can't spell does that make my ideas less
Feb 24, 2007. 8:11 PMtrebuchet03 says:
Spelling and grammar are standard within language.... "Standard" and language are "synonymous" ;)

Imagine someone posting in Swedish with misspelled words and improper language use.... How can someone that doesn't speak/read that language possibly have it translated to a language they understand. Considering the international community - it makes it that much more important (especially when you consider how much attention it takes to read auto-translated text in the first place) ;)

I honestly can't think of a sane person that would put their life in the hands of a doctor with a radical new idea for treatment if that doctor can't put his/her idea to paper coherently. If s/he can't do that, how can others in the community check his/her work for flaws. Are we all doctors? Some of us are (not necessarily M.D.s). But similar to what you said -- your job doesn't make your idea any less than another (but it could make it less credible).


Again, ideas are great... But they are only thoughts if not conveyed.... And if not conveyed with any credit, they're just the child that everyone asks "What the hell did his/her parents do?"


Hehe, just looking down the comments that I haven't seen until now... looks like others are thinking the same as far as language is concerned :P



What makes it worse.... Spell checking is VERY easy especially with software like TinySpell or even by using a browser like FireFox2 that has built in spell checking.

My last point.... I've noticed an interesting pattern/phenomenon on instructables with regards to spelling "debates" as this. And it's VERY good for instructables as it means the site has a healthy growth rate.... This same subject comes up regularly (every other month or so I think). And usually, it's by a member that wasn't registered the last time the topic came up :P Every time it ends with... yeah, spelling and etc. etc. are important things to keep in mind (typo's etc. excluded).

These "debates" do change policy (at least explicitly stated policy) around here though -- just look at the list that Weissensteinburg posted.
Feb 24, 2007. 6:50 PMWeissensteinburg says:
It doesnt make your idea less, but it does make it less of an instructable.

Quote from ewilhelm on what a finished instructable is:

"
- details a finished project with instruction (not just links to instructions)
- has clear images that you took of your project (web-found clip-art is not acceptable)
- uses proper spelling and grammar
- contains appropriate cautions or safety considerations
- does not violate someone else's copyright
- does not violate the Instructables terms of service
- is typically written about something you are very passionate about and want to share."
Feb 24, 2007. 5:00 PMLasVegas says:
Any language translated, even with some of the most cryptic translators, use better grammar that some of the Instructables I've seen (All apparently written by pre-pubecient US or Canada Americans.). Translators also rarely misspell. A great idea expressed with bad spelling and grammar is illegible and therefore moot. No one would ever know what the idea was. If you can't spell, use a spell checker! They're free! If you can talk, you can use proper grammar. Most of the bad grammatical errors I've seen in forums and Instructables were either a result of laziness or the idiotic 1337 (leet) talk which one would never use when having a real discussion.
Feb 26, 2007. 3:05 AMtim_n says:
I'm afraid to say I use 1337 talk during daily life. Mainly because it annoys my boss. Plus I'm old enough to know better = )
Feb 24, 2007. 3:48 PMfrank26080115 says:
i think what is written in canadian english should stay canadian english
Feb 24, 2007. 4:23 PMWeissensteinburg says:
Maybe everyone should just get firefox, which checks your spelling automatically.
Feb 24, 2007. 4:49 PMLasVegas says:
Every program on my computer checks spelling automatically. This is a built-in feature of Mac OS X (10.4). Well, all but Firefox!
Feb 23, 2007. 8:31 PMWeissensteinburg says:
I Kind of agree with you, spelling and grammar is never excusable, but some people will mess up something because they cant understand a future...hell, for my first instructable it took me 10 minutes just to figure out the image notes. And of course we should always be nice to people, not just when its the first.

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!