RFID: the REAL Story
Intro: RFID: the REAL Story
STEP 1: What Is RFID?
STEP 2: Myth 1: RFID Chips Can Be Tracked From Across the Room!!!!
Many RFID conspiracy theorists will tell you that an RFID chip can be read from across the room. This is true, however, they fail to mention that these are active RFID chips. Active RFID chips are similar to passive(the common kind), except that they require a battery, and are therefor much larger than passive chips.
STEP 3: Myth 2: RFID Chips Will Contain All of Your Personal Information!!!
While it's true, RFID chips do store information, as I stated earlier, the only information they store is the particular identification number for that chip. So no, I'm sorry conspiracy theorists, RFID chips don't contain your financial and medical records for everyone to see.
STEP 4: Myth 3: They Will Control Your Mind!!!
Well, thats really I've got for the moment. I do encourage anyone with any other facts(or myths) about RFID to say so in the comments. Ever notice how conspiracy theorists never show their sources? Please, show me your "proof" than any of these myths is true
33 Comments
sonic broom 6 years ago
Conspiracy theorists do not exist. There is sheep and non sheep.
eallin1 9 years ago
Great, well thought out "instructable" (RANT) from a 14 year old. It was already shown at defcon FIVE years ago (even BEFORE the lame rant was written) that RFID can and often DO pose a great security risk. Nobody EVER said they can "control your mind". I'm pretty sure you made that up in your own mind.
When RFID chips are embedded in your car tires (like each one having it's very own SSI# rather you like it or not), it's a little scary. It's already been shown that the "fast pass" toll readers aren't the only places they're being read. They're also being used for "traffic control" (ie stalking purposes) all over the place.
Imagine a world where Target is sending you spam for tons of baby shower stuff because they knew you were pregnant before your family did. Now, imagine TARGET gets HACKED and everyone else knows too. Guess what? ALREADY HAPPENED ;)
Imagine schools where your forced to wear your RFID chip all day, every day so they they use them to monitor your every movement... even while you use the bathroom. ALREADY HAPPENING.
Take a look around the place. RFID can and ARE being hacked like crazy. GO FIGURE! Anyone can pick up they're very own RFID reader for $30 bucks. People have been hacking them more than Rasberry Pi! And you don't HAVE to read them from across the room, just have one placed next to a doorway where everyone comes and goes. Eazy Peazy baby!
Be sure to keep that PASSPORT of yours hidden, you crazy conspiracy theorists... everyone with their head in the sand is secure.
Would kind of be common sense to see that having tracking devices attached to you all the time may be a slight invasion of privacy and serious security risk. Too bad there are so many people who lack common sense.
So the REAL story is, this "inscrutable" was a complete and total FAIL on every level. The only thing it was trying to "instruct" readers to do was DUMMY UP and stick their heads in the sand when it came to their own privacy and security. It was all proven false before it was even written. It's even worse now.
And I am being as "nice" as possible. I'm definitely being CONSTRUCTIVE. It's kind of like telling people to "not worry" about leaving their IDs on the dashboards of their cars with the doors unlocked. Only a "paranoid conspiracy theorist" would be worried about stuff like that! Like there's a "conspiracy" where people go around trying to steal your personal info and sell it for money or something!
I mean, what reason would a company try to gather Intel on you? I can't figure it out and anyone who thinks they can must be paranoid or whatever...
Read up on RFID. Educate yourself on the serious security risks of this developing tech and cover your own butt Just like putting a firewall or anitvirus on your PC, it's not "paranoia", it's just common sense.
knozis 10 years ago
francisroan 11 years ago
pilgrimboz 12 years ago
rimar2000 13 years ago
pilgrimboz 12 years ago
metrogdor22 13 years ago
Wessinc 13 years ago
pilgrimboz 12 years ago
rugerio 12 years ago
Those 'Anti-Conspiracy Theorists' meanwhile do n't bother to think at all.
They just accept whatever bullshit the powers that be put in front of them.
Talk about 'mind control'. You don't need it with people like this.
They do n't have 'minds' to control.( That is unless they Are already being controlled.)
kidmosey 12 years ago
Unless you are some ultraparanoid cash-only baseball-cap-in-public type person, you are already pretty easy to track, with or without rfid.
On the off chance that you run into someone who is siphoning rfid's, they have no way of knowing what the particular id is used for. They have a number, but won't be able to tell if it's for a lock, a credit card, or just a pair of shoes.
thirst4know 12 years ago
GonzoLives 13 years ago
http://www.rfidglobalsolution.com/ (They're so SMUG! )
And read the piece entitled: "Prison RFID Study Finds Planning Is Critical" By Claire Swedberg.
Here's a delightful excerpt: "Sept. 13, 2010—A study conducted by nonprofit research organization RAND Corp [emphasis mine-sound familiar?]. has found that RFID deployments in correctional facilities require considerable customization to each prison's unique needs and infrastructure.
According to the report, failure to properly anticipate infrastructure installation challenges, as well as the need for proper funding and training for staff members, can delay installations or render the system ineffective. The study, titled "Tracking Inmates and Locating Staff with Active Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID): Early Lessons Learned in One U.S. Correctional Facility," was conducted by the RAND Corp., with funding provided by the U.S. Department of Justice's National Institute of Justice (NIJ) division.
Researchers took a two-pronged approach: determining how many RFID installations were actually in use in U.S. prisons, and studying the installation process in one correctional institution. "
There was mention in the subtitle of "controlling inmate violence"...wonder HOW? (they track tasers with RFID's in the UK).
For the rest: here's the totally innocuous link by those whacko conspiracy the--uh, er...by the people who MAKE the damned things!
http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/view/7862
rblee 13 years ago
"Standard" passive RFID is very short range, but various people have demonstrated that with a powerful RF field and a high quality receiver/antenna combination they can be read over considerably greater distances. The last time I looked the record was 3 or 4 metres, although this was in laboratory conditions. It's worth remembering that the reason most, if not all, commercial RFID readers only work over short ranges is because they're built down to a price, and a few centimeters is plenty for passive applications (EPOS, stock control, etc.). They can do better in the right circumstances.
Yes, RFID chips only carry a unique number. Your social security number is similar, as is your credit card number, as is the electronic lock that you open by waving an RFID chip near it. What is far more important is what that number is keyed to. If it's on a sock, did you pay for that sock with a credit card? If so that could allow a black hat to find out all about you. It will allow the forces of law and order to find out all about you. Is it a pass card for a transit system? If it's read and a copy made, someone gets to ride around at your expense. This happened in London, UK (my home town), and they had to replace all the cards (google for: +TfL +"oyster card") at considerable expense, although you might reasonably argue that this isn't standard RFID - It just appears to be.
In practice, you don't need to read these things from very far away. The Oyster card scam was apparently just took advantage of the fact that London's underground system is packed to the gunnels during the rush hour (think Tokyo), and it's normal to be in intimate contact with the 3 or 4 people standing around you. Close enough is good enough.
None of these things may concern you, but they are provenly possible, and actually seem to be a favorite prank in American Universities. It seems to me that it's unwise to play down the potential dangers. The London Underground customer who's in intimate contact with dozens of strangers every day has a very different risk profile from someone living in a rural community. The devil is in the detail.
You may find this interesting:
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/01/primer-information-theory-and-privacy
It describes a formal technique for identifying people, stratified by the nature of the information available about them. Perhaps you should ask yourself where the random unique number in an RFID chip could lead? And could this be detrimental to the card holder?
Before anyone asks, I do have a metallic credit card holder. Faraday cages aren't illegal (in the UK, at least) and it removes the potential problems at a stroke. I do not own an aluminum beanie hat, and never have :).
metrogdor22 13 years ago
rblee 13 years ago
The latter approach comes out of a paranoid concern that "The Man" will want to track us by the large number of RFID chips we will all be carrying around, attached to our clothes and similar. The idea is that everyone exchanges chips randomly with strangers - Imagine a bowl in every bar into which every customer empties their chips, stirs it around, then grabs a random handful. This would have the theoretical advantage of polluting any database used for tracking people, rendering it useless. Well, maybe. I'm not that paranoid yet...
A lot of UK refuse bins have RFID chips in them to allow people to be charged according to the weight of rubbish they generate. This is hugely unpopular, but is easily defeated with one of those mini-EMP generators that you can build with a disposable camera. Given that these bins (we call them "wheelie bins" because they, err, have wheels?) cost around 100 UKP, and the chips aren't replaceable, judging by the one in my drive. A recipe for trouble, if ever I saw one. :)
The time to worry, of course, is when they start to forcibly inject them into people. Fortunately this would probably be a massive vote loser, so is unlikely to happen in real life. In my opinion, of course.
metrogdor22 13 years ago
owenaero 13 years ago
metrogdor22 13 years ago