RC Car Upgrade Using 3D Printing

2,385

35

4

Introduction: RC Car Upgrade Using 3D Printing

RC cars are a fun and inexpensive way to experiment with new and interesting engineering ideas. My name is Antonio Cervantes and as a mechanical engineering graduate student from San Jose State University, I've always loved racecar engineering and wanted to try designing new upgrades for my RC car. The goal for this project is to design 3D printable aerodynamic pieces that upgrade the speed and handling of my Armma Typhon buggy RC car. The concepts designed in this project were inspired by the cars from Formula 1 racing.

Supplies

Hardware

  1. Arrma Typhon 1/8 Scale RC car
  2. Creality Ender 3 3D printer
  3. 3D printer filament (PTEG or ABS preferred for outdoor use)
  4. Calipers
  5. 2, 3, & 4mm socket head cap screws
  6. Blue painters tape
  7. Duck tape or Command strips
  8. Velcro strap

Software

  1. Fusion 360
  2. Ansys
  3. Matlab
  4. Cura

Step 1: Research

To start my project, I first did some research on the basics of car aerodynamics. I read some research papers and watched some YouTube videos to gain a good understanding of how aerodynamics affect a vehicle's performance. I found that front and rear wings give a car a good balance of front and rear downforce, and the shape underneath the car can add downforce via ground effects. Ground effect is the phenomenon where air is forced down into a small space causing a low-pressure region, which creates a vacuum that pulls the car to the floor, also known as downforce. My goal was to apply these same engineering principles to an RC car to see if they can improve the car's performance better than the stock manufacturer's build. I planned to design and build a front and rear wing, an undertray, and side pods that use the ground effect phenomena.


Image Sources: Left image, Right image

Step 2: Measurements

In order to design parts for an existing RC car, it's important to look for and measure any potential mounting locations. I looked for mounting locations that I could screw my parts into so that they would hold securely. I measured the dimensions of the holes to screw the parts into. I found that the front wing could mount to the holes wear the front bumper is mounted, and the new rear wing could mount where the old rear wing was. The side pods could mount to 2 extended tabs with holes on the sides of the chassis, and the undertray could be glued or taped to the bottom of the car.

Step 3: Front and Rear Wing Design

The front and rear wings were designed in Fusion 360 using the NACA 4412 airfoil. The airfoil 2D sketch geometry was obtained from the website Airfoil Tools. A 3-element wing was chosen for the rear wing, and a 2-element wing was chosen for the front. These multi-element wings help gain downforce while lowering drag force. The wings were designed to use center supports that slide the wings through a cutout in the shape of the wing profile. The sides of the wings have holes in which a 2mm and 3mm screw is used to screw the side panels to the sides of the wings. The center supports have holes that use 3mm screws to mount to the body of the RC car. The rear wing mounts to the same holes as the old rear wing, and the front wing mounts to the holes where the front bumper is mounted to.

Step 4: Simulations

Simulations are a great way to test different configurations of aerodynamic pieces. It was important for me to test different front and rear wing setups because I wanted to get good downforce while keeping the drag force as low as possible. I tested about 5 iterations of the front and rear wing using Ansys Fluent CFD software. I found that a 3 element design worked best for the rear wing, and a 2 element design worked for the front. I did not simulate the undertray and side pods because drag is not a major problem for them since the use of ground effect gives low drag, so I skipped simulating those components in order to save time.

Step 5: Undertray Design

The undertray was designed to use ground effect to generate downforce using the floor of the car and the ground. I started by using the spline tool to sketch an inverted wing profile. The undertray profile has a sloping hump and smoothing transition back to flat. This profile squeezes the air against the ground forcing it to move faster under the hump. This fast-moving air creates a low-pressure zone which sucks the car down to the ground. The undertray has fins that run along the length of the undertray. These fins help seal the air with the undertray and ground to keep it from escaping out the sides and direct the air to flow in a straight line. The top of the undertray is flat so that it could be glued or taped to the bottom of the RC car.

Step 6: Side Pod Design

The side pods were also designed to use ground effect. It features a custom wing-like profile that was sketched using the spline tool. The side pod has a bottom hump that uses ground effect for downforce, and the top is tilted for extra downforce from air pushing on the top. The side panels also help seal air between the ground and pod and direct airflow in a straight line. The side pods are mounted to the RC car via tabs with holes that are mounted to side tabs on the RC car chassis.

Step 7: Final Design

My final CAD design contains all the aero pieces and a model my RC car so that I can see how it would look on the car itself. All the parts colored in blue were 3D printed.

Step 8: Test Prints

Before beginning to 3D print all of my aero parts, I created some test prints to check the fitment of the parts on the RC car. Test prints are important because they can save time from printing unusable 3D prints, and help catch any dimension errors from the 3D printer due to thermal expansion or other problems.

Step 9: 3D Prints

All parts we printed on a Creality Ender 3 and CR-10 3D printers. Print times ranged from 5 hours to 12 hours for 17 total parts. All parts were small enough to fit on a 220x220mm print bed except for the undertray which required a 300x300mm print bed. There was minimal post-processing of the printed parts except for cutting away some material for the mounting holes and the cutouts of the front and rear wing supports.

Step 10: Install

The final built car can be seen in the image on the left. The installation of the aero pieces was simple and required very little time. The rest of the images show the install process from the beginning to the end.

Step 11: Final Build

These are some more images of the final build from various angles.

Step 12: Test

In order to see if my design improved the performance over the stock setup of the RC car, I needed to test it. I tested the RC car with its stock components, then with my new design components. I used the Matlab Mobile app on my iPhone and strapped it to the rear of the car using a velcro strap. Matlab Mobile can record data from the accelerometer and GPS in the iPhone. Leveraging this app was helpful to record the acceleration G-forces and top speed of the car. I recorded data from the car doing figure-8 laps, left and righthand circle turns, and speed runs. This video shows how I mounts the iPhone to the RC car and the various test I conducted.

Step 13: Performance Comparison

Matlab was used to process and plot the G-force data for the stock RC car setup and the new upgraded setup. Taking a look at the data, we can see that the new upgrades had worse cornering performance than its stock setup. This was due to the RC car being an off-road buggy with supple suspension allowing it to compress so low that the side pods and undertray begin to drag on the ground. The average cornering G-force for the stock setup was 0.85Gs, and the average cornering G-force for the upgraded setup was 0.6Gs. The top speed for the RC car was slightly improved from 17.5 mph for the stock setup to 18.3 mph for the upgraded setup. This was probably due to the fact that the front wing was able to slice through the air better than the stock front bumper. In the end, this project was meant to be an experiment to see if I could improve an RC car's performance with aerodynamics, but I learned that other aspects of the car need to be considered as well. Suspension, chassis build, and engine/motors are also very important when it comes to improving car performance.

Step 14: Future Improvements

A major problem with my aero design is that the undertray and side pods relied heavily on side skirt fins to seal the air between the underside and exterior air. I designed the undertray to use the 3D printed side skirts, however, this did not work great because when the RC car's suspension compressed, it pushed the plastic skirts onto the ground causing them to slide, taking away grip from the tires. For the side pods, I did the opposite and made skirts that were too short and used tape to extend them. This did not work because the tape would fold when the RC car's suspension compressed and would not return to its original shape and stayed bent. A better material would need to be used such as a flexible polymer for the side skirts so that they could bend with suspension compression and return to their original shape.

Be the First to Share

    Recommendations

    • Fabric Challenge

      Fabric Challenge
    • Backyard Contest

      Backyard Contest
    • Meatless Challenge

      Meatless Challenge

    4 Comments

    0
    kodak_jack
    kodak_jack

    16 days ago on Step 14

    Is this the Mega version with the brushed motor or the 3S brushless one? I would think most who liked this would use the design to do speed runs = straight line, all the stops pulled out. If it's the Mega version, will you convert it to brushless for more speed? Some who do speed runs run the batteries off to the side where you have your pods and they hook them up in parallel for more amps. If you were doing speed runs, the suspension wouldn't come into play by very much and bottoming the pieces wouldn't be a problem - as long as the surface was half-way smooth. Nice, well thought out designs. Might the front and back wings want to be as wide as the outer edge of the tires?

    0
    srilyk
    srilyk

    16 days ago

    Love the ideas here! It would also be cool to use the high speed video functions of your iPhone to see if you can visually see any changes to handling as well

    0
    Zhedax
    Zhedax

    16 days ago

    I really like the approach you took on this project, it has proper research and good methodology, however, from my experience with RC cars, weight plays a bigger role than aero, because of the size those cars, as well as the layout of the components. My guess after checking the G force chart is that the car has more weight + distributed more on the front and the back that it is understeering more. I quite like the idea of the floor and sidepods, but about the wings, I would try to imitate more Nascar's design to reduce drag and cover the wheels as is one of the elements that generates more drag. Apart from that, I have seen crazy weight reductions, such as drilling holes on the chassis where stiffness was already stiff enough, but of course I am not going to suggest you destroy the car in order to achieve a good weight reduction.
    Thanks for sharing this. It is nice to have people so dedicated to projects as you do and with the same methodic approach

    0
    MaciejG17
    MaciejG17

    Question 16 days ago

    In your CFD simulations, what was the assumed speed of the wings? I don't want to assume just from the colours in your chart, just curious whether it was corresponding to actual speed reached by the car during the tests.