How to Run Composite Video and Network Data Through an Ethernet Cable

How to Run Composite Video and Network Data Through an Ethernet Cable
I needed to run Video and Audio to another part of my house. Problem was, I didn't have that much AV cable, nor the time and money to do a good installation. However I did have plenty of Cat 5 Ethernet Cable lying around. This is what I came up with, Cethernet (pronounced Seethernet) or Composite-Ethernet.

Warning This will not work with Gigabit networks, however if its for home use you probably don't need to worry.

(Bear with me this is my first instructible)

Other than video and audio you can adapt this to run a number of things. When used with a telephone line, it may be referred to as a 3 pair or 4 pair Voice/Data cable.

Now about the parts you'll need. You can of course throw something together by splicing wires, but i decided to go for a cleaner look. As you can see from the pictures below.

I used these items which can be purchased at your local Radioshack or parts store

(Note: this is just for one end of the cable)

1. Project box from Radioshack (Altoids tins work as well, its easy just to ground everything to the case)
2. 3 Phono Jacks (They come in packs of 4)
3. Ethernet Cable
4. Soldering Iron
5. Solder
6. RJ45 Crimp tool (optional)
7. RJ45 Jacks (optional)
8. Housing of some sort (I used a "Shack" project box on one end and metal mint tin on the other)

6 and 7 are only if your making the cable, you can also just cut a cable near the end and use that. It would probably be easier for most people. However this project is geared toward people who have a crimping tool, because I used one. I will do my best to describe what non-crimpers should do, I'll try to do one without crimping soon so I can get some pics.

Just letting you know you might have to improvise some on the box, but I have found that just wrapping it all in electrical tape will work. Just make sure the wires and Jacks are insulated.

 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
 

Step 1Cutting/Making the Cable

 For those without ethernet crimpers and jacks
Cut a slit in the shielding about 4 in. from the ethernet plug on the end of the cable. Then locate the brown, brown-white, blue and blue-white wires. Cut these wires and pull them out of the shielding through the hole you made. Make sure you snip enough wire for it to come out of the shielding.

For those with ethernet crimpers and jacks
Cut the shielding completely, without cutting the wires about 5 in. from the end of the cable. Pull off the shielding but don't throw it away. Next pull out the brown, brown-white, blue and  blue-white wires out of the main cable. Then slide the shielding back over the other 4 wires left--the oranges and greens.
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
99 comments
1-40 of 99next »
Aug 5, 2011. 6:32 AMmasonboi13 says:
Does anyone know if you can plug your xbox/ps3 video and audio phonos into this and view the video on your pc via the connected ethernet?
Feb 9, 2011. 1:55 AMxagop says:
WHat kind of work is this? nonsense. less in details.
Apr 9, 2011. 9:18 AMxdrone says:
Man, it is all wrong, there is not way for the hub, switch or router to make sense of the signal coming in, let alone the voltages to run a signal. Composite video is only 2 V max DC. Ethernet data is at 5 VDC square wave. There is nothing similar between the 2 signals and no circuit to convert the composite video+audio to digital signal and envelope it with a header for the Ethernet device for direction.
It is very complicated to create a device for such an instructable title. Thinking about the design alone gives me a nose bleed.
Jul 7, 2011. 5:04 PMRhamkota says:
The Ethernet data is only run through a few wires, that leaves some that are being unused. That is why it works.
Apr 9, 2011. 9:21 AMxdrone says:
This is as bad as designing a 220V mains outlet with male plug rather a socket.
Nov 26, 2010. 1:34 PMWalendas says:
Instead of ethernet cables, can you use telephone cables?
Jan 25, 2011. 4:14 AME_MAN says:
you could.... but the whole point of this is to run both the network capability and the audio/video signal. I would work on the phone cable, but you would only be able to run the audio/video. it would also be possible to run just one channel of sound over a telephone cable with the telephone line. there might be some interference thought..... have fun!
Jan 25, 2011. 2:21 PME_MAN says:
No problem. I just used a similar hack to run two network connections over one cat5e cable. Works great!
Jan 25, 2011. 12:57 PMWalendas says:
Thanks! Great explanation!
Dec 31, 2008. 3:46 PMarbarbarb says:
I'm intruiged. So is this simply a cable extender for a point to point connection? If you plug the Ethernet jack (connected to the video-out source) into a hub which connects to another hub, which you then connect the TV, will you get the signal on the TV? This could be useful for broadcasting the signal from my set top box over my network so I can just connect TV's in other rooms to watch the same show without having to use one of those horrible wireless extenders. And thinking further ahead, if you used it as a USB extender for a cheap webcam rather than an IPCam would it work? Great idea! Thanks.
Nov 3, 2010. 12:23 PMeban26 says:
I just tried your "How to run composite video and network data through ethernet cable" to be able to receive TV in kitchen, unfortunately I do not have ethernet wiring in the kitchen but do access the internet on my laptop via Netgear Powerline AV+ 200 connection to a modem in an upstairs office.

Unfortunately it didn't work for TV but OK for data transmission. Any known reason or ideas please??
Jul 23, 2009. 12:19 PMpresidentof69 says:
Just for reference, USBs cable length is 15 ft without a repeater/powered hub.
Oct 28, 2010. 6:16 PMcomputergeek321 says:
what dose this do
Jul 18, 2009. 3:01 PMstevie1 says:
just a thought but would this work with a wireless router so that it could be wireless??
Aug 21, 2009. 10:21 PMjongscx says:
...no. What you're doing here is using the ethernet cat5/cat5e cable for a purpose different than what the router is expecting. As such, the signals, voltages, etc. would not work well, and at the least, won't be read correctly by the router... At the most, it would fry your router or/and your video source from the conflicting voltages on the wires...
Jul 2, 2010. 8:09 AMmmould03 says:
But on the otherhand, wouldn't it be possible to get some strong IR transmitters or some other form of signal-broadcasting components to just send the pure signal out without alteration and build a receiver for the other side? Say run from a/v source in the livingroom through the diningroom and into the kitchen where it splits to view on the TV on the counter and then runs (after the split) to the transmitter you've built which beams it out the back window to the receiver hooked to your setup on the back patio? Could this work? I'm getting a little excited here... at the very least, cat5 is very easy to run and there is quite some potential in this as there are 8 wires, 4 twisted pair... that's 4 audio devices, or two A/V devices and an additional audio. I'm SOOOO playing over the weekend... will report back if I figure out anything spiffy.
Sep 4, 2009. 6:37 AMstevie1 says:
oh, ok thanks for the explanation.
Jun 19, 2010. 4:02 AMtech_sponge61 says:
So i could use ethernet cable and splice it to some AV cables and connect my laptop to my TV?? and since i wouldn't need to connect to a network I would only use 2 pairs/4 wires to run audio and video? this would be cool to do and I have all the parts so i wouldn't have to buy anything!
May 24, 2010. 3:35 PMsnaremj says:
I don't know if anyone still looks at this but im thinking about doing this for my living room. But keeping it on its own network. What was the video quality like on ths project?...
Mar 28, 2010. 3:17 AMPondering It All says:
Interesting thing:  If you want to run composite video more than 250 feet, you can't use a normal coaxial video cable.  The signal is too degraded so you lose all of the image detail.
For up to 1000 feet or so, the solution is to use a video balun on each end of a twisted pair.  Shielded twisted pair would be nice, but unshielded (UTP such as CAT5) works okay too.  The source-side balun converts the single-ended 75 Ohm composite video into differential 100 Ohm, (that matches the CAT5 impedance).  The far balun converts it back to 75 Ohm single-ended.  This also avoids noise picked up in a long coaxial cable outer shield, and isolates the two sides to prevent ground loops.
Dec 14, 2009. 9:32 PMYerboogieman says:
Imagine if you had RJ45 built into your house...
Sep 25, 2009. 5:42 AMBlackice504 says:
there is one other problem with this you will only get Half Duplex Network so your connection ( INTERNAL ) would be half speed of a Full Duplexing Network. so for people that just need a Connection with internet maybe share some files and a printer fine. High speed downloading + remote desktop on the download machine would be a nightmare ( already a nightmare for the windows OS as it limits its connections in sp2. but thats another story. but all in all a good idea. personaly i would run my video and audio in one network cable and make the video RGB (component) and Digital Audio ( 1 RCA ) + 5.1 or 7.1 Digital Audio. (makre sure your sound card can do that) or you would just get Stereo.
Sep 23, 2009. 5:44 AM0utbreak says:
it looks cool but cant it make noice(parazite) if the sound and the video (-) negatives attached together..??
Jan 30, 2009. 12:10 AMterrapinlogo says:
would this setup work with my laptop and tv in my room and a pc and tv with dvd player out in the living area? would it transmitt the audio and video through the network hub or not?
untitled2.bmp
Sep 23, 2009. 1:35 AMGroxx says:
I doubt it, but I would be extremely interested in the results if anyone tries it. If it's just a splitter + generic amp, then sure. But if there's any kind of data cleaning (ie, noise removal), which any decent digital amp should do, it'd probably destroy your A/V quality. If you / anyone does try and succeed, though, please leave a comment and include which hub you use, as that may matter :)
Sep 23, 2009. 1:37 AMGroxx says:
Oh, and as mixadj notes below, it may damage your router if you try. Again, I'd doubt it as the power is so low, but I'll also claim zero responsibility if it does ;)
Mar 25, 2009. 7:50 PMmatbh says:
throught a hub?????????????????? i´m not sure about that!
Aug 21, 2009. 10:25 PMjongscx says:
actually,in the strictest sense, since the hub in this picture would be acting just as a splitter, it should work... Unfortunately, if you're using something beefier than a hub, say a switch, or even a router... you may be out of luck, as the other cables would be in use...
Jul 14, 2010. 12:38 AMKasm279 says:
I've never owned a hub, too young for that. All I've got is a router and a switch >.>
Sep 17, 2009. 6:05 AMf47m1k3 says:
The idea of using a repeater would be a novel idea. However, since youre using UTP, using an amplifier (repeaters are for digital signals) might not be a good idea unless you upgraded the setup to STP. You might pick up some EMI from AC wiring if you're not careful of where you run it and you would just end up amplifying the noise along with the signal. However, that aside, I do like this instructable. Great idea for reducing the cables running from room to room especially considering that 50' of cat5 is cheaper than 50' of RCA.
Jul 19, 2009. 11:02 AMmacpower says:
I was on a job where we specked out a room to be wired with A/V and S-Video. When we came in monday morning, they had run cat-5 AND put down a raised floor. Any chance of rerunning the cabling would've been too much time down. We ran out to our local electronics/camera store and bought a ton of rca jacks. We crimped them onto the cat-5 and kept on going with the job. Worked like a dream. That showroom is still going strong off the corner of 5th avenue and 43rd st. in NYC. Best out-of-the-box 3 hours of my life. The union workers that were doing all the other construction were amazed at our ingenuity and promised that they would talk about that one for years.
Apr 11, 2009. 4:55 AMcoolsciencetech says:
ok here is a question. Once you have completed the project do you just lay the wire down from your pc to your ps3 or whatever you want to hook it up to? Also could you run it through the wired network in most houses while on the internet?
May 9, 2009. 7:08 AMun0 says:
why can't i plug into my router?
Jul 18, 2009. 2:41 PMgrue says:
because if you do, it will get fried
Apr 3, 2009. 3:06 AMrecordmasta001 says:
could you still use your telephone/wierd network at the same time?
Mar 30, 2009. 3:44 PMmbach04 says:
Why not just use a video balun? You'll get much less signal loss, and you have two spare pairs when your done. Just a thought.
Mar 11, 2009. 1:25 PMduncanmacrae says:
Have been looking for balun to achive the RCA Composite to RG45 connection but mixadj approach looks simpler and cheaper. However simple hook up of connectors doesn't match the impedance of the RCA coax 75ohm cable to Cat 5 or 6 which I understand is 100ohms. May not be critical for short runs. Any comments?
1-40 of 99next »

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
8
Followers
2
Author:mixadj