Robot 4.jpg
Robot 3.JPG
Robot 2.JPG
Robot 1.JPG
This is a very simple robot that uses a simple switch as a sensor and stands on only two wheels with inverted pendulum mechanism.
When the robot is going to fall the motor starts and moves the robot to the direction it is going to fall, so the motor torque about the center of gravity that is higher than the motor makes the robot balanced.


 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Things you need

Motor.JPG
Shaft and Wheels.JPG
Battery Holders.JPG
Switch.JPG
Wires.JPG
Position of Battery Holders on the Neck.JPG
Sensor Switch.JPG
Button Cell.JPG
Nail.JPG
To make this robot you need following parts and tools:
small electric motor
some gears
(or a motor with gearbox)
a shaft
two wheels
some sheets of plastic to make bearings and the robot neck
two battery holders
4 AA batteries
one button cell
one SPDT (single pole double throw) switch with a metal lever
one toggle switch for the on/off switchs
one nail
some wire
soldering iron
some glue
1-40 of 220Next »
nmvb says: Nov 19, 2012. 5:50 PM
why is the switch in between the battery packs instead of after?
vahid_you2004 (author) in reply to nmvbNov 21, 2012. 3:16 AM
Because it must control the current to flow to the motor, so it must be before motor.
nmvb says: Jul 29, 2012. 6:19 PM
what is a roller on the SPDT switch? does it matter if this has one?
vahid_you2004 (author) in reply to nmvbJul 31, 2012. 3:54 AM
roller causes the switch move on the ground perfectly, I recommend to attach a simple roller to your switch or use a switch with roller.
David97 says: Jul 22, 2011. 5:34 PM
I built one of these and my one doesn't tip over. It is about 11 cm in height. Also mounting the switch out further from the axel helps it is 1.5 cm from axel from the cloest edge on switch. Hope this helps to get your one working well.
Aso it is a good idea to have the hight of switch adjustable. As I spent 2 hours adjusting the hight.
vahid_you2004 (author) in reply to David97Jul 23, 2011. 6:26 AM
Good idea, by an adjustable switch you can make robot standing on a steep too.
Could you upload a video of your robot, it would be very helpful for ones who want to make one.
AlKaswa says: Dec 22, 2009. 11:44 AM
where would i find a single pole double throw switch
vahid_you2004 (author) in reply to AlKaswaDec 25, 2009. 3:55 AM
Electronic devices shop
milsorgen in reply to vahid_you2004Jan 6, 2010. 3:24 PM
 aka radioshack

ive also pulled one out of a computer, and several other interesting looking switches. mostly out of the optical drives, front panels and a somewhat of floppy drives, but if you keep your eyes open...
ben_xman in reply to milsorgenJul 21, 2011. 8:25 PM
I've also noticed that radioshack has accelerometers. I wonder if you could use those too? Might be more arduino based than BEAM though....
Chowmix12 in reply to milsorgenMay 7, 2010. 7:07 PM
try the buttons from mouses. they are conveniently SPDT, (not needed) but they have no lever, i've been able to fashion ones from paperclips and other simple materials.
TigrisLi says: Jun 1, 2011. 4:41 PM
Where did you get the wheel with the shaft??
vahid_you2004 (author) in reply to TigrisLiJun 2, 2011. 4:59 AM
A toy!
TigrisLi in reply to vahid_you2004Jun 4, 2011. 12:20 PM
ok, thanks!
ladieslilman98 says: Dec 28, 2010. 9:19 AM
Add a second sensor, the motor wont work as hard, and it will stay balanced longer.
tobyscool says: Nov 25, 2010. 2:23 AM
i made the hugest mistake i shorted the batteries EPIC FAIL so my battery bursted
Exocetid says: Aug 22, 2010. 8:43 AM
This robot is great and I really like how you did the position sensor, extremely clever and what "Instructables" is all about. That said, you might want to change the switch on your sensor, which basically just gives you "Bang-Bang" control and hence the instability, to a potentiometer or variable resistor. That may involve putting an amplifier in there, but we EE's have been allowing ME's to use electronics for quite some time now ;-) (mechatronics)
vahid_you2004 (author) in reply to ExocetidAug 24, 2010. 3:43 AM
Good idea. I like mechatronics a lot.
ForgetMyProfile says: Feb 4, 2010. 2:31 PM
It seems to me that the center of gravity is high which causes the robot to have to react faster than it is capable of due to the circuitry delays, inefficiency of the wheels to move as quickly as needed.

I have two Segways (a blast, by the way) and they stand up on their own. It's fun to watch them "dance"..

I literally had to go to the factory in NH to take a class on how to ride these models. Yes, long time ago.

What they suggested this: to stabilize my units when first riding it, add some weights to the saddle bags on either side. It not only helped me when learning, it helped the Segway stay upright without excess movement

So what I'll seggest (lol) to you is this: get the center of gravity lower by moving the batteries down or adding weight to the bottom of the plastic. That should allow the bot to stay upright without falling over.

LET ME KNOW HOW THAT WORKS.

Robb
Grand Rapids, MI
iMakeItHappen in reply to ForgetMyProfileMay 27, 2010. 12:23 AM
 Thats really cool and a good idea, and i have an alarm clock like that, it has a very dense material on the bottom with a rounded edge, so to turn it off u just push it back, then it pops back up.

but why do u have 2 segways, its pretty cool, i just dont understand y u have them.
ForgetMyProfile in reply to iMakeItHappenMay 27, 2010. 2:05 AM
Originally, I bought the two Segways for advertising purposes.

My intention was to hire good looking college gals to ride them around with our company logo on the side of the saddle bags, answering questions about our business and handing out literature.

Great marketing idea, but have not had enough time to devote to the project.
Robot Lover says: Jan 7, 2010. 7:01 PM
  I like this. Reminds me of my youth, building a line following robot with a car battery and two window regulator motors from an old Lincoln.
  It would be interesting to try it with tilt switchs (**MERCURY is BAD kids**) and perhaps make two stages of power, voltage divider between cells for those times when it tilts beyond a certain range the additional voltage is switched on.
  Also would be neat to try a magnetic pendulem with reed switchs.

Good Job.
Chowmix12 in reply to Robot LoverMay 7, 2010. 7:04 PM
but you would need a spdt tilt switch... i think this switch is better because of its immediate response and its adjustable. You can't adjust the force of gravity on the tilt sensor...
stephenniall in reply to Robot LoverFeb 13, 2010. 11:28 AM
Mercury is Cool !
l33tm4s73r in reply to stephenniallMar 15, 2010. 12:46 PM
lolz
Robot Lover in reply to stephenniallFeb 13, 2010. 1:57 PM
it's true.
ratgod says: Apr 29, 2010. 6:18 PM
Thats pretty good considering their is no microcontroller doing the balancing, its a neat simplistic design.

excellent instructable.
lothartje says: Apr 2, 2010. 5:14 AM
nice music :)
godscountry says: Mar 12, 2010. 10:27 AM
this is interesting,another way to balance on one or two wheels without the high cost,if perfected,it might make for some fun toys.
cupnoodles2 says: Feb 22, 2010. 4:34 PM
its pretty nice i made one myself but its not working that great lol
i think its because i only used two gears one on the motor and another one on the driver shaft so there's no mechanical income but im not sure if its that or it is just that the batterries are not fresh enought :O

thanks for the instructable and i apologize for my bad english
cupnoodles2 in reply to cupnoodles2Feb 22, 2010. 4:59 PM
honestly i know that there's not enought torq lol since i didnt used a third gear well im remaking it xD
dingo27 says: Dec 25, 2009. 9:00 AM
This is awesome! So simple, but i wouldnt reccomend soldering a battery, it may explode 
Mikishiwa says: Dec 7, 2009. 10:23 AM
will it be possible to make this robot drive straight without balancing in one spot continuously? For example using this www.instructables.com/id/Tilt_Sensor_cheap_easy_nontoxic/ as a switch, so it will be able to balance in two directions an maybe drive 2-5 metres without falling.
vahid_you2004 (author) in reply to MikishiwaDec 12, 2009. 3:44 AM
To move this robot you need more complicated controlling system than a simple switch, you must also have some motor sensors and a microcontroller to measure motor speed and control its torque and speed.
For more info search "balancing robot" on internet.
chengtianzheng says: Dec 2, 2009. 12:42 AM
Here, the best design!
chengtianzheng says: Dec 2, 2009. 12:39 AM
nice working,thank you!
ewiemers says: Oct 27, 2009. 8:08 AM
The problem isn't the center of gravity, it's stability. The switch will work as a measurement device so long as the robot is VERY close to vertical. If you get much past that narrow threshold, the robot doesn't add more torque to the motor to compensate. If you want it to be more stable, you'll have to use some analog device to measure the tilt-angle and another circuit to control motor torque through input voltage. A simple sensor would be a multi-turn potentiometer.
vahid_you2004 (author) in reply to ewiemersOct 28, 2009. 7:05 AM
You're right.

High CG object has high moment of inertia, so it needs more moment to move and has more stabillity. Because of these you must choose the longest robot and consider your motor power.

The more complex controlling system, the more stabillity. but the most important feature of this robot is that it is simple (according to the the others comments)
Binary Ninja says: Sep 9, 2009. 2:38 PM
For a future robot you may want to put the weight lower so it has a lower center of gravity.
rimar2000 in reply to Binary NinjaSep 12, 2009. 2:39 PM
No, the center of gravity must be higher. You played to hold a stick upright in the palm of your hand? The longer, is easier to keep it vertical.
1-40 of 220Next »
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!