Building A Stereo Tube Amp

PrintPrint PDF FacebookFacebook TwitterTwitter Send this to a friendE-mail
by thobson
 

introBuilding A Stereo Tube Amp

Ever wanted to build a highly dangerous, inefficient, yet awesomely retro piece of electronics? Well, I have. That's pretty much what a tube amp is. Vacuum tubes are old electronic components that act like transistors, controlling a lot of current with a little current. You usually hear about tubes being used in guitar amplifiers, because they distort in a way that suits guitar playing. However, tubes can also be used to amplify a stereo signal from another audio source such as a CD or MP3 player. Tube amps, unfortunately, aren't the most practical things in the world; they consume a great deal of power, get very hot, and are big. That being said, they look damn cool, and some people seem to think they sound pretty nice, too.

You can learn a lot about electricity and electronics from a project such as this. Going through the process of purchasing parts, planning, and executing is a useful experience for any maker. Keep in mind that I am just a dude on the internet - take everything I say with a grain of salt. Except, of course, for these next few sentences. This project is dangerous in a very serious way. It involves high voltages and a lot of current that can make you feel decidedly unpleasant or even decidedly dead. If you decide to work on it with the power on, be careful. Some of the capacitors in this amp will hold onto a charge for a long while after the power has been switched off. Discharge all capacitors through a resistor connected to ground, preferably with a voltmeter across it to be absolutely sure the cap has completely discharged. When testing the amp out for the first time, use something like a twelve volt power brick instead of plugging directly into the wall, just to be safe, as well as to prevent things from exploding or melting. An old trick is to keep your left hand in your back pocket all the time, so if you do get shocked, it hopefully won't reach your heart.

Also, you'll need to know how to read a schematic, solder, and use a hand drill.

****UPDATE****: Kits are now available on my site and in the Makers Market!
Building A Stereo Tube Amp
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up.
 

step 1First Things First: Tubes

Quick Intro to Tubes

A project such as this one can teach you a lot of about electricity and electronics. In order to appreciate what more or less goes on in this amplifier, we need to take a look at how a few things work, and first up are the vacuum tubes themselves.

A vacuum tube is just a glass tube that's had all the air sucked out of it. A good example are the early lightbulbs, inside of which a filament was subjected to a current which caused it to produce energy in the form of light and heat. If the interior of lightbulb were not a vacuum, the filament would experience combustion due to the extreme temperature and presence of oxygen and be destroyed.

The Diode

The most basic vacuum tube is a diode, so named because of the two electrodes which it contains. Vacuum tubes are said to be thermionic, meaning that heat is used to cause the emission of electrons from an electrode. If a negatively charged electrode (as in it has an excess of electrons, in tubes it's called the cathode) is heated by a filament, the electrons in it become 'excited' and, if a sufficient electric potential difference or voltage is present, they will actually be emitted, or jump off of the electrode. The potential difference must be due to another electrode, called the anode or plate, which is positively charged and therefore exerting an attractive force on these enthusiastic little particles, causing them to whip across the vacuum from the negatively charged cathode. Since electric current flows from negative to positive and never the other way around, the current can only flow one way in a diode. However, this isn't much good for amplification, and so we move on to the next step in the vacuum tube hierarchy: the triode.

The Triode

In a triode, there is a third electrode in addition to the anode and the cathode, called the grid. The grid carries a negative voltage and is connected to an input source, which, in the case of this amp, is producing a fluctuating audio signal. The negative voltage on the grid repels a certain amount of the electrons leaping off of the cathode, and how many electrons it repels depends on how negative it is, which in turn depends on the amplitude of the audio signal. This is by definition amplification; using a small amount of electricity to control a much larger amount. The audio signal is quite small, and it is effectively controlling the flow of however many electrons we choose to saturate the cathode with. The base voltage of the grid, the voltage that is present whether there is a signal or not, is referred to as the bias voltage. The bias determines how much current the tube draws when there is no signal.

The Tetrode

Add yet another electrode and you get a tetrode. This new electrode is called the screen or shield. Basically, the screen prevents the flow of electrons across the tube to be affected too much by the anode, and instead be totally controlled by the changes occurring in the grid. It has a smaller positive voltage than the anode. When the electrons initially break free from the cathode, they can only 'see' the screen, and so they rush towards it, and upon reaching it notice the anode and continue on towards it.

The Pentode

And then we come to the pentode. In a pentode there is, obviously, a fifth electrode that wasn't there before. This is the suppressor. The suppressor sits between the anode and the screen and is somewhat negative in charge. Its purpose is to make sure any electrons that might bounce off the anode don't escape for too long by repelling them back into it.

Note

Pentodes are not the end of the road when it comes to tubes, there are many other kinds, and if you're interested in them, check out the links step. There are two kinds of tubes used in this amp: triodes and pentodes. The triodes are used in the preamplifier stage, where the audio signal is stepped up to a certain level suitable for further amplification by the pentodes of the main amplifier.

Also, check out this fantastic old-fangled movie about tubes and how they are made:


First Things First: Tubes
BasicDiode.jpgBasicTriode.jpgBasicTetrode.jpgBasicPentode.jpg
To Download the PDF or View All Steps,   
Become a Pro Member »
114 comments
1-40 of 114next »
Jul 10, 2010. 10:58 AMpermissiontoskatefreely says:
I have some questions about the power supply 1. Why does it need to be grounded to earth? 2. I noticed that the positive supply only uses 2 diodes. Why not 4? The negative Supply uses 4.
Aug 10, 2009. 11:49 PMredstarsrbija says:
wtf people! tube amps have NO quality loss when amplifying audio signals thats why there so great. digital amplifiers turn nicely rounded sound waves into nasty square-like sound waves, tube amps do not do this, the sound reproduction is perfect.
Apr 25, 2010. 4:39 PMXellers says:
Incorrect.
Jun 8, 2010. 6:42 AMuberchoob says:
I'm not gunna be dogmatic about it, but I think red is correct. Distortion and poor sound quality comes when tubes are overdriven. This doesn't usually happen with a quality stereo amp with plenty of headroom, but is intentionally done with guitar amps in order to achieve a specific sound.
Jun 8, 2010. 12:31 PMXellers says:
There are many types of distortion - wave clipping is not the only kind. For example, if you look at any audio tube datasheet, you will notice a "THD" or "Total Harmonic Distortion" percentage listed as a property.
Jun 8, 2010. 7:36 PMuberchoob says:
Thanks for the info :D So is it that tube systems reproduce certain frequencies that digital typically does not and so its a tradeoff between different freq. reproduction profiles, or is it that some people just plain like the distortion that tubes produce in all their music?? I guess it could also have to do with the sampling rate required with digital compared to the more steady current produced from a tube system?
Aug 10, 2009. 11:52 PMredstarsrbija says:
they're*
Mar 28, 2010. 6:51 PMgato.chan says:
Very nice job.  I'm looking into building a similar amp and have a question.  The schematic shows 2x 5965 tubes and 2x 6V6 tubes.  Where are the other 2 6V6 tubes used?
Feb 11, 2010. 6:55 PMXellers says:
I know that this might seem like a fairly obvious question, but I just built a vacuum tube amplifier and my tubes' plates glow a slight red when the music is playing. Is this normal operation, or am I putting too much power through them? The particular tube that I am using is the 13EM7, thank you!
Feb 17, 2010. 4:46 PMXellers says:
I think I've tracked the problem down - I didn't have the funds to buy any sort of output transformer, so I instead used a 120VAC step-down transformer - the voltage drop across the transformer is too low, so the plate gets too much voltage, the tube becomes overbiased, and the plate reddens.
Jan 28, 2010. 5:29 PMlucek says:
I always wanted to make a vacuum tube computer, but I know it would cost an arm and a leg not to mention a ton of time to make a calculator.
Dec 3, 2009. 8:23 PMyauch701 says:
The hammond 125d seems to be a bit cheaper here www.tinyurl.com/ylza2kq 
Don't know about the shipping.. How much did everything cost for the build?
Oct 26, 2009. 3:00 PMcerwinthedoc says:
I'm sure I'm missing something here, but I just wanted to get a clear answer. This instructable appears to be geared towards using the tube amp for playing music from Ipods, CD players, etc.

but would you say the sound quality would be suitable for guitar? sure, I'm open to the idea of altering the design to make it suitable for guitar (adding an EQ, distortion, etc) but what do you think?
Oct 27, 2009. 9:21 AMcerwinthedoc says:
Crap. Well, back on the hunt. There's another tutorial on here for building a tube amp for guitars, but the author was a little unclear on some parts. But hey, thank you anyway. You made a great tutorial.
Oct 26, 2009. 7:09 PMXellers says:
Actually, all that you would need is a preamplifier of some sort to bring the signal from the guitar up to line level. A small tube preamp can be built with instructions from this site, or you can buy a small solid state one for a rather trivial price.
Oct 20, 2009. 7:18 PMiamtoats says:
If you rotate the adjacent transformers so they're perpendicular to one another, there will be less noise in the circuit. 
Oct 2, 2008. 6:42 PMXellers says:
Tube amps are built for quality.... So how could you use an iPod?! Low quality MP3s played through tube amps!!!! It's the ned of the world
Aug 10, 2009. 11:53 PMredstarsrbija says:
digital amps will cause a further loss in audio quality
Oct 11, 2008. 5:35 PMwupme says:
You know, thats exactly what i asked myself when i saw commercial iPod Tube Amps... What a waste..
Oct 12, 2008. 5:53 PMREA says:
Thats apple! Ripping people off since the iPod!
Aug 10, 2009. 7:10 PMthatonekid says:
it has nothing to do with apple its just that compressing music into mp3 format looses lots of quality, you can easily convert tracks off of a cd to .wav files that sound much better but are ten times the size of an mp3. apple doesnt rip people off.
Aug 11, 2009. 8:47 AMwupme says:
No it is apple. Other Companys create MP3 Players that sound better, have more features and no Copyprotection. Of course you can't compare an MP3 to an actual CD, but there is still a hughe difference on how the same MP3 sounds on an iPod or lets say an iRiver Player. Apple products is 50% of the price just for being Apple, to have some kind of symbol that you can show of with.
Aug 12, 2009. 5:45 PMthatonekid says:
na your all just haters, apple puts top of the line audio processors in their products and you can easily transfer music off someones ipod onto your computer, just show hidden files in explorer, and on a mac there is 3rd party software that lets you copy music back and forth. and just about every piece of technology is marked up at least 2x what it costs to build when you buy it retail, not just apple. and trust me you get what you pay for when it comes to apple computers, they are not marked up any higher than any other brand computer with the same specs. and they use the highest quality parts for they're pcs and laptops, where else can you get a laptop with dual video cards, one being a dedicated 512mb GeForce 9600M GT, 4GB of DDR3 1066mhz ram and a 3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor with 6MB L2 cache, with a 1066mhz fsb, all protected by a single piece of billet aluminum.
Dec 22, 2009. 9:06 PMLkArio says:
@ thatonekid: That's nothing, there are laptop PCs with MUCH better hardware.
Dec 23, 2009. 9:13 AMREA says:
i have a Toshiba tablet PC. lets see Apple beat that.
Aug 12, 2009. 7:26 PMREA says:
>...you can easily transfer music off someones ipod onto your computer, just show hidden files in explorer, and on a mac there is 3rd party software that lets you copy music back and forth...

ahem. for zune. connect, open zune software, rightclick the song, select "add to collection." no folders, no hassle.

>...where else can you get a laptop with dual video cards, one being a dedicated 512mb GeForce 9600M GT, 4GB of DDR3 1066mhz ram and a 3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor with 6MB L2 cache, with a 1066mhz fsb, all protected by a single piece of billet aluminum...

let me ask you something. yes they do have good specs, but what about the every-day person who doesnt know/give a damn about whats in there? let say i want a lappy that i will just be using to check my twitter or facebook or whatever it is kids check these days. am i going to go for a quad-core lappy with a NVIDA Gforce 2.5 tb graphics card (over-exagerated) and 3 pb memory (impossible), or am i going to get the lappy with a nice big screen and is easy to use? its not about quantity and quallity, its about what you need. and, no im not being a fanboy. honestly, i hate WinVista and am going to get OS X when i get the money, but i know what i need and what i dont, and Apple has what i dont need.
Aug 10, 2009. 10:51 PMREA says:
lol hat?
Oct 12, 2008. 7:51 PMwupme says:
I think that amps are not even made by apple, was some 3rd party company. But still, you're right. iPod, iPhone all just to ripp people off. Other companys give you more, with higher quality, for less. Well except that they don't got an apple as logo...
Feb 24, 2009. 10:04 PMdestrokhan says:
If you factor in the piece of mind of not worrying about viruses, the resale value of macs being far greater than pcs (which have virtually no resale value), not having to buy virus software, the fact that you can run virtually everything on macs now since they switched to the intel chip and that OSX is profoundly better than vista and xp...macs come out on top.
Jul 16, 2009. 4:43 PMiamtoats says:
You can only update the ram... That only gets you so far. Actually you can update everything in the Mac Pro (the desktop), but that computer's starting price is..... Unspeakable....
Aug 12, 2009. 5:48 PMthatonekid says:
with some know how the hard drive and processor is upgradable in all the current macs
Jan 28, 2010. 4:20 PMKasm279 says:
 the CPUs are soldered in on all of the current Macs except for the Mac Pro. The last iMac to have a removable CPU was thr tray loading G3, last laptop was the iBook G3 Clamshell and the PowerBook G3.
Oct 18, 2008. 11:50 AMXellers says:
Hmmmmm.... I'm going to have to disagree with you, I like Apple products such as the iPod because they are very easy to use (and hack), and because everything is kept simple and tidy (Although they cost much more than they should...). There simply isn't any MP3 player out there yet that can truly compete with the iPod (although I would really like an iPod like MP3 player that isn't made by Apple). But then again, I hate Apple computers because unlike PCs, their OS isn't very useful to me, they use non-standard parts (and are thus DIY proof for the most part), and they are way overpriced.
Oct 18, 2008. 2:31 PMwupme says:
Other companys MP3 Player are also easy to use, if you know how to move a file. You're not forced to use the stupid iTunes Software (I got all my 400 CDs digitalized and stored on a NAS, imagine to import that too iTunes..). I know there is 3rd party Software you can use for that, but there's also 3rd Party Software for other Players. There have always been MP3 Players that can compete with the iPod. Some Time Ago the iRiver Models beat every iPod, especially when it comes to Sound. Today is Archos. And even cheaper MP3 Players by other companies run out the iPod. Its just a novelty item, and besides the iPhone (wich is in my opinion a really bad mobile that didn't bring anything new ...) hyped more than anything else. If People would start to directly compare them, they would stop using it, well except those who only look for Design.
Dec 14, 2008. 10:41 AMXellers says:
That's true, but I got all of my iPods broken or obsolete and for free from people who didn't know what to do with them, so when I have a collection that works well, I can't complain.
Oct 18, 2008. 10:04 PMREA says:
you have brought a very good argument to the table.
1-40 of 114next »