How to blend in with crowds.

 by m1k3y
Featured
800px-Taipei_MRT_Crowds.jpg
Being inconspicuous takes practice, skill and cunning. Here are some things that I've learned about staying anonymous.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Dress for success

Dress so you don't stand out. Normally this means dressing plainly. Although, sometimes you may need to dress up like a zombie to blend in with a crowd.

Anticipate what the rest of the crowd will look like and use common sense. Avoid bright colors or revealing clothing. Avoid anything that could get people to pay attention to you. Avoid being too out of style and too in style. Avoid things with big logos or graphics on it.

In most situations the ideal outfit has dark muted colors, is clean, covers your naughty bits and matches. It should have a timeless look.
1-40 of 79Next »
zilliana says: Jul 30, 2011. 2:21 PM
Uhm, is there ANY way for a hijabi (muslim gal who wears headscarf) who feels stalked to blend into the crowd? I've got a friend who wears the scarf and she feels that there is no way for her to hide short of violating her religious policies. Can you help?
Kirtap10 in reply to zillianaFeb 10, 2013. 9:15 AM
A hooded sweatshirt, drug rug, hooded jacket, etc. is inconspicuous and modest and it would mostly hide a hijab.
th30be in reply to zillianaJun 12, 2012. 11:08 PM
tell her to take it off. If she feels that she being stalked and is being endangered then who cares about religion. It is not worth being hurt.
barnowl12 in reply to zillianaJan 12, 2012. 1:35 PM
Your friend should wear a scarf that isn't bright and is an earth tone or kind of a dull color. I have seen dull colors on other hijabi's and it looks fine
sabu.dawdy says: Feb 10, 2013. 8:05 AM
this is a lovely idea :)
Udon says: Dec 18, 2008. 9:32 AM
A white dude (tallish, green eyes, hair on arms, porridgey pale skin, spiky but far from I-have-perfect-black-hair-that-looks-like-this-when-I-woke-up-and-it-moves-in-the-wind-just-like-in-Anime-because-I-am-Asian kind of hair, huge and monstrous feet) trying to blend into China. Buddy of mine went to Shanghai for the F1 - he was there for 3 days, and walking on the street he eckons he was the tallest person on that part of the continent. He's 1.8m. Can blending in even be possible?
jeffconnelly in reply to UdonSep 12, 2010. 8:24 PM
If you're above average height, slouching can help; Below average - high/thick heels.
That guy there says: Jun 17, 2010. 10:24 AM
if you combine this hiding technique with this hidden blade then you have a deadly combo indeed!
hidden blade link:  http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-Make-the-Assassins-Creed-Hidden-Blade/
daninja says: Apr 7, 2009. 12:28 PM
Thanks for the great instructable! now i can hide the fact that i have wings on my back that i can fold in and the wingspan is 15 feet. Yes, i can fly!
kathynv says: Dec 18, 2008. 10:15 AM
If you suspect that someone is looking for/at you, immediately develop a plausible reason to be in the area; get a haircut or shave, look at/purchase foods at an outdoor market. If you're doing what all the other people of your gender are doing, it's usually a lot easier to blend.
mysterygirl154 says: Nov 3, 2008. 11:49 AM
You forgot to act like nothings weird I almost always do my homework right before its due in class, and I never get caught. It's kind of funny watching other people get caught and it drives my friends nutty.
zero4hero says: Aug 10, 2008. 5:58 PM
I found waldo and the wizard now where is that damn scroll?
generalmayhem says: May 22, 2008. 11:22 AM
See also Harrison Ford's escape from Tommy Lee Jones and the rest of the Federal Marshalls by blending into the St. Patrick's Day parade crowd in the movie "The Fugitive". He obviously read this instructable first.
Sypran in reply to generalmayhemMay 22, 2008. 7:28 PM
why in every movie is there a St. Pattys day parade that the good guy can blend in to escape?
cecilomar in reply to SypranJun 14, 2008. 9:44 AM
Because everybody is drunk?
Spinning_Rings in reply to SypranMay 22, 2008. 9:00 PM
It's the writer's convenience.
DeusExMach in reply to Spinning_RingsMay 27, 2008. 12:21 PM
A Deus Ex St. Patty's day?
Spinning_Rings in reply to DeusExMachMay 27, 2008. 2:02 PM
Um... What?
DeusExMach in reply to Spinning_RingsMay 27, 2008. 2:45 PM
A "Deus Ex Machina" is a literary device in which an actor playing "God" would descend from the top of the stage, and fix the situation for the protagonist with a helpful and timely intervention. The term translates as "God out of the Machine", referring to the contraption used to lower the actor into place. It has since become synonomous with any random plot device that serves as a "Saving Grace" for the main character in a story. ...and now, you know.
IkilledKenny in reply to DeusExMachJun 14, 2008. 8:16 PM
people like green?
Kulawend in reply to DeusExMachJun 13, 2008. 9:03 PM
I learned that in 9th grade, and I attended an under-budgeted school. It's amazing what people don't know that they should.
Spinning_Rings in reply to KulawendJun 14, 2008. 11:12 AM
I think I can get through life just fine without knowing a couple of play terms, thank you very much.
Kulawend in reply to Spinning_RingsJun 14, 2008. 12:53 PM
Play terms? When you think of literary devices think story terms, but then again literary devices are only important to know about if you plan on reading a book.
Spinning_Rings in reply to KulawendJun 14, 2008. 8:17 PM
"The term translates as "God out of the Machine", referring to the contraption used to lower the actor into place." I'll also have you know that knowing literary devices and being able to read have nothing to do with each other. I can enjoy Terry Pratchett, Anthony Horowitz, William Shakespeare, Neil Gaiman, or any other writer without being able to write a three-page paper on the use of foreshadowing in one of their books.
DeusExMach in reply to Spinning_RingsJun 16, 2008. 11:32 AM
oh. I apologize for wasting your time. I thought we were here to learn about things we didn't otherwise know. Forgive me for trying to include a little bit extra in answer to a direct question. Unless it was a rhetorical question, and if so, I'll answer it with rhetoric. To whit: "Knowledge is power" "Deus Ex Machinas are overused in american cinema, literature, et. al." "You're makin' us look like jerks... READ A BOOK!".
Spinning_Rings in reply to DeusExMachJun 16, 2008. 12:54 PM
I'm sorry, I wasn't trying to insult you, I was just arguing the point that how many literary terms I know has nothing to do with my ability to read. I am an avid reader, and I find it highly offensive and elitist towards scholars to say that I'm not good at it because I don't know all the scholarly terms. I'm not mad at you, I was quite grateful to you for explaining the joke, I liked it, it was funny, and I got to learn something new. But I don't like being told I'm a bad reader because I didn't already know it.
Kulawend in reply to Spinning_RingsJun 15, 2008. 12:52 AM
The term Deus Ex Machina may have originated from plays, but in modern times it's most observed in books. You know how it is, the main character is just about to die and suddenly he is saved by some magical force. I can't even count how many books (and movies) I know of that end like that. I'm not trying to say knowing about literary devices are essential to reading, but they are somewhat important for readers, and especially writers to learn. Knowing more about the subject you are working with is always important, eh?
cd41 in reply to KulawendOct 29, 2008. 5:48 PM
A Dues Ex Machina is when the author just spontanieously fixes the conflict with an out of place event and ends the story, like in that Superman movie when he just flies counter-clockwise around the globe to go back in time, but i apriciate the fact that we both read the wikipedia article (and you are using the example about its use in greek plays)
DeusExMach in reply to cd41Oct 31, 2008. 8:08 AM
Actually, no, I didn't read the wikipedia article, I passed 10th grade English class.
cd41 in reply to DeusExMachNov 2, 2008. 11:10 AM
well glad to see teahcers take examples from wikipedia ain't it? just btw not trying to fight but you should consider taking more time and adding in more details to your comments
DeusExMach in reply to cd41Nov 2, 2008. 3:43 PM
10th grade english class was 11 years ago. There was no Wikipedia back then.
cd41 in reply to DeusExMachNov 2, 2008. 4:34 PM
Wow you had one amazing nice psycic teacher then..:)
DeusExMach in reply to cd41Nov 3, 2008. 11:29 AM
no.
Udon in reply to DeusExMachDec 18, 2008. 9:18 AM
And what does any of this have to do with Harrison Ford?
cd41 in reply to UdonDec 18, 2008. 7:02 PM
Not sure how but he can join the party
Spinning_Rings in reply to KulawendJun 16, 2008. 1:19 PM
I'm sorry I wasn't clear. You see, I wasn't arguing the point that it was only applicable to plays, I was trying to explain why I was confused. I totally agree that it's not just for play. When DeusExMach explained it, the first thing I thought of was the Emilist from the Animorphs book series I liked when I was a kid. So I wasn't trying to argue there. On the other hand, I am going to argue the second point on the grounds that: A.) If you weren't trying to say that, then you failed miserably because that's exactly what "literary devices are only important to know about if you plan on reading a book," sounds like it to me. And B.) I don't agree that it's "somewhat Important" for readers--refering back to those animorphs books, I liked them just the same before and after I'd heard of Deus Ex Machina--, but for writers... You see, the way I think of it (and I doubt many would try to argue this,) writing isn't a science, it's an art. Now on the one hand, learning the techniques another artist has discovered can help make an artist's work more vivid and detailed, like when an artist first learns of shading or one-point-perspective. But on the other hand, too much emphasis on studying the techniques of other artists and not enough on discovering and developing one's own techniques leads to a lack of creativity, a regurgitation of what's already been done. So while I'll admit it's of some importance, I think it's something you need to be careful not to put too much emphasis on.
Kulawend in reply to Spinning_RingsJun 16, 2008. 5:44 PM
You're totally right, writing is an art, but you are dead wrong if you think that using literary devices takes away any creativity from the user's writing. The device itself is simply another tool, it requires the writer to use it creatively.
Spinning_Rings in reply to KulawendJun 16, 2008. 7:33 PM
Interesting. So what this boils down to is that I think of literary devices as techniques, guidelines that enforce rigidity, whereas you think of them as tools, prompts that encourage thought. A rather simple difference of views, as far as I can see. Alright. We've both adequately explained or views, and neither of us has been swayed. Unless you have something else you think will persuade me, then it's time to either end the conversation or change the subject before the tension builds any more. ... ... ... So, how about this weather?
killarowa in reply to DeusExMachJun 11, 2008. 4:35 AM
and knowing is half the battle. G.I. JOE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeusExMach in reply to killarowaJun 11, 2008. 5:56 AM
Sure, knowing is half the battle. And you know what? So is losing. Losing is half the battle. Let's focus on ALL the battle, here.
1-40 of 79Next »
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!