17565Views51Replies

Author Options:

Future Weapons Answered

What would the future weapons look like? Will they use bullets? Most recent innovations in weaponry?

Discussions

0
Jack A Lopez
Jack A Lopez

9 years ago

The future of warfare is not going to be about some new kind of gun.

The trend you should be worried about is the expanding role of automation in warfare; i.e. gun-toting robots.

What you're going to see a lot of in the next few years is humans being killed by robots, with speed, cunning, and utter ruthlessness.  People will wonder how it is that the robots got so smart and so deadly so fast.  While the robots themselves will be wondering why it is that humans are so soft, stupid, and easy to kill.

Did y'all somehow fail to notice any of the movies, or TV spin-offs, of the Terminator franchise?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0438488/

Did you fail to see or hear any of those stories on the news about the Former US is using robots (aka drones, aka UAVs) to drop bombs on people halfway around the world via remote control?
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/18-over-700-killed-in-44-drone-strikes-in-2009-am-01

Or what about these comments from the Chairman of the Former U.S. Joint Cheifs of Staff? About how the next JSF is likely to be "the last manned fighter [aircraft]"
http://www.motherboard.tv/2010/6/13/will-the-u-s-military-s-new-jet-be-the-last-manned-fighter--2

And I guess somehow you all weren't freaked out by the Big-Dog quadruped, or any of the other Youtube videos from Boston Dynamics.
http://www.youtube.com/user/BostonDynamics

Yeah. Some kind of new gun. That's it.  Something to do with "resonance" or "extraterrestrials". 
;-P



0
nickodemus
nickodemus

Reply 9 years ago

That Big Dog is a pretty awesome piece of tech, but it makes me still makes me giggle every time it stumbles.

I think the exoskeleton is gonna be first, before robots.


0
REA
REA

11 years ago

rounds made out of uranium. if the bullet doesnt kill you, the cancer will.

0
comodore
comodore

Reply 10 years ago

:P Good idea!

0
KentsOkay
KentsOkay

Reply 10 years ago

Depleted uranium rounds have been used for a while now. They are mostly used in the A-10 Thunderbolt. When fired they spontaneously combust, creating an incinderary round that explodes on impact.

0
REA
REA

Reply 10 years ago

arent exploding rounds illegal in war?

0
KentsOkay
KentsOkay

Reply 10 years ago

They are illegal for anti-personnel, but just fine for anti armor. They do have a major draw back of radiation poisoning for those who handle it (re-loaders etc..), however I believe if that draw back can be defeated they are the way to roll for conventional weapons.

0
muttyfutty
muttyfutty

Reply 10 years ago

How can anaything be ILLEGAL in war?

0
zascecs
zascecs

Reply 9 years ago

War's about killing. Its hard to believe that people would make rules...

New Rule in 2010:
"You're only aloud to use 2 atomic bombs per day, it's not fair otherwise."

0
REA
REA

Reply 9 years ago

actually the use of a-bombs, h-bombs, and nukes is illegal in war. this is due to high civilian casualties, large-scale property damage, and long-term effects on the environment (nuclear fallout).

0
zascecs
zascecs

Reply 9 years ago

Damn, well then I don't see much of a point in making them, unless they're in the hands of terrorists...

0
REA
REA

Reply 10 years ago

>...They do have a major draw back of radiation poisoning for those who handle it (re-loaders etc..)...

lead armour?

0
___
___

Reply 10 years ago

lead poisoning

0
REA
REA

Reply 10 years ago

the lead would (obviously) be encased in a some type of flexable material to keep from being poisoned (like the led aprons at hospitals used during x-ray scans).

0
REA
REA

Reply 10 years ago

only setbacks: uranium will give the gunman cancer too, and theres a chance of a nuclear explosion when they hit.

0
comodore
comodore

Reply 10 years ago

No there is bot a chance of nuclear explosion when they hit...

0
REA
REA

Reply 10 years ago

but wouldent the chance make the weapon better?

0
comodore
comodore

Reply 10 years ago

Maybe... :P

0
REA
REA

Reply 10 years ago

0
comodore
comodore

Reply 10 years ago

:P

0
zascecs
zascecs

9 years ago

People will probably end up stealing technology from the extra terrestrial...

0
zascecs
zascecs

Reply 9 years ago

I never saw that. If she came from outside Earth, then she probably was.

0
Goodhart
Goodhart

Reply 9 years ago

I was teasing a bit. She (Sally Field) had "telepathic" power to read minds....and tried to keep it from her date. It was a funny show, but I was playing on the word "extra" there (she had something "extra" and she was "terrestrial" :-)

0
zascecs
zascecs

Reply 9 years ago

Oh, lol. I guess if you put it that way...

0
shinjiyuubix
shinjiyuubix

9 years ago

Just pray and your enemies will die.

0
comodore
comodore

12 years ago

What show? Yes, resonance can be destructive. Nikola Tesla did some experiments whit resonance and found it to be potencialy destructive. There is a story, true or not, it is very interesting: Tesla made a resonance pocked-sizes machine. The machine could take down a building. Tesla was afraid but curious and he turned it on and started to adjust the frequency, suddenly the building started to shake, his tools were falling of the shelfs... He understood that the resonance will bring the building to the ground so he took a hammer to his machine. When he looked out the window he saw that other building around his had also been shaken! The police and fire department came, Tesla told his secretary to say nothing. Everybody thought that it was an earthquake but only Tesla and his secretary knew the truth!!! COOL story? :)

0
tech-king
tech-king

Reply 12 years ago

they busted that on mythbusters. although it can cause shaking at the resonant frequency (i proved that part with my scroll saw. evrything okay, add speed. add more speed. at 2/3 full speed, my desk was shaking like crazy. at full speed, the shaking stopped) although it will shake, it wont fall down. its probably going to be devices that use light and sound. the emphassis will be on non-lethal though

0
comodore
comodore

Reply 12 years ago

Yes, they were a little scared in the end the the bridge was shaking 50m away. Tesla was a genius and just may have made something like this, something we don't yet understand.

0
DehLeprechaun
DehLeprechaun

Reply 9 years ago

"What about the millenium bridge, a combination of an unfortunate resonance and people 'marching' as they went across it, lots of people end up in step" MYTHBUSTERS busted that

0
killerjackalope
killerjackalope

Reply 12 years ago

What about the millenium bridge, a combination of an unfortunate resonance and people 'marching' as they went across it, lots of people end up in step when hindered by those in front caused the bridge to come incredibly close to destroying itself, it would have if people ignored the shaking which turned to full on wiggling....

0
Matt21497
Matt21497

Reply 11 years ago

that needs to be entered in the pocket sized contest

0
comodore
comodore

Reply 11 years ago

:D

0
Firebert010
Firebert010

Reply 12 years ago

Future Weapons is another show on the discovery channel. I believe it is on Fridays at 9.

The show goes around testing the "latest" in weaponry around the globe. It's an alright show, but it does get a little boring the way the host talks.

I'd take Mail Call over it any day.

0
xACIDITYx
xACIDITYx

Reply 12 years ago

That's because Mack, or whatever, whispers throughout the entire show.

0
westfw
westfw

Reply 12 years ago

Tesla may have been a genius, but I find the magical properties people tend to assign to some of his inventions extremely unlikely.

0
Weissensteinburg
Weissensteinburg

12 years ago

I was watching some one movie where the guy used compressed air on this little got that shot out a bolt and then pulled it back in lightning fast. Leaves no bullets or evidence ; )

0
Weissensteinburg
Weissensteinburg

Reply 12 years ago

yep.

"some one movie"

What did that mean? hm

0
drakesword
drakesword

Reply 9 years ago

The device was a captive bolt pistol. Commonly used in cow slaughter. By the way . . . . Did you know you cant spell slaughter with out laughter?

0
heavy.metal.nguyen
heavy.metal.nguyen

Reply 12 years ago

I don't know...I usually don't notice small mistakes like that. I only watched like 30 minutes of that movie, I think that thing though is used to kill cows or something.

0
Weissensteinburg
Weissensteinburg

Reply 12 years ago

A quick google search shows your right. I thought it was neat that he used it to blow the locks out of doors.

0
Neovenetar
Neovenetar

10 years ago

future weapons will probably be far better versions of the guns that fire lightning bolts

0
LOG21
LOG21

10 years ago

That gun is the Kriss, it shoots a .45 with a revolutionary bull-pup system that takes away all recoil. Oh and by the way the 7.62 is to big for assualt rifles, there is also a 6.8 with the power of the 7.62 bu accuracy and speed of the 5.56, very effective.

0
Optimus Primerib
Optimus Primerib

10 years ago

Most rifles will be pullpups, use a 6.65 catridge, planes will have lasers, and the chuck norris bomb will be the most devastating weapon known to mankind.

0
TigerNod
TigerNod

11 years ago

I think that all future weapons will use bullpup designs. In 2029, rifles with the mag in front of the trigger will be just as old as muzzle loading guns are now. The 5,56 mm round has no potential. To pierce future bodyarmour you will need at least 7.62 mm or larger. Also, I think that battle rifles have a lot of potential in the US armed forces since they work better with experienced soldiers.

0
BrokenArsenal
BrokenArsenal

12 years ago

that is the kriss .45 cal smg. it was made as a more powerful smg then the mp5 but with less recoil then a normal .45 cal smg

0
KtM13
KtM13

12 years ago

That picture is from the KRISS. (cool gun) And i think the army go use the 416 bullet. Shoot's with a cold barrel 2500 metr accurate.