Applying for a job with the secret services or just protective of your iPhone?

Either way this is an instructable for you.This holder can not only withstand  bullets and pellets from  low caliber guns and air rifles but is stab proof, protects your smart phone from falls, from hits by a  hammer and even will survive someone jumping on it , I have tried and tested these ( yes, I have even shot at it) as you can see from the second picture .
In fact you can make a holder for just about any phone (you could even make one for an ipad) its just that the dimensions which I will give in this instructable will be for an iPhone 4/4s. If you would like me to post an instructable to bulletproof  a different device please leave a comment.

In this instructable I will teach you how to build a bullet proof iPhone case from materials which are more readily available and cheaper than pre-prepared bulletproof materials such as Kevlar.
This case will cost you approximately $25 / £15 compared with about $90 / £60 for a pre-made bullet proof plate.

-55 x 20 cm sheet of mild steel , 3 mm thick ( this is in total but you can easily get several smaller bits of steel as long as they are no shorter than 14 Cm and no less wide than 10 Cm )
-firm foam sheet A4 sized and at least 1 cm thick
-epoxy resin (I used Araldite)
-fairly tough cloth ( can use thick clothing etc)
- small neodymium magnet

- metal file
-glue gun
-black spray paint (optional)
-gun to test !

Step 1:

The first step will be to cut out to size your armor plating:
1) take your mild steel sheet 
2) draw onto it 5 rectangles each 13 x 6.0 Cm
3)using your hack saw (if you have a mechanized saw this will speed up the process) cut them each out
4) file down the edges until they are flat and smooth

These plates later on will be mounted on top of each other along side some further plating and will act as the main armor to stop the bullet. If you would like to bullet proof your phone to high caliber and velocity bullets you will need to cut out more of these plates.
Not to be rude or anything, but if you claim something to be bullet proof , it actually should be. 7.62 round would turn that into scrap. Just consider the fact that if you can cut the metal you used to make it with scissors it's probably not bullet proof, ( or even stomp proof)
22 rifle vs road sign. which is made of thicker metal than your case. hmm, lest we throw kinetic energy out the window...
<p>Hmmm, lest we actually READ the Instructable before flaming it with condescending, patronizing, yet ironically inarticulate comments. Only the outside, shaped case is made from thin metal, otherwise the average DIYer wouldn't be able to form a phone-shaped box from it. What you failed to notice is that the thin outer box is holding several plates of thicker steel. Sound like it might work? It should, it's exactly the way many bulletproof vests function- a thin, flexible 'carrier' stuffed with steel plate. </p>
also, if your being shot at, chances are you made allot of bad decisions consecutively, if your not government personnel, in that case if they happen to get your phone, your employer will more than likely compensate you for damages anyways.
<p>You'd didn't even read the instructions... The scissors were used to cut the fabric/foam materials. </p>
I agree. This may be able to stop a .22, or maybe even a 9mm, but anything bigger will tear right through. Also, you've made it to be hammer proof etc. There are already cases made out there that are half as slim and can protect even more.
Half as slim?That would be twice as thick.
lol oops...
I'm sure there are cases out there that do the same, but wouldn't that defeat 90% of this page? I mean, it is all about home projects. Mainly stuff you can find in stores. <br> <br>Good work man. Just one thing. If you haven't shot at it, don't say it's bulletproof. False advertising and all.
I do appreciate the time and thought that has been put into this, but I agree with the criticism over false advertising. I don't have the silly thought that bullet proof requires one to fire the largest common calibre found in war, but some evidence is required, but we have not seen the .22 test yet. The deformation, and lead splatter would be visually (and probably functionally) significant. A solid metal box would also act as a Faraday cage and significantly reduce the signal.
yeah you can buy something similar or better - but doesn't that cover about 90% of the instructables out there?
Chuckle , there's always a bigger/stronger gun , where do you stop ? After all it is just a phone . The nice thing about the case is it's a little big and heavy making you spend less time talking and giving you more time to pay attention whats going on around you . Called situational awareness .
Guys, I really cannot believe how pedantic you are all being. If it stops a low calibre bullet, it is bullet-proof. How many readers here are going to be facing high calibre rounds anyway? When we say something is bullet-proof it is a euphemism, usually, for &quot;very tough&quot;....and clearly this design is very tough. <br> <br>And so what if there are other things out there that do it better? The whole point of Instructables is to do it yourself. Give credit where it is due.
1) You can cut kevlar with scissors. It's all about composition. Just as a glass block can support hundreds of pounds/kilos under compression but be shattered by a few pounds concentrated by a punch, Certain types and weaves of kevlar stop different types of penetrations e.g. vest that stop bullets won't stop knives. Prison guards wear different vest than do police or soldiers because the former faces knives and the latter guns.<br> <br> 2) Technically, no one claims to be &quot;bullet proof.&quot; If you look at the trade materials, the legally approved speak for all types of armoring is &quot;resistant.&quot; The reason is that if you want to, you can shoot through anything. &quot;Proof&quot; implies impervious and there is no such thing. In common speech, however, &quot;bullet proof&quot; is used.<br> <br> 3) A standard civilian deer rifle with a hollow point hunting round will punch through almost every body armor out there. If you use a hardened bullet, easily made, it will punch through most of a steel engine block. Yet in common speech we don't say, &quot;whoa, you can't call that police vest 'bullet proof' because there are 3 million civilian weapons in the US alone that can shoot through it front to back.&quot;<br> <br> 3) Even if you restrict the issue to just a single bullet, at a single caliber fired from a single model of weapon, there will be in the real world a vast spread in the energy and thus lethality of all the bullets flying around a battle field. The penetrating power of rounds is a laboratory abstraction set under fixed ranges, temperatures, pressures, winds, DISTANCES, age of munitions and maintenance of the weapon. In the real world, you deal with spent shots over distance, ricochets, crappy ammo and guns that haven't been cleaned since Eisenhower is president.<br> <br> That's why there are so many documented instances of people being saved by bibles, badges, dog tags etc. The round the caught didn't have the energy to penetrate such an object under those conditions even though in the lab, it probably would have.<br> <br> 4) The utility of armor is all about what it protects. Not even tanks are equally armored all around. You might reflect that armor disappeared almost entirely from 19th century battle fields because of all the high energy line of sight shots would punch through any armor a man could carry. Armor only returned in mid-WWI in the form of a helmet whose sole intent was to protect against low-mass, low-velocity shrapnel. Any military bullet of the age would go right through any helmet, yet soldiers still found the minimal, single purpose protection it provided worth the humping weight and they have ever since.<br> <br> Likewise, even a small increase in protection for a vital tool like a smart phone is worth the effort. Just because it won't stop laboratory ideal common rounds make it useless.<br> <br> This is a very useful field expedient.
So a class II bulletproof vest isn't? Really? (the joys of youth and 'internet experts') <br>(most BP vest are NOT knife proof)
If it can stop a low caliber bullet only then I would say it is more of a Flak Case. Also to those saying how many people need to worry about rifle rounds... How many people need a &quot;bullet proof&quot; iphone case... People being shot at that's who.
Thanks, the bulletproof iPhone case makes my life so much easier.
The metal with the red circle does not show signs of any bullet impacts. A .22lr would tear straight through that sheet steel, padding, and your phone. sorry. good luck
What about the front and have you tested with rifles ?
Very cool but I wonder how a phone would withstand the G-force impact of a bullet strike. I think it would crack the phone from the impact alone. I saw that there is foam within the case, but I still am concerned that the foam would lack the dampening effect needed to save the phone. Still very cool though.
iPod 4g
To all those saying this isn't bullet proof, you don't know what you are saying. The term bullet proof doesn't mean &quot;stop everything&quot;. It means the item is rated to stop whatever the maker claims it will stop. The term originates from testing medieval armor vs. bullets of the time. The maker would prove that his armor would stop a bullet by shooting it. The dent from the bullet would be left as the proofing mark. Even if this thing will only stop a .22 pistol, it is still bullet proof.
bullet proof does in fact mean it will stop any bullet .i think bullet resistant would be a more accurate description .as that is the term used by the armor manufacturers
If you increased the padding inside this would work great for portable hard drives as well.
Well, nice with getting the &quot;bulletproof&quot; to be literal, but what about your phone's reception? <br>I mean, it makes no sense to bother doing this, if the phone stops being a phone and becomes ballast.
Simple, cheap, more or less everyday objects or easily obtainable materials. Fun idea and well done instructable. <br>It is beyond me how it attracted so many dimwitted criticisms. Does maybe a faible for firearms go with a lack of wits? <br>Anyway, keep on bulletproofing!
veeguy, perhaps you should read it again. There are FIVE layers of 3mm plate .... <br> <br>Here, I'll help .. <br> <br>4) when you have your sides all folded up you must then glue (using Araldite ) in place a rectangle of thick cloth 13 x 6 Cm onto the base of the shape with folded sides. <br> 5) now on top of this cloth glue in place one of your rectangular metal plates <br> 6) again on top of this plate glue a rectangle of thick cloth and continue this pattern until all 5 of your plates and all 6 of your cloth pieces are sandwiched together. This constant layering of metal will slow down the bullet while the cloth will be reducing the force of the impact on your phone.
I haven't read all of the comments. Have you considered ceramic plates. It only has to work once anyway. The newer materials used for vests use ceramic plates under the kevlar body armor. As to the composition of the plates I have no idea. The idea is to absorb the impact and spread out the effect and not stopping the round completely.
Why would you want to protect an iPhone in the first place? <br>;P
This is a nice instructable for a heavy duty iphone case. The 3mm mild steel would work out to 10 gauge metal, quite a sturdy material. My problem comes in where the author implies this would withstand a &quot;low caliber bullet&quot;. It will not. My Daisy 880 pellet rifle will shoot a .177 caliber hunting pellet through both sides of this case and the phone inside it. If you want to build this great ultra heavy duty phone case, go for it, but don't assume it will stop a projectile, especially one fired by a real gun. This is how people get hurt or killed.
While bullet proof has always been one of those words that gets on my nerves -- it's actually bullet resistant -- 3-4mm mild steel should stop most hand gun rounds. Not to say it wouldn't break your ribs with the case, but shouldn't penetrate. And your daisy? no... no it can not.
I personally would look into carbon fiber molded directly over a semi-soft inner case as it's would be stronger and lighter. But there are SO many iPod/iPhone cases out there someone has got to have done this already. Also, if you really want to make your phone MIL-SPEC shockproof even a thin coat of Sugru or like silicone bumper around the corners and edges would also be a good thing. Your phone may very well stay intact in a steel case but even with the liner the the gravity/inertial flux from being dropped (can be in excess of 200 G's from a good height) is what's gonna scramble it's guts and make it into a useless brink (but it will still look pretty on the outside). The more strategically placed semi-soft stuff to lessen the impact flux (especially on the corners and edges) the better the chance of it's survival.
I personally would look into carbon fiber molded directly over a semi-soft inner case as it's would be stronger and lighter. But there are SO many iPod/iPhone cases out there someone has got to have done this already. Also, if you really want to make your phone MIL-SPEC shockproof even a thin coat of Sugru or like silicone bumper around the corners and edges would also be a good thing. Your phone may very well stay intact in a steel case but even with the liner the the gravity/inertial flux from being dropped (can be in excess of 200 G's from a good height) is what's gonna scramble it's guts and make it into a useless brink (but it will still look pretty on the outside). The more strategically placed semi-soft stuff to lessen the impact flux (especially on the corners and edges) the better the chance of it's survival.
The last I knew, metal killed RF. Kind of a requirement with a phone. This is where a good plastic composite material with soft armor is handy, but as a Kyle Brinkerhoff noted, 7.62 is the gold standard. Most soft armor will not stop such a round. <br>If RF isn't an issue, and you want it to withstand more &quot;damage&quot; (ie: your hammer, your foot, not including any rifle) use stainless. Very brittle though. Best bet would to be layer the stainless. Again: 5 LB phone. No RF. No GPS.
I agree, I see several problems. 1. signal 2. Even if your mild steel (i'm assuming 10/20 carbon) stops the round it can still transfer an imence amount of force to the object. <br>A 45 might not penitrait but shock and force would crush your phone to pieces and possiby bracke your ribs. It might stop a .22 ,.25 or .32 but a 9mm, 40cal or anything bigger would go right through. Nevermind any real rifle caliber. <br> 3. Try and explain this thing at airport security. <br>My best thought would be alternating layers of carbon fiber and kevlar backed up with thin sheets of titaniun but I still think that idea is scetchy in terms of signal and stopping power.
If simple metal blocked signals, going inside a metal shed or even an enclosed vehicle would kill your phone. <br> <br>Metal will attenuate but not kill an RF signal. The specific amount of attenuation is dependent on frequency and composition. To block a single entirely, you need a Faraday cage which is an all encompassing metal surround with an electrical current running though it. <br> <br>In fact, controlling stray radio signals is a big problem in both civilian and military applications. Your computer and it's power cables have partial and full faraday cages just to prevent ambient RF from scrambling it. Military tech goes to extraordinary lengths to both hide and find almost anything electric which emits RF. <br> <br>
You don't have your facts quite right. The Faraday cage has to be able to conduct the charge from one side to the other. There is no electric current applied in a faraday cage, other than the signal that goes through the metal from one side to the other.
Nice comment, I had always wondered about that and assumed that aluminium was fairly penetrable and composed the majority of enclosures. The current makes so much more sense, and explains the massive active electronic components enclosing my sister's labs... I wish my brain worked better sometimes.. =)
One thing that seems to not be sinking in, there is no such thing as bullet &quot;proof&quot;. An item can only be bullet resistant. Nothing can be truly rated bullet proof, since by definition would imply the substance stopping ALL bullets. <br> <br>This would only meet the a NIJ 0101.03 Standard of Level 1 <br>This std tested early body armor that could only stop fragmentation and very low velocity pistol ammunition. Only stopping a .22 at 1,050 fps (320 mps) meets the minimum level 1. <br> <br>Now with that you are trading a useless level of protection for a massive amount of weight. I have shooting glasses made of polymer that can stop a .22 at 1,050 fps. Any metal would be a poor trade off for weight v resistance. Ceramic or high density polymers would be preferred. In fact other than being a paper weight in high winds that I have almost take me off the ground in Iraq this would only be a heavy useless equipment addition. Any soldier knows weight is always an issue in combat and this is just too much. <br> <br>Also I unlike many that comment AM an expert in this area. One being retired military and very combat tested. As well as a now retired cop and in both jobs tested ballistic performance and body armor ballistic resistantance. I am FBI trained on bullet ballistic performance and testing. <br> <br>You have a good idea here that unfortunately has been done to death in the world of smart phone protective cases. There are more than a few that claim bullet resistance all be it like this at the minimum lvl. I think this could be taken in the right direction with more resistant and much lighter synthetic materials or ceramics . <br> <br>Good luck with it.
3mm of steel will stop virtually nothing.
some short range bb guns maybe....but if it been hited by steel bb you will get a nice bullet hole and a broken Iphone screen... <br>
Serious suggestion: perhaps making something like this out of Micarta ShotBlocker (a bullet resistant fiberglass you can work with ordinary tools) or something that would stop actually stop a common caliber (9mm, .380, .45) bullet? I suppose you could also use Acrylite, if you didn't mind having a 2&quot; thick phone case. ;)
Sorry to break it to you but you chose the wrong materials. I would not want to have to add this brick to my already heavy combat kit. Not to mention that the other comment-or is right. There is no way that mild steal will ever be bullet proof from today's high velocity combat round. If you were to make it from steel, you would need a 12mm of Brinell 500 hardness steal, which would make your case prohibitively heavy. From experience focus on not making bullet proof but drop proof. Make it so that it is shock proof so that when you have this in a pack and you are dropping and rolling, nothing happens to it. Focusing on bullet proof isn't practical and would require too much material which would make it bulky but not shock proof.
Though I do like the idea that you are expanding your concepts and world views, I do have an ISSUE with your choice of words. NOTHING is &quot;Bullet-Proof&quot; it is only &quot;Bullet-Resist&quot;
This is in no way a commentary on this project. I just think it's a cool video.<br> <br> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZzoB6xBWOI" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZzoB6xBWOI</a><br>
What gauge steel would 3 mm be ? Most metal here &quot; USA &quot; is sold by the gauge just like wire or by thousandths of an inch .
It would be close to 11 gauge sheet, using 1/8&quot; plate might be a better choice though.
Thanks for the information .
A video of you shooting, hammering and stomping on it would be nice to see. :)

About This Instructable




More by lockershop:Scary 7ft jack-in-the-box (from Tinkercad to real life) Mechanical blooming flower ring Micro paper robots (cyborg crab) 
Add instructable to: