Heat Exchangers and 3D Printing

22,603

156

39

Introduction: Heat Exchangers and 3D Printing

About: Engineer from the Netherlands. Projects in 3D printing, electronics, prop making, sewing and whatever interests me. (If you have a pressing question go to my site and ask it there. I am way more likely to an…

I live in a one bedroom apartment and while I love living there, there are some issues with ventilation. There are only windows on one side with small ventilation grilles above two windows. The air tends to get stale in the winter because there is not enough air flowing. Opening the windows every day would solve the problem, but that would waste a lot of heat.

There is a way around this, a 'heat exchanger' or 'heat recovery system'. Now normal people would just open a window, but I always wanted to try and make one. In this Instructable I will share a few designs I tried and share efficiencies and my conclusion for now.

All exchangers are at least in part 3D printed and there is even a completely 3D printed design.All files are available (and will be kept up to date) here:

http://ytec3d.com/3dp-heat-exchanger/

Step 1: What Is a Heat Exchanger

Simply put a heat exchanger is a device that transfers the heat from one flow of to another (in this case air to air). They do this by making 2 flows of air with different temperatures pass one another separated by a thin wall. Heat travels from the hotter flow of air, through the wall and into the cooler flow of air. The only part that requires energy is making the air move. Everything else happens by temperature difference alone.

The heat exchanger is great for ventilation systems for homes in cooler countries because homes can then be ventilated without losing the heat. The humid, stale air of inside can be replaces with the dry, fresh air from the outside without also replacing the heat.

In an ideal world, heat exchangers can transfer up to 100% of the heat from one flow to the other, but in the real world, percentages are lower. My initial goal was to make an exchanger with 80% efficiency. Efficiency in heat exchanger is how much of the heat is transferred between the flows of air. An example:

The air outside is 0°C and the inside air is 20°C. If there is a 80% efficient heat exchanger in the ventilation system, the 0°C air from the outside will be heated to 16°C when it exits the exchanger. The 20°C air will be cooled to 4°C when it exits the heat exchanger.

As seen in the image, there are a few design options. Also there are 3 distinct flow directions.

  • Cross flow: The streams flow perpendicular to each other. Exchanging heat sideways (the 50 - 70% exchanger)
  • Parallel flow: Both flows enter from the same side and exit the same side. This way allows for at most 50% heat transfer.
  • Counter flow: The most efficient, where the flows are opposite from one another. This creates a hot side and a cool side. Depending on the design, counter flow can get close to 100% efficiency. All my tests use counter flow heat exchangers.

Step 2: Partially 3D Printed Heat Exchanger

The partially 3D printed heat exchanger has all of the complex parts printed. These are the end caps, adapters and shrouds. The main frame of the exchanger is a PVC tube. For those who want to duplicate the design, it is a 90mm PVC tube and I dare anyone to find it in an ordinary hardware store. I messed up and designed this heat exchanger around a tube that is only available on the internet.

The exchanging is done in drinking straws. Normal straws are only around 20cm long but I managed to find straws 75cm long on the internet. The straws have a wall thickness of 0.1mm and a diameter of 6.5mm. 91 were used in the current design. Effectively each straw has a surface area of around 140cm² (it is 150, but not all is used). With a total of 91 straws, this gives a total surface area of 12500cm². Over a square meter or 13.5 square feet.

To assemble the exchanger, the tube was cut to length. The straw holes in the end caps were drilled to give a loose but clamping fit. Both end caps were glued to the tube and aligned. The straws were fed through by hand, one at a time. After all straws were in place, one side was glued using super glue. Then from the other side the straws were pulled to tighten them and the other side was glued as well.

The fans are standard 60mm fans. The fans are rated at 38m²/h, but due to the resistance of the exchanger, a fraction of that is probably achieved. The fans consume 1.75W each. The fans have adapters to mount them to things like vacuum cleaner hoses. 60mm fans are not ideal. They are noisy and not that efficient. In the future I might replace them with something quieter and more efficient like 120mm case fans.

To download the files, go here:

http://ytec3d.com/3dp-heat-exchanger/

Step 3: Completely 3D Printed Heat Exchanger

The completely 3D printed version is, as the name suggests, completely 3D printed. To make it I modified my Ultimaker with an E3D V6 with 0.25mm nozzle.

The walls of the exchanger are 0.3mm thick. The outside dimensions of the exchanger are 15x8x7cm but it has an internal surface area of around 1000cm² (1/10th of a square meter or about a square foot). It is printed in PLA and takes around 10 hours to print at 0.16mm layer thickness. With special adapters it can fit 60mm fans and all the other adapters I have designed.

special adapters were printed to connect the 60mm fans to the 3D printed exchanger. The accessories used on the partially 3D printed heat exchanger also fit on the completely 3D printed version.

To download the files, go here:

http://ytec3d.com/3dp-heat-exchanger/

Step 4: Measuring Exchanger Efficiency 1

Making a heat exchanger is meaningless without determining how efficient it is. The test is fairly straight forward and gives a decent ball park efficiency figure. In the real world efficiency is also dependent on flow, but for this test the heat exchanger will be ran at one speed only.

The basics of the testing equipment is an Arduino Uno with 4 10k thermistors (NTC) and an SD card for logging. Thermistors are not known for their accuracy, but with some calibration I got them to operate within +/- 0.5°C of each other. The logger takes a sample of each airflow every few seconds and stores it on an SD card. These values can be imported into excel to make a functional graph.

The flow will not be equal on both sides. I currently have no way to measure actual flow. To still get a good efficiency reading, both in and output flows were measured. By calculating both efficiencies, I can average them out and get a decent ball park on the efficiency.

Efficiency is measured as full potential energy vs. energy actually being used. In the case of the heat exchanger it is total temperature difference vs. transferred heat. This is assuming equal flow and equal mediums. The 4 temperatures (unit does not matter):

  • Hot in (the warmer air that enters the hot side of the exchanger)
  • Hot out (the warmer air that exits the cool side of the exchanger)
  • Cool in (the cooler air that enters the cool side of the exchanger)
  • Cool out (the cooler air that exits the hot side of the exchanger)

Hot flow efficiency: (Hot in - Hot out) / (Hot in - Cool in) x 100%

Cool flow efficiency: (Cool out - Cool in) / (Hot in - Cool in) x 100%

Step 5: Measuring Exchanger Efficiency 2

To measure the actual efficiency a one of the inputs was suspended over a heat source (ie. a heater) and the other input was in a cooler place. Both setups have 4 fans, 2 for each flow. The heat source is approximately 35°C while the cooler side is around 19°C.

Partially 3D printed exchanger

The first graph is a short test of the partially printed exchanger inside of my house. Every bottom number is 1 second, the total test was around 18 minutes. From top to bottom, the lines are: Hot in, Cool out, Hot out, Cool in. The hot air was removed too soon, the line was not yet stable. The stables situation was: HI: 34°C, HO: 23°C, CI: 18°C, CO: 32°C. Putting these values through the efficiency formulas gives 68.75% for the hot flow and 87.5% for the cool flow. This averages to 78.125% efficiency. The difference in efficiencies is due to the different flows and measuring errors. An interesting this to see is the thermal 'lag' of the exchanger. It takes over 10 minutes for the exchanger to reach a stable temperature.

The second graph is a longer test in my local (cooler) hacker space with an electric heater for a heat source. Every bottom number is 6 seconds, the total test lasted about 2,5 hours. Again from top to bottom, the lines are: Hot in, Cool out, Hot out, Cool in. Interesting to see here is that the temperature of the room slowly rose over time, due to all the electric heaters used. The heat was periodically removed to see the effect. 2 stable lines can be found, one at 450 and one at 1000.

450 -> HI: 35°C, HO: 20°C, CI: 14.5°C, CO: 30.5°C, giving 73.2% for the hot flow and 78.0% for the cool flow

1000 -> HI: 31°C, HO: 19.5°C, CI: 15.5°C, CO: 28°C, giving 74.2% for the hot flow and 80.6% for the cool flow

The average efficiency of the partially 3D printed heat exchanger is 76.5%.

Fully 3D printed exchanger

The third and final graph is the fully 3D printed heat exchanger. The fans were run at 10V to reduce the flow. Every bottom number is 6 seconds, the total test lasted just over an hour. Again from top to bottom, the lines are: Hot in, Cool out, Hot out, Cool in. The thermal 'lag' of this exchanger is a lot lower. The 2 times used will be the peak at 120 and the valley at 210.

120 -> HI: 38°C, HO: 27°C, CI: 22.5°C, CO: 33°C, giving 70.9% for the hot flow and 67.7% for the cool flow

210 -> HI: 33°C, HO: 25.5°C, CI: 21°C, CO: 30°C, giving 62.5% for the hot flow and 75% for the cool flow

The average efficiency of the Fully 3D printed heat exchanger is 69%. An important note to make here is that in a smaller (unlogged) test the 3D printed heat exchanger ran at 12V, the efficiency was closer to 50 - 60%.

Step 6: Making It Useful

The initial goal was to make this exchanger part of an active ventilation for my house. The goal is to properly ventilate my house without pumping all the heat from my home. Because I lack a centralized ventilation system and this is a rented apartment, I decided the ventilation above my window was the best place for the ventilation. One side of the ventilation grille is used to draw new air in, the other side is used to vent old air out. The rest of the grille is taped off.

This setup has a few drawbacks. First, the fans are quite noisy. This is not a setup I can run while I am at home. The second is that the hoses leak heat. They are not insulated and will preheat and precool the air. The test was done with outside air at around 0°C, yet the incoming air was already 6°C after only 50cm of hose. The longer hose has a difference upwards of 10°C. The Third thing is that I cannot really close my curtains with the tubes in the way. I can remove the hoses to close my curtains while I am home. It will not run when I am home anyway.

With those drawbacks out of the way,

Does it work?

The answer, YES. After running for over 8 hours while I was at work, the air was a lot fresher. Usually when I come home there is a certain staleness to the air, but now I came home to nothing. Just nice air.

I had the logger running for the entire time. The test started around 8 o'clock, every number on the X is 6 seconds. There are 3 zones of interest.

0-3000: Here the air outside is slowly heating up. Temperatures around this point are: HI: 17°C, HO: 10°C, CI: 6°C, CO: 14.5°C, giving 63.6% for the hot flow and 77.3% for the cool flow, averaging 70.5%.

3000-4000: Here the sun hits the window and there is a spike in temperature. No useful data can be gathered from this time.

4000-6000: The air outside is slowly cooling. Temperatures around this point are: HI: 17°C, HO: 12°C, CI: 8°C, CO:
15°C, giving 55.6% for the hot flow and 77.8% for the cool flow, averaging 66.7%.

Step 7: Conclusion

There are 3 conclusions I can draw from this project so far

The project as a whole was a success. I got fresh air into my home and the heat exchanger exchanged a large percentage of the heat. The execution of the ventilation could have been quieter and more compact, but as a whole, it works better than expected.

The big partially 3D printed version works remarkably well. Running at 70 - 80% efficiency, it is good for one of my first attempts. It does have some issues with unequal resistance and pressure drop. The side that goes through the straws has less resistance than the side around the straws and it takes quite some pressure to get real flow out of it. The 60mm fans can get air to move, but they are struggling hard. Whether the efficiency drops significantly if the flow increases much is not yet known.

The 3D printed heat exchanger works surprisingly well. I did not expect it to have the efficiency 69% it had. That said, from other smaller test it does seem that if the flow goes up, the efficiency goes down quickly (for the fully 3D printed version at least). The big logged test I did was at a lower flow. When I later preformed the test with a higher flow, I got 50 - 60%. Not bad, but less than initial testing.

Step 8: Futere Tests / Improvements

What my tests so far have shown me is that I know too little. I need better measurements, more different measurements and a more controlled test. What I want to do is design a better test setup.

I want to manually heat the air using electrically heated wire. This way I cannot only control the exact temperature, I can also determine the flow by comparing the energy I added to the air to the temperature rise of the air. I want to use better temperature sensors that are both calibrated and more accurate. This way I can get more precise results.

For the test itself I do not only want to determine efficiency at one temperature and flow. I also want to see what the influence is on the efficiency if the temperature difference (ΔT) becomes bigger and smaller, and how the efficiency changes when the flow is changed.

In this setup I want to test small test exchangers, so I can see the effect of wall thickness, flow paths, surface area and more. If I learned one thing from the tests I have done so far, it is that there is a lot more to know here than I already do.

While I cannot promise when I will do these tests, I really want to do them.

Arduino All The Things! Contest

Participated in the
Arduino All The Things! Contest

Brave the Elements Contest

Participated in the
Brave the Elements Contest

Full Spectrum Laser Contest 2016

Participated in the
Full Spectrum Laser Contest 2016

2 People Made This Project!

Recommendations

  • Reclaimed Materials Contest

    Reclaimed Materials Contest
  • Made with Math Contest

    Made with Math Contest
  • Edible Art Challenge

    Edible Art Challenge

39 Comments

0
NickG5
NickG5

7 months ago

Nice project

I have a conundrum with my heat exchanger which is a half plate half cells made from 6mm Corflute

Both my experimental setup and my final version show a thermal gain which I think may be down to the relative humidity reduction seen from heating the air.

Here is some of the data https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QZpoKzE4mEQyLDlSAIYE7HNVPVFLRTwz/view?usp=sharing

I double checked all the instrumentation and its working and correct in both instances

The production system used DHT22 sensors which are pretty accurate and calibrated

Does anyone know what this phenomena might be caused by?

The whole project is here https://greenwayerv.blogspot.com/

experiment1.jpghe1.pngheatexchnager 2.jpgHE2.jpg
0
dragonator
dragonator

Reply 7 months ago

I am a bit rusty on HVAC, so these are guesses at the moment.
The first thing is that humidity will make a difference. Especially if water actually starts to condense, it will impart a huge amount of extra energy. Especially at a temperature of 19.5 and a humidity of 88%, you really only need to drop a few degrees before you hit the dew point.
Second is the perceived accuracy of the DHT22. It is not horrible at all, but it is also not the gold standard of precision or accuracy from what I know. There is a possibility that your offset is caused by sensors having different lineairities. Is it possible for you to switch sensors around to verify that the offset is the same?

0
HarryO22
HarryO22

Question 11 months ago on Step 8

Beautifully done, it is also possible to use hot water and air with the 3d printed version.
I am thinking of the warm air from the crawl space under the house to the heat pump.

0
dragonator
dragonator

Reply 11 months ago

I think you could lose some efficiency if you kept using plastic. Plastic works because air has a lousy thermal conductivity, and plastic does roughly match it, so it is balanced. Water is orders of magnitude better at conducting heat, so the plastic could bottleneck. This would have to be tested to confirm this though.

Is something like a radiator not much better here? This is basically a water to air heat exchanger.

0
hassanwali47
hassanwali47

Question 1 year ago on Step 4

hey bro.... is there any chance i can get the audino uno programming of thermistors it would be of great help
email hassanwali47@gmail.com

0
dragonator
dragonator

Answer 1 year ago

The program is available on the site in the link

0
osiacionut
osiacionut

1 year ago

What is your opinion about changing the straws with 4mm copper pipe...as i know copper has better thermal conductivity than plastic

0
dragonator
dragonator

Reply 1 year ago

I am still running the investigation on copper vs. aluminium vs. plastic. Copper will probably have a higher thermal transfer, but for now I am still unsure if it is more efficient. The thermal transfer from air to material and back is way lower than the transfer through the material, and if it conducts too well, it might actually travel up or down the exchanger to somewhere where it is not supposed to be. I did run an initial test where the three materials showed little difference, but I need better tools to verify.

0
lhgrappler
lhgrappler

2 years ago

Hi I am wondering how this will work in the summer. Where I live winters are cold and dry, summers are hot and very humid. Will this reduce humidity from outside air?

0
dragonator
dragonator

Reply 2 years ago

If the inside air is already cold and you exchange it with hotter humid outside air, there is a chance some of the water will indeed condense. I suspect however that this will not be a massive amount of water, since condensing water releases a huge amount of energy. I could run the numbers if you are curious.

0
lhgrappler
lhgrappler

Reply 2 years ago

That would be great. Thanks.

0
dragonator
dragonator

Reply 2 years ago

Lets assume that your outside air is 30 degrees with 80% humidity, and the inside air is 20 degrees at 40% humidity. At 30 degrees air holds at most 30.4 grams of water per m2, at 20 degrees air can only hold 17.3 grams per m2 at most.

your outside air is 30 degrees at 80%, so there is 24.3 grams per m2. This is 21.1 gram per kilo of air. Your inside air of 20 degrees now passes through the heat exchanger, and the outside 30 degrees air as well. The outside air tries to cool to 20 degrees. However, at 20 degrees, the maximum amount of water allowed to be in the air is 14.5 grams, so 6.6 grams of water will condense. Water releases 2250(ish) joules of energy for every gram that is condensed. This means 14.85kJ is released for every kg of air passing through the heat exchanger, if it was going to condense every bit of the excess water. Air itself takes only 1000(ish) joules to heat 1kg by 1 degree, so the amount of energy released is enough to to heat the air by 14.85 degrees Celsius.

Your cool, dry inside air has much less energy in it than the humid outside air. Water takes an absolutely enormous amount of energy to vaporize, and releases an equal amount of energy when it condenses. This means that you can cool down the air until the humidity is 100% (around 28.5 degrees Celsius) and then spend the rest of your cool air condensing water from the outside air, giving you a max of 0.5 or so degrees extra. I am afraid that if I did the math right, that a heat exchanger should not help for hot, humid air on the outside and cool dry air on the inside. You will have air of around 28C and 100% humidity come out of the heat exchanger.

(As a side fact, The other way around, with warmer more humid air inside and cooler, dryer air on the outside, the humidity will actually help you get even more heat back from the inside air, since some water condenses and releases heat.)

sources:
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/maximum-moistur...
https://www.rotronic.com/en/humidity_measurement-f...

https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-c...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthalpy_of_vaporiza...


0
hubi
hubi

3 years ago

I have built a heat exchanger, for a friends terrarium.
I took an used heat exchanger from a dead tumble dryer, so I had only to design the enlosure and fa connections. I did not measure the efficiency.

0
offtherails2010
offtherails2010

3 years ago

FANTASTIC JOB !!!

OMG Thank you thank you thank you !!

i live in a tiny box room and its FREEZING COLD this time of year - well the only reason i hate UK is because we got 9 MOnths OF WINTER AND ONLY 3 months OF SUMMER... SO....

This will help greatly when i do my soldering marathons and still keep the heat in my room while bringing in fresher air, well, i hope i get it right when my 3D Printer arrives and i get used to printing with it lol

Gathering up them straws now !

0
theultimatebeing
theultimatebeing

4 years ago

Congratulations on your great work!

A couple of years ago, I myself designed an air to air heat exchanger that was supposed to be 3D printed and be the core of an HRV system for small spaces. My company, together with a fellow company were thinking to set up a crowdfunding campaign, in order to develop a customisable commercial solution. We were focusing on using standard size (10 of 15 cm), circular diameter pipes with insulation material encasing the heat exchanger and computer fans for moving the air (like you did). We were thinking we could achieve air flow values of 30 m3/hour. Unfortunately, I was then told that my heat exchanger design would cost nearly 500 euros to print, even in polymer. That caused us to cancel the initiative.

Since our company has been working on engineering projects to improve the indoor environmet, I would be fascinating to be able to provide a customizable solution with a cost of, let's say, 100 euros. I hope that we will get the opportunity to set up this project again in the future. Any ideas?

0
iisan7
iisan7

5 years ago

I'm going to try to build one of these using my library's 3d printer! Newb questions. I will have to do the partially 3d-printed version. So, question about sourcing the other items. I think I've found straws that will work. Is 90mm the inside or outside diameter of the pipe? I'm in the U.S. and wondering if I can fit 3in pipe, which has an outside diameter of 3.5in/89mm.

0
goldentaiji
goldentaiji

Reply 4 years ago

iisan7, did you have any luck building it with 3 inch PVC pipe? Planning on making one too.

0
dragonator
dragonator

Reply 5 years ago

90mm is the outside diameter. 89mm should fit.

0
AnthoniV
AnthoniV

5 years ago

Hey, very interesting project, but I have one remark. You're not using your ventilation power to calculate the efficiency;)

an other remark is about your ventilation. You're using computer ventilators, they're made to give speed to your air, not pressure(that's what you need). You could achieve this maybe, I'm not sure, by putting two ventilators in serie.

You could also use the building to help you. If you live in a windy area it can suck the air out by itself, you just need to make some changes ;)

0
dragonator
dragonator

Reply 5 years ago

I am currently only focusing on thermal efficiency. I would love to include the fans into the equation, but for that I also need the flow rate, and that I lack. My future setup will include an airflow meter.

PC fans were what I had at hand. I knew from the beginning they would be sub optimal.