Tesla Turbines promise up to 92% efficiency of converting air or fluid flow to rotational energy and its use can also be inverted for use as a pump with exceptionally high efficiency too. With compressed air becoming recognised as a feasible form of energy storage, we can see this device in everyday life soon as a source of locomotion. Factoring the simplicity, robustness and resillience to ingress of this design and you have something ideal for pumping heterogenous fluids like sewarage or fluids with suspended particulate. As a pump, this device has an important role to play in the developing world. More about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_turbine
Remove these ads by
Signing UpStep 1: Tools that you will need
2. Circle cutter - get this from you stationary shop for 1.99
3. Engineering Compass - optional, you can use the circle cutter to mark the workpieces
4. Sheet-metal drill bit and a 5 mm drill bit
5. Half-round file
6. Hole file
7. Craft glue or hot-melt glue
8. Epoxy glue to bond aluminium (that's aluminum to you lot in the US/Canada!)
9. Gaffa/Bodge/Duct/Electrical tape
10. Hacksaw with metal blade to cut aluminium (see proper pronounciation in item 8)
11. Pillar drill
12. Compressor to supply the air to drive the turbine. You can also use a drinking straw and blow really hard 'till your eyes pop out.
13. Some spare hard disk platters (chances are that you will have a couple of attempts to cut the right shape of slots in them)

















































Visit Our Store »
Go Pro Today »




Basically, if you used it as a pump you may be able to use a stream of air as propulsion instead.
That's the wonderful thing with this invention by Tesla: it works very well both ways. So turning this into a pump will work.
Anyways, how can I tell if it's ceramic or metal without drilling into it? Is there a way to drill a ceramic plate successfully, without cracking or shearing?
In theory at least, the boundary effect would likely be a lot better with ceramic ones, too. That's because the old metal plate drive platters actually had an oxide coding (yes..rust) which..if you look at an electron microscope, is actually extremely bumpy/spikey vs slightly hilly (it's a huge difference, at that detail level).
So what hard disc drives have you used? The issue is that well..the drive I want to use is only about 2 years old. I'm not sure how "ancient" yours are though...
You say that some have ceramics, but not many that you've run into (iirc, that's what you said..maybe that was someone else ;) but which manufacturers..years, sizes, etc are these?
I wish there were a good way of being able to tell it, without cracking it. But I don't think e.g. a magnet would be a "test" of that sort of thing.
Thanks.
The surface effect is approximately the same over a perfectly smooth or a slightly textured surface - the drag force is applied well above the surface. We are not talking microscopic wind -vanes here, like in a pelton turbine! So ignore the point about the slightly rough iron oxide.
Besides, you will see that a metal hard disk platter is one of the most perfect surfaces you have ever seen - press two of them together and see how much effort is required to separate them.
1. I machined the hard drive case completely flat.
2. I placed an aluminum block on top and machined it to fit on top of the flat surface.
3. I placed a polycarbonate square on top as a covering.
Thanks for this awesome instructable!
I am from America.
I was intending to use this project as to have a play around with the porting, to see if there was an optimum or preferable set out, I am interested to know what happens when you off set the ports.
I spent half the day building this project and it took 30seconds with my air compressor for the hdd motor to internally disintegrate, I have not the slightest clue as to what the rpm's were but it was screaming, the momentum almost threw it out of my hand when the motor ceased. The shaft is jammed tight i could not get it to even slightly budge with a big pair of pliers.
Oh wel, l just have to find another motor with a long enough shaft, as the couple of spares that I have aren't long enough for the four disc and spacers.
Warning to others, don't get trigger happy with the compressed air, or your fun will be short lived.
Great project great results!!
I found a spreadsheet somewhere (and I don't know where it is now) that suggested that spacing should be about 0.8mm for something that has the viscosity of air. The more viscous the flowing material (water is more viscous than air) the bigger the spacing should be. It seems to not be too critical, but too tight and you loose energy from 'squeezing' your fluid through the gaps, and to loose and you loose energy from not sufficient fluid coming into 'contact' with the disk platters. My guess is that spacing is directly proportional to fluid viscosity (I do not know much about fluid mechanics).
The size of the inlet nozzle is of little importance - your aim is to get all the fluid to flow over the surfaces of all disk platters. I have a rectangular inlet that is a wide as the set if platters, which i made by simply sawing a cut into the one drive chassis, such that the airflow is directed along the outer tangent (i.e. 90degs to the radius line) of the platter. This way you will get maximum 'contact' between the energetic air and the platter surfaces.
oh and by the way this years project is an extension of my project last year using your design it won me a bronze at nationals.
I guess that the math for how big the holes need to be is very complex, but as long as you have holes at least, this will work.
Also, having a ratchet wrench allows you to put a fsckload of torque on a torx bit. Some of those screws are really tight.